Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0902.2007 · Physical Review Letters

Direct Measurements of Entanglement and Permutation Symmetry

S. J. van Enk

Published May 12, 2009• 17 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

So-called direct measurements of entanglement are collective measurements on multiple copies of a (bipartite or multipartite) quantum system that directly provide one with a value for some entanglement measure, such as the concurrence for bipartite states. Multiple copies are needed since the entanglement of a mixed state is not a linear function of the density matrix. The procedures proposed and implemented so far make certain assumptions about the states generated. This feature distinguishes direct measurements from standard entanglement verification tests such as Bell inequalities, entanglement witnesses, and quantum-state tomography, which make no such assumptions. I discuss how a direct measurement can be turned into a quantitative entanglement verification test without such assumptions by exploiting a recent theorem by Renner [Nature Phys. 3, 645 (2007)10.1038/nphys684].

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.102.190503

Related papers

Measuring multipartite entanglement efficiently by testing symmetries

Xiaoyu Liu, Jordi Tura, Albert Rico

Recently, a technique known as quantum symmetry test has gained increasing attention for detecting bipartite entanglement in pure quantum states. In this work we show that, beyond qualitative detection, a family of well-defined measures of bipartite and multipartite entanglement can be obtained with symmetry tests. We propose and benchmark several efficient methods to estimate these measures, and derive near-optimal sampling strategies for each. Despite the nonlinearity of the methods, we demonstrate that the sampling error scales no worse than $O(N_{\mathrm{tot}}^{-1/2})$ with the total number of copies $N_{\mathrm{tot}}$, which suggests experimental feasibility. By exploiting symmetries we compute our measures for large number of copies, and derive the asymptotic decay exponents for relevant states in many-body systems. Using these results we identify tradeoffs between estimation complexity and sensitivity of the presented entanglement measures, oriented to practical implementations.

quant-pharXiv:2511.07537•Nov 12, 2025•0 citations

Quantitative entanglement witnesses

Jens Eisert, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, K M R Audenaert

Entanglement witnesses provide tools to detect entanglement in experimental situations without the need of having full tomographic knowledge about the state. If one estimates in an experiment an expectation value smaller than zero, one can directly infer that the state has been entangled, or specifically multi-partite entangled, in the first place. In this paper, we emphasize that all these tests—based on the very same data—give rise to quantitative estimates in terms of entanglement measures: 'If a test is strongly violated, one can also infer that the state was quantitatively very much entangled'. We consider various measures of entanglement, including the negativity, the entanglement of formation, and the robustness of entanglement, in the bipartite and multipartite setting. As examples, we discuss several experiments in the context of quantum state preparation that have recently been performed.

arXiv:quant-ph/0607167•New Journal of Physics•Mar 2, 2007•216 citations

Collectibility for mixed quantum states

Łukasz Rudnicki, Zbigniew Puchała, Paweł Horodecki +1 more

Bounds analogous to entropic uncertainty relations allow one to design practical tests to detect quantum entanglement by a collective measurement performed on several copies of the state analyzed. This approach, initially worked out for pure states only [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 150502 (2011)], is extended here for mixed quantum states. We define collectibility for any mixed states of a multipartite system. Deriving bounds for collectibility for positive partially transposed states of given purity provides insight into the structure of entangled quantum states. In the case of two qubits the application of complementary measurements and coincidence based detections leads to a test of entanglement of pseudopure states.

arXiv:1211.0573•Physical Review A•Dec 26, 2012•20 citations

Entanglement meter: estimation of entanglement with single copy in interferometer

Som Kanjilal, Vivek Pandey, Arun Kumar Pati

Abstract Efficient certification and quantification of high dimensional entanglement of composite systems are challenging both theoretically as well as experimentally. Here, we demonstrate how to measure the linear entropy, negativity and the Schmidt number of bipartite systems from the visibility of Mach–Zehnder interferometer using single copies of the quantum state. Our result shows that for any two qubit pure bipartite state, the interference visibility is a direct measure of entanglement. We also propose how to measure the mutual predictability experimentally from the intensity patterns of the interferometric set-up without having to resort to local measurements of mutually unbiased bases. Furthermore, we show that the entanglement witness operator can be measured in a interference setup and the phase shift is sensitive to the separable or entangled nature of the state. Our proposal bring out the power of Interferometric set-up in entanglement detection of pure and several mixed states which paves the way towards design of entanglement meter.

arXiv:2209.15592•New Journal of Physics•Apr 1, 2023•2 citations

Nondestructive verification of entangled states via fidelity witnessing

Ferran Riera-Sàbat, Jorge Miguel-Ramiro, Wolfgang Dür

Assessing the quality of an ensemble of noisy entangled states is a central task in quantum information processing. Usually, this is done by measuring and hence destroying multiple copies, from which state tomography or fidelity estimation can be employed to characterize states. Here we propose several methods to directly distinguish between two different sets of states, e.g., if their fidelity is above or below a certain threshold value. This turns out to be significantly more efficient and importantly keeps the verified states intact. We make use of auxiliary entanglement or an ensemble of larger size, where we operate on the whole ensemble, but measure only a small fraction where information has been concentrated. For certain state families, we demonstrate that such an approach can even outperform optimal methods that collectively measure directly a fixed fraction of the ensemble.

