Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1004.4596 · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications

Emergence and collapse of quantum mechanical superposition: Orthogonality of reversible dynamics and irreversible diffusion

Gerhard Grössing, Siegfried Fussy, J Mesa Pascasio, Herbert Schwabl

Published Jul 20, 2010• 20 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.physa.2010.07.017

Related papers

Collapse of the Wave Function: Irreversibility as a Fundamental Dynamical Principle

Abderrahim Lyoubi-Idrissi

The collapse of the wave function remains one of the deepest puzzles in quantum mechanics. The Schrödinger equation is unitary and time-reversal symmetric, yet measurement requires an additional postulate that is neither—and we have no physical explanation for why. Existing interpretations either deny that collapse is real (Many-Worlds), treat it as purely subjective (QBism), or add stochastic noise by hand without deriving it from fundamental principles (GRW, CSL). We demonstrate that collapse is a real physical process requiring fundamentally irreversible dynamics. No purely unitary, time-symmetric theory can account for the objective suppression of macroscopic superpositions—irreversibility must be built into the dynamics from the start. We introduce a minimal extension of quantum mechanics through coupling to a universal scalar field (the I-field) governed by an explicit time-asymmetric field equation. Collapse emerges objectively through deterministic dissipative dynamics, with no reference to observers, measurement devices, or stochastic noise. By integrating out the I-field degrees of freedom, we derive effective Lindblad dynamics for quantum systems. The collapse rate scales quadratically with system mass, ensuring microscopic quantum coherence remains intact while macroscopic superpositions are dynamically suppressed. Unlike stochastic collapse models (GRW/CSL), the mechanism is deterministic and produces no spontaneous heating. Unlike gravitational collapse proposals (Diósi-Penrose), it provides explicit field equations rather than heuristic arguments. Unlike environmental decoherence, the irreversibility is fundamental rather than effective. The theory respects relativistic causality and makes testable predictions for current and near-future experiments in matter-wave interferometry, optomechanical systems, and molecular interferometry. Observation of mass-dependent decoherence without accompanying stochastic heating would provide strong evidence for the I-field mechanism. The framework establishes irreversibility as a fundamental interaction rather than an emergent phenomenon, providing a unified physical origin for both wave function collapse and the quantum arrow of time.

•Jan 16, 2026•0 citations

Irreversibility and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

G. C. Ghirardi

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

[5] Quantum Superposition as Pre-Record Alignment Dynamics

CESAR ARELLANES

In the preceding papers, time was identified with the irreversible ordering of retained measurement records, gravitation with the constraint imposed by their accumulated density, electromagnetism with reversible alignment dynamics, and inertia with resistance to reconfiguration of retained structure under bounded alignment update. This paper addresses the remaining sector: the reversible dynamics that operate prior to record formation. We reinterpret quantum superposition as the structured coexistence of alignment pathways before an outcome becomes retained. Probability, in this view, reflects the weighting of pre-record alignment configurations rather than epistemic uncertainty or branching worlds. Quantum mechanics emerges as the unique calculus governing alignment evolution before irreversible commitment, completing the physical account without modifying the formalism.

•Feb 26, 2026•0 citations

On irreversibility in quantum mechanics

N. V. Lunin, Vladimir I Kogan

Doklady Physics•Dec 1, 2004•1 citation

Irreversibility in quantum mechanics

Boris B. Kadomtsev

Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk•Jan 1, 2003•20 citations

(FAPP) Infinity Does Macroscopic Irreversibility from Microscopic Reversibility

Karl Svozil

Infinity is central to deriving macroscopic irreversibility from reversible microscopic laws across mathematics, theoretical computer science and physics. In analysis, infinite processes—such as Dedekind cuts and Cauchy sequences—construct real numbers as equivalence classes of rational approximations, bridging discrete rationals to the continuous real line. In quantum mechanics, infinite tensor products model nested measurements, where sectorization partitions the Hilbert space into equivalence classes, reconciling unitary evolution with wavefunction collapse. In statistical mechanics, macrostates emerge as equivalence classes of microstates sharing identical macroscopic properties, providing the statistical basis for thermodynamic irreversibility despite reversible dynamics. Equivalence relations formalize For-All-Practical-Purposes (FAPP) indistinguishability, reflecting operational limits on precision and observation. Together, these examples reveal a unified framework where infinity and equivalence underpin emergent macroscopic behavior from microscopic reversibility.

