Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0911.4009

Remarks on the violation of Bell's inequality in Josephson phase qubits

Robert Alicki

Published Nov 20, 2009• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The consistency test and error estimation for the data concerning recently reported violation of Bell inequality for Josephson phase qubits are presented in details. It is pointed out that the deviation of the Bell signal from the classical limit might still be challenged.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0911.4009

Related papers

Recent progress towards violating the CHSH Bell inequality in Josephson phase qubits

M. Ansmann, Radoslaw C. Bialczak, M. Hofheinz +7 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 11, 2008•0 citations

Violation of Bell's inequality in Josephson phase qubits

M. Ansmann, H. Wang, Radoslaw C. Bialczak +9 more

Nature•Sep 1, 2009•440 citations

Benchmarking the superconducting Josephson Phase Qubit: The violation of Bell's inequality

M. Ansmann

•Jan 1, 2009•30 citations

Violation of Bell's Inequality using Josephson Phase Qubits

M. Ansmann, Radoslaw C. Bialczak, Nadav Y. Katz +7 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 15, 2006•0 citations

Attempt to Violate the CHSH Bell Inequality in Josephson Phase Qubits

M. Ansmann, Radoslaw C. Bialczak, Nadav Y. Katz +8 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 6, 2007•0 citations

Bell's inequality violations: relation with de Finetti's coherence principle and inferential analysis of experimental data

Franco Fagnola, Matteo Gregoratti

It is often believed that de Finetti's coherence principle naturally leads, in the finite case, to the Kolmogorov's probability theory of random phenomena, which then implies Bell's inequality.Thus, not only a violation of Bell's inequality looks paradoxical in the Kolmogorovian framework, but it should violate also de Finetti's coherence principle.Firstly, we show that this is not the case: the typical theoretical violations of Bell's inequality in quantum physics are in agreement with de Finetti's coherence principle.Secondly, we look for statistical evidence of such violations: we consider the experimental data of measurements of polarization of photons, performed to verify empirically violations of Bell's inequality, and, on the basis of the estimated violation, we test the null hypothesis of Kolmogorovianity for the observed phenomenon.By standard inferential techniques we compute the pvalue for the test and get a clear strong conclusion against the Kolmogorovian hypothesis.

Communications on Stochastic Analysis•Mar 1, 2012•1 citation
It is often believed that de Finetti's coherence principle naturally leads, in the finite case, to the Kolmogorov's probability theory of random phenomena, which then implies Bell's inequality.Thus, not only a violation of Bell's inequality looks paradoxical in the Kolmogorovian framework, but it should violate also de Finetti's coherence principle.Firstly, we show that this is not the case: the typical theoretical violations of Bell's inequality in quantum physics are in agreement with de Finetti's coherence principle.Secondly, we look for statistical evidence of such violations: we consider the experimental data of measurements of polarization of photons, performed to verify empirically violations of Bell's inequality, and, on the basis of the estimated violation, we test the null hypothesis of Kolmogorovianity for the observed phenomenon.By standard inferential techniques we compute the pvalue for the test and get a clear strong conclusion against the Kolmogorovian hypothesis.