Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1002.3732

Reply to the Comments by B. Farid and A.M. Tsvelik, arXiv:0909.2886v1, and B. Farid, arXiv:0909.2887v1

J. Kokalj, Peter Prelovšek

Published Feb 19, 2010• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In the recent preprints the authors claim that conclusions on the violation of the Luttinger sum rule (LSR) as put forward in published papers by the present authors are false or at least not conclusive enough. It concerns the validity of the LSR within the Mott-Hubbard insulator as manifested in the 1D model of spinless fermions, and the Hubbard model on a triangular lattice. We show below that arguments against the presented analysis are rather easily rejected while still the general question of the validity and breakdown of the LSR remains to be answered.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1002.3732

Related papers

Comment on "Violation of the Luttinger sum rule within the Hubbard model on a triangular lattice", by J. Kokalj and P. Prelovsek [Eur. Phys. J. B 63, 431 (2008), arXiv:arXiv:0709.0263]

Behnam Farid

Using the first-order series expansion of the function G(k;mu), in powers of mu' = mu - U/2, pertaining to the insulating ground state of a single-band Hubbard Hamiltonian at half-filling, Kokalj and Prelovsek have in a recent paper [Eur. Phys. J. B 63, 431 (2008), arXiv:arXiv:0709.0263] reported breakdown of the Luttinger theorem for the specific case where the lattice on which the Hubbard Hamiltonian is defined is a two-dimensional triangular lattice, for which the ground state is not invariant under particle-hole transformation. Here G(k;mu) is the single-particle Green function G(k;e) evaluated at e = mu, the zero-temperature limit of the chemical potential corresponding to half-filling, and U the on-site interaction energy. In this Comment we demonstrate that unless mu' = 0 (to be strictly distinguished from mu' small but non-vanishing), any finite-order series expansion for G(k;mu) in powers of mu' in general falsely signals breakdown of the Luttinger theorem. The violation of this theorem as asserted by Kokalj and Prelovsek is therefore an artifact of their first-order calculation.

arXiv:0909.2887•Sep 16, 2009•0 citations

Comment on "Breakdown of the Luttinger sum rule within the Mott-Hubbard insulator", by J. Kokalj and P. Prelovsek [Phys. Rev. B 78, 153103 (2008), arXiv:arXiv:0803.4468]

Behnam Farid, Alexei M. Tsvelik

On the basis of an analysis of the numerical results corresponding to the half-filled 1D t-t'-V model on some finite lattices, Kokalj and Prelovsek (KP) have in a recent paper [Phys. Rev. B 78, 153103 (2008), arXiv:arXiv:0803.4468] concluded that the Luttinger theorem (LT) does not apply for the Mott-Hubbard (MH) insulating phase of this model (i.e. for V >> t) in the thermodynamic limit; KP even suggested, incorrectly, that failure of the LT were apparent for a half-filled finite system consisting of N=26 lattice sites. By employing a simple model for the self-energy Sigma of a MH state, we show that the finite-size-scaling approach of the type utilised by KP is not reliable for the system sizes considered by KP. On the basis of the equivalence of the model under consideration (at half-filling and for t'/t << 1) and the XXZ spin-chain Hamiltonian for SU(2) spins, we further show that for V > V_c(t,t') the system under consideration has a charge-density-wave (CDW) ground state (GS) in the thermodynamic limit, corresponding to a doubling of the unit cell in comparison with that specific to the underlying lattice. Although this GS is also insulating, its spectral gap is due to the broken translational symmetry of the GS; it is not a correlation-induced MH gap. The LT is therefore a priori valid for this GS. This fact establishes that the conclusion by KP is indeed erroneous. Finally, we present a heuristic argument due to Volovik that sheds light on the mechanism underlying the robustness of the LT. In an appendix, we present the details of the calculation of the single-particle Green function of the broken-symmetry GS of the model under consideration by means of bosonization and in terms of the form factors of a class of soliton-generating fields pertaining to the quantum sine-Gordon Hamiltonian. [Shortened abstract]

arXiv:0909.2886•Sep 16, 2009•1 citation

Comment on `On the Luttinger theorem concerning the number of particles in the ground states of systems of interacting fermions', arXiv:0711.0952v1, by B. Farid

