Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1002.2436 · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Leftover Hashing Against Quantum Side Information

Marco Tomamichel, Christian Schaffner, Adam Smith, Renato Renner

Published Aug 1, 2011• 303 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The Leftover Hash Lemma states that the output of a two-universal hash function applied to an input with sufficiently high entropy is almost uniformly random. In its standard formulation, the lemma refers to a notion of randomness that is (usually implicitly) defined with respect to classical side information. Here, a strictly more general version of the Leftover Hash Lemma that is valid even if side information is represented by the state of a quantum system is shown. Our result applies to almost two-universal families of hash functions. The generalized Leftover Hash Lemma has applications in cryptography, e.g., for key agreement in the presence of an adversary who is not restricted to classical information processing.

DOI
10.1109/tit.2011.2158473

Related papers

Leftover Hashing against quantum side information

Marco Tomamichel, Renato Renner, Christian Schaffner +1 more

The Leftover Hash Lemma states that the output of a two-universal hash function applied to an input with sufficiently high entropy is almost uniformly random. In its standard formulation, the lemma refers to a notion of randomness that is (usually implicitly) defined with respect to classical side information. Here, we prove a (strictly) more general version of the Leftover Hash Lemma that is valid even if side information is represented by the state of a quantum system. Furthermore, our result applies to arbitrary δ-almost two-universal families of hash functions. The generalized Leftover Hash Lemma has applications in cryptography, e.g., for key agreement in the presence of an adversary who is not restricted to classical information processing.

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Jun 1, 2010•38 citations

Extracting classical randomness in a quantum world

Renato Renner

Extractors are functions that transform a weakly random value X into an almost perfectly uniform value Z. Traditionally, extractors have been studied in a context where the side information, relative to which the distributions of X and Z are defined, is purely classical. Only recently, the notion of extractors has been generalized to scenarios where side information might be represented by the state of a quantum-mechanical system (while X and Z are still classical). This generalization is crucial for numerous applications, e.g., in cryptography, where an adversary might hold quantum-mechanical side information. In this article, we review this generalized notion of extractors as well as a construction of extractors based on two-universal hashing.

IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW)•May 1, 2008•1 citation

Dual Universality of Hash Functions and Its Applications to Quantum Cryptography

Toyohiro Tsurumaru, M. Hayashi

In this paper, we introduce the concept of dual universality of hash functions and present its applications to quantum cryptography. We begin by establishing the one-to-one correspondence between a linear function familyFand a code familyC, and thereby defining ε-almost dual universal2hash functions, as a generalization of the conventional universal2hash functions. Then, we show that this generalized (and thus broader) class of hash functions is in fact sufficient for the security of quantum cryptography. This result can be explained in two different formalisms. First, by noting its relation to the δ-biased family introduced by Dodis and Smith, we demonstrate that Renner's two-universal hashing lemma is generalized to our class of hash functions. Next, we prove that the proof technique by Shor and Preskill can be applied to quantum key distribution (QKD) systems that use our generalized class of hash functions for privacy amplification. While Shor-Preskill formalism requires an implementer of a QKD system to explicitly construct a linear code of the Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) type, this result removes the existing difficulty of the construction of a linear code of CSS code by replacing it by the combination of an ordinary classical error correcting code and our proposed hash function. We also show that a similar result applies to the quantum wire-tap channel. Finally, we compare our results in the two formalisms and show that, in typical QKD scenarios, the Shor-Preskill-type argument gives better security bounds in terms of the trace distance and Holevo information than the method based on the δ-biased family.

arXiv:1101.0064•IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Apr 2, 2013•55 citations

Sharp lower bounds on the extractable randomness from non-uniform sources

Boris Škorić, Chibuzo Obi, Evgeny A. Verbitskiy +1 more

Extraction of uniform randomness from (noisy) non-uniform sources is an important primitive in many security applications, e.g. (pseudo-)random number generators, privacy-preserving biometrics, and key storage based on Physical Unclonable Functions. Generic extraction methods exist, using universal hash functions. There is a trade-off between the length of the extracted bit string and the uniformity of the string. In the literature there are proven lower bounds on this length as a function of the desired uniformity. The best known bound involves a quantity known as smooth min-entropy. Unfortunately, there exist at least three definitions of smooth entropy. In this paper we compare three of these definitions, and we derive improved lower bounds on the extractable randomness.\nWe also investigate the use of almost universal hash functions, which are slightly worse at extracting randomness than universal hash functions, but are preferable in practice because they require far less resources in devices. We show that using them has negligible effect on the extractable randomness.\nKeywords: Leftover Hash Lemma; Universal hash function; Randomness extraction

