In this paper, we give a concrete example of a Lüders operation LA with n=3, such that LA(B)=B does not imply that B commutes with all E1, E2, and E3 in A, this example answers an open problem of Professor Gudder.
Let E be an effect algebra and ES be the set of all sharp elements of E. E is said to be sharply dominating if for each a∈E there exists a smallest element a∈Es such that a≤a. In 2002, Professors Gudder and Greechie proved that each σ-sequential effect algebra is sharply dominating. In 2005, Professor Gudder presented 25 open problems in International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 44, 2199-2205, the 3th problem asked: Is each sequential effect algebra sharply dominating? Now, we construct an example to answer the problem negatively.