Achim Rosch

In his preprint, arXiv:0711.0952v1, Behnam Farid argues that the Luttinger theorem is valid not only for a metal but also for a Mott insulator if the chemical potential is calculated by taking the limit of vanishing temperature at fixed particle density. In contrast, we have found in our recent paper (Eur. Phys. J. B 59, 495 (2007) or arXiv:cond-mat/0602656) on the basis of a controlled strong coupling expansion that the Luttinger theorem is violated in this limit for a particle-hole asymmetric two-band Mott insulator. In an extensive discussion of our result Farid argues that an arbitrarily weak breaking of particle-hole symmetry leads to a destruction of the Mott insulating state at half filling. In this comment we point out that this is not correct.

arXiv:0711.3093•Nov 20, 2007•0 citations

Violation of the Luttinger sum rule within the Hubbard model on a triangular lattice

J. Kokalj, Peter Prelovšek

arXiv:0709.0263•The European Physical Journal B•Jun 1, 2008•8 citations

Breakdown of the Luttinger sum rule within the Mott-Hubbard insulator

J. Kokalj, Peter Prelovšek

The validity of the Luttinger sum rule is investigated within the prototype tight-binding model of interacting fermions in one dimension, i.e., the $t\text{\ensuremath{-}}V$ model including the next-nearest-neighbor hopping ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$, in order to break the particle-hole symmetry. Scaling analysis of finite-system results at half filling reveals evident breakdown of the sum rule in the large gap regime at $V⪢t$ while the sum rule appears to recover together with vanishing of the Mott-Hubbard gap.

arXiv:0803.4468•Physical Review B•Oct 9, 2008•10 citations

Reply to ``Comment on `On the Luttinger theorem concerning number of particles in the ground states of systems of interacting fermions','' arXiv:0711.3093v1, by A. Rosch

Behnam Farid

We reply to the Comment by Achim Rosch [1] (arXiv:0711.3093v1) who challenges our finding in Ref. [2] (arXiv:0711.0952v1) with regard to the validity of the Luttinger theorem in the cases of Mott insulating N-particle ground states (even) when the chemical potential used in applying this theorem coincides with the zero-temperature limit of the chemical potential satisfying the equation of state corresponding to N particles. Rosch further argues that the strong-coupling expression for the single-particle Green function presented in Ref. [3] (arXiv:cond-mat/0602656v2) and analyzed in Ref. [2] does not imply destruction of the Mott insulating state at half-filling as a result of an arbitrary weak hopping contribution that breaks particle-hole symmetry and therefore suggests that our conclusion in Ref. [2] to the contrary were incorrect. Here we show the shortcomings of Rosch's arguments.

