We discuss the problem of finding the most favorable conditions for closing the detection loophole in a test of local realism with a Bell inequality. For a generic nonmaximally entangled two-qubit state and two incompatible bases to be adopted for alternative measurements of two observables $\mathrm{a\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}$ and $\mathrm{b\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}$ on each party, we apply Hardy's proof of nonlocality without inequality and derive an Eberhard-like inequality. For an infinity of nonmaximally entangled states we find that it is possible to refute local realism by requiring perfect detection efficiency for only one of the two observables, say $\mathrm{b\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}$, to be measured on each party: The test is free from the detection loophole for any value of the detection efficiency corresponding to the other observable $\mathrm{a\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}$. The maximum tolerable noise in such a loophole-free observable-asymmetric test is also evaluated.
We discuss the problem of finding the most favorable conditions for closing the detection loophole in a test of local realism with a Bell inequality. For a generic nonmaximally entangled two-qubit state and two incompatible bases to be adopted for alternative measurements of two observables a\ifmmode^\elseˆ\fi and b\ifmmode^\elseˆ\fi on each party, we apply Hardy's proof of nonlocality without inequality and derive an Eberhard-like inequality. For an infinity of nonmaximally entangled states we find that it is possible to refute local realism by requiring perfect detection efficiency for only one of the two observables, say b\ifmmode^\elseˆ\fi, to be measured on each party: The test is free from the detection loophole for any value of the detection efficiency corresponding to the other observable a\ifmmode^\elseˆ\fi. The maximum tolerable noise in such a loophole-free observable-asymmetric test is also evaluated.
We propose the use of entangled pairs of neutral kaons, considered as a promising tool to close the well known loopholes affecting generic Bell's inequality tests, in a specific Hardy-type experiment. Hardy's contradiction without inequalities between local realism and quantum mechanics can be translated into a feasible experiment by requiring ideal detection efficiencies for only one of the observables to be alternatively measured. Neutral kaons are near to fulfill this requirement and therefore to close the efficiency loophole.
Abstract Bell’s inequality provides a remarkable way to test the consistency between quantum mechanics and classic local realistic theory. However, experimental demonstrations of the loophole-free Bell test are challenging and only recently have been demonstrated with bipartite systems. A central obstacle for the photonic system is that the sampling efficiency, including the collection and detection efficiencies, must be above a certain threshold. We here generalize two-particle Eberhard’s inequality to the n-particle systems and derive a Bell-type inequality for multi-particle systems, which significantly relaxes this threshold. Furthermore, an experimental proposal to achieve a multi-partite Bell test without the fair sampling assumption is presented for the case of three particles. For any given value of the sampling efficiency, we give the optimal configurations for actual implementation, the optimal state, the maximum background noise that the system can tolerate, and the lowest fidelity of the quantum state. We believe our work can serve as a recipe for experimentalists planning to violate local realism using a multi-partite quantum state without the sampling loophole.
Let us imagine an experimentalist, who has maximally entangled photons and wants to violate Bell’s inequality in his laboratory. Among many obstacles he has to overcome, two of them are the most significant. Firstly, he has to avoid exchanging information about the measurement settings between the particles. Secondly, he has to detect particles with a high enough probability, because if the detection efficiency is too low, one can reproduce quantum correlations using a LHV (Local Hidden Variables) model. These two problems are known in the literature, respectively, as the locality loophole [1] and the detection loophole [2, 3]. Fortunately, it is possible to close the locality loophole using photons in the experiment [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. However, closing the detection loophole is still an object of study. The authors of [9] showed that for the CHSH inequality, the lower bound for detector efficiency needed to close the loophole is 82.8% for maximally entangled states. This bound was lowered to 66.7% by Eberhard [10]. Furthermore, the detector efficiency has been studied for other Bell inequalities [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. In our research, we are trying to answer the following question: If we prepare a Bell experiment and we have two detectors, having different efficiencies both smaller than 100%, which detector should each party receive? And also: Which representation of the chosen Bell inequality should we consider? These are very crucial questions, which arise in laboratories. Hence, we hope that our results will be useful for experimentalists. We focus on the I3322 inequality [17], which is a natural candidate for testing, because of its asymmetry [14, 18]. We consider the case of a post-selection strategy, which consists in rejecting all the rounds in the Bell experiment when one of the detectors does not click. We used numerical optimisation methods to find both the best classical strategy for Alice and Bob and the best detector clicking strategy. Thus, we have found minimal efficiencies of the detectors of Alice and Bob needed to violate I3322. We made the same studies also for symmetric representations of I3322 [19]. Our results show that the minimal efficiencies of Alice and Bob’s detectors of the asymmetric representation of I3322 is lower than in case of the symmetric one [20]. It is work in progress, and we are examining other post-selection methods as well as other Bell inequalities. We want to consider also the case when non-maximally entangled states are used in Bell experiments.
In Bell experiments, one problem is to achieve high enough photodetection to ensure that there is no possibility of describing the results via a local hidden-variable model. Using the Clauser-Horne inequality and a two-photon nonmaximally entangled state, a photodetection efficiency higher than 0.67 is necessary. Here we discuss atom-photon Bell experiments. We show that, assuming perfect detection efficiency of the atom, it is possible to perform a loophole-free atom-photon Bell experiment whenever the photodetection efficiency exceeds 0.50.
Loophole-free quantum nonlocality often demands experiments with high complexity (defined by all parties' settings and outcomes) and multiple efficient detectors. Here, we identify the fundamental efficiency and complexity thresholds for quantum steering using two-qubit entangled states. Remarkably, it requires only one photon detector on the untrusted side, with efficiency ε>1/X, where X≥2 is the number of settings on that side. This threshold applies to all pure entangled states, in contrast to analogous Bell-nonlocality tests, which require almost unentangled states to be loss-tolerant. We confirm these predictions in a minimal-complexity (X=2 for the untrusted party and a single three-outcome measurement for the trusted party), detection-loophole-free photonic experiment with $ε= (51.6 \pm 0.4)\% $.
Abstract Imperfect detection efficiency remains one of the major obstacles in achieving loophole-free Bell tests over long distances. At the same time, the challenge of establishing a common reference frame for measurements becomes more pronounced as the separation between parties increases. In this work, we tackle both of these issues by examining the impact of limited detection efficiency on the probability of Bell inequality violation with Haar random measurement settings. We derive analytical lower bounds on the violation probability for a two-qubit maximally entangled state, which is tight for correlation inequalities and perfect detection efficiencies. We further investigate it numerically for more qubits and settings using two detection efficiency models and an original method based on the linear programming. Beyond that, we show that the so-called typicality of Bell inequality violation, i.e. almost certain violation of local realism with sufficiently many particles or random measurement directions, holds even if the detection efficiency is limited. Our findings reveal that increasing the number of measurement settings can compensate for efficiency losses above the critical threshold. Additionally, we determine critical detection efficiencies for both two-party and three-party scenarios. For two parties, we recover previously established results, while for three parties, we derive a symmetric critical efficiency of η crit = 2 / 3 for the W and GHZ states within the binning model. In cases involving the no-detection outcome, we present a modified inequality using a pair of orthogonal observables for each party with η crit ≈ 0.7208 , which is notably less than 0.75 for the GHZ state. These results offer deeper insights into the limitations and possibilities for certifying non-locality in the presence of limited detection efficiency, shedding light on its robustness in practical Bell tests.