Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0904.0197 · Annales Henri Poincaré

Relations between the Hepp-Lieb and the Alli-Sewell Laser Models

Fabio Bagarello

Published Oct 1, 2002• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s00023-002-8645-2

Related papers

New Structures in the Theory of the Laser Model

Fabio Bagarello, Geoffrey L. Sewell

In a recent article, Alli and Sewell formulated a new version of the Dicke-Hepp-Lieb laser model in terms of quantum dynamical semigroups, and thereby extended the macroscopic picture of the model. In the present article, we complement that picture with a corresponding microscopic one, which carries the following new results. (a) The local microscopic dynamics of the model is piloted by the classical, macroscopic field, generated by the collective action of its components; (b) the global state of the system carries no correlations between its constituent atoms after transient effects have died out; and (c) in the latter situation, the state of the system at any time $t$ maximises its entropy density, subject to the constraints imposed by the instantaneous values of its macroscopic variables.

arXiv:0904.0205•Apr 1, 2009•0 citations

Theoretical models of laser-induced processes

Stig Stenholm

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 1995•0 citations

New structures in the theory of the laser model. II. Microscopic dynamics and a nonequilibrium entropy principle

Fabio Bagarello, Geoffrey L. Sewell

In a recent article, Alli and Sewell [J. Math. Phys. 36, 5598 (1995)] formulated a new version of the Dicke–Hepp–Lieb laser model in terms of quantum dynamical semigroups, and thereby extended the macroscopic picture of the model. In the present article, we complement that picture with a corresponding microscopic one, which carries the following new results. (a) The local microscopic dynamics of the model is piloted by the classical, macroscopic field, generated by the collective action of its components; (b) the global state of the system carries no correlations between its constituent atoms after transient effects have died out; and (c) in the latter situation, the state of the system at any time t maximizes its entropy density, subject to the constraints imposed by the instantaneous values of its macroscopic variables.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•May 1, 1998•24 citations

Non-Markoffian effects in the laser

Fritz Haake

Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei•Apr 1, 1969•47 citations

Phonon laser effect and Dicke–Hepp–Lieb superradiant phase transition in magnetic cantilever coupled to a Bose–Einstein condensate

Aranya B. Bhattacherjee, Tobias Brandes

We propose the possibility of a phonon laser by coupling a Bose–Einstein condensate to a nanomechanical cantilever with a magnetic tip. Due to the magnetic coupling, atomic spin flips induce cantilever motion, which can be used to produce a phonon laser. The system is described by the equivalent of the Jaynes–Cummings Hamiltonian. By controlling the number of atoms and the population inversion, one can obtain either a continuous wave or transient lasing. The two-body atom–atom interaction is also shown to coherently manipulate the lasing process. We also show that in the strong coupling limit, the same system can undergo a Dicke–Hepp–Lieb superradiant phase transition. Exotic phase diagrams can be obtained by tuning the two body atom–atom interaction.

arXiv:1209.3244•Canadian Journal of Physics•May 16, 2013•3 citations

A Double Resonance Model for Lasers Without Inversion

G. Bhanu Prasad

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1993•0 citations
In a recent article, Alli and Sewell formulated a new version of the Dicke-Hepp-Lieb laser model in terms of quantum dynamical semigroups, and thereby extended the macroscopic picture of the model. In the present article, we complement that picture with a corresponding microscopic one, which carries the following new results. (a) The local microscopic dynamics of the model is piloted by the classical, macroscopic field, generated by the collective action of its components; (b) the global state of the system carries no correlations between its constituent atoms after transient effects have died out; and (c) in the latter situation, the state of the system at any time ttt maximises its entropy density, subject to the constraints imposed by the instantaneous values of its macroscopic variables.
In a recent article, Alli and Sewell [J. Math. Phys. 36, 5598 (1995)] formulated a new version of the Dicke–Hepp–Lieb laser model in terms of quantum dynamical semigroups, and thereby extended the macroscopic picture of the model. In the present article, we complement that picture with a corresponding microscopic one, which carries the following new results. (a) The local microscopic dynamics of the model is piloted by the classical, macroscopic field, generated by the collective action of its components; (b) the global state of the system carries no correlations between its constituent atoms after transient effects have died out; and (c) in the latter situation, the state of the system at any time t maximizes its entropy density, subject to the constraints imposed by the instantaneous values of its macroscopic variables.
We propose the possibility of a phonon laser by coupling a Bose–Einstein condensate to a nanomechanical cantilever with a magnetic tip. Due to the magnetic coupling, atomic spin flips induce cantilever motion, which can be used to produce a phonon laser. The system is described by the equivalent of the Jaynes–Cummings Hamiltonian. By controlling the number of atoms and the population inversion, one can obtain either a continuous wave or transient lasing. The two-body atom–atom interaction is also shown to coherently manipulate the lasing process. We also show that in the strong coupling limit, the same system can undergo a Dicke–Hepp–Lieb superradiant phase transition. Exotic phase diagrams can be obtained by tuning the two body atom–atom interaction.