Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1009.2192 · Journal of Mathematical Physics

The nonrelativistic limit of (central-extended) Poincaré group and some consequences for quantum actualization

Juan Sebastián Ardenghi, Mario Castagnino, Rutwig Campoamor-Stursberg

Published Oct 1, 2009• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The nonrelativistic limit of the centrally extended Poincaré group is considered and their consequences in the modal Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics are discussed [O. Lombardi and M. Castagnino, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys 39, 380 (2008); J. Phys, Conf. Ser. 128, 012014 (2008)]. Through the assumption that in quantum field theory the Casimir operators of the Poincaré group actualize, the nonrelativistic limit of the latter group yields to the actualization of the Casimir operators of the Galilei group, which is in agreement with the actualization rule of previous versions of modal Hamiltonian interpretation [Ardenghi et al., Found. Phys. (submitted)].

DOI
10.1063/1.3243822

Related papers

Galilei Group and Nonrelativistic Quantum Mechanics

Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond

This paper is devoted to the study of the Galilei group and its representations. The Galilei group presents a certain number of essential differences with respect to the Poincaré group. As Bargmann showed, its physical representations, here explicitly constructed, are not true representations but only up-to-a-factor ones. Consequently, in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, the mass has a very special role, and in fact, gives rise to a superselection rule which prevents the existence of unstable particles. The internal energy of a nonrelativistic system is known to be an arbitrary parameter; this is shown to come also from Galilean invariance, because of a nontrivial concept of equivalence between physical representations. On the contrary, the behavior of an elementary system with respect to rotations, is very similar to the relativistic case. We show here, in particular, how the number of polarization states reduces to two for the zero-mass case (though in fact there are no physical zero-mass systems in nonrelativistic mechanics). Finally, we study the two-particle system, where the orbital angular momenta quite naturally introduce themselves through the decomposition of the tensor product of two physical representations.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 1963•241 citations

A Galilei-invariant Version of the Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation

Olímpia Lombardi

Abstract Although it is usual to read that non-relativistic quantum mechanics is covariant, and even invariant, under the Galilei transformations, this topic has scarcely been addressed in the standard literature on the theory. This fact has, at least, two undesirable consequences. On the one hand, the meanings of the concepts of covariance and invariance are not precisely elucidated. On the other hand, one is left without a clear idea about in what sense the covariance and/or invariance of quantum mechanics can be asserted. This situation has its counterpart in the field of the interpretation of quantum mechanics: the relevance of the Galilei group is rarely discussed in the impressive amount of literature on the subject. The general premise underlying the present chapter is that the relationship between interpretation and Galilei transformations deserves to be seriously analyzed: the fact that the theory is covariant under the Galilei group does not guarantee the same property for the interpretation because, in general, interpretations add interpretative postulates to the formal structure of the theory. On this basis, and after clarifying the concepts of covariance and invariance, this chapter considers in what sense quantum mechanics is covariant and under what conditions it is invariant under the transformations of the Galilei group. This conceptual framework will provide the tools to study the result of the application of the Galilei transformations to the Modal-Hamiltonian interpretative postulates.

•Feb 19, 2026•0 citations

Non-canonical quantum optics (II): Poincaré covariant formalism and thermodynamic limit

Marek Czachor, Monika Syty

The paper contains further development of the idea of field quantization introduced in M. Czachor, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. {\bf 33} (2000) 8081-8103. The formalism is extended to the relativistic domain. The link to the standard theory is obtained via a thermodynamic limit. Unitary representations of the Poincaré group at the level of fields and states are explicitly given. Non-canonical multi-photon and coherent states are introduced. In the thermodynamic limit the statistics of photons in a coherent state is Poissonian. The $S$ matrix of radiation fields produced by a classical current is given by a non-canonical coherent-state displacement operator, a fact automatically eliminating the infrared catastrophe. Field operators are shown to be operators and not operator-valued distributions, and can be multiplied at the same point in configuration space. An exactly solvable example is used to compare predictions of the standard theory with those of non-canonical quantum optics, and explicitly shows the mechanism of automatic ultraviolet regularization occuring in the non-canonical theory. Similar conclusions are obtained in perturbation theory, where one finds the standard Feynman diagrams, but the Feynman rules are modified. A comparison with the Dicke-Hepp-Lieb model allows to identify the physical structure behind the non-canonical algebra as corresponding to an ensemble of indefinite-frequency oscillators with constant density $N/V$.