arXiv:0711.3195•Nov 20, 2007•0 citations
In the recent preprints the authors claim that conclusions on the violation of the Luttinger sum rule (LSR) as put forward in published papers by the present authors are false or at least not conclusive enough. It concerns the validity of the LSR within the Mott-Hubbard insulator as manifested in the 1D model of spinless fermions, and the Hubbard model on a triangular lattice. We show below that arguments against the presented analysis are rather easily rejected while still the general question of the validity and breakdown of the LSR remains to be answered.
Using the first-order series expansion of the function G(k;mu), in powers of mu' = mu - U/2, pertaining to the insulating ground state of a single-band Hubbard Hamiltonian at half-filling, Kokalj and Prelovsek have in a recent paper [Eur. Phys. J. B 63, 431 (2008), arXiv:arXiv:0709.0263] reported breakdown of the Luttinger theorem for the specific case where the lattice on which the Hubbard Hamiltonian is defined is a two-dimensional triangular lattice, for which the ground state is not invariant under particle-hole transformation. Here G(k;mu) is the single-particle Green function G(k;e) evaluated at e = mu, the zero-temperature limit of the chemical potential corresponding to half-filling, and U the on-site interaction energy. In this Comment we demonstrate that unless mu' = 0 (to be strictly distinguished from mu' small but non-vanishing), any finite-order series expansion for G(k;mu) in powers of mu' in general falsely signals breakdown of the Luttinger theorem. The violation of this theorem as asserted by Kokalj and Prelovsek is therefore an artifact of their first-order calculation.
On the basis of an analysis of the numerical results corresponding to the half-filled 1D t-t'-V model on some finite lattices, Kokalj and Prelovsek (KP) have in a recent paper [Phys. Rev. B 78, 153103 (2008), arXiv:arXiv:0803.4468] concluded that the Luttinger theorem (LT) does not apply for the Mott-Hubbard (MH) insulating phase of this model (i.e. for V >> t) in the thermodynamic limit; KP even suggested, incorrectly, that failure of the LT were apparent for a half-filled finite system consisting of N=26 lattice sites. By employing a simple model for the self-energy Sigma of a MH state, we show that the finite-size-scaling approach of the type utilised by KP is not reliable for the system sizes considered by KP. On the basis of the equivalence of the model under consideration (at half-filling and for t'/t << 1) and the XXZ spin-chain Hamiltonian for SU(2) spins, we further show that for V > V_c(t,t') the system under consideration has a charge-density-wave (CDW) ground state (GS) in the thermodynamic limit, corresponding to a doubling of the unit cell in comparison with that specific to the underlying lattice. Although this GS is also insulating, its spectral gap is due to the broken translational symmetry of the GS; it is not a correlation-induced MH gap. The LT is therefore a priori valid for this GS. This fact establishes that the conclusion by KP is indeed erroneous. Finally, we present a heuristic argument due to Volovik that sheds light on the mechanism underlying the robustness of the LT. In an appendix, we present the details of the calculation of the single-particle Green function of the broken-symmetry GS of the model under consideration by means of bosonization and in terms of the form factors of a class of soliton-generating fields pertaining to the quantum sine-Gordon Hamiltonian. [Shortened abstract]
In his preprint, arXiv:0711.0952v1, Behnam Farid argues that the Luttinger theorem is valid not only for a metal but also for a Mott insulator if the chemical potential is calculated by taking the limit of vanishing temperature at fixed particle density. In contrast, we have found in our recent paper (Eur. Phys. J. B 59, 495 (2007) or arXiv:cond-mat/0602656) on the basis of a controlled strong coupling expansion that the Luttinger theorem is violated in this limit for a particle-hole asymmetric two-band Mott insulator. In an extensive discussion of our result Farid argues that an arbitrarily weak breaking of particle-hole symmetry leads to a destruction of the Mott insulating state at half filling. In this comment we point out that this is not correct.
The validity of the Luttinger sum rule is investigated within the prototype tight-binding model of interacting fermions in one dimension, i.e., the $t\text{\ensuremath{-}}V$ model including the next-nearest-neighbor hopping ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$, in order to break the particle-hole symmetry. Scaling analysis of finite-system results at half filling reveals evident breakdown of the sum rule in the large gap regime at V⪢tV⪢tV⪢t while the sum rule appears to recover together with vanishing of the Mott-Hubbard gap.
We reply to the Comment by Achim Rosch [1] (arXiv:0711.3093v1) who challenges our finding in Ref. [2] (arXiv:0711.0952v1) with regard to the validity of the Luttinger theorem in the cases of Mott insulating N-particle ground states (even) when the chemical potential used in applying this theorem coincides with the zero-temperature limit of the chemical potential satisfying the equation of state corresponding to N particles. Rosch further argues that the strong-coupling expression for the single-particle Green function presented in Ref. [3] (arXiv:cond-mat/0602656v2) and analyzed in Ref. [2] does not imply destruction of the Mott insulating state at half-filling as a result of an arbitrary weak hopping contribution that breaks particle-hole symmetry and therefore suggests that our conclusion in Ref. [2] to the contrary were incorrect. Here we show the shortcomings of Rosch's arguments.