Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0812.2278

A Topological Phase in a Quantum Gravity Model

Michael Hartley Freedman

Published Dec 12, 2008• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

I would claim that we do not have a suitably general definition of what a topological phase is, or more importantly, any robust understanding of how to enter one even in the world of mathematical models. The latter is, of course, the more important issue and the main subject of this note. But a good definition can sharpen our thinking and a poor definition can misdirect us. I will not attempt a final answer here but merely comment on the strengths and weaknesses of possible definitions and argue for some flexibility. In particular, I describe a rather simple class of ``quantum gravity'' models which are neither lattice nor field theoretic but appear to contain strong candidates for topological phases.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0812.2278

Related papers

Topological Berry phase terms for spin systems in arbitrary dimensions(Fundamental Problems and Applications of Quantum Field Theory-Topological Aspects of Quantum Field Theory-)

Akihiro Tanaka

素粒子論研究•Apr 20, 2007•0 citations

Quantum spin liquids in a square lattice subject to an Abelian flux

Fadi Sun, Jinwu Ye

We report that a possible Z2 quantum spin liquid (QSL) can be observed in a new class of frustrated system: spinor bosons subject to a pi flux in a square lattice. We construct a new class of Ginsburg-Landau (GL) type of effective action to classify possible quantum or topological phases at any coupling strengths. It can be used to reproduce the frustrated SF with the 4 sublattice $ 90^{\circ} $ coplanar spin structure plus its excitations in the weak coupling limit and the FM Mott plus its excitations in the strong coupling limit achieved in our previous work. It also establishes deep and intrinsic connections between the GL effective action and the order from quantum disorder (OFQD) phenomena in the weak coupling limit. Most importantly, it predicts two possible new phases at intermediate couplings: a FM SF phase or a frustrated magnetic Mott phase. We argue that the latter one is more likely and melts into a $ Z_2 $ quantum spin liquid (QSL) phase. If the heating issue can be under a reasonable control at intermediate couplings $ U/t \sim 1 $, the topological order of the $ Z_2 $ QSL maybe uniquely probed by the current cold atom or photonic experimental techniques.

arXiv:2005.04695•May 10, 2020•0 citations

Introduction

J. Oitmaa, Chris J. Hamer, Weihong Zheng

Lattice models in theoretical physics A major part of theoretical physics involves the construction and systematic analysis of mathematical models as a description of the physical world. For microscopic phenomena, in particular, the reference to models becomes quite explicit. The phenomena are often complex, and any theory that attempts to include every detail soon becomes intractable. It is more fruitful to develop models which ignore irrelevant details but, hopefully, capture the essential physics of the phenomena of interest. Thus we have the Heisenberg model of magnetic order, the Bardeen–Cooper– Schrieffer (BCS) model of superconductivity, and so on. It is important to note, at the outset, that the models we shall be discussing describe strongly interacting, and therefore highly correlated, systems of particles. These are difficult and interesting problems. Where interactions are absent, or weak, elementary treatments are possible and the resulting phenomena are generally unspectacular. Why lattice models? In solid-state phenomena there is usually an underlying lattice structure, and the symmetry properties of this lattice play an important role in the analysis. Even the process of electrical conduction in metals or semiconductors can be equally well described in terms of localized quantum states or in terms of the more usual continuum picture. In quantum field theory, which is formulated in a space–time continuum, a lattice is often introduced for computational purposes. One can think of this in two ways: as an approximation to the continuum, which is then recovered as a limit at the end of the calculations, or as a necessary means of regulating the theory (i.e. controlling divergences) in calculating the Feynman path integral.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 6, 2006•0 citations

Quantum phase transition from the topological viewpoint

Izumi Tanaka

This study targets quantum phases which are characterized by topological properties and no associated with the symmetry breaking. We concern ourselves primarily with the transitions among these quantum phases. This type of quantum phase transition was investigated by $G$-cobordism in unified framework. This framework provides a useful method to investigate a new quantum phase.

arXiv:1307.2916•Jul 7, 2013•0 citations

Ribbon operators in the generalized Kitaev quantum double model based on Hopf algebras

