Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1005.2507

Scaled Triangleland Model of Quantum Cosmology

Edward James Anderson

Published May 14, 2010• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In scaled relational particle mechanics, only relative times, relative angles and relative separations are meaningful. It arose in the study of the absolute versus relative motion debate. It has then turned out to be a useful toy model of classical and quantum general relativity, such as for investigating conceptual strategies for the problem of time. This paper studies the 3-particle 2-d scaled relational particle model, for which the configurations are scaled triangles. The configuration space for these is R^3 with a conformally flat metric thereupon (it is the cone over the corresponding shape space S^2. I use multiple harmonic oscillator type potentials and other potentials suggested by analogy with cosmology, and solve for some of these by using a partial analogy with the treatment of the atom in spherical and parabolic coordinates. Spherical coordinates are here the total moment of inertia $I$ for radius and two pure-shape coordinates. These are Θ, a function of the ratio of the two relative separations of subsystems, and Φ, the relative angle between the two subsystems. Parabolic coordinates are Φagain and twice the partial moments of inertia of each subsystem. I interpret these solutions using 1) a `Bohr moment of inertia' for the model universe (playing the role of the scalefactor). 2) Expectations and spreads of sizes and shapes. 3) Superimposing the probability density function on the labelled tessellation of the configuration space that encodes meaningful subregions such as collinear configurations, equilateral triangles and isosceles triangles. Applications include hidden time, emergent semiclassical time, timeless and histories theory problem of time strategies, and comparing reduced and Dirac methods of quantization.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1005.2507

Related papers

Shape Operators and Zodiac Tessellation: Improved Interpretation of Quantum Cosmological Triangleland

Edward James Anderson

With toy modelling of conceptual aspects of quantum cosmology and the problem of time in quantum gravity in mind, I study the classical and quantum dynamics of the scalefree triangle formed by 3 particles in 2-d. The shape spaces (configuration spaces for scalefree systems) both for this and for 4 particles in 1-d are spheres. Three quantities u whose squares sum to one play the role of Cartesian coordinates for an auxiliary surrounding flat 3-space and are then good variables from the perspective of kinematical quantization. These quantities turn out to be obvious ratios of relative separations for 4 particles in 1-d and rather less trivial Dragt-type coordinates in the case of the triangle. In each case, the u furthermore admit useful interpretation as shape quantities; the triangle’s three Dragt-type coordinates are an ellipicity of the system’s moments of inertia, a measure of anisoscelesness and the triangle’s area up to proportionality. I promote these quantities at the quantum level to operators whose expectation and spread are then useful in understanding the quantum states of the system. Additionally, I tessellate the mass-weighted shape sphere by its physical interpretation as the triangle, which parallels partitioning the night sky zodiacally and austro-boreally; juxtaposing this with classical trajectories/quantum mechanical wavefunctions permits straightforward reading off of the sequence of triangles in the motion/how probable each triangle is. I explain how features desirable for quantum cosmology cause one’s models to depart in detail from somewhat similar models already studied in molecular physics. I include applications to multiverse modelling and to timeless approaches to the problem of time.

•Sep 13, 2009•0 citations

SHAPE SPACE METHODS FOR QUANTUM COSMOLOGICAL TRIANGLELAND

Edward James Anderson, Damtp Cambridge U. K

With toy modelling of conceptual aspects of quantum cosmology and the problem of time in quantum gravity in mind, I study the classical and quantum dynamics of the pure-shape (i.e. scale-free) triangle formed by 3 particles in 2-d. I do so by importing techniques to the triangle model from the corresponding 4 particles in 1-d model, using the fact that both have 2-spheres for shape spaces, though the latter has a trivial realization whilst the former has a more involved Hopf (or Dragt) type realization. I furthermore interpret the ensuing Dragt-type coordinates as shape quantities: a measure of anisoscelesness, the ellipticity of the base and apex’s moments of inertia, and a quantity proportional to the area of the triangle. I promote these quantities at the quantum level to operators whose expectation and spread are then useful in understanding the quantum states of the system. Additionally, I tessellate the 2-sphere by its physical interpretation as the shape space of triangles, and then use this as a back-cloth from which to read off the interpretation of dynamical trajectories, potentials and wavefunctions. I include applications to timeless approaches to the problem of time and to the role of uniform states in quantum cosmological modelling. PACS: 04.60Kz.

