Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0904.1372 · Symmetry Integrability and Geometry Methods and Applications

The Analytic Continuation of the Lippmann-Schwinger Eigenfunctions, and Antiunitary Symmetries

Rafael de la Madrid

Published Apr 8, 2009• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We review the way to analytically continue the Lippmann-Schwinger bras and kets into the complex plane.We will see that a naive analytic continuation leads to nonsensical results in resonance theory, and we will explain how the non-obvious but correct analytical continuation is done.We will see that the physical basis for the non-obvious but correct analytic continuation lies in the invariance of the Hamiltonian under anti-unitary symmetries such as time reversal or PT .

DOI
10.3842/sigma.2009.043

Related papers

The rigged Hilbert space approach to the Lippmann–Schwinger equation: II. The analytic continuation of the Lippmann–Schwinger bras and kets

Rafael de la Madrid

The analytic continuation of the Lippmann–Schwinger bras and kets is obtained and characterized. It is shown that the natural mathematical setting for the analytic continuation of the solutions of the Lippmann–Schwinger equation is the rigged Hilbert space rather than just the Hilbert space. It is also argued that this analytic continuation entails the imposition of a time asymmetric boundary condition upon the group time evolution, resulting in a semigroup time evolution. Physically, the semigroup time evolution is simply a (retarded or advanced) propagator.

arXiv:quant-ph/0603177•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Mar 29, 2006•10 citations

Two analytic continuations of the Lippmann-Schwinger eigenfunctions

Rafael de la Madrid

We first present two possible analytic continuations of the Lippmann-Schwinger eigenfunctions to the second sheet of the Riemann surface, and then we compare the different Gamow vectors that are obtained through each analytic continuation.

arXiv:quant-ph/0404007•Apr 1, 2004•0 citations

Inverse of the PCT theorem

Carl M. Bender

PCT , a fundamental symmetry of quantum field theory, is derived from the assumption of Lorentz invariance and positivity of the spectrum.What happens if we assume only Lorentz invariance and PCT symmetry?Hamiltonians having this property need not be Hermitian but, except when PCT is spontaneously broken, the energy levels of such Hamiltonians are all real and positive!In this talk I examine quantum mechanical and quantum field theoretic systems whose Hamiltonians are non-Hermitian but obey PCT symmetry.These systems have weird and remarkable properties.Examples of such Hamiltonians are H = p 2 + ix 3 and H = p 2x 4 .Hamiltonians such as these are complex deformations of conventional Hermitian Hamiltonians.Thus, in this talk I study the analytic continuation of conventional quantum mechanics into the complex plane.

European Physical Society Conference on High Energy Physics (EPS-HEP)•Dec 1, 2001•0 citations

Complex frequencies, analytic continuation, and equivalent spectra in generalized quantum theory

E. C. G. Sudarshan

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jul 1, 1995•0 citations

RIGGED HILBERT SPACE RESONANCES AND TIME ASYMMETRIC QUANTUM MECHANICS

Arno Böhm, Hani Kaldass

The Rigged Hilbert Space (RHS) theory of resonance scattering and decay is reviewed and contrasted with the standard Hilbert space (HS) theory of quantum mechanics. The main difference is in the choice of boundary conditions. Whereas the conventional theory allows for the in-states $ϕ^+$ and the out-states (observables) $ψ^-$ of the S-matrix elements $(ψ^-,ϕ^+)=(ψ^{out},S ϕ^{in})$ any elements of the HS $\H$, $\{ψ^-\}=\{ϕ^+\}(=\H)$, the RHS theory chooses the boundary conditions~: $ϕ^+\inΦ_-\subset\H\subsetΦ_-^\times$, $ψ^-\inΦ_+\subset \H\subset Φ_+^\times$, where $Φ_-$ ($Φ_+$) are Hardy class spaces associated to the lower (upper) half-plane of the second sheet of the analytically continued S-matrix. This can be phenomenologically justified by causality. The two RHS's for states $ϕ^+$ and observables $ψ^-$ provide new vectors which are not in $\H$, e.g. the Dirac-Lippmann-Schwinger kets $|E^{\pm}\inΦ_{\mp}^{\times}$ (solutions of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation with $\pm iε$ respectively) and the Gamow vectors $|E_R-iΓ/2^\pm\inΦ_{\mp}^\times$. The Gamow vectors $|E_R-iΓ/2^-$ have all the properties that one heuristically needs for quasistable states. In addition, they give rise to asymmetric time evolution expressing irreversibility on the microphysical level.

arXiv:quant-ph/9909081•WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Nov 1, 2000•5 citations

An Introduction to Scattering Theory

Milan Šindelka

The purpose of these lectures is to give an accessible and self contained introduction to quantum scattering theory in one dimension. Part A defines the theoretical playground, and develops basic concepts of scattering theory in the time domain (Asymptotic Condition, in- and out- states, scattering operator $\hat{S}$). The aim of Part B is then to build up, in a step-by-step fashion, the time independent scattering theory in energy domain. This amounts to introduce the Lippmann-Schwinger equation for the stationary scattering states (denoted as $| ψ_{E(\pm 1)}^\pm \rangle$), to discuss fundamental properties of $| ψ_{E(\pm 1)}^\pm \rangle$, and subsequently to construct $\hat{S}$ and $\hat{T}$ operators in terms of $| ψ_{E(\pm 1)}^\pm \rangle$. Physical contents of the $\hat{S}$ and $\hat{T}$ operators is then illuminated by deriving explicit formulas for the probability of transmission/reflection of our quantum particle through/from the interaction region of the potential. An illustrative numerical example is given, which also highlights an existence of scattering resonances. Finally, Part C elaborates the nonhermitian scattering theory (Siegert pseudostate formalism), which offers an extremely powerful tool suitable for clear cut understanding of the resonance phenomena.