arXiv:2209.06849•Physical Review A•Feb 10, 2023•3 citations

Experimental determination of entanglement for arbitrary pure states

Shao-Ming Fei, Ming‐Jing Zhao, Kai Chen +1 more

We present a way of experimentally determining the concurrence in terms of the expectation values of local observables for arbitrary multipartite pure states. Instead of the joint measurements on two copies of a state in the experiment for two-qubit systems [S. P. Walborn et al., Nature (London) 440, 20 (2006)], we only need one copy of the state in every measurement for any arbitrary dimensional multipartite systems, avoiding the preparation of twin states or the imperfect copy of the state.

arXiv:0909.4851•Physical Review A•Sep 21, 2009•31 citations
So-called direct measurements of entanglement are collective measurements on multiple copies of a (bipartite or multipartite) quantum system that directly provide one with a value for some entanglement measure, such as the concurrence for bipartite states. Multiple copies are needed since the entanglement of a mixed state is not a linear function of the density matrix. The procedures proposed and implemented so far make certain assumptions about the states generated. This feature distinguishes direct measurements from standard entanglement verification tests such as Bell inequalities, entanglement witnesses, and quantum-state tomography, which make no such assumptions. I discuss how a direct measurement can be turned into a quantitative entanglement verification test without such assumptions by exploiting a recent theorem by Renner [Nature Phys. 3, 645 (2007)10.1038/nphys684].
Recently, a technique known as quantum symmetry test has gained increasing attention for detecting bipartite entanglement in pure quantum states. In this work we show that, beyond qualitative detection, a family of well-defined measures of bipartite and multipartite entanglement can be obtained with symmetry tests. We propose and benchmark several efficient methods to estimate these measures, and derive near-optimal sampling strategies for each. Despite the nonlinearity of the methods, we demonstrate that the sampling error scales no worse than O(Ntot−1/2)O(N_{\mathrm{tot}}^{-1/2})O(Ntot−1/2​) with the total number of copies NtotN_{\mathrm{tot}}Ntot​, which suggests experimental feasibility. By exploiting symmetries we compute our measures for large number of copies, and derive the asymptotic decay exponents for relevant states in many-body systems. Using these results we identify tradeoffs between estimation complexity and sensitivity of the presented entanglement measures, oriented to practical implementations.
Entanglement witnesses provide tools to detect entanglement in experimental situations without the need of having full tomographic knowledge about the state. If one estimates in an experiment an expectation value smaller than zero, one can directly infer that the state has been entangled, or specifically multi-partite entangled, in the first place. In this paper, we emphasize that all these tests—based on the very same data—give rise to quantitative estimates in terms of entanglement measures: 'If a test is strongly violated, one can also infer that the state was quantitatively very much entangled'. We consider various measures of entanglement, including the negativity, the entanglement of formation, and the robustness of entanglement, in the bipartite and multipartite setting. As examples, we discuss several experiments in the context of quantum state preparation that have recently been performed.
Bounds analogous to entropic uncertainty relations allow one to design practical tests to detect quantum entanglement by a collective measurement performed on several copies of the state analyzed. This approach, initially worked out for pure states only [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 150502 (2011)], is extended here for mixed quantum states. We define collectibility for any mixed states of a multipartite system. Deriving bounds for collectibility for positive partially transposed states of given purity provides insight into the structure of entangled quantum states. In the case of two qubits the application of complementary measurements and coincidence based detections leads to a test of entanglement of pseudopure states.
Abstract Efficient certification and quantification of high dimensional entanglement of composite systems are challenging both theoretically as well as experimentally. Here, we demonstrate how to measure the linear entropy, negativity and the Schmidt number of bipartite systems from the visibility of Mach–Zehnder interferometer using single copies of the quantum state. Our result shows that for any two qubit pure bipartite state, the interference visibility is a direct measure of entanglement. We also propose how to measure the mutual predictability experimentally from the intensity patterns of the interferometric set-up without having to resort to local measurements of mutually unbiased bases. Furthermore, we show that the entanglement witness operator can be measured in a interference setup and the phase shift is sensitive to the separable or entangled nature of the state. Our proposal bring out the power of Interferometric set-up in entanglement detection of pure and several mixed states which paves the way towards design of entanglement meter.
Assessing the quality of an ensemble of noisy entangled states is a central task in quantum information processing. Usually, this is done by measuring and hence destroying multiple copies, from which state tomography or fidelity estimation can be employed to characterize states. Here we propose several methods to directly distinguish between two different sets of states, e.g., if their fidelity is above or below a certain threshold value. This turns out to be significantly more efficient and importantly keeps the verified states intact. We make use of auxiliary entanglement or an ensemble of larger size, where we operate on the whole ensemble, but measure only a small fraction where information has been concentrated. For certain state families, we demonstrate that such an approach can even outperform optimal methods that collectively measure directly a fixed fraction of the ensemble.