Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1009.2438 · Studia Logica

Weakly Intuitionistic Quantum Logic

Ronnie Hermens

Published Oct 10, 2012• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s11225-012-9401-3

Related papers

Quantum Logic in Intuitionistic Perspective

Bob Coecke

arXiv:math/0011208•Studia Logica•Apr 1, 2002•28 citations

On Intuitionistic Logic with a Quantum Modal Operator

Sonja Smets

•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

Comparing Intuitionistic Quantum Logics: From Orthomodular Lattices to Frames

Dan Marsden

•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

A Survey of Fuzzy Intuitionistic Logics in Quantum Mechanics

Gianpiero Cattaneo, M. L. Dalla Chiara, Roberto Giuntini

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1993•0 citations

Quantum intuitionistic logic and the Gelfand representation theorem

Dion M. F. Hartmann

The subject of this thesis is on the shared horizon of theoretical physics and logic: Quantum logic. In 1936, Birkhofff and von Neumann already formulated a quantum logic. But, this logic has some undesirable properties concerning the interpretation of the logical conjunction and disjunction as ``and'' and ``or''. Therefor, Landsman has recently set out to develop a new logic for quantum mechanics, which is set up inside a topos and thus is intuitionistic. \n\nThe construction of Landsmans intuitionistic quantum logic relies on the Gelfand representation theorem. However, to apply the theorem a constructive proof is needed. Coquand and Spitters recently published such a proof, but the material that was published is too condensed for our taste. So in this thesis we attempt to expand on this constructive proof of the Gelfand representation theorem and check all details the original authors left out. As a result, more insight is gained in the constructive proof of the Gelfand representation theorem, providing a stronger foundation for intuitionistic quantum logic.

•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Implicational quantum logic

Kenji Tokuo

Axiomathes•Jan 21, 2022•1 citation
The subject of this thesis is on the shared horizon of theoretical physics and logic: Quantum logic. In 1936, Birkhofff and von Neumann already formulated a quantum logic. But, this logic has some undesirable properties concerning the interpretation of the logical conjunction and disjunction as ``and'' and ``or''. Therefor, Landsman has recently set out to develop a new logic for quantum mechanics, which is set up inside a topos and thus is intuitionistic. \n\nThe construction of Landsmans intuitionistic quantum logic relies on the Gelfand representation theorem. However, to apply the theorem a constructive proof is needed. Coquand and Spitters recently published such a proof, but the material that was published is too condensed for our taste. So in this thesis we attempt to expand on this constructive proof of the Gelfand representation theorem and check all details the original authors left out. As a result, more insight is gained in the constructive proof of the Gelfand representation theorem, providing a stronger foundation for intuitionistic quantum logic.