Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0909.3783 · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

An Error Model for the Cirac-Zoller cnot Gate

Sara Felloni, G. Strini

Published Jan 1, 2010• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-11731-2_25

Related papers

An Error Model for the Cirac-Zoller Gate

Sara Felloni, G. Strini

Quantum Communication and Quantum Networking•Oct 11, 2012•0 citations

Realization of the Cirac–Zoller controlled-NOT quantum gate

Ferdinand Schmidt‐Kaler, Hartmut Häffner, Mark Riebe +7 more

Nature•Mar 1, 2003•892 citations

Ion Trap Quantum Computers Part 2: The Universal 2-Qubit-CNOT Gate

Bernd Baumann

The Cirac-Zoller mechanism is generally used for the implementation of CNOT gates in ion trap quantum computers. We present here a highly detailed quantum physical description of this approach. To keep the presentation simple, the qubits are modeled as rigid rotors and the radiation field of each of the lasers is treated as a classical field. In combination with the corresponding first part (Ion Trap Quantum Computer Part 1: 1-Qubit Gates), this results in the complete quantum theory of a universal set of quantum gates. This presentation is intended for readers with basic knowledge of quantum physics and assumes familiarity with Part 1.

Scientific Insights•Dec 26, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Gate Introduction: NOT and CNOT Gates

Hiu Yung Wong

Springer eBooks•Jun 21, 2023•3 citations

Quantum Gate Introduction: NOT and CNOT Gates

Hiu Yung Wong

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2022•1 citation

Full quantum theory of control-not gate in ion-trap quantum computation

Biyao Yang, Yang Li

We investigate the exact effect on ion trap quantum computation after field quantization. First an exact expression of failure probability from field quantization after many CNOT operations in Cirac-Zoller scheme is given. It is proportional to operation number and the amplitude of $|1\rangle_x |0\rangle_y$ or $|1\rangle_x |1\rangle_y$ in initial state, and inverse proportional to mean number of photons and amplitude of $|0\rangle_x |0\rangle_y$ or $|0\rangle_x |1\rangle_y$ in initial state. Then we calculate the failure probability when the limitation to mean number of photons in sideband transition is considered. When the initial state is $|1\rangle_x |0\rangle_y$ or $|1\rangle_x |1\rangle_y$, after about $10^2$ times of CNOT operations, failure probability is no less than $10^{-2}$, while $10^{-2}$ is the known maximum threshold in fault-tolerant quantum computation. Then when the initial state is $|1\rangle_x |0\rangle_y$ or $|1\rangle_x |1\rangle_y$, the number of CNOT gates on the same pair of physical qubits should be no more than $10^2$ in one error-correction period, or else the computation cannot be implemented reliably. This conclusion can help to determine the number of CNOT operations between coding and decoding in one error-correction period in fault-tolerant quantum computation.

arXiv:1511.08797•Nov 26, 2015•0 citations
The Cirac-Zoller mechanism is generally used for the implementation of CNOT gates in ion trap quantum computers. We present here a highly detailed quantum physical description of this approach. To keep the presentation simple, the qubits are modeled as rigid rotors and the radiation field of each of the lasers is treated as a classical field. In combination with the corresponding first part (Ion Trap Quantum Computer Part 1: 1-Qubit Gates), this results in the complete quantum theory of a universal set of quantum gates. This presentation is intended for readers with basic knowledge of quantum physics and assumes familiarity with Part 1.
We investigate the exact effect on ion trap quantum computation after field quantization. First an exact expression of failure probability from field quantization after many CNOT operations in Cirac-Zoller scheme is given. It is proportional to operation number and the amplitude of ∣1⟩x∣0⟩y|1\rangle_x |0\rangle_y∣1⟩x​∣0⟩y​ or ∣1⟩x∣1⟩y|1\rangle_x |1\rangle_y∣1⟩x​∣1⟩y​ in initial state, and inverse proportional to mean number of photons and amplitude of ∣0⟩x∣0⟩y|0\rangle_x |0\rangle_y∣0⟩x​∣0⟩y​ or ∣0⟩x∣1⟩y|0\rangle_x |1\rangle_y∣0⟩x​∣1⟩y​ in initial state. Then we calculate the failure probability when the limitation to mean number of photons in sideband transition is considered. When the initial state is ∣1⟩x∣0⟩y|1\rangle_x |0\rangle_y∣1⟩x​∣0⟩y​ or ∣1⟩x∣1⟩y|1\rangle_x |1\rangle_y∣1⟩x​∣1⟩y​, after about 10210^2102 times of CNOT operations, failure probability is no less than 10−210^{-2}10−2, while 10−210^{-2}10−2 is the known maximum threshold in fault-tolerant quantum computation. Then when the initial state is ∣1⟩x∣0⟩y|1\rangle_x |0\rangle_y∣1⟩x​∣0⟩y​ or ∣1⟩x∣1⟩y|1\rangle_x |1\rangle_y∣1⟩x​∣1⟩y​, the number of CNOT gates on the same pair of physical qubits should be no more than 10210^2102 in one error-correction period, or else the computation cannot be implemented reliably. This conclusion can help to determine the number of CNOT operations between coding and decoding in one error-correction period in fault-tolerant quantum computation.