Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1004.2964 · Physical Review Letters

Kitaev-Heisenberg Model on a Honeycomb Lattice: Possible Exotic Phases in Iridium Oxides A2IrO3

Jiří Chaloupka, George Jackeli, Giniyat Khaliullin

Published Jul 9, 2010• 1,055 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We derive and study a spin one-half Hamiltonian on a honeycomb lattice describing the exchange interactions between Ir4+ ions in a family of layered iridates A2IrO3 (A=Li,Na). Depending on the microscopic parameters, the Hamiltonian interpolates between the Heisenberg and exactly solvable Kitaev models. Exact diagonalization and a complementary spin-wave analysis reveal the presence of an extended spin-liquid phase near the Kitaev limit and a conventional Néel state close to the Heisenberg limit. The two phases are separated by an unusual stripy antiferromagnetic state, which is the exact ground state of the model at the midpoint between two limits.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.105.027204

Related papers

Symmetric spin-orbital-Hubbard model on honeycomb lattice: An origin of Kitaev model and beyond

Yue Yu, Shaojing Qin

We study a spin model on honeycomb lattice with two types of Heisenberg exchange couplings, $J$ and $\tilde J$, where $J$ is for the conventional spin and and $\tilde J$ for rotated spin. When $\tilde J=0$, this is the conventional Heisenberg model. When J=0, the system is either in a stripy antiferromagnetic order($\tilde J 0$, antiferromagnetic for rotated spin). The competition between two ferromagnetic orders or two antiferromagnetic orders induces Kitaev's spin liquid phase characterized by the exactly solvable Kitaev model ($J=\tilde J$). Our model can be applied to layered Mott insulators A$_2$IrO$_3$ (A=Li, Na). For a monolayer of Li$_2$IrO$_3$, we show that it is possible to tune the controlling parameter into the Kitaev spin liquid regime by a link-dependent Rashba spin-orbital coupling.

•Feb 8, 2012•0 citations

Tuning into the Kitaev spin liquid phase from a new perspective in Li$_2$IrO$_3$

Yue Yu, Long Liang, Qian Niu +1 more

We study a spin model on honeycomb lattice with two types of Heisenberg exchange couplings, $J$ and $\tilde J$, where $J$ is for the conventional spin and and $\tilde J$ for rotated spin. When $\tilde J=0$, this is the conventional Heisenberg model. When J=0, the system is either in a stripy antiferromagnetic order($\tilde J 0$, antiferromagnetic for rotated spin). The competition between two ferromagnetic orders or two antiferromagnetic orders induces Kitaev's spin liquid phase characterized by the exactly solvable Kitaev model ($J=\tilde J$). Our model can be applied to layered Mott insulators A$_2$IrO$_3$ (A=Li, Na). For a monolayer of Li$_2$IrO$_3$, we show that it is possible to tune the controlling parameter into the Kitaev spin liquid regime by a link-dependent Rashba spin-orbital coupling.

•Feb 8, 2012•0 citations

Tuning into the Kitaev spin liquid phase: A spin model on the honeycomb lattice with two types of Heisenberg exchange couplings

Yue Yu, Long Liang, Qian Niu +1 more

We study a spin model on honeycomb lattice with two types of Heisenberg exchange couplings, $J$ and $\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}$, where $J$ is for the conventional spin and $\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}$ is for rotated spin. When $J=0$, the system is either in a stripy antiferromagnetic order ($\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}<0$, ferromagnetic for rotated spin) or a zigzag antiferromagnetic order ($\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}>0$, antiferromagnetic for rotated spin). The competition between two ferromagnetic orders or between two antiferromagnetic orders induces Kitaev's spin liquid phase, characterized by the exactly solvable Kitaev model ($J=\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}$). Our model can be applied to layered Mott insulators $A$${}_{2}$IrO${}_{3}$ ($A=\text{Li}$, Na). For a monolayer of Li${}_{2}$IrO${}_{3}$, we show that it is possible to tune the controlling parameter into the Kitaev spin liquid regime by a link-dependent Rashba spin-orbital coupling.

arXiv:1202.1610•Physical Review B•Jan 29, 2013•14 citations

Kitaev-like honeycomb magnets: Global phase behavior and emergent effective models

