Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1012.5293 · Physical Review A

Phase estimation with nonunitary interferometers: Information as a metric

Thomas B. Bahder

Published May 2, 2011• 8 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Determining the phase in one arm of a quantum interferometer is discussed taking into account the three nonideal aspects in real experiments: nondeterministic state preparation, nonunitary state evolution due to losses during state propagation, and imperfect state detection. A general expression is written for the probability of a measurement outcome taking into account these three nonideal aspects. As an example of applying the formalism, the classical Fisher information and fidelity (Shannon mutual information between phase and measurements) are computed for few-photon Fock and N00N states input into a lossy Mach-Zehnder interferometer. These three nonideal aspects lead to qualitative differences in phase estimation, such as a decrease in fidelity and Fisher information that depends on the true value of the phase.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.83.053601

Related papers

Fidelity of quantum interferometers

Thomas B. Bahder, Paul A. Lopata

For a generic interferometer, the conditional probability density distribution $p(\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{\mid}m)$, for the phase $\ensuremath{\phi}$ given measurement outcome $m$ will generally have multiple peaks. Therefore, the phase sensitivity of an interferometer cannot be adequately characterized by the standard deviation, such as $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{\sim}1∕\sqrt{N}$ (the standard limit), or $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{\sim}1∕N$ (the Heisenberg limit). We propose an alternative measure of phase sensitivity---the fidelity of an interferometer---defined as the Shannon mutual information between the phase shift $\ensuremath{\phi}$ and the measurement outcomes $m$. As an example application of interferometer fidelity, we consider a generic optical Mach-Zehnder interferometer, used as a sensor of a classical field. For the case where there exists no a priori information on the phase shift, we find the surprising result that maximally entangled state input leads to a lower fidelity than Fock state input, for the same photon number.

arXiv:quant-ph/0602123•Physical Review A•Nov 15, 2006•16 citations

Dispersion and fidelity in quantum interferometry

David S. Simon, Alexander V. Sergienko, Thomas B. Bahder

We consider Mach-Zehnder and Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometers with nonclassical states of light as input, and study the effect that dispersion inside the interferometer has on the sensitivity of phase measurements. We study in detail a number of different one- and two-photon input states, including Fock, dual Fock, maximally path-entangled $\ensuremath{\mid}N,0⟩+⟨{0}_{,}N\ensuremath{\mid}$ (``N00N'') states, and photon pairs from parametric down-conversion. Assuming there is a phase shift ${\ensuremath{\phi}}_{0}$ in one arm of the interferometer, we compute the probabilities of measurement outcomes as a function of ${\ensuremath{\phi}}_{0}$, and then compute the Shannon mutual information between ${\ensuremath{\phi}}_{0}$ and the measurements. This provides a means of quantitatively comparing the utility of various input states for determining the phase in the presence of dispersion. In addition, we consider a simplified model of parametric down-conversion for which probabilities can be explicitly computed analytically, and which serves as a limiting case of the more realistic down-conversion model.

arXiv:0810.4501•Physical Review A•Nov 26, 2008•7 citations

Phase Estimation in Linear and Nonlinear Interferometers

Sushovit Adhikari

Phase estimation has a wide range of applications. Over the years, several strategies have been studied to improve precision in phase estimation. These strategies include using exotic quantum states to quantum detection schemes. This dissertation summarizes my effort in improving the precision of phase estimation with a linear and nonlinear interferometer. Chapter 1 introduces quantum optics and quantum metrology. I introduce all relevant quantum states of light used. We also look into tools and terminologies of quantum metrology such as Fisher information, shot-noise limit, Heisenberg limit, etc., along with examples of phase estimation with a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. In Chapter 2, I discuss multiple phase estimation using a multimode interferometer. Building upon previous work, our scheme consists of a multimode interferometer with single-photon inputs. By using a quantum Fisher information analysis, we show that our scheme gives a constant improvement over other schemes. We also show that our scheme with photon-number-resolving detection approaches the quantum Cram\'er-Rao bound. Moreover, we also consider the probabilistic nature of photon emission at the input, and we study its effect on phase sensitivity. I discuss phase estimation with SU(1,1) interferometer in Chapter 3. We look at phase sensitivity in this interferometer with different input states. Namely, we consider two different phase estimation scheme, one using thermal and squeezed states, and others using coherent and displaced squeezed states with parity and on-off as a detection scheme. We also look into the effect of photon loss inside the interferometer. In Chapter 4, we revisit phase estimation in SU(1,1) interferometer from the perspective of quantum Fisher information. I discuss in detail a longstanding confusion regarding the use of quantum Fisher information in SU(1,1) interferometer. We show that phase averaging or quantum Fisher information matrix method is needed in general for calculating the phase sensitivity which resolves inconsistencies reported in previously published articles.

