Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0905.2466

A Simple Bound on the Error of Perturbation Theory in Quantum Mechanics

Daniel Harlow

Published May 15, 2009• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

I provide a straightforward proof that a simple harmonic oscillator perturbed by an (almost) arbitrary positive interaction has a perturbative expansion for any finite-time Euclidian transition amplitude which obeys the following result: the difference of the sum of the first N terms of the series and the exact result is bounded in absolute value by the next term in the series. The proof makes no assumptions about either the strength of the interactions or the convergence of the perturbation series. I then argue that the result generalizes immediately to a much broader class of quantum mechanical systems, including bare perturbation theory in quantum field theory. The case of renormalized perturbation theory is more subtle and remains open, as does the generalization to energy levels and connected S-matrix elements.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0905.2466

Related papers

Perturbation theory

Giampiero V. M. Esposito, Giuseppe Marmo, George Sudarshan

The subject of perturbation theory in non-relativistic quantum mechanics is introduced. First, perturbation theory for stationary states in the absence of degeneracy is studied. The case of nearby levels, perturbations of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator, the occurrence of degeneracy, Stark and Zeeman effects are then described in detail. After a brief outline of the variational method, the Dyson series for time-dependent perturbation theory is derived, with application to harmonic perturbations. The Fermi golden rule is also presented. The chapter ends with an assessment of four branches of the subject: regular perturbation theory, asymptotic perturbation theory, and summability methods, spectral concentration and singular perturbations. Approximate methods for stationary states It is frequently the case, in physical problems, that the full Hamiltonian operator H consists of an operator H 0 whose eigenvalues and eigenfunctions are known exactly, and a second term V resulting from a variety of sources (e.g. the interaction with an electric field, or a magnetic field, or the relativistic corrections to the kinetic energy, or the effects of spin). The problems and aims of perturbation theory for stationary states can be therefore summarized as follows. (i) Once the domain of (essential) self-adjointness of the ‘unperturbed’ Hamiltonian H 0 is determined, find on which domain the ‘sum’ H = H 0 + V represents an (essentially) self-adjoint operator (the reader should remember from appendix 4. A that in general, once some operators A and B are given, the intersection of their domains, on which their sum is defined, might be the empty set). […]

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 11, 2004•0 citations

Perturbation theory for arbitrary coupling strength?

B. P. Mahapatra, N. B. Pradhan

We present a new formulation of perturbation theory for quantum systems, designated here as: “mean field perturbation theory” (MFPT), which is free from power-series-expansion in any physical parameter, including the coupling strength. Its application is thereby extended to deal with interactions of arbitrary strength and to compute system-properties having non-analytic dependence on the coupling, thus overcoming the primary limitations of the “standard formulation of perturbation theory” (SFPT). MFPT is defined by developing perturbation about a chosen input Hamiltonian, which is exactly solvable but which acquires the nonlinearity and the analytic structure (in the coupling strength) of the original interaction through a self-consistent, feedback mechanism. We demonstrate Borel-summability of MFPT for the case of the quartic- and sextic-anharmonic oscillators and the quartic double-well oscillator (QDWO) by obtaining uniformly accurate results for the ground state of the above systems for arbitrary physical values of the coupling strength. The results obtained for the QDWO may be of particular significance since “renormalon”-free, unambiguous results are achieved for its spectrum in contrast to the well-known failure of SFPT in this case.

arXiv:1607.01510•Modern Physics Letters A•Mar 2, 2018•1 citation

Renormalized perturbation series and the semiclassical limit of quantum mechanics

Francisco Marcelo Fernández

The accuracy of the renormalized perturbation series for anharmonic oscillators and other simple quantum-mechanical models increases with the quantum number when the adjustable parameter is determined by a simple variational criterion. In the semiclassical limit of quantum mechanics such an expansion converges towards the result of the Jeffreys–Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin method to all orders. The hypervirial and Hellmann–Feynman theorems facilitate the derivation of the semiclassical series from Rayleigh–Schrödinger perturbation theory.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 1995•8 citations

