Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0901.3262 · Foundations of Physics

Why the Hamilton Operator Alone Is not Enough

I. Schmelzer

Published Mar 24, 2009• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-009-9299-4

Related papers

Hamilton Operators

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Sep 1, 2011•0 citations

Hamilton Operators

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Feb 20, 2018•0 citations

Hamilton Operators

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Mar 1, 2004•0 citations

Hamilton Operators

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Mar 1, 2006•0 citations

On Some Physical Applications of Hamilton’s Operator

Frederick William Owens

•Jan 1, 1902•0 citations

WHY THE HAMILTON OPERATOR ALONE IS NOT ENOUGH

I. Schmelzer

Abstract. In the many worlds community seems to exist a belief that the physics of a quantum theory is completely defined by it’s Hamilton operator given in an abstract Hilbert space, especially that the position basis may be derived from it as preferred using decoherence techniques. We show, by an explicit example of non-uniqueness, taken from the theory of the KdV equation, that the Hamilton operator alone is not sufficient to fix the physics. We need the canonical operators ˆp, ˆq as well. As a consequence, it is not possible to derive a “preferred basis ” from the Hamilton operator alone, without postulating some additional structure like a “decomposition into systems”. We argue that this makes such a derivation useless for fundamental physics. 1.

•Nov 20, 2012•8 citations
Abstract. In the many worlds community seems to exist a belief that the physics of a quantum theory is completely defined by it’s Hamilton operator given in an abstract Hilbert space, especially that the position basis may be derived from it as preferred using decoherence techniques. We show, by an explicit example of non-uniqueness, taken from the theory of the KdV equation, that the Hamilton operator alone is not sufficient to fix the physics. We need the canonical operators ˆp, ˆq as well. As a consequence, it is not possible to derive a “preferred basis ” from the Hamilton operator alone, without postulating some additional structure like a “decomposition into systems”. We argue that this makes such a derivation useless for fundamental physics. 1.