Civil War Book Review•Feb 22, 2019•0 citations

Phase Sensitivity of a Mach-Zehnder Quantum Sensor

Thomas B. Bahder, Paul A. Lopata

We investigate the dependence of the fidelity of a Mach-Zehnder quantum interferometer on the prior information about the phase, for Fock state input and for maximally entangled (N00N) state input. For no prior information, the fidelity for Fock state input is greater than for N00N state input. In the limit of a narrow distribution describing the prior information, we find that both Fock and N00N state inputs lead to nearly equal fidelity.

arXiv:quant-ph/0701243•Jan 31, 2007•0 citations

Analysis of practical phase sensing with quantum interferometers

Fahad S. Alghannam

In phase sensing with quantum interferometers, likelihood estimation is used to obtain the estimated value of the measured phase. Moreover, the precision for such sensors depends on the total phase difference between the two paths of the interferometer. To determine the optimal operation parameters of the interferometer, fisher information analysis is required. Both objectives, i.e. likelihood estimation and performance optimization, require knowledge of the probabilities for different events as a function of the phase difference τ. In this article we drive expressions for these probabilities considering the effects of practical parameters like the interferometer’s visibility, the optical pulse width, and the effect of imperfect detectors. Furthermore, we depict fisher information curves for some chosen input states showing the effects of reduced visibility and short pulse widths.

Optics Continuum•Jul 30, 2025•0 citations

Maximal quantum Fisher information for phase estimation without initial parity

Xu Yu, Xiang Zhao, Luyi Shen +3 more

Mach-Zehnder interferometer is a common device in quantum phase estimation and the photon losses in it are an important issue for achieving a high phase accuracy. Here we thoroughly discuss the precision limit of the phase in the Mach-Zehnder interferometer with a coherent state and a superposition of coherent states as input states. By providing a general analytical expression of quantum Fisher information, the phase-matching condition and optimal initial parity are given. Especially, in the photon loss scenario, the sensitivity behaviors are analyzed and specific strategies are provided to restore the phase accuracies for symmetric and asymmetric losses.

