Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1101.3837 · Information Processing Letters

Superiority of exact quantum automata for promise problems

Andris Ambainis, Abuzer Yakaryılmaz

Published Jan 5, 2012• 59 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.ipl.2012.01.001

Related papers

Classical and Quantum Counter Automata on Promise Problems

Masaki Nakanishi, Abuzer Yakaryılmaz

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2015•13 citations

Promise problems solved by quantum and classical finite automata

Shenggen Zheng, Lvzhou Li, Daowen Qiu +1 more

arXiv:1411.3870•Theoretical Computer Science•Jan 4, 2017•14 citations

Unary Probabilistic and Quantum Automata on Promise Problems

Aida Gainutdinova, Abuzer Yakaryılmaz

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2015•16 citations

Complexity of Promise Problems on Classical and Quantum Automata

Maria Paola Bianchi, Carlo Mereghetti, Beatrice Palano

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2014•22 citations

Unary probabilistic and quantum automata on promise problems

Aida Gainutdinova, Abuzer Yakaryılmaz

Quantum Information Processing•Dec 26, 2017•22 citations

Potential of Quantum Finite Automata with Exact Acceptance

Jozef Gruska, Daowen Qiu, Shenggen Zheng

The potential of the exact quantum information processing is an interesting, important and intriguing issue. For examples, it has been believed that quantum tools can provide significant, that is larger than polynomial, advantages in the case of exact quantum computation only, or mainly, for problems with very special structures. We will show that this is not the case. In this paper the potential of quantum finite automata producing outcomes not only with a (high) probability, but with certainty (so called exactly) is explored in the context of their uses for solving promise problems and with respect to the size of automata. It is shown that for solving particular classes [Formula: see text] of promise problems, even those without some very special structure, that succinctness of the exact quantum finite automata under consideration, with respect to the number of (basis) states, can be very small (and constant) though it grows proportional to [Formula: see text] in the case deterministic finite automata (DFAs) of the same power are used. This is here demonstrated also for the case that the component languages of the promise problems solvable by DFAs are non-regular. The method used can be applied in finding more exact quantum finite automata or quantum algorithms for other promise problems.

arXiv:1404.1689•International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science•Apr 1, 2015•31 citations
The potential of the exact quantum information processing is an interesting, important and intriguing issue. For examples, it has been believed that quantum tools can provide significant, that is larger than polynomial, advantages in the case of exact quantum computation only, or mainly, for problems with very special structures. We will show that this is not the case. In this paper the potential of quantum finite automata producing outcomes not only with a (high) probability, but with certainty (so called exactly) is explored in the context of their uses for solving promise problems and with respect to the size of automata. It is shown that for solving particular classes [Formula: see text] of promise problems, even those without some very special structure, that succinctness of the exact quantum finite automata under consideration, with respect to the number of (basis) states, can be very small (and constant) though it grows proportional to [Formula: see text] in the case deterministic finite automata (DFAs) of the same power are used. This is here demonstrated also for the case that the component languages of the promise problems solvable by DFAs are non-regular. The method used can be applied in finding more exact quantum finite automata or quantum algorithms for other promise problems.