•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

Generalised entropy accumulation

Tony Metger, Omar Fawzi, David Sutter +1 more

The min-entropy of a quantum system A conditioned on another quantum system E describes how much randomness can be extracted from A with respect to an adversary in possession of E. This quantity plays a crucial role in quantum cryptography: the security proofs of many quantum cryptographic protocols reduce to showing a lower bound on such a min-entropy. Here, we develop a new tool, called generalised entropy accumulation, for computing such bounds. Concretely, we consider a sequential process in which each step outputs a system Aiand updates a side information register E. We prove that if this process satisfies a natural “non-signalling” condition between past outputs and future side information, the min-entropy of the outputs $A_{1},\ldots,\ A_{n}$ conditioned on the side information E at the end of the process can be bounded from below by a sum of von Neumann entropies associated with the individual steps. This is a generalisation of the entropy accumulation theorem (EAT) [1], which deals with a more restrictive model of side information: there, past side information cannot be updated in subsequent rounds, and newly generated side information has to satisfy a Markov condition.Due to its more general model of side-information, our generalised EAT can be applied more easily and to a broader range of cryptographic protocols. In particular, it is the first general tool that is applicable to mistrustful device-independent cryptography. To demonstrate this, we give the first security proof for blind randomness expansion [2] against general adversaries. Furthermore, our generalised EAT can be used to give improved security proofs for quantum key distribution [3], and also has applications beyond quantum cryptography.

Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Oct 1, 2022•35 citations

Leftover Hashing From Quantum Error Correction: Unifying the Two Approaches to the Security Proof of Quantum Key Distribution

Toyohiro Tsurumaru

We show that the Mayers-Shor-Preskill approach and Renner's approach to proving the security of quantum key distribution (QKD) are essentially the same. We begin our analysis by considering a special case of QKD called privacy amplification (PA). PA itself is an important building block of cryptography, both classical and quantum. The standard theoretical tool used for its security proof is called the leftover hashing lemma (LHL). We present a direct connection between the LHL and the coding theorem of a certain quantum error correction code. Then we apply this result to proving the equivalence between the two approaches to proving the security of QKD.