arXiv:1412.4325•Optics Express•Jun 12, 2018•34 citations
Determining the phase in one arm of a quantum interferometer is discussed taking into account the three nonideal aspects in real experiments: nondeterministic state preparation, nonunitary state evolution due to losses during state propagation, and imperfect state detection. A general expression is written for the probability of a measurement outcome taking into account these three nonideal aspects. As an example of applying the formalism, the classical Fisher information and fidelity (Shannon mutual information between phase and measurements) are computed for few-photon Fock and N00N states input into a lossy Mach-Zehnder interferometer. These three nonideal aspects lead to qualitative differences in phase estimation, such as a decrease in fidelity and Fisher information that depends on the true value of the phase.
For a generic interferometer, the conditional probability density distribution $p(\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{\mid}m)$, for the phase $\ensuremath{\phi}$ given measurement outcome mmm will generally have multiple peaks. Therefore, the phase sensitivity of an interferometer cannot be adequately characterized by the standard deviation, such as $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{\sim}1∕\sqrt{N}$ (the standard limit), or $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{\sim}1∕N$ (the Heisenberg limit). We propose an alternative measure of phase sensitivity---the fidelity of an interferometer---defined as the Shannon mutual information between the phase shift $\ensuremath{\phi}$ and the measurement outcomes mmm. As an example application of interferometer fidelity, we consider a generic optical Mach-Zehnder interferometer, used as a sensor of a classical field. For the case where there exists no a priori information on the phase shift, we find the surprising result that maximally entangled state input leads to a lower fidelity than Fock state input, for the same photon number.
We consider Mach-Zehnder and Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometers with nonclassical states of light as input, and study the effect that dispersion inside the interferometer has on the sensitivity of phase measurements. We study in detail a number of different one- and two-photon input states, including Fock, dual Fock, maximally path-entangled $\ensuremath{\mid}N,0⟩+⟨{0}_{,}N\ensuremath{\mid}$ (``N00N'') states, and photon pairs from parametric down-conversion. Assuming there is a phase shift ${\ensuremath{\phi}}_{0}$ in one arm of the interferometer, we compute the probabilities of measurement outcomes as a function of ${\ensuremath{\phi}}_{0}$, and then compute the Shannon mutual information between ${\ensuremath{\phi}}_{0}$ and the measurements. This provides a means of quantitatively comparing the utility of various input states for determining the phase in the presence of dispersion. In addition, we consider a simplified model of parametric down-conversion for which probabilities can be explicitly computed analytically, and which serves as a limiting case of the more realistic down-conversion model.
Phase estimation has a wide range of applications. Over the years, several strategies have been studied to improve precision in phase estimation. These strategies include using exotic quantum states to quantum detection schemes. This dissertation summarizes my effort in improving the precision of phase estimation with a linear and nonlinear interferometer. Chapter 1 introduces quantum optics and quantum metrology. I introduce all relevant quantum states of light used. We also look into tools and terminologies of quantum metrology such as Fisher information, shot-noise limit, Heisenberg limit, etc., along with examples of phase estimation with a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. In Chapter 2, I discuss multiple phase estimation using a multimode interferometer. Building upon previous work, our scheme consists of a multimode interferometer with single-photon inputs. By using a quantum Fisher information analysis, we show that our scheme gives a constant improvement over other schemes. We also show that our scheme with photon-number-resolving detection approaches the quantum Cram\'er-Rao bound. Moreover, we also consider the probabilistic nature of photon emission at the input, and we study its effect on phase sensitivity. I discuss phase estimation with SU(1,1) interferometer in Chapter 3. We look at phase sensitivity in this interferometer with different input states. Namely, we consider two different phase estimation scheme, one using thermal and squeezed states, and others using coherent and displaced squeezed states with parity and on-off as a detection scheme. We also look into the effect of photon loss inside the interferometer. In Chapter 4, we revisit phase estimation in SU(1,1) interferometer from the perspective of quantum Fisher information. I discuss in detail a longstanding confusion regarding the use of quantum Fisher information in SU(1,1) interferometer. We show that phase averaging or quantum Fisher information matrix method is needed in general for calculating the phase sensitivity which resolves inconsistencies reported in previously published articles.
In phase sensing with quantum interferometers, likelihood estimation is used to obtain the estimated value of the measured phase. Moreover, the precision for such sensors depends on the total phase difference between the two paths of the interferometer. To determine the optimal operation parameters of the interferometer, fisher information analysis is required. Both objectives, i.e. likelihood estimation and performance optimization, require knowledge of the probabilities for different events as a function of the phase difference τ. In this article we drive expressions for these probabilities considering the effects of practical parameters like the interferometer’s visibility, the optical pulse width, and the effect of imperfect detectors. Furthermore, we depict fisher information curves for some chosen input states showing the effects of reduced visibility and short pulse widths.
Mach-Zehnder interferometer is a common device in quantum phase estimation and the photon losses in it are an important issue for achieving a high phase accuracy. Here we thoroughly discuss the precision limit of the phase in the Mach-Zehnder interferometer with a coherent state and a superposition of coherent states as input states. By providing a general analytical expression of quantum Fisher information, the phase-matching condition and optimal initial parity are given. Especially, in the photon loss scenario, the sensitivity behaviors are analyzed and specific strategies are provided to restore the phase accuracies for symmetric and asymmetric losses.