Juraj Rusnačko, Dorota Gotfryd, Jiří Chaloupka

Compounds of transition metal ions with strong spin-orbit coupling recently attracted attention due to the possibility to host frustrated bond-dependent anisotropic magnetic interactions. In general, such interactions lead to complex phase diagrams that may include exotic phases, e.g., the Kitaev spin liquid. Here we report on our comprehensive analysis of the global phase diagram of the extended Kitaev-Heisenberg model relevant to honeycomb lattice compounds ${\mathrm{Na}}_{2}{\mathrm{IrO}}_{3}$ and $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{-}{\mathrm{RuCl}}_{3}$. We have utilized recently developed method based on spin coherent states that enabled us to resolve arbitrary spin patterns in the cluster ground states obtained by exact diagonalization. Global trends in the phase diagram are understood in combination with the analytical mappings of the Hamiltonian that uncover peculiar links to known models---Heisenberg, Ising, Kitaev, or compass models on the honeycomb lattice---or reveal entire manifolds of exact fluctuation-free ground states. Finally, our study can serve as a methodological example that can be applied to other spin models with complex bond-dependent non-Heisenberg interactions.

arXiv:1902.07451•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Feb 19, 2019•55 citations

Ground state phase diagram of the Kitaev-Heisenberg model on a honeycomb-triangular lattice

Masanori Kishimoto, Katsuhiro Morita, Yukihiro Matsubayashi +3 more

The Kitaev-Heisenberg model defined on both honeycomb and triangular lattices has been studied intensively in recent years as a possible model to describe spin-orbital physics in iridium oxides. In the model, there are many phases characteristic for each lattice. However, there is no study of how the phases in the two lattices merge with each other when geometry changes from the honeycomb lattice to triangular lattice. We investigate the ground state of the Kitaev-Heisenberg model defined on the system connecting the honeycomb and triangular lattices, named a honeycomb-triangular lattice. We obtain a ground state phase diagram of this model with classical spins by using the Luttinger-Tisza method and classical Monte Carlo simulation. In addition to known phases in the honeycomb and triangular lattices, we find coexisting phases consisting of the known phases. From the exact diagonalization and density-matrix renormalization-group calculations for the model with quantum spins, we find phases similar to the classical results, implying a small effect of quantum fluctuation on the phase diagram.

arXiv:1804.06080•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Aug 10, 2018•15 citations

Phase diagram and spin correlations of the Kitaev-Heisenberg model: Importance of quantum effects

Dorota Gotfryd, Juraj Rusnačko, Krzysztof Wohlfeld +3 more

We explore the phase diagram of the Kitaev-Heisenberg model with nearest neighbor interactions on the honeycomb lattice using the exact diagonalization of finite systems combined with the cluster mean field approximation, and supplemented by the insights from analytic approaches: the linear spin-wave and second-order perturbation theories. This study confirms that by varying the balance between the Heisenberg and Kitaev term, frustrated exchange interactions stabilize in this model either one of four phases with magnetic long range order: N\'eel phase, ferromagnetic phase, and two other phases with coexisting antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic bonds, zigzag and stripy phase, or one of two distinct spin-liquid phases. Out of these latter disordered phases, the one with ferromagnetic Kitaev interactions has a substantially broader range of stability as the neighboring competing ordered phases, ferromagnetic and stripy, have very weak quantum fluctuations. Focusing on the quantum spin-liquid phases, we study spatial spin correlations and dynamic spin structure factor of the model by the exact diagonalization technique, and discuss the evolution of gapped low-energy spin response across the quantum phase transitions between the disordered spin liquid and phases with long range magnetic order.