arXiv:quant-ph/0205011•May 2, 2002•2 citations

New Dynamical Group for the Relativistic Quantum Mechanics of Elementary Particles

J. J. Aghassi, P. Román, Ruggero María Santilli

Nonrelativistic Galilean quantum mechanics and the standard transition to relativistic Poincar\'e quantum mechanics is analyzed in terms of group theory. Special emphasis is given to the discussion of the relation between dynamics and geometry. Certain unsatisfactory features are pointed out and a new relativistic group ${\mathcal{G}}_{5}$ is suggested as the symmetry group of dynamics. ${\mathcal{G}}_{5}$ contains both the nonrelativistic Galilei group and the Poincar\'e group as subgroups, and it is a group extension of the restricted Lorentz group. For use in relativistic quantum mechanics, the central extension of ${\mathcal{G}}_{5}$ by a phase group must be employed. The Lie algebra of this relativistic quantum-mechanical Galilei group ${\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{\mathcal{G}}}_{5}$ contains an acceptable covariant space-time position operator and a nontrivial relativistic mass operator. The latter also serves to describe dynamical development. The irreducible unitary projective representations of ${\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{\mathcal{G}}}_{5}$ correspond to infinite towers of states with increasing spin.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•May 15, 1970•43 citations

Quantum mechanics: symmetry and interpretation

Sebastián Fortín, Olímpia Lombardi

In this paper it will be argued that any realist interpretation of quantum mechanics intending to preserve the objectivity of the set of the definite-valued observables should require such a set to be invariant under the symmetry group of the theory. In particular, it will be shown that the natural way to reach this goal is to appeal to the Casimir operators of the Galilean group. Additionally, this idea will be generalized in two ways: (i) by selecting the definite-valued observables of a system in quantum field theory as those represented by the Casimir operators of the Poincaré group, and (ii) by extending the strategy to gauge symmetries.

•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Relativistic Invariance and Modal Interpretations

John Earman, Laura Ruetsche

A number of arguments have been given to show that the modal interpretation of ordinary nonrelativistic quantum mechanics cannot be consistently extended to the relativistic setting. We find these arguments inconclusive. However, there is a prima facie reason to think that a tension exists between the modal interpretation and relativistic invariance; namely, the best candidate for a modal interpretation adapted to relativistic quantum field theory, a prescription due to Rob Clifton (2000), comes out trivial when applied to a number of systems of physical interest. However, it is far from clear whether this difficulty for the modal interpretation is traceable to relativistic invariance per se or to the infinite number of degrees of freedom involved. In any case, the proponents of the modal interpretation have work to do.

