Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1101.5684 · Quantum Information Processing

On the impossibility of non-static quantum bit commitment between two parties

Qin Li, Chengqing Li, Dongyang Long, Wai Hong Chan, Chunhui Wu

Published Jul 27, 2011• 9 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s11128-011-0259-5

Related papers

A short impossibility proof of quantum bit commitment

Giulio Chiribella, Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano, Paolo Perinotti +2 more

arXiv:0905.3801•Physics Letters A•Feb 28, 2013•38 citations

Is Quantum Bit Commitment Really Impossible?

András Bodor

This paper has been withdrawn.

arXiv:quant-ph/9711040•Nov 19, 1997•1 citation

Why quantum bit commitment and quantum coin tossing are impossible

Hoi‐Kwong Lo, H. F. Chau

Presented at•Jan 1, 1996•2 citations

Non-static Quantum Bit Commitment

Jeong Woon Choi, Dowon Hong, Ku-Young Chang +2 more

Quantum bit commitment has been known to be impossible by the independent proofs of Mayers, and Lo and Chau, under the assumption that the whole quantum states right before the unveiling phase are static to users. We here provide an unconditionally secure non-static quantum bit commitment protocol with a trusted third party, which is not directly involved in any communications between users and can be limited not to get any information of commitment without being detected by users. We also prove that our quantum bit commitment protocol is not secure without the help of the trusted third party. The proof is basically different from the Mayers-Lo-Chau's no-go theorem, because we do not assume the staticity of the finally shared quantum states between users.

arXiv:0901.1178•Jan 9, 2009•2 citations

The Physics of No-Bit-Commitment: Generalized Quantum Non-Locality Versus Oblivious Transfer

Anthony J. Short, Nicolas Gisin, Sandu Popescu

Quantum Information Processing•Apr 1, 2006•22 citations

How unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is possible

Horace P. Yuen

Bit commitment involves the submission of evidence from one party to another so that the evidence can be used to confirm a later revealed bit value by the first party, while the second party cannot determine the bit value from the evidence alone. It is widely believed that unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is impossible due to quantum entanglement cheating, which is codified in a general impossibility theorem. In this paper, the scope of this general impossibility proof is analyzed, and gaps are found. Two variants of a bit commitment scheme utilizing anonymous quantum states and decoy states are presented. In the first variant, the exact verifying measurement is independent of the committed bit value, thus the second party can make it before the first party opens, making possible an unconditional security proof based on no-cloning. In the second variant, the impossibility proof fails because quantum entanglement purification of a mixed state does not render the protocol determinate. Whether impossibility holds in this or similar protocols is an open question, although preliminary results already show that the impossibility proof cannot work as it stands.

arXiv:quant-ph/0109055•Sep 13, 2001•0 citations
Quantum bit commitment has been known to be impossible by the independent proofs of Mayers, and Lo and Chau, under the assumption that the whole quantum states right before the unveiling phase are static to users. We here provide an unconditionally secure non-static quantum bit commitment protocol with a trusted third party, which is not directly involved in any communications between users and can be limited not to get any information of commitment without being detected by users. We also prove that our quantum bit commitment protocol is not secure without the help of the trusted third party. The proof is basically different from the Mayers-Lo-Chau's no-go theorem, because we do not assume the staticity of the finally shared quantum states between users.
Bit commitment involves the submission of evidence from one party to another so that the evidence can be used to confirm a later revealed bit value by the first party, while the second party cannot determine the bit value from the evidence alone. It is widely believed that unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is impossible due to quantum entanglement cheating, which is codified in a general impossibility theorem. In this paper, the scope of this general impossibility proof is analyzed, and gaps are found. Two variants of a bit commitment scheme utilizing anonymous quantum states and decoy states are presented. In the first variant, the exact verifying measurement is independent of the committed bit value, thus the second party can make it before the first party opens, making possible an unconditional security proof based on no-cloning. In the second variant, the impossibility proof fails because quantum entanglement purification of a mixed state does not render the protocol determinate. Whether impossibility holds in this or similar protocols is an open question, although preliminary results already show that the impossibility proof cannot work as it stands.