arXiv:1608.05333•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jan 23, 2017•75 citations
We derive and study a spin one-half Hamiltonian on a honeycomb lattice describing the exchange interactions between Ir4+ ions in a family of layered iridates A2IrO3 (A=Li,Na). Depending on the microscopic parameters, the Hamiltonian interpolates between the Heisenberg and exactly solvable Kitaev models. Exact diagonalization and a complementary spin-wave analysis reveal the presence of an extended spin-liquid phase near the Kitaev limit and a conventional Néel state close to the Heisenberg limit. The two phases are separated by an unusual stripy antiferromagnetic state, which is the exact ground state of the model at the midpoint between two limits.
We study a spin model on honeycomb lattice with two types of Heisenberg exchange couplings, JJJ and J~\tilde JJ~, where JJJ is for the conventional spin and and J~\tilde JJ~ for rotated spin. When J~=0\tilde J=0J~=0, this is the conventional Heisenberg model. When J=0, the system is either in a stripy antiferromagnetic order(J~0\tilde J 0J~0, antiferromagnetic for rotated spin). The competition between two ferromagnetic orders or two antiferromagnetic orders induces Kitaev's spin liquid phase characterized by the exactly solvable Kitaev model (J=J~J=\tilde JJ=J~). Our model can be applied to layered Mott insulators A2_22​IrO3_33​ (A=Li, Na). For a monolayer of Li2_22​IrO3_33​, we show that it is possible to tune the controlling parameter into the Kitaev spin liquid regime by a link-dependent Rashba spin-orbital coupling.
Tuning into the Kitaev spin liquid phase from a new perspective in Li2_22​IrO3_33​
We study a spin model on honeycomb lattice with two types of Heisenberg exchange couplings, JJJ and J~\tilde JJ~, where JJJ is for the conventional spin and and J~\tilde JJ~ for rotated spin. When J~=0\tilde J=0J~=0, this is the conventional Heisenberg model. When J=0, the system is either in a stripy antiferromagnetic order(J~0\tilde J 0J~0, antiferromagnetic for rotated spin). The competition between two ferromagnetic orders or two antiferromagnetic orders induces Kitaev's spin liquid phase characterized by the exactly solvable Kitaev model (J=J~J=\tilde JJ=J~). Our model can be applied to layered Mott insulators A2_22​IrO3_33​ (A=Li, Na). For a monolayer of Li2_22​IrO3_33​, we show that it is possible to tune the controlling parameter into the Kitaev spin liquid regime by a link-dependent Rashba spin-orbital coupling.
We study a spin model on honeycomb lattice with two types of Heisenberg exchange couplings, JJJ and $\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}$, where JJJ is for the conventional spin and $\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}$ is for rotated spin. When J=0J=0J=0, the system is either in a stripy antiferromagnetic order ($\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}<0$, ferromagnetic for rotated spin) or a zigzag antiferromagnetic order ($\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}>0$, antiferromagnetic for rotated spin). The competition between two ferromagnetic orders or between two antiferromagnetic orders induces Kitaev's spin liquid phase, characterized by the exactly solvable Kitaev model ($J=\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}$). Our model can be applied to layered Mott insulators AAA2{}_{2}2​IrO3{}_{3}3​ (A=LiA=\text{Li}A=Li, Na). For a monolayer of Li2{}_{2}2​IrO3{}_{3}3​, we show that it is possible to tune the controlling parameter into the Kitaev spin liquid regime by a link-dependent Rashba spin-orbital coupling.
Compounds of transition metal ions with strong spin-orbit coupling recently attracted attention due to the possibility to host frustrated bond-dependent anisotropic magnetic interactions. In general, such interactions lead to complex phase diagrams that may include exotic phases, e.g., the Kitaev spin liquid. Here we report on our comprehensive analysis of the global phase diagram of the extended Kitaev-Heisenberg model relevant to honeycomb lattice compounds Na2IrO3{\mathrm{Na}}_{2}{\mathrm{IrO}}_{3}Na2​IrO3​ and $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{-}{\mathrm{RuCl}}_{3}$. We have utilized recently developed method based on spin coherent states that enabled us to resolve arbitrary spin patterns in the cluster ground states obtained by exact diagonalization. Global trends in the phase diagram are understood in combination with the analytical mappings of the Hamiltonian that uncover peculiar links to known models---Heisenberg, Ising, Kitaev, or compass models on the honeycomb lattice---or reveal entire manifolds of exact fluctuation-free ground states. Finally, our study can serve as a methodological example that can be applied to other spin models with complex bond-dependent non-Heisenberg interactions.
The Kitaev-Heisenberg model defined on both honeycomb and triangular lattices has been studied intensively in recent years as a possible model to describe spin-orbital physics in iridium oxides. In the model, there are many phases characteristic for each lattice. However, there is no study of how the phases in the two lattices merge with each other when geometry changes from the honeycomb lattice to triangular lattice. We investigate the ground state of the Kitaev-Heisenberg model defined on the system connecting the honeycomb and triangular lattices, named a honeycomb-triangular lattice. We obtain a ground state phase diagram of this model with classical spins by using the Luttinger-Tisza method and classical Monte Carlo simulation. In addition to known phases in the honeycomb and triangular lattices, we find coexisting phases consisting of the known phases. From the exact diagonalization and density-matrix renormalization-group calculations for the model with quantum spins, we find phases similar to the classical results, implying a small effect of quantum fluctuation on the phase diagram.
We explore the phase diagram of the Kitaev-Heisenberg model with nearest neighbor interactions on the honeycomb lattice using the exact diagonalization of finite systems combined with the cluster mean field approximation, and supplemented by the insights from analytic approaches: the linear spin-wave and second-order perturbation theories. This study confirms that by varying the balance between the Heisenberg and Kitaev term, frustrated exchange interactions stabilize in this model either one of four phases with magnetic long range order: N\'eel phase, ferromagnetic phase, and two other phases with coexisting antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic bonds, zigzag and stripy phase, or one of two distinct spin-liquid phases. Out of these latter disordered phases, the one with ferromagnetic Kitaev interactions has a substantially broader range of stability as the neighboring competing ordered phases, ferromagnetic and stripy, have very weak quantum fluctuations. Focusing on the quantum spin-liquid phases, we study spatial spin correlations and dynamic spin structure factor of the model by the exact diagonalization technique, and discuss the evolution of gapped low-energy spin response across the quantum phase transitions between the disordered spin liquid and phases with long range magnetic order.