Summation of Perturbation Series in Quantum Mechanics

Anil C. Rae

This is the first in a series of papers. It deals with the linked-cluster summation of the perturbation series in quantum mechanics and quantum statistical physics. In particular, a formalism is developed for calculating the matrix element of the operator $\mathrm{exp}(+sH)$, where $H$ is the quantum-mechanical Hamiltonian operator. It is found that the matrix element may be written as an ordinary $c$-number integral of a $c$-number function over the phase space. This function is found by doing a linked-cluster summation of the usual perturbation series. It is in the form of an exponential of an effective Hamiltonian, ${H}_{\mathrm{eff}}$, which is a function of the parameter $s$ and the $c$-number momentum and position coordinates. We have assumed that the Hamiltonian has no spin-dependent terms. The matrix element is written in such a form that it may be used for calculating the transition matrix elements in time-dependent perturbation theory as well as for calculating the canonical partition function ${Z}_{N}$ in quantum statistical mechanics. The former is obtained by substituting $s=\ensuremath{-}\frac{\mathrm{it}}{\ensuremath{\hbar}}$ and the latter by substituting $s=\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\beta}$. The series for ${H}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ depends only on the potential and is independent of the statistics. The effects of the statistics (Bose-Einstein, Fermi-Dirac, or Maxwell-Boltzmann) are all included in a certain factor multiplying $\mathrm{exp}(s{H}_{\mathrm{eff}})$. Thus we have succeeded in separating the statistical and quantum corrections. These latter arise from the noncommutativity of the position and momentum operators. The effective Hamiltonian is an infinite series. A diagrammatic technique is given for evaluating this series. It is an expansion in powers of the coupling constant and can also be expanded in powers of Planck's constant. In general, it is not possible to give a closed-form expression for ${H}_{\mathrm{eff}}$. But for most practical cases it is sufficient to keep the first few powers of Planck's constant $\ensuremath{\hbar}$, because it is very small. We therefore have an entirely new method of approximation. The statistical effect may always be included exactly. No numerical estimates are made in this paper.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Feb 15, 1973•0 citations

Answer of the most important unsettled question of physical theory in 20th century

Junhao, Z.

Quantum mechanics take the sum of first finite order approximate solutions of time-dependent perturbation to substitute the exact solution. From the point of mathematics, it may be correct only in the convergent region of the time-dependent perturbation series. Where is the convergent region of this series? Quantum mechanics did not answer this problem. However it is relative to the question, can we use the Schrodinger equation to describe the transition processes? So it is the most important unsettling problem of physical theory. We find out the time-dependent approximate solution for arbitrary and the exact solution. Then we can prove that: (1) In the neighborhood of the conservation of energy, the series is divergent. The basic error of quantum mechanics is using the sum of the first finite orders approximate solutions to substitute the exact solution in this divergent region. It leads to an infinite error. So the Fermi golden rule is not a mathematically reasonable inference of the. Schrodinger equation (2) The transiton probability per unit time deduced from the exact solution of Schrodinger equation cannot describe the transition processes. This paper is only a prime discussion.

arXiv:physics/0101046•Jan 8, 2001•0 citations

Time-dependent perturbation and exact results for the periodically driven quantum harmonic oscillator

Russell Akridge

Transition amplitudes and probabilities for the harmonic oscillator with a forcing function proportional to cos(ωt) beginning at time zero are calculated to lowest nonvanishing order using time-dependent perturbation theory. The results are compared with the exact amplitudes and probabilities. When the exact amplitude is expanded in a Taylor series in powers of the coupling constant, the individual terms turn out to be the perturbation amplitudes, showing that the complete series of perturbation amplitudes converges to the exact amplitude.