•Aug 16, 2016•24 citations

QUANTUM COSMOLOGICAL METROLAND MODEL

Edward James Anderson, Anne T. Franzen, Theoretical Physics +1 more

Relational particle mechanics is useful for modelling whole-universe issues such as quantum cosmology or the problem of time in quantum gravity, including some aspects outside the reach of comparably complex mini-superspace models. In this paper, we consider the mechanics of pure shape and not scale of four particles on a line, so that the only physically significant quantities are ratios of relative separations between the constituents' physical objects. Many of our ideas and workings extend to the N-particle case. As such models' configurations resemble depictions of metro lines in public transport maps, we term them 'N-stop metrolands'. This 4-stop model's configuration space is a 2-sphere, from which our metroland mechanics interpretation is via the 'cubic' tessellation. This model yields conserved quantities which are mathematically SO(3) objects like angular momenta but are physically relative dilational momenta (i.e. coordinates dotted with momenta). We provide and interpret various exact and approximate classical and quantum solutions for 4-stop metroland; from these results one can construct expectations and spreads of shape operators that admit interpretations as relative sizes and the 'homogeneity of the model universe's contents', and also objects of significance for the problem of time in quantum gravity (e.g. in the naïve Schrödinger and records theory timeless approaches).

•Jan 1, 2010•32 citations

Relational quadrilateralland II: The Quantum Theory

Edward James Anderson, Sophie Kneller

We provide the quantum treatment of the relational quadrilateral. The underlying reduced configuration spaces are ℂℙ 2 and the cone over this. We consider exact free and isotropic HO potential cases and perturbations about these. Moreover, our purely relational kinematical quantization is distinct from the usual one for ℂℙ 2 , which turns out to carry absolutist connotations instead. Thus, this paper is the first to note absolute-versus-relational motion distinctions at the kinematical rather than dynamical level. It is also an example of value to the discussion of kinematical quantization along the lines of Isham, 1984. The relational quadrilateral is the simplest RPM whose mathematics is not standard in atomic physics (the triangle and four particles on a line are both based on 𝕊 2 and ℝ 3 mathematics). It is far more typical of the general quantum relational N-a-gon than the previously studied case of the relational triangle. We consider useful integrals as regards perturbation theory and the peaking interpretation of quantum cosmology. We subsequently consider problem of time (PoT) applications of this: quantum Kuchař beables, the Machian version of the semiclassical approach and the timeless naïve Schrödinger interpretation. These go toward extending the combined Machian semiclassical-Histories-Timeless Approach of [Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23 (2014) 1450014] to the case of the quadrilateral, which will be treated in subsequent papers.

International Journal of Modern Physics D•Apr 21, 2014•11 citations

Relational Quadrilateralland. II. The Quantum Theory

Anderson, Edward, Kneller, Sophie

This paper provides the quantum treatment of the relational quadrilateral. The underlying reduced configuration spaces are $\mathbb{CP}^2$ and the cone over this, C($\mathbb{CP}^2$). We consider exact free and isotropic HO potential cases and perturbations about these. Moreover, our purely relational kinematical quantization is distinct from the usual one for $\mathbb{CP}^2$, which turns out to carry absolutist connotations instead. Thus this paper is the first to note absolute-versus-relational motion distinctions at the kinematical rather than dynamical level, and also an example of value to the discussion of kinematical quantization along the lines of Isham 1984. This treatment of the relational quadrilateral is the first relational QM with very new mathematics for a finite QM model, and is far more typical of the general quantum relational $N$-a-gon than the previously-studied case of the relational triangle. We consider useful integrals as regards perturbation theory and the peaking interpretation of quantum cosmology. We subsequently consider problem of time applications of this: quantum Kuchař beables, the Machian version of the semiclassical approach and the timeless naive Schrodinger interpretation. These go toward extending the combined Machian semiclassical-histories-timeless approach of [1] to the case of the quadrilateral, which will be treated in subsequent papers.

arXiv:1303.5645•Mar 22, 2013•41 citations

Relational particle models: I. Reconciliation with standard classical and quantum theory

Edward Anderson

This paper concerns the absolute versus relative motion debate. The Barbour and Bertotti 1982 work may be viewed as an indirectly set up relational formulation of a portion of Newtonian mechanics. I consider further direct formulations of this and argue that the portion in question -- universes with zero total angular momentum, that are conservative and with kinetic terms that are (homogeneous) quadratic in their velocities -- is capable of accommodating a wide range of classical physics phenomena. Furthermore, as I develop in Paper II, this relational particle model is a useful toy model for canonical general relativity. I consider what happens if one quantizes relational rather than absolute mechanics, indeed whether the latter is misleading. By exploiting Jacobi coordinates, I show how to access many examples of quantized relational particle models and then interpret these from a relational perspective. By these means, previous suggestions of bad semiclassicality for such models can be eluded. I show how small (particle number) universe relational particle model examples display eigenspectrum truncation, gaps, energy interlocking and counterbalanced total angular momentum. These features mean that these small universe models make interesting toy models for some aspects of closed universe quantum cosmology. While, these features do not compromise the recovery of reality as regards the practicalities of experimentation in a large universe such as our own.

