Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0912.2874 · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

Localization and the interface between quantum mechanics, quantum field theory and quantum gravity I

Bert Schroer

Published May 1, 2010• 23 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.03.003

Related papers

Localization and the interface between quantum mechanics, quantum field theory and quantum gravity dedicated to the memory of Rob Clifton submitted to "Studies in History and Philosophy of Physics"

Bert Schroer, Xavier Sigaud

•Jan 1, 2009•1 citation

A non-relativistic theory of quantum mechanics and gravity with local modulus symmetry

Tao Zhou

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

On Quantum Gravity and the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Lee Smolin

•Jan 1, 1984•6 citations

Quantum Gravity and the Interpretation of Quantum Theory

Claus Kiefer

Oxford University Press eBooks•Feb 22, 2007•0 citations

No Third Slot: A Local Entropy–Phase Closure of "Quantum Gravity" Within Standard Quantum Mechanics

Radu Necsanu

Within orthodox quantum mechanics, the only empirical content of any physical claim is a change in the outcome statistics of a declared measurement. In the modern formulation of measurement theory this declaration is an instrument (a family of completely positive maps) or equivalently a POVM together with an implementation. In curved spacetimes, localized measurement theory supplies the appropriate notion of a “local interface”: a finite laboratory worldtube with finite switching, whose induced observables lie in the causal hull and whose instruments compose causally. This paper proves a closure result: for any declared localized measurement, all geometric dependence (metric, connection, curvature, horizons) can affect outcome statistics only through exactly two operational apertures: • Phase / support aperture: the implemented localized instrument or channel on the accessible algebra, including any differential proper‑time or propagation‑dependent phase and any geometry‑dependent support of the induced observable. • Entropy aperture: the accessibility restriction itself (restriction of the global state to the accessible algebra), equivalently a trace over inaccessible degrees of freedom, with the corresponding mixedness/entropy as the interface invariant. There is no third independent slot in the quantum‑mechanical probability rule into which “quantum gravity” can be inserted. Common‑mode phases are operationally null. Sub‑resolution “micro‑selection” is inadmissible without a refined POVM/instrument. And “mediator” talk without a mediator POVM is non‑identifiable, because Stinespring dilations are never unique. The closure is robust: within finite‑response classes, small perturbations of couplings or geometry produce proportionally small changes in outcome statistics. The result does not deny the possibility of new physics beyond orthodox QM. It eliminates a specific move that has repeatedly appeared in quantum‑gravity discourse: treating curvature as an additional, independently specifiable ingredient of orthodox quantum‑mechanical prediction at a local interface.

•Feb 3, 2026•0 citations

Manifest non-locality in quantum mechanics, quantum field theory and quantum gravity

Laurent Freidel, Robert G. Leigh, Djordje Minić

Julian Schwinger Centennial Conference•Dec 1, 2019•1 citation
Within orthodox quantum mechanics, the only empirical content of any physical claim is a change in the outcome statistics of a declared measurement. In the modern formulation of measurement theory this declaration is an instrument (a family of completely positive maps) or equivalently a POVM together with an implementation. In curved spacetimes, localized measurement theory supplies the appropriate notion of a “local interface”: a finite laboratory worldtube with finite switching, whose induced observables lie in the causal hull and whose instruments compose causally. This paper proves a closure result: for any declared localized measurement, all geometric dependence (metric, connection, curvature, horizons) can affect outcome statistics only through exactly two operational apertures: • Phase / support aperture: the implemented localized instrument or channel on the accessible algebra, including any differential proper‑time or propagation‑dependent phase and any geometry‑dependent support of the induced observable. • Entropy aperture: the accessibility restriction itself (restriction of the global state to the accessible algebra), equivalently a trace over inaccessible degrees of freedom, with the corresponding mixedness/entropy as the interface invariant. There is no third independent slot in the quantum‑mechanical probability rule into which “quantum gravity” can be inserted. Common‑mode phases are operationally null. Sub‑resolution “micro‑selection” is inadmissible without a refined POVM/instrument. And “mediator” talk without a mediator POVM is non‑identifiable, because Stinespring dilations are never unique. The closure is robust: within finite‑response classes, small perturbations of couplings or geometry produce proportionally small changes in outcome statistics. The result does not deny the possibility of new physics beyond orthodox QM. It eliminates a specific move that has repeatedly appeared in quantum‑gravity discourse: treating curvature as an additional, independently specifiable ingredient of orthodox quantum‑mechanical prediction at a local interface.