Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1006.2759 · Physical Review A

Bell inequality for pairs of particle-number-superselection-rule restricted states

Libby Heaney, Seung-Woo Lee, Dieter Jaksch

Published Oct 28, 2010• 10 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Proposals for Bell-inequality tests on systems restricted by the particle-number-superselection rule often require operations that are difficult to implement in practice. In this article, we derive a Bell inequality, where measurements on pairs of states are used as a method to bypass this superselection rule. In particular, we focus on mode entanglement of an arbitrary number of massive particles and show that our Bell inequality detects the entanglement in an identical pair of states when other inequalities fail. However, as the number of particles in the system increases, the violation of our Bell inequality decreases due to the restriction in the measurement space caused by the superselection rule. This Bell test can be implemented using techniques that are routinely used in current experiments.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.82.042116

Related papers

Bell-inequality test for spatial-mode entanglement of a single massive particle

Libby Heaney, Janet Anders

Experiments violating Bell inequalities have formed our belief that the world at its smallest is genuinely nonlocal. While many nonlocality experiments use the first quantized picture, the physics of fields of indistinguishable particles is captured most conveniently by second quantization. This implies the possibility of nonlocal correlations, such as entanglement, between modes of the field. In this paper, we propose an experimental scheme that tests the theoretically predicted entanglement between modes in space occupied by massive bosons. A successful test of this scheme would not only indicate that mode entanglement is as genuine as particle entanglement, despite the particle number superselection rule, but would also prove that this superselection rule can be overcome.

arXiv:0810.2882•Physical Review A•Sep 4, 2009•22 citations

Multipartite nonlocality in the presence of particle-number super-selection rules

Sebastian Meznaric, Libby Heaney, Dieter Jaksch

Super-selection rules severely restrict the possible operations one can perform on an entangled state. Their effect on the observation of non-locality through the Bell inequalities is only partially understood in the bipartite case. In this article we examine a range of multipartite entangled states and find that for those states the super-selection rules limit the genuinely multipartite nonlocality but not the non-genuinely multipartite. We argue that when the number of particles is smaller than the number of parties, genuinely multipartite nonlocality cannot be detected unless the super-selection rules can be relaxed. The tests proposed in the paper can be implemented using routinely used experimental techniques.

arXiv:1108.1436•Aug 6, 2011•0 citations

Reference frames for Bell inequality violation in the presence of superselection rules

Tomasz Paterek, P Kurzyński, D K L Oi +1 more

Superselection rules (SSRs) constrain the allowed states and operations in quantum theory. They limit preparations and measurements and hence impact our ability to observe non-locality, in particular the violation of Bell inequalities. We show that a reference frame compatible with a particle number SSR does not allow observers to violate a Bell inequality if and only if it is prepared using only local operations and classical communication. In particular, jointly prepared separable reference frames are sufficient for obtaining violations of a Bell inequality. We study the size and non-local properties of such reference frames using superselection-induced variance. These results suggest the need for experimental Bell tests in the presence of superselection.

arXiv:1004.5184•New Journal of Physics•Apr 19, 2011•9 citations

Reference frames for Bell inequality violation in the presence of superselection rules

Tomasz Paterek, Paweł Kurzyński, Daniel K. L. Oi +1 more

Superselection rules (SSRs) constrain the allowed states and operations in quantum theory. They limit preparations and measurements and hence impact our ability to observe non-locality, in particular the violation of Bell inequalities. We show that a reference frame compatible with a particle number SSR does not allow observers to violate a Bell inequality if and only if it is prepared using only local operations and classical communication. In particular, jointly prepared separable reference frames are sufficient for obtaining violations of a Bell inequality. We study the size and non-local properties of such reference frames using superselection-induced variance. These results suggest the need for experimental Bell tests in the presence of superselection.

•Apr 19, 2011•5 citations

Role of Particle Entanglement in the Violation of Bell Inequalities

Tomasz Wasak, Augusto Smerzi, Jan Chwedeńczuk

Entanglement between two separate systems is a necessary resource to violate a Bell inequality in a test of local realism. We demonstrate that to overcome the Bell bound, this correlation must be accompanied by the entanglement between the constituent particles. This happens whenever a super-selection rule prohibits coherences between states with different total number of particles and thus imposes a constraint on feasible local operations in each sub-system. We show that the necessary entanglement between the particles might solely result from their indistinguishability. We also give an example of both mode and particle-entangled pure state, which does not violate any Bell inequality. Our result reveals a fundamental relation between the non-locality and the particle entanglement.

arXiv:1609.01576•Scientific Reports•Jan 23, 2018•13 citations

Quantum Entanglement for Systems of Identical Bosons. I General Theory

Bryan J. Dalton, John Goold, B. M. Garraway +1 more

These two accompanying papers treat two mode entanglement for systems of identical massive bosons and the relationship to spin squeezing and other quantum correlation effects. Entanglement is a key quantum feature of composite systems where the probabilities for joint measurements on the composite sub-systems are no longer determined from measurement probabilities on the separate sub-systems. We focus on the meaning of entanglement, the quantum paradoxes associated with entangled states, and important tests that allow an experimentalist to determine whether a quantum state - in particular, one for massive bosons is entangled. Our tests for entanglement fully utilise the symmetrisation principle and super-selection rules for bosonic massive particles. These papers provides detailed arguments necessary for the conclusions of a recent paper which presented results for rigorously demonstrating the entanglement of a two-mode Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC). In the first paper (I), we discuss the meaning of entanglement for systems of identical particles. For such systems, the relevant quantum density operators must satisfy the symmetrisation principle and global and local super-selection rules prohibiting states in which there are coherences between differing particle numbers. We fully justify these requirements. In the second quantisation approach, both the system and sub-systems are modes (or sets of modes) rather than particles, particles being associated with different mode occupancies. In the accompanying review paper (II), we consider spin squeezing and other tests for entanglement for two-mode bosonic systems. Starting from paper (I) we determine which tests are useful for detecting entanglement in massive bosonic (BEC), as opposed to photonic, systems. Several new inequalities are derived, and recent key experiments are analysed.