arXiv:gr-qc/0511068•Classical and Quantum Gravity•Mar 17, 2006•35 citations
In scaled relational particle mechanics, only relative times, relative angles and relative separations are meaningful. It arose in the study of the absolute versus relative motion debate. It has then turned out to be a useful toy model of classical and quantum general relativity, such as for investigating conceptual strategies for the problem of time. This paper studies the 3-particle 2-d scaled relational particle model, for which the configurations are scaled triangles. The configuration space for these is R^3 with a conformally flat metric thereupon (it is the cone over the corresponding shape space S^2. I use multiple harmonic oscillator type potentials and other potentials suggested by analogy with cosmology, and solve for some of these by using a partial analogy with the treatment of the atom in spherical and parabolic coordinates. Spherical coordinates are here the total moment of inertia III for radius and two pure-shape coordinates. These are Θ, a function of the ratio of the two relative separations of subsystems, and Φ, the relative angle between the two subsystems. Parabolic coordinates are Φagain and twice the partial moments of inertia of each subsystem. I interpret these solutions using 1) a `Bohr moment of inertia' for the model universe (playing the role of the scalefactor). 2) Expectations and spreads of sizes and shapes. 3) Superimposing the probability density function on the labelled tessellation of the configuration space that encodes meaningful subregions such as collinear configurations, equilateral triangles and isosceles triangles. Applications include hidden time, emergent semiclassical time, timeless and histories theory problem of time strategies, and comparing reduced and Dirac methods of quantization.
With toy modelling of conceptual aspects of quantum cosmology and the problem of time in quantum gravity in mind, I study the classical and quantum dynamics of the scalefree triangle formed by 3 particles in 2-d. The shape spaces (configuration spaces for scalefree systems) both for this and for 4 particles in 1-d are spheres. Three quantities u whose squares sum to one play the role of Cartesian coordinates for an auxiliary surrounding flat 3-space and are then good variables from the perspective of kinematical quantization. These quantities turn out to be obvious ratios of relative separations for 4 particles in 1-d and rather less trivial Dragt-type coordinates in the case of the triangle. In each case, the u furthermore admit useful interpretation as shape quantities; the triangle’s three Dragt-type coordinates are an ellipicity of the system’s moments of inertia, a measure of anisoscelesness and the triangle’s area up to proportionality. I promote these quantities at the quantum level to operators whose expectation and spread are then useful in understanding the quantum states of the system. Additionally, I tessellate the mass-weighted shape sphere by its physical interpretation as the triangle, which parallels partitioning the night sky zodiacally and austro-boreally; juxtaposing this with classical trajectories/quantum mechanical wavefunctions permits straightforward reading off of the sequence of triangles in the motion/how probable each triangle is. I explain how features desirable for quantum cosmology cause one’s models to depart in detail from somewhat similar models already studied in molecular physics. I include applications to multiverse modelling and to timeless approaches to the problem of time.
With toy modelling of conceptual aspects of quantum cosmology and the problem of time in quantum gravity in mind, I study the classical and quantum dynamics of the pure-shape (i.e. scale-free) triangle formed by 3 particles in 2-d. I do so by importing techniques to the triangle model from the corresponding 4 particles in 1-d model, using the fact that both have 2-spheres for shape spaces, though the latter has a trivial realization whilst the former has a more involved Hopf (or Dragt) type realization. I furthermore interpret the ensuing Dragt-type coordinates as shape quantities: a measure of anisoscelesness, the ellipticity of the base and apex’s moments of inertia, and a quantity proportional to the area of the triangle. I promote these quantities at the quantum level to operators whose expectation and spread are then useful in understanding the quantum states of the system. Additionally, I tessellate the 2-sphere by its physical interpretation as the shape space of triangles, and then use this as a back-cloth from which to read off the interpretation of dynamical trajectories, potentials and wavefunctions. I include applications to timeless approaches to the problem of time and to the role of uniform states in quantum cosmological modelling. PACS: 04.60Kz.
