arXiv:0908.0035

What do quantum "weak" measurements actually measure?

Stephen Parrott

Published Aug 3, 2009• 6 citations

Abstract

A precise definition of "weak [quantum] measurements" and "weak value" (of a quantum observable) is offered, and simple finite dimensional examples are given showing that weak values are not unique and therefore probably do not correspond to any physical attribute of the system being "weakly" measured, contrary to impressions given by most of the literature on weak measurements. A possible mathematical error in the seminal paper introducing "weak values" is explicitly identified. A mathematically rigorous argument obtains results similar to, and more general than, the main result of that paper and concludes that even in the infinite-dimensional context of that paper, weak values are not unique. This implies that the "usual" formula for weak values is not universal, but can apply only to specific physical situations. The paper is written in a more pedagogical and informal style than is usual in the research literature in the hope that it might serve as an introduction to weak values.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.0908.0035

Related papers

Quantum weak values are not unique; what do they actually measure?

Stephen Parrott

Precise definitions of "weak [quantum] measurements" and "weak value" [of a quantum observable] are offered, which seem to capture the meaning of the often vague ways that these terms are used in the literature. Simple finite dimensional examples are given showing that weak values of an observable are not unique, and in fact arbitrary weak values can be obtained by appropriate weak measurements. This implies that a "weak value" of an observable A, *by itself*, can furnish no unambiguous information about A; any information in a weak value is inextricably connected with the particular measurement procedure used to obtain that weak value. Moreover, arbitrary weak values can be obtained using a "meter space" of dimension as small as 2. A "Remarks" section questions the utility of "weak measurement".

arXiv:0909.0295Sep 2, 200910 citations

Weak measurements in quantum mechanics

Lajos Diósi

The article recapitulates the concept of weak measurement in its broader sense encapsulating the trade between asymptotically weak measurement precision and asymptotically large measurement statistics. Essential applications in time-continuous measurement and in postselected measurement are presented both in classical and in quantum contexts. We discuss the anomalous quantum weak value in postselected measurement. We concentrate on the general mathematical and physical aspects of weak measurements and we do not expand on their interpretation. Particular applications, even most familiar ones, are not subject of the article which was written for Elsevier's Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics.

arXiv:quant-ph/0505075May 10, 20059 citations

Weak measurements: From measuring incompatible observables and testing quantum contextuality to protective measurements

Fabrizio Piacentini, Alessio Avella, Rudi Lussana +9 more

Summary form only given. Measurements are the very basis of Physics, especially in Quantum Mechanics, where they assume even a more fundamental role because of wave function collapse after a “strong” (projective) measurement. Furthermore, measuring a quantum-mechanical observable completely erases the information on its conjugate one (e.g. measurement of position erases information on momentum, and vice-versa). Nevertheless, in Quantum Mechanics other kinds of measurement are possible. For example, wave function collapse can be overcome through Weak Measurements, i.e. measurements performed with an interaction sufficiently weak not to collapse the original state, featuring several interesting properties. An example of these are weak values [1-3], realised for the first time in [4-6], that have been used for addressing fundamental questions [7-12] as Contextuality and are also a tool for Quantum Metrology [13-19]. One of the most intriguing properties of Weak Measurements is that, since they are not affected by wave function collapse, they can allow gathering simultaneous information on non-commuting observables [20], impossible with the standard (projective) measurement protocols. A second example is offered by Protective Measurements [21], a new technique able to extract information on the expectation value of an observable even measuring a single particle. In this talk, after a general introduction to WMs, we present the first realisation of sequential weak value measurements [22], i.e. a joint measurement of the weak value of (incompatible) polarizations on a single photon. Then, we present an experiment addressed to explore the connection between anomalous weak values and Contextuality [23], showing a clear violation of the inequality proposed in [12] while satisfying all the additional theoretical requests, unequivocally demonstrating the contextual nature of weak values. Finally, we present and discuss the first implementation of Protective Measurements, showing unprecedented measurement capability and demonstrating how the expectation value of an observable can be obtained with a single measurement on a single particle.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC)Jun 1, 20170 citations

Weak measurements in non-Hermitian systems

A. Matzkin

'Weak measurements'—involving a weak unitary interaction between a quantum system and a meter followed by a projective measurement—are investigated when the system has a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian. We show in particular how the standard definition of the 'weak value' of an observable must be modified. These studies are undertaken in the context of bound-state scattering theory, a non-Hermitian formalism for which the involved Hilbert spaces are unambiguously defined and the metric operators can be explicitly computed. Numerical examples are given for a model system. This article is part of a special issue of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical devoted to 'Quantum physics with non-Hermitian operators'.

arXiv:1204.3296Journal of Physics A Mathematical and TheoreticalOct 23, 20128 citations

"Contextual weak values" of quantum measurements with positive measurement operators are not limited to the traditional weak value

Stephen Parrott

A recent Letter in Physical Review Letters, "Contextual Values of Observables in Quantum Measurements", by J. Dressel, S. Agarwal, and A. N. Jordan (abbreviated DAJ below), introduces the concept of "contextual values" and claims that they lead to "a natural definition of a general conditioned average that converges uniquely to the quantum weak value in the minimal disturbance limit". However, they do not define "minimal disturbance limit". The present paper is in part the saga of my search for a definition of "minimal disturbance limit" under which this claim could be proved. The search finally ended in what is probably a definitive counterexample to the claim.

arXiv:1102.4407Feb 22, 20113 citations

Weak values and weak measurements in quantum mechanics

Ludvík Vízdal

The main goal of this thesis is to introdude to readers the concept of weak measure- ments in quantum mechanics. Firstly a model of indirect measuremnts is established as an alternative to Von Neumann measurement postulate. This model leads to a possible generalization in a form of weak measurements. Then the concept of postselection is introduced and involved into the issue of weak measurements which leads to the weak values of physical quantities. All these theoretical concepts are presented using simple model examples. Finally, a discussion in provided on the possible interpretation and of weak values and their experimental verification.

Jan 1, 20240 citations