Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0901.0951

Quantum Measurement Reliability versus Reversibility

S. J. van Enk, M. G. Raymer

Published Jan 7, 2009• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

There is a constraining relation between the reliability of a quantum measurement and the extent to which the measurement process is, in principle, reversible. The greater the information that is gained, the less reversible the measurement dynamics become. To illustrate this relation, we develop a simple physical model for quantum measurement, as well as a hypothetical scheme by which the experimenters can determine the reliability and reversibility. We derive an "uncertainty" (constraining) relation between reliability and reversibility, which holds even when there is no interaction with any external environment other than the fundamental information recording device.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0901.0951

Related papers

Quantum reversibility is relative, or does a quantum measurement reset initial conditions?

Wojciech Hubert Zurek

I compare the role of the information in classical and quantum dynamics by examining the relation between information flows in measurements and the ability of observers to reverse evolutions. I show that in the Newtonian dynamics reversibility is unaffected by the observer's retention of the information about the measurement outcome. By contrast-even though quantum dynamics is unitary, hence, reversible-reversing quantum evolution that led to a measurement becomes, in principle, impossible for an observer who keeps the record of its outcome. Thus, quantum irreversibility can result from the information gain rather than just its loss-rather than just an increase of the (von Neumann) entropy. Recording of the outcome of the measurement resets, in effect, initial conditions within the observer's (branch of) the Universe. Nevertheless, I also show that the observer's friend-an agent who knows what measurement was successfully carried out and can confirm that the observer knows the outcome but resists his curiosity and does not find out the result-can, in principle, undo the measurement. This relativity of quantum reversibility sheds new light on the origin of the arrow of time and elucidates the role of information in classical and quantum physics. Quantum discord appears as a natural measure of the extent to which dissemination of information about the outcome affects the ability to reverse the measurement.This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Foundations of quantum mechanics and their impact on contemporary society'.

arXiv:1808.08598•Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•May 28, 2018•16 citations

Complete Information Balance in Quantum Measurement

Seung-Woo Lee, Jaewan Kim, Hyunchul Nha

Quantum measurement is a basic tool to manifest intrinsic quantum effects from fundamental tests to quantum information applications. While a measurement is typically performed to gain information on a quantum state, its role in quantum technology is indeed manifold. For instance, quantum measurement is a crucial process element in measurement-based quantum computation. It is also used to detect and correct errors thereby protecting quantum information in error-correcting frameworks. It is therefore important to fully characterize the roles of quantum measurement encompassing information gain, state disturbance and reversibility, together with their fundamental relations. Numerous efforts have been made to obtain the trade-off between information gain and state disturbance, which becomes a practical basis for secure information processing. However, a complete information balance is necessary to include the reversibility of quantum measurement, which constitutes an integral part of practical quantum information processing. We here establish all pairs of trade-off relations involving information gain, disturbance, and reversibility, and crucially the one among all of them together. By doing so, we show that the reversibility plays a vital role in completing the information balance. Remarkably, our result can be interpreted as an information-conservation law of quantum measurement in a nontrivial form. We completely identify the conditions for optimal measurements that satisfy the conservation for each tradeoff relation with their potential applications. Our work can provide a useful guideline for designing a quantum measurement in accordance with the aims of quantum information processors.

arXiv:1912.10592•Quantum•Mar 17, 2021•17 citations

INFORMATION EXTRACTION VERSUS IRREVERSIBILITY IN QUANTUM MEASUREMENT PROCESSES

Francesco Buscemi, Masahito Hayashi, Michał Horodecki

A quantum measurement process, when non-trivial, is not a closed evolution: the appearance of classical outcomes is usually interpreted as the evidence of some decoherence-like mechanism causing quantum superpositions to degrade into classical mixtures. Such mechanism is due to a net flow of information from the input system (measurement object), through the physical apparatus interacting with the object (measurement probe), into some environment, the latter representing all those degrees of freedom which are not directly accessible by the experimenter. For this reason, the phenomenon of state reduction induced by the measurement process generally entails an irreversible state change. The aim of our contribution is to answer the following questions : how much information a measurement is able to extract? "How much" irreversible is the state reduction due to a particular measurement process? In which way information gain and irreversibility are related?

International Journal of Quantum Information•Jul 1, 2008•0 citations

Balance Between Information Gain and Reversibility in Weak Measurement

Yong Wook Cheong, Seung-Woo Lee

We derive a tight bound between the quality of estimating a quantum state by measurement and the success probability of undoing the measurement in arbitrary dimensional systems, which completely describes the tradeoff relation between the information gain and reversibility. In this formulation, it is clearly shown that the information extracted from a weak measurement is erased through the reversing process. Our result broadens the information-theoretic perspective on quantum measurement as well as provides a standard tool to characterize weak measurements and reversals.

arXiv:1203.4909•Physical Review Letters•Oct 9, 2012•91 citations

Partially reversible operation and information gain in quantum measurement processes

Masashi Ban

A partially reversible operation is introduced in quantum measurement processes and the information-theoretical property is investigated. The dual map of a partially reversible operation becomes reversible with respect to the intrinsic observable of a physical system. It is shown that the amount of information about the intrinsic observable of the physical system, obtained in a quantum measurement process described by a partially reversible operation, is equal to the decrease of the entropy of the measured physical system.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jan 1, 1999•3 citations