American Journal of Physics•Feb 1, 1995•5 citations
I provide a straightforward proof that a simple harmonic oscillator perturbed by an (almost) arbitrary positive interaction has a perturbative expansion for any finite-time Euclidian transition amplitude which obeys the following result: the difference of the sum of the first N terms of the series and the exact result is bounded in absolute value by the next term in the series. The proof makes no assumptions about either the strength of the interactions or the convergence of the perturbation series. I then argue that the result generalizes immediately to a much broader class of quantum mechanical systems, including bare perturbation theory in quantum field theory. The case of renormalized perturbation theory is more subtle and remains open, as does the generalization to energy levels and connected S-matrix elements.
The subject of perturbation theory in non-relativistic quantum mechanics is introduced. First, perturbation theory for stationary states in the absence of degeneracy is studied. The case of nearby levels, perturbations of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator, the occurrence of degeneracy, Stark and Zeeman effects are then described in detail. After a brief outline of the variational method, the Dyson series for time-dependent perturbation theory is derived, with application to harmonic perturbations. The Fermi golden rule is also presented. The chapter ends with an assessment of four branches of the subject: regular perturbation theory, asymptotic perturbation theory, and summability methods, spectral concentration and singular perturbations. Approximate methods for stationary states It is frequently the case, in physical problems, that the full Hamiltonian operator H consists of an operator H 0 whose eigenvalues and eigenfunctions are known exactly, and a second term V resulting from a variety of sources (e.g. the interaction with an electric field, or a magnetic field, or the relativistic corrections to the kinetic energy, or the effects of spin). The problems and aims of perturbation theory for stationary states can be therefore summarized as follows. (i) Once the domain of (essential) self-adjointness of the ‘unperturbed’ Hamiltonian H 0 is determined, find on which domain the ‘sum’ H = H 0 + V represents an (essentially) self-adjoint operator (the reader should remember from appendix 4. A that in general, once some operators A and B are given, the intersection of their domains, on which their sum is defined, might be the empty set). […]
We present a new formulation of perturbation theory for quantum systems, designated here as: “mean field perturbation theory” (MFPT), which is free from power-series-expansion in any physical parameter, including the coupling strength. Its application is thereby extended to deal with interactions of arbitrary strength and to compute system-properties having non-analytic dependence on the coupling, thus overcoming the primary limitations of the “standard formulation of perturbation theory” (SFPT). MFPT is defined by developing perturbation about a chosen input Hamiltonian, which is exactly solvable but which acquires the nonlinearity and the analytic structure (in the coupling strength) of the original interaction through a self-consistent, feedback mechanism. We demonstrate Borel-summability of MFPT for the case of the quartic- and sextic-anharmonic oscillators and the quartic double-well oscillator (QDWO) by obtaining uniformly accurate results for the ground state of the above systems for arbitrary physical values of the coupling strength. The results obtained for the QDWO may be of particular significance since “renormalon”-free, unambiguous results are achieved for its spectrum in contrast to the well-known failure of SFPT in this case.
The accuracy of the renormalized perturbation series for anharmonic oscillators and other simple quantum-mechanical models increases with the quantum number when the adjustable parameter is determined by a simple variational criterion. In the semiclassical limit of quantum mechanics such an expansion converges towards the result of the Jeffreys–Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin method to all orders. The hypervirial and Hellmann–Feynman theorems facilitate the derivation of the semiclassical series from Rayleigh–Schrödinger perturbation theory.
This is the first in a series of papers. It deals with the linked-cluster summation of the perturbation series in quantum mechanics and quantum statistical physics. In particular, a formalism is developed for calculating the matrix element of the operator exp(+sH)\mathrm{exp}(+sH)exp(+sH), where HHH is the quantum-mechanical Hamiltonian operator. It is found that the matrix element may be written as an ordinary ccc-number integral of a ccc-number function over the phase space. This function is found by doing a linked-cluster summation of the usual perturbation series. It is in the form of an exponential of an effective Hamiltonian, Heff{H}_{\mathrm{eff}}Heff​, which is a function of the parameter sss and the ccc-number momentum and position coordinates. We have assumed that the Hamiltonian has no spin-dependent terms. The matrix element is written in such a form that it may be used for calculating the transition matrix elements in time-dependent perturbation theory as well as for calculating the canonical partition function ZN{Z}_{N}ZN​ in quantum statistical mechanics. The former is obtained by substituting $s=\ensuremath{-}\frac{\mathrm{it}}{\ensuremath{\hbar}}$ and the latter by substituting $s=\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\beta}$. The series for Heff{H}_{\mathrm{eff}}Heff​ depends only on the potential and is independent of the statistics. The effects of the statistics (Bose-Einstein, Fermi-Dirac, or Maxwell-Boltzmann) are all included in a certain factor multiplying exp(sHeff)\mathrm{exp}(s{H}_{\mathrm{eff}})exp(sHeff​). Thus we have succeeded in separating the statistical and quantum corrections. These latter arise from the noncommutativity of the position and momentum operators. The effective Hamiltonian is an infinite series. A diagrammatic technique is given for evaluating this series. It is an expansion in powers of the coupling constant and can also be expanded in powers of Planck's constant. In general, it is not possible to give a closed-form expression for Heff{H}_{\mathrm{eff}}Heff​. But for most practical cases it is sufficient to keep the first few powers of Planck's constant $\ensuremath{\hbar}$, because it is very small. We therefore have an entirely new method of approximation. The statistical effect may always be included exactly. No numerical estimates are made in this paper.
Quantum mechanics take the sum of first finite order approximate solutions of time-dependent perturbation to substitute the exact solution. From the point of mathematics, it may be correct only in the convergent region of the time-dependent perturbation series. Where is the convergent region of this series? Quantum mechanics did not answer this problem. However it is relative to the question, can we use the Schrodinger equation to describe the transition processes? So it is the most important unsettling problem of physical theory. We find out the time-dependent approximate solution for arbitrary and the exact solution. Then we can prove that: (1) In the neighborhood of the conservation of energy, the series is divergent. The basic error of quantum mechanics is using the sum of the first finite orders approximate solutions to substitute the exact solution in this divergent region. It leads to an infinite error. So the Fermi golden rule is not a mathematically reasonable inference of the. Schrodinger equation (2) The transiton probability per unit time deduced from the exact solution of Schrodinger equation cannot describe the transition processes. This paper is only a prime discussion.
Transition amplitudes and probabilities for the harmonic oscillator with a forcing function proportional to cos(ωt) beginning at time zero are calculated to lowest nonvanishing order using time-dependent perturbation theory. The results are compared with the exact amplitudes and probabilities. When the exact amplitude is expanded in a Taylor series in powers of the coupling constant, the individual terms turn out to be the perturbation amplitudes, showing that the complete series of perturbation amplitudes converges to the exact amplitude.