Philosophy of Science•Oct 1, 2005•50 citations
The nonrelativistic limit of the centrally extended Poincaré group is considered and their consequences in the modal Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics are discussed [O. Lombardi and M. Castagnino, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys 39, 380 (2008); J. Phys, Conf. Ser. 128, 012014 (2008)]. Through the assumption that in quantum field theory the Casimir operators of the Poincaré group actualize, the nonrelativistic limit of the latter group yields to the actualization of the Casimir operators of the Galilei group, which is in agreement with the actualization rule of previous versions of modal Hamiltonian interpretation [Ardenghi et al., Found. Phys. (submitted)].
This paper is devoted to the study of the Galilei group and its representations. The Galilei group presents a certain number of essential differences with respect to the Poincaré group. As Bargmann showed, its physical representations, here explicitly constructed, are not true representations but only up-to-a-factor ones. Consequently, in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, the mass has a very special role, and in fact, gives rise to a superselection rule which prevents the existence of unstable particles. The internal energy of a nonrelativistic system is known to be an arbitrary parameter; this is shown to come also from Galilean invariance, because of a nontrivial concept of equivalence between physical representations. On the contrary, the behavior of an elementary system with respect to rotations, is very similar to the relativistic case. We show here, in particular, how the number of polarization states reduces to two for the zero-mass case (though in fact there are no physical zero-mass systems in nonrelativistic mechanics). Finally, we study the two-particle system, where the orbital angular momenta quite naturally introduce themselves through the decomposition of the tensor product of two physical representations.
Abstract Although it is usual to read that non-relativistic quantum mechanics is covariant, and even invariant, under the Galilei transformations, this topic has scarcely been addressed in the standard literature on the theory. This fact has, at least, two undesirable consequences. On the one hand, the meanings of the concepts of covariance and invariance are not precisely elucidated. On the other hand, one is left without a clear idea about in what sense the covariance and/or invariance of quantum mechanics can be asserted. This situation has its counterpart in the field of the interpretation of quantum mechanics: the relevance of the Galilei group is rarely discussed in the impressive amount of literature on the subject. The general premise underlying the present chapter is that the relationship between interpretation and Galilei transformations deserves to be seriously analyzed: the fact that the theory is covariant under the Galilei group does not guarantee the same property for the interpretation because, in general, interpretations add interpretative postulates to the formal structure of the theory. On this basis, and after clarifying the concepts of covariance and invariance, this chapter considers in what sense quantum mechanics is covariant and under what conditions it is invariant under the transformations of the Galilei group. This conceptual framework will provide the tools to study the result of the application of the Galilei transformations to the Modal-Hamiltonian interpretative postulates.
The paper contains further development of the idea of field quantization introduced in M. Czachor, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. {\bf 33} (2000) 8081-8103. The formalism is extended to the relativistic domain. The link to the standard theory is obtained via a thermodynamic limit. Unitary representations of the Poincaré group at the level of fields and states are explicitly given. Non-canonical multi-photon and coherent states are introduced. In the thermodynamic limit the statistics of photons in a coherent state is Poissonian. The SSS matrix of radiation fields produced by a classical current is given by a non-canonical coherent-state displacement operator, a fact automatically eliminating the infrared catastrophe. Field operators are shown to be operators and not operator-valued distributions, and can be multiplied at the same point in configuration space. An exactly solvable example is used to compare predictions of the standard theory with those of non-canonical quantum optics, and explicitly shows the mechanism of automatic ultraviolet regularization occuring in the non-canonical theory. Similar conclusions are obtained in perturbation theory, where one finds the standard Feynman diagrams, but the Feynman rules are modified. A comparison with the Dicke-Hepp-Lieb model allows to identify the physical structure behind the non-canonical algebra as corresponding to an ensemble of indefinite-frequency oscillators with constant density N/VN/VN/V.
Nonrelativistic Galilean quantum mechanics and the standard transition to relativistic Poincar\'e quantum mechanics is analyzed in terms of group theory. Special emphasis is given to the discussion of the relation between dynamics and geometry. Certain unsatisfactory features are pointed out and a new relativistic group G5{\mathcal{G}}_{5}G5​ is suggested as the symmetry group of dynamics. G5{\mathcal{G}}_{5}G5​ contains both the nonrelativistic Galilei group and the Poincar\'e group as subgroups, and it is a group extension of the restricted Lorentz group. For use in relativistic quantum mechanics, the central extension of G5{\mathcal{G}}_{5}G5​ by a phase group must be employed. The Lie algebra of this relativistic quantum-mechanical Galilei group ${\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{\mathcal{G}}}_{5}$ contains an acceptable covariant space-time position operator and a nontrivial relativistic mass operator. The latter also serves to describe dynamical development. The irreducible unitary projective representations of ${\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{\mathcal{G}}}_{5}$ correspond to infinite towers of states with increasing spin.
In this paper it will be argued that any realist interpretation of quantum mechanics intending to preserve the objectivity of the set of the definite-valued observables should require such a set to be invariant under the symmetry group of the theory. In particular, it will be shown that the natural way to reach this goal is to appeal to the Casimir operators of the Galilean group. Additionally, this idea will be generalized in two ways: (i) by selecting the definite-valued observables of a system in quantum field theory as those represented by the Casimir operators of the Poincaré group, and (ii) by extending the strategy to gauge symmetries.
A number of arguments have been given to show that the modal interpretation of ordinary nonrelativistic quantum mechanics cannot be consistently extended to the relativistic setting. We find these arguments inconclusive. However, there is a prima facie reason to think that a tension exists between the modal interpretation and relativistic invariance; namely, the best candidate for a modal interpretation adapted to relativistic quantum field theory, a prescription due to Rob Clifton (2000), comes out trivial when applied to a number of systems of physical interest. However, it is far from clear whether this difficulty for the modal interpretation is traceable to relativistic invariance per se or to the infinite number of degrees of freedom involved. In any case, the proponents of the modal interpretation have work to do.