Irreversibility and Measurement in Quantum Mechanics

Douglas Snyder

Irreversibility is often considered to characterize measurements in quantum mechanics. Fundamental problems with this characterization are addressed. First, whether a measurement is made in quantum mechanics is an arbitrary decision on the part of the experimenter concerning how the experimental circumstances are structured. Second, how is irreversibility that occurs in making a measurement explained in terms of a neurophysiological mechanism where a macroscopic measuring instrument is not required in principle to make the measurement, as in macroscopic quantum tunneling? Third, how does irreversibility characterize a negative observation where there is no physical interaction in the measurement process?

arXiv:physics/0002048•Feb 28, 2000•5 citations
There is a constraining relation between the reliability of a quantum measurement and the extent to which the measurement process is, in principle, reversible. The greater the information that is gained, the less reversible the measurement dynamics become. To illustrate this relation, we develop a simple physical model for quantum measurement, as well as a hypothetical scheme by which the experimenters can determine the reliability and reversibility. We derive an "uncertainty" (constraining) relation between reliability and reversibility, which holds even when there is no interaction with any external environment other than the fundamental information recording device.
I compare the role of the information in classical and quantum dynamics by examining the relation between information flows in measurements and the ability of observers to reverse evolutions. I show that in the Newtonian dynamics reversibility is unaffected by the observer's retention of the information about the measurement outcome. By contrast-even though quantum dynamics is unitary, hence, reversible-reversing quantum evolution that led to a measurement becomes, in principle, impossible for an observer who keeps the record of its outcome. Thus, quantum irreversibility can result from the information gain rather than just its loss-rather than just an increase of the (von Neumann) entropy. Recording of the outcome of the measurement resets, in effect, initial conditions within the observer's (branch of) the Universe. Nevertheless, I also show that the observer's friend-an agent who knows what measurement was successfully carried out and can confirm that the observer knows the outcome but resists his curiosity and does not find out the result-can, in principle, undo the measurement. This relativity of quantum reversibility sheds new light on the origin of the arrow of time and elucidates the role of information in classical and quantum physics. Quantum discord appears as a natural measure of the extent to which dissemination of information about the outcome affects the ability to reverse the measurement.This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Foundations of quantum mechanics and their impact on contemporary society'.
Quantum measurement is a basic tool to manifest intrinsic quantum effects from fundamental tests to quantum information applications. While a measurement is typically performed to gain information on a quantum state, its role in quantum technology is indeed manifold. For instance, quantum measurement is a crucial process element in measurement-based quantum computation. It is also used to detect and correct errors thereby protecting quantum information in error-correcting frameworks. It is therefore important to fully characterize the roles of quantum measurement encompassing information gain, state disturbance and reversibility, together with their fundamental relations. Numerous efforts have been made to obtain the trade-off between information gain and state disturbance, which becomes a practical basis for secure information processing. However, a complete information balance is necessary to include the reversibility of quantum measurement, which constitutes an integral part of practical quantum information processing. We here establish all pairs of trade-off relations involving information gain, disturbance, and reversibility, and crucially the one among all of them together. By doing so, we show that the reversibility plays a vital role in completing the information balance. Remarkably, our result can be interpreted as an information-conservation law of quantum measurement in a nontrivial form. We completely identify the conditions for optimal measurements that satisfy the conservation for each tradeoff relation with their potential applications. Our work can provide a useful guideline for designing a quantum measurement in accordance with the aims of quantum information processors.
A quantum measurement process, when non-trivial, is not a closed evolution: the appearance of classical outcomes is usually interpreted as the evidence of some decoherence-like mechanism causing quantum superpositions to degrade into classical mixtures. Such mechanism is due to a net flow of information from the input system (measurement object), through the physical apparatus interacting with the object (measurement probe), into some environment, the latter representing all those degrees of freedom which are not directly accessible by the experimenter. For this reason, the phenomenon of state reduction induced by the measurement process generally entails an irreversible state change. The aim of our contribution is to answer the following questions : how much information a measurement is able to extract? "How much" irreversible is the state reduction due to a particular measurement process? In which way information gain and irreversibility are related?
We derive a tight bound between the quality of estimating a quantum state by measurement and the success probability of undoing the measurement in arbitrary dimensional systems, which completely describes the tradeoff relation between the information gain and reversibility. In this formulation, it is clearly shown that the information extracted from a weak measurement is erased through the reversing process. Our result broadens the information-theoretic perspective on quantum measurement as well as provides a standard tool to characterize weak measurements and reversals.
A partially reversible operation is introduced in quantum measurement processes and the information-theoretical property is investigated. The dual map of a partially reversible operation becomes reversible with respect to the intrinsic observable of a physical system. It is shown that the amount of information about the intrinsic observable of the physical system, obtained in a quantum measurement process described by a partially reversible operation, is equal to the decrease of the entropy of the measured physical system.
Irreversibility is often considered to characterize measurements in quantum mechanics. Fundamental problems with this characterization are addressed. First, whether a measurement is made in quantum mechanics is an arbitrary decision on the part of the experimenter concerning how the experimental circumstances are structured. Second, how is irreversibility that occurs in making a measurement explained in terms of a neurophysiological mechanism where a macroscopic measuring instrument is not required in principle to make the measurement, as in macroscopic quantum tunneling? Third, how does irreversibility characterize a negative observation where there is no physical interaction in the measurement process?