arXiv:2204.03651•Apr 8, 2022•1 citation
We review the way to analytically continue the Lippmann-Schwinger bras and kets into the complex plane.We will see that a naive analytic continuation leads to nonsensical results in resonance theory, and we will explain how the non-obvious but correct analytical continuation is done.We will see that the physical basis for the non-obvious but correct analytic continuation lies in the invariance of the Hamiltonian under anti-unitary symmetries such as time reversal or PT .
The analytic continuation of the Lippmann–Schwinger bras and kets is obtained and characterized. It is shown that the natural mathematical setting for the analytic continuation of the solutions of the Lippmann–Schwinger equation is the rigged Hilbert space rather than just the Hilbert space. It is also argued that this analytic continuation entails the imposition of a time asymmetric boundary condition upon the group time evolution, resulting in a semigroup time evolution. Physically, the semigroup time evolution is simply a (retarded or advanced) propagator.
PCT , a fundamental symmetry of quantum field theory, is derived from the assumption of Lorentz invariance and positivity of the spectrum.What happens if we assume only Lorentz invariance and PCT symmetry?Hamiltonians having this property need not be Hermitian but, except when PCT is spontaneously broken, the energy levels of such Hamiltonians are all real and positive!In this talk I examine quantum mechanical and quantum field theoretic systems whose Hamiltonians are non-Hermitian but obey PCT symmetry.These systems have weird and remarkable properties.Examples of such Hamiltonians are H = p 2 + ix 3 and H = p 2x 4 .Hamiltonians such as these are complex deformations of conventional Hermitian Hamiltonians.Thus, in this talk I study the analytic continuation of conventional quantum mechanics into the complex plane.
The Rigged Hilbert Space (RHS) theory of resonance scattering and decay is reviewed and contrasted with the standard Hilbert space (HS) theory of quantum mechanics. The main difference is in the choice of boundary conditions. Whereas the conventional theory allows for the in-states ϕ+ϕ^+ϕ+ and the out-states (observables) ψ−ψ^-ψ− of the S-matrix elements (ψ−,ϕ+)=(ψout,Sϕin)(ψ^-,ϕ^+)=(ψ^{out},S ϕ^{in})(ψ−,ϕ+)=(ψout,Sϕin) any elements of the HS $\H$, {ψ−}={ϕ+}(=)˝\{ψ^-\}=\{ϕ^+\}(=\H){ψ−}={ϕ+}(=)˝​, the RHS theory chooses the boundary conditions~: ϕ+∈Φ−⊂⊂˝Φ−×ϕ^+\inΦ_-\subset\H\subsetΦ_-^\timesϕ+∈Φ−​⊂⊂˝​Φ−×​, ψ−∈Φ+⊂⊂˝Φ+×ψ^-\inΦ_+\subset \H\subset Φ_+^\timesψ−∈Φ+​⊂⊂˝​Φ+×​, where Φ−Φ_-Φ−​ (Φ+Φ_+Φ+​) are Hardy class spaces associated to the lower (upper) half-plane of the second sheet of the analytically continued S-matrix. This can be phenomenologically justified by causality. The two RHS's for states ϕ+ϕ^+ϕ+ and observables ψ−ψ^-ψ− provide new vectors which are not in $\H$, e.g. the Dirac-Lippmann-Schwinger kets ∣E±∈Φ∓×|E^{\pm}\inΦ_{\mp}^{\times}∣E±∈Φ∓×​ (solutions of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation with ±iε\pm iε±iε respectively) and the Gamow vectors ∣ER−iΓ/2±∈Φ∓×|E_R-iΓ/2^\pm\inΦ_{\mp}^\times∣ER​−iΓ/2±∈Φ∓×​. The Gamow vectors ∣ER−iΓ/2−|E_R-iΓ/2^-∣ER​−iΓ/2− have all the properties that one heuristically needs for quasistable states. In addition, they give rise to asymmetric time evolution expressing irreversibility on the microphysical level.
The purpose of these lectures is to give an accessible and self contained introduction to quantum scattering theory in one dimension. Part A defines the theoretical playground, and develops basic concepts of scattering theory in the time domain (Asymptotic Condition, in- and out- states, scattering operator S^\hat{S}S^). The aim of Part B is then to build up, in a step-by-step fashion, the time independent scattering theory in energy domain. This amounts to introduce the Lippmann-Schwinger equation for the stationary scattering states (denoted as ∣ψE(±1)±⟩| ψ_{E(\pm 1)}^\pm \rangle∣ψE(±1)±​⟩), to discuss fundamental properties of ∣ψE(±1)±⟩| ψ_{E(\pm 1)}^\pm \rangle∣ψE(±1)±​⟩, and subsequently to construct S^\hat{S}S^ and T^\hat{T}T^ operators in terms of ∣ψE(±1)±⟩| ψ_{E(\pm 1)}^\pm \rangle∣ψE(±1)±​⟩. Physical contents of the S^\hat{S}S^ and T^\hat{T}T^ operators is then illuminated by deriving explicit formulas for the probability of transmission/reflection of our quantum particle through/from the interaction region of the potential. An illustrative numerical example is given, which also highlights an existence of scattering resonances. Finally, Part C elaborates the nonhermitian scattering theory (Siegert pseudostate formalism), which offers an extremely powerful tool suitable for clear cut understanding of the resonance phenomena.