arXiv:1809.05479•IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Jan 27, 2020•19 citations
The Leftover Hash Lemma states that the output of a two-universal hash function applied to an input with sufficiently high entropy is almost uniformly random. In its standard formulation, the lemma refers to a notion of randomness that is (usually implicitly) defined with respect to classical side information. Here, a strictly more general version of the Leftover Hash Lemma that is valid even if side information is represented by the state of a quantum system is shown. Our result applies to almost two-universal families of hash functions. The generalized Leftover Hash Lemma has applications in cryptography, e.g., for key agreement in the presence of an adversary who is not restricted to classical information processing.
The Leftover Hash Lemma states that the output of a two-universal hash function applied to an input with sufficiently high entropy is almost uniformly random. In its standard formulation, the lemma refers to a notion of randomness that is (usually implicitly) defined with respect to classical side information. Here, we prove a (strictly) more general version of the Leftover Hash Lemma that is valid even if side information is represented by the state of a quantum system. Furthermore, our result applies to arbitrary δ-almost two-universal families of hash functions. The generalized Leftover Hash Lemma has applications in cryptography, e.g., for key agreement in the presence of an adversary who is not restricted to classical information processing.
Extractors are functions that transform a weakly random value X into an almost perfectly uniform value Z. Traditionally, extractors have been studied in a context where the side information, relative to which the distributions of X and Z are defined, is purely classical. Only recently, the notion of extractors has been generalized to scenarios where side information might be represented by the state of a quantum-mechanical system (while X and Z are still classical). This generalization is crucial for numerous applications, e.g., in cryptography, where an adversary might hold quantum-mechanical side information. In this article, we review this generalized notion of extractors as well as a construction of extractors based on two-universal hashing.
In this paper, we introduce the concept of dual universality of hash functions and present its applications to quantum cryptography. We begin by establishing the one-to-one correspondence between a linear function familyFand a code familyC, and thereby defining ε-almost dual universal2hash functions, as a generalization of the conventional universal2hash functions. Then, we show that this generalized (and thus broader) class of hash functions is in fact sufficient for the security of quantum cryptography. This result can be explained in two different formalisms. First, by noting its relation to the δ-biased family introduced by Dodis and Smith, we demonstrate that Renner's two-universal hashing lemma is generalized to our class of hash functions. Next, we prove that the proof technique by Shor and Preskill can be applied to quantum key distribution (QKD) systems that use our generalized class of hash functions for privacy amplification. While Shor-Preskill formalism requires an implementer of a QKD system to explicitly construct a linear code of the Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) type, this result removes the existing difficulty of the construction of a linear code of CSS code by replacing it by the combination of an ordinary classical error correcting code and our proposed hash function. We also show that a similar result applies to the quantum wire-tap channel. Finally, we compare our results in the two formalisms and show that, in typical QKD scenarios, the Shor-Preskill-type argument gives better security bounds in terms of the trace distance and Holevo information than the method based on the δ-biased family.
Extraction of uniform randomness from (noisy) non-uniform sources is an important primitive in many security applications, e.g. (pseudo-)random number generators, privacy-preserving biometrics, and key storage based on Physical Unclonable Functions. Generic extraction methods exist, using universal hash functions. There is a trade-off between the length of the extracted bit string and the uniformity of the string. In the literature there are proven lower bounds on this length as a function of the desired uniformity. The best known bound involves a quantity known as smooth min-entropy. Unfortunately, there exist at least three definitions of smooth entropy. In this paper we compare three of these definitions, and we derive improved lower bounds on the extractable randomness.\nWe also investigate the use of almost universal hash functions, which are slightly worse at extracting randomness than universal hash functions, but are preferable in practice because they require far less resources in devices. We show that using them has negligible effect on the extractable randomness.\nKeywords: Leftover Hash Lemma; Universal hash function; Randomness extraction
The min-entropy of a quantum system A conditioned on another quantum system E describes how much randomness can be extracted from A with respect to an adversary in possession of E. This quantity plays a crucial role in quantum cryptography: the security proofs of many quantum cryptographic protocols reduce to showing a lower bound on such a min-entropy. Here, we develop a new tool, called generalised entropy accumulation, for computing such bounds. Concretely, we consider a sequential process in which each step outputs a system Aiand updates a side information register E. We prove that if this process satisfies a natural “non-signalling” condition between past outputs and future side information, the min-entropy of the outputs A1,…, AnA_{1},\ldots,\ A_{n}A1​,…, An​ conditioned on the side information E at the end of the process can be bounded from below by a sum of von Neumann entropies associated with the individual steps. This is a generalisation of the entropy accumulation theorem (EAT) [1], which deals with a more restrictive model of side information: there, past side information cannot be updated in subsequent rounds, and newly generated side information has to satisfy a Markov condition.Due to its more general model of side-information, our generalised EAT can be applied more easily and to a broader range of cryptographic protocols. In particular, it is the first general tool that is applicable to mistrustful device-independent cryptography. To demonstrate this, we give the first security proof for blind randomness expansion [2] against general adversaries. Furthermore, our generalised EAT can be used to give improved security proofs for quantum key distribution [3], and also has applications beyond quantum cryptography.
We show that the Mayers-Shor-Preskill approach and Renner's approach to proving the security of quantum key distribution (QKD) are essentially the same. We begin our analysis by considering a special case of QKD called privacy amplification (PA). PA itself is an important building block of cryptography, both classical and quantum. The standard theoretical tool used for its security proof is called the leftover hashing lemma (LHL). We present a direct connection between the LHL and the coding theorem of a certain quantum error correction code. Then we apply this result to proving the equivalence between the two approaches to proving the security of QKD.