arXiv:1007.0664

Is Quantum Field Theory ontologically interpretable? On localization, particles and fields in relativistic Quantum Theory

David Schroeren

Published Jul 5, 2010• 0 citations

Abstract

In this paper, I provide a formal set of assumptions and give a natural criterion for a quantum field theory to admit particles. I construct a naïve approach to localization for a free bosonic quantum field theory and show how this localization scheme, as a consequence of the Reeh-Schlieder theorem, fails to satisfy this criterion. I then examine the Newton-Wigner concept of localization and show that it fails to obey strong microcausality and thus is subject to a more general version of the Reeh-Schlieder theorem. I review approaches to quantum field theoretic explanations of particle detection events and explain how particles can be regarded as emergent phenomena of a relativistic field theory. In particular, I show that effective localization of Hilbert space vectors is equivalent to an approximate locality of observable algebras.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1007.0664

Related papers

Relativistic Quantum Field Theory

Many of the "counterintuitive" features of relativistic quantum field theory have their formal root in the Reeh-Schlieder theorem, which in particular entails that local operations applied to the vacuum state can produce any state of the entire field.It is of great interest then that I.E.Segal and, more recently, G. Fleming (in a paper entitled "Reeh-Schlieder meets Newton-Wigner") have proposed an alternative "Newton-Wigner" localization scheme that avoids the Reeh-Schlieder theorem.In this paper, I reconstruct the Newton-Wigner localization scheme and clarify the limited extent to which it avoids the counterintuitive consequences of the Reeh-Schlieder theorem.I also argue that there is no coherent interpretation of the Newton-Wigner localization scheme that renders it free from act-outcome correlations at spacelike separation.

Princeton University Press eBooksMar 19, 20198 citations

Reeh-Schlieder Defeats Newton-Wigner: On Alternative Localization Schemes in Relativistic Quantum Field Theory

Hans Halvorson

Many of the “counterintuitive” features of relativistic quantum field theory have their formal root in the Reeh-Schlieder theorem, which in particular entails that local operations applied to the vacuum state can produce any state of the entire field. It is of great interest then that I. E. Segal and, more recently, G. Fleming (in a paper entitled “Reeh-Schlieder meets Newton-Wigner”) have proposed an alternative “Newton-Wigner” localization scheme that avoids the Reeh-Schlieder theorem. In this paper, I reconstruct the Newton-Wigner localization scheme and clarify the limited extent to which it avoids the counterintuitive consequences of the Reeh-Schlieder theorem. I also argue that there is no coherent interpretation of the Newton-Wigner localization scheme that renders it free from act-outcome correlations at spacelike separation.

arXiv:quant-ph/0007060Philosophy of ScienceMar 1, 200166 citations

Photon localization: Local measurements, localized states, and causality

Jan Gulla, Johannes Skaar

We review what it means for a relativistic particle to be localized and argue that the most useful approach is through local measurement. This perspective ties localization directly to relativistic causality and measurable outcomes in spacetime. Strict localization in quantum field theory is formalized by states that give the same expectation value as vacuum for all local observables outside some spacetime region. With this formalism, single photons cannot be strictly localized, but coherent states can. The structure and interpretation of local observables and local operator algebras are discussed in connection with the Reeh-Schlieder theorem. Since probabilities of local measurement outcomes cannot vanish in vacuum, particle detection events must be phrased carefully. Key characteristics of strictly localized states are surveyed alongside concrete strategies for constructing them. The relationship between localization, causality, and on-demand sources is analyzed, finding that strictly localized states can represent localized, propagating information in quantum field theory. Explicit examples of localized photonic states are presented with an emphasis on quantum optics, including states that approximate single photons and (entangled) Bell states.

quant-pharXiv:2610.30473Reviews of Modern PhysicsOct 23, 20260 citations

Localization in quantum field theory

Riccardo Falcone, Claudio Conti

We review the issue of localization in quantum field theory and detail the nonrelativistic limit. Three distinct localization schemes are examined: the Newton–Wigner, the algebraic quantum field theory, and the modal scheme. Among these, the algebraic quantum field theory provides a fundamental concept of localization, rooted in its axiomatic formulation. In contrast, the Newton–Wigner scheme draws inspiration from the Born interpretation, applying mainly to the nonrelativistic regime. The modal scheme, relying on the representation of single particles as positive frequency modes of the Klein–Gordon equation, is found to be incompatible with the algebraic quantum field theory localization. This review delves into the distinctive features of each scheme, offering a comparative analysis. A specific focus is placed on the property of independence between state preparations and observable measurements in spacelike separated regions. Notably, the notion of localization in algebraic quantum field theory violates this independence due to the Reeh–Schlieder theorem. Drawing parallels with the quantum teleportation protocol, it is argued that causality remains unviolated. Additionally, we consider the nonrelativistic limit of quantum field theory, revealing the emergence of the Born scheme as the fundamental concept of localization. Consequently, the nonlocality associated with the Reeh–Schlieder theorem is shown to be suppressed under nonrelativistic conditions.

arXiv:2312.15348Reviews in PhysicsJul 14, 20244 citations

Where's that quantum?

Stephan De Bièvre

The nature and properties of the vacuum as well as the meaning and localization properties of one or many particle states have attracted a fair amount of attention and stirred up sometimes heated debate in relativistic quantum field theory over the years. I will review some of the literature on the subject and will then show that these issues arise just as well in non-relativistic theories of extended systems, such as free bose fields. I will argue they should as such not have given rise either to surprise or to controversy. They are in fact the result of the misinterpretation of the vacuum as ``empty space'' and of a too stringent interpretation of field quanta as point particles. I will in particular present a generalization of an apparently little known theorem of Knight on the non-localizability of field quanta, Licht's characterization of localized excitations of the vacuum, and explain how the physical consequences of the Reeh-Schlieder theorem on the cyclicity and separability of the vacuum for local observables are already perfectly familiar from non-relativistic systems of coupled oscillators.

arXiv:math-ph/0607044Jul 20, 20060 citations

Localization in Relativistic Quantum Theories

Lars O. Herrmann

Although the concept of localization in non-relativistic quantum mechanics is mathematically well-defined there is no obvious and unambiguous way to generalize it to relativistic quantum theory. After a brief review of localization in quantum mechanics the Newton-Wigner localization scheme is introduced and it is shown by the example of a massive spinless system how it leads to a position operator with seemingly unphysical properties. This motivated the development of several theorems which claim to rule out the existence of localizable particles. A particularly important one of them is presented and its validity discussed. In the last section however it is shown that if localization is considered with respect to spacelike hyperplanes, the properties of the Newton-Wigner position operators are not necessarily unphysical and localizable particles can exist.

Jun 1, 20105 citations