Quantum Economics and Finance•Jun 12, 2025•0 citations
The collapse of the wave function remains one of the deepest puzzles in quantum mechanics. The Schrödinger equation is unitary and time-reversal symmetric, yet measurement requires an additional postulate that is neither—and we have no physical explanation for why. Existing interpretations either deny that collapse is real (Many-Worlds), treat it as purely subjective (QBism), or add stochastic noise by hand without deriving it from fundamental principles (GRW, CSL). We demonstrate that collapse is a real physical process requiring fundamentally irreversible dynamics. No purely unitary, time-symmetric theory can account for the objective suppression of macroscopic superpositions—irreversibility must be built into the dynamics from the start. We introduce a minimal extension of quantum mechanics through coupling to a universal scalar field (the I-field) governed by an explicit time-asymmetric field equation. Collapse emerges objectively through deterministic dissipative dynamics, with no reference to observers, measurement devices, or stochastic noise. By integrating out the I-field degrees of freedom, we derive effective Lindblad dynamics for quantum systems. The collapse rate scales quadratically with system mass, ensuring microscopic quantum coherence remains intact while macroscopic superpositions are dynamically suppressed. Unlike stochastic collapse models (GRW/CSL), the mechanism is deterministic and produces no spontaneous heating. Unlike gravitational collapse proposals (Diósi-Penrose), it provides explicit field equations rather than heuristic arguments. Unlike environmental decoherence, the irreversibility is fundamental rather than effective. The theory respects relativistic causality and makes testable predictions for current and near-future experiments in matter-wave interferometry, optomechanical systems, and molecular interferometry. Observation of mass-dependent decoherence without accompanying stochastic heating would provide strong evidence for the I-field mechanism. The framework establishes irreversibility as a fundamental interaction rather than an emergent phenomenon, providing a unified physical origin for both wave function collapse and the quantum arrow of time.
In the preceding papers, time was identified with the irreversible ordering of retained measurement records, gravitation with the constraint imposed by their accumulated density, electromagnetism with reversible alignment dynamics, and inertia with resistance to reconfiguration of retained structure under bounded alignment update. This paper addresses the remaining sector: the reversible dynamics that operate prior to record formation. We reinterpret quantum superposition as the structured coexistence of alignment pathways before an outcome becomes retained. Probability, in this view, reflects the weighting of pre-record alignment configurations rather than epistemic uncertainty or branching worlds. Quantum mechanics emerges as the unique calculus governing alignment evolution before irreversible commitment, completing the physical account without modifying the formalism.
Infinity is central to deriving macroscopic irreversibility from reversible microscopic laws across mathematics, theoretical computer science and physics. In analysis, infinite processes—such as Dedekind cuts and Cauchy sequences—construct real numbers as equivalence classes of rational approximations, bridging discrete rationals to the continuous real line. In quantum mechanics, infinite tensor products model nested measurements, where sectorization partitions the Hilbert space into equivalence classes, reconciling unitary evolution with wavefunction collapse. In statistical mechanics, macrostates emerge as equivalence classes of microstates sharing identical macroscopic properties, providing the statistical basis for thermodynamic irreversibility despite reversible dynamics. Equivalence relations formalize For-All-Practical-Purposes (FAPP) indistinguishability, reflecting operational limits on precision and observation. Together, these examples reveal a unified framework where infinity and equivalence underpin emergent macroscopic behavior from microscopic reversibility.