Relational particle mechanics is useful for modelling whole-universe issues such as quantum cosmology or the problem of time in quantum gravity, including some aspects outside the reach of comparably complex mini-superspace models. In this paper, we consider the mechanics of pure shape and not scale of four particles on a line, so that the only physically significant quantities are ratios of relative separations between the constituents' physical objects. Many of our ideas and workings extend to the N-particle case. As such models' configurations resemble depictions of metro lines in public transport maps, we term them 'N-stop metrolands'. This 4-stop model's configuration space is a 2-sphere, from which our metroland mechanics interpretation is via the 'cubic' tessellation. This model yields conserved quantities which are mathematically SO(3) objects like angular momenta but are physically relative dilational momenta (i.e. coordinates dotted with momenta). We provide and interpret various exact and approximate classical and quantum solutions for 4-stop metroland; from these results one can construct expectations and spreads of shape operators that admit interpretations as relative sizes and the 'homogeneity of the model universe's contents', and also objects of significance for the problem of time in quantum gravity (e.g. in the naïve Schrödinger and records theory timeless approaches).
We provide the quantum treatment of the relational quadrilateral. The underlying reduced configuration spaces are ℂℙ 2 and the cone over this. We consider exact free and isotropic HO potential cases and perturbations about these. Moreover, our purely relational kinematical quantization is distinct from the usual one for ℂℙ 2 , which turns out to carry absolutist connotations instead. Thus, this paper is the first to note absolute-versus-relational motion distinctions at the kinematical rather than dynamical level. It is also an example of value to the discussion of kinematical quantization along the lines of Isham, 1984. The relational quadrilateral is the simplest RPM whose mathematics is not standard in atomic physics (the triangle and four particles on a line are both based on 𝕊 2 and ℝ 3 mathematics). It is far more typical of the general quantum relational N-a-gon than the previously studied case of the relational triangle. We consider useful integrals as regards perturbation theory and the peaking interpretation of quantum cosmology. We subsequently consider problem of time (PoT) applications of this: quantum Kuchař beables, the Machian version of the semiclassical approach and the timeless naïve Schrödinger interpretation. These go toward extending the combined Machian semiclassical-Histories-Timeless Approach of [Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23 (2014) 1450014] to the case of the quadrilateral, which will be treated in subsequent papers.
This paper provides the quantum treatment of the relational quadrilateral. The underlying reduced configuration spaces are CP2\mathbb{CP}^2CP2 and the cone over this, C(CP2\mathbb{CP}^2CP2). We consider exact free and isotropic HO potential cases and perturbations about these. Moreover, our purely relational kinematical quantization is distinct from the usual one for CP2\mathbb{CP}^2CP2, which turns out to carry absolutist connotations instead. Thus this paper is the first to note absolute-versus-relational motion distinctions at the kinematical rather than dynamical level, and also an example of value to the discussion of kinematical quantization along the lines of Isham 1984. This treatment of the relational quadrilateral is the first relational QM with very new mathematics for a finite QM model, and is far more typical of the general quantum relational NNN-a-gon than the previously-studied case of the relational triangle. We consider useful integrals as regards perturbation theory and the peaking interpretation of quantum cosmology. We subsequently consider problem of time applications of this: quantum Kuchař beables, the Machian version of the semiclassical approach and the timeless naive Schrodinger interpretation. These go toward extending the combined Machian semiclassical-histories-timeless approach of [1] to the case of the quadrilateral, which will be treated in subsequent papers.
This paper concerns the absolute versus relative motion debate. The Barbour and Bertotti 1982 work may be viewed as an indirectly set up relational formulation of a portion of Newtonian mechanics. I consider further direct formulations of this and argue that the portion in question -- universes with zero total angular momentum, that are conservative and with kinetic terms that are (homogeneous) quadratic in their velocities -- is capable of accommodating a wide range of classical physics phenomena. Furthermore, as I develop in Paper II, this relational particle model is a useful toy model for canonical general relativity. I consider what happens if one quantizes relational rather than absolute mechanics, indeed whether the latter is misleading. By exploiting Jacobi coordinates, I show how to access many examples of quantized relational particle models and then interpret these from a relational perspective. By these means, previous suggestions of bad semiclassicality for such models can be eluded. I show how small (particle number) universe relational particle model examples display eigenspectrum truncation, gaps, energy interlocking and counterbalanced total angular momentum. These features mean that these small universe models make interesting toy models for some aspects of closed universe quantum cosmology. While, these features do not compromise the recovery of reality as regards the practicalities of experimentation in a large universe such as our own.