arXiv:1506.06906•Jun 23, 2015•1 citation
Proposals for Bell-inequality tests on systems restricted by the particle-number-superselection rule often require operations that are difficult to implement in practice. In this article, we derive a Bell inequality, where measurements on pairs of states are used as a method to bypass this superselection rule. In particular, we focus on mode entanglement of an arbitrary number of massive particles and show that our Bell inequality detects the entanglement in an identical pair of states when other inequalities fail. However, as the number of particles in the system increases, the violation of our Bell inequality decreases due to the restriction in the measurement space caused by the superselection rule. This Bell test can be implemented using techniques that are routinely used in current experiments.
Experiments violating Bell inequalities have formed our belief that the world at its smallest is genuinely nonlocal. While many nonlocality experiments use the first quantized picture, the physics of fields of indistinguishable particles is captured most conveniently by second quantization. This implies the possibility of nonlocal correlations, such as entanglement, between modes of the field. In this paper, we propose an experimental scheme that tests the theoretically predicted entanglement between modes in space occupied by massive bosons. A successful test of this scheme would not only indicate that mode entanglement is as genuine as particle entanglement, despite the particle number superselection rule, but would also prove that this superselection rule can be overcome.
Super-selection rules severely restrict the possible operations one can perform on an entangled state. Their effect on the observation of non-locality through the Bell inequalities is only partially understood in the bipartite case. In this article we examine a range of multipartite entangled states and find that for those states the super-selection rules limit the genuinely multipartite nonlocality but not the non-genuinely multipartite. We argue that when the number of particles is smaller than the number of parties, genuinely multipartite nonlocality cannot be detected unless the super-selection rules can be relaxed. The tests proposed in the paper can be implemented using routinely used experimental techniques.
Superselection rules (SSRs) constrain the allowed states and operations in quantum theory. They limit preparations and measurements and hence impact our ability to observe non-locality, in particular the violation of Bell inequalities. We show that a reference frame compatible with a particle number SSR does not allow observers to violate a Bell inequality if and only if it is prepared using only local operations and classical communication. In particular, jointly prepared separable reference frames are sufficient for obtaining violations of a Bell inequality. We study the size and non-local properties of such reference frames using superselection-induced variance. These results suggest the need for experimental Bell tests in the presence of superselection.
Superselection rules (SSRs) constrain the allowed states and operations in quantum theory. They limit preparations and measurements and hence impact our ability to observe non-locality, in particular the violation of Bell inequalities. We show that a reference frame compatible with a particle number SSR does not allow observers to violate a Bell inequality if and only if it is prepared using only local operations and classical communication. In particular, jointly prepared separable reference frames are sufficient for obtaining violations of a Bell inequality. We study the size and non-local properties of such reference frames using superselection-induced variance. These results suggest the need for experimental Bell tests in the presence of superselection.
Entanglement between two separate systems is a necessary resource to violate a Bell inequality in a test of local realism. We demonstrate that to overcome the Bell bound, this correlation must be accompanied by the entanglement between the constituent particles. This happens whenever a super-selection rule prohibits coherences between states with different total number of particles and thus imposes a constraint on feasible local operations in each sub-system. We show that the necessary entanglement between the particles might solely result from their indistinguishability. We also give an example of both mode and particle-entangled pure state, which does not violate any Bell inequality. Our result reveals a fundamental relation between the non-locality and the particle entanglement.
These two accompanying papers treat two mode entanglement for systems of identical massive bosons and the relationship to spin squeezing and other quantum correlation effects. Entanglement is a key quantum feature of composite systems where the probabilities for joint measurements on the composite sub-systems are no longer determined from measurement probabilities on the separate sub-systems. We focus on the meaning of entanglement, the quantum paradoxes associated with entangled states, and important tests that allow an experimentalist to determine whether a quantum state - in particular, one for massive bosons is entangled. Our tests for entanglement fully utilise the symmetrisation principle and super-selection rules for bosonic massive particles. These papers provides detailed arguments necessary for the conclusions of a recent paper which presented results for rigorously demonstrating the entanglement of a two-mode Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC). In the first paper (I), we discuss the meaning of entanglement for systems of identical particles. For such systems, the relevant quantum density operators must satisfy the symmetrisation principle and global and local super-selection rules prohibiting states in which there are coherences between differing particle numbers. We fully justify these requirements. In the second quantisation approach, both the system and sub-systems are modes (or sets of modes) rather than particles, particles being associated with different mode occupancies. In the accompanying review paper (II), we consider spin squeezing and other tests for entanglement for two-mode bosonic systems. Starting from paper (I) we determine which tests are useful for detecting entanglement in massive bosonic (BEC), as opposed to photonic, systems. Several new inequalities are derived, and recent key experiments are analysed.