Bowen Yan, Penghua Chen, Shawn Xingshan Cui

Abstract Kitaev’s quantum double model is a family of exactly solvable lattice models that realize two dimensional topological phases of matter. The model was originally based on finite groups, and was later generalized to semi-simple Hopf algebras. We rigorously define and study ribbon operators in the generalized quantum double model. These ribbon operators are important tools to understand quasi-particle excitations. It turns out that there are some subtleties in defining the operators in contrast to what one would naively think of. In particular, one has to distinguish two classes of ribbons which we call locally clockwise and locally counterclockwise ribbons. Moreover, we point out that the issue already exists in the original model based on finite non-abelian groups, but it seems to not have been noticed in the literature. We show how certain common properties would fail even in the original model if we were not to distinguish these two classes of ribbons. Perhaps not surprisingly, under the new definitions ribbon operators satisfy all properties that are expected. For instance, they create quasi-particle excitations only at the end of the ribbon, and the types of the quasi-particles correspond to irreducible representations of the Drinfeld double of the input Hopf algebra. However, the proofs of these properties are much more complicated than those in the case of finite groups. This is partly due to the complications in dealing with general Hopf algebras rather than group algebras.

arXiv:2105.08202•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Feb 15, 2022•15 citations

On ground state phases of quantum spin systems

Sven Bachmann

In this short note, I review some recent results about gapped ground state phases of quantum spin systems and discuss the notion of topological order.

arXiv:1208.5263•Aug 26, 2012•0 citations
I would claim that we do not have a suitably general definition of what a topological phase is, or more importantly, any robust understanding of how to enter one even in the world of mathematical models. The latter is, of course, the more important issue and the main subject of this note. But a good definition can sharpen our thinking and a poor definition can misdirect us. I will not attempt a final answer here but merely comment on the strengths and weaknesses of possible definitions and argue for some flexibility. In particular, I describe a rather simple class of ``quantum gravity'' models which are neither lattice nor field theoretic but appear to contain strong candidates for topological phases.
We report that a possible Z2 quantum spin liquid (QSL) can be observed in a new class of frustrated system: spinor bosons subject to a pi flux in a square lattice. We construct a new class of Ginsburg-Landau (GL) type of effective action to classify possible quantum or topological phases at any coupling strengths. It can be used to reproduce the frustrated SF with the 4 sublattice $ 90^{\circ} $ coplanar spin structure plus its excitations in the weak coupling limit and the FM Mott plus its excitations in the strong coupling limit achieved in our previous work. It also establishes deep and intrinsic connections between the GL effective action and the order from quantum disorder (OFQD) phenomena in the weak coupling limit. Most importantly, it predicts two possible new phases at intermediate couplings: a FM SF phase or a frustrated magnetic Mott phase. We argue that the latter one is more likely and melts into a $ Z_2 $ quantum spin liquid (QSL) phase. If the heating issue can be under a reasonable control at intermediate couplings $ U/t \sim 1 $, the topological order of the $ Z_2 $ QSL maybe uniquely probed by the current cold atom or photonic experimental techniques.
Lattice models in theoretical physics A major part of theoretical physics involves the construction and systematic analysis of mathematical models as a description of the physical world. For microscopic phenomena, in particular, the reference to models becomes quite explicit. The phenomena are often complex, and any theory that attempts to include every detail soon becomes intractable. It is more fruitful to develop models which ignore irrelevant details but, hopefully, capture the essential physics of the phenomena of interest. Thus we have the Heisenberg model of magnetic order, the Bardeen–Cooper– Schrieffer (BCS) model of superconductivity, and so on. It is important to note, at the outset, that the models we shall be discussing describe strongly interacting, and therefore highly correlated, systems of particles. These are difficult and interesting problems. Where interactions are absent, or weak, elementary treatments are possible and the resulting phenomena are generally unspectacular. Why lattice models? In solid-state phenomena there is usually an underlying lattice structure, and the symmetry properties of this lattice play an important role in the analysis. Even the process of electrical conduction in metals or semiconductors can be equally well described in terms of localized quantum states or in terms of the more usual continuum picture. In quantum field theory, which is formulated in a space–time continuum, a lattice is often introduced for computational purposes. One can think of this in two ways: as an approximation to the continuum, which is then recovered as a limit at the end of the calculations, or as a necessary means of regulating the theory (i.e. controlling divergences) in calculating the Feynman path integral.
This study targets quantum phases which are characterized by topological properties and no associated with the symmetry breaking. We concern ourselves primarily with the transitions among these quantum phases. This type of quantum phase transition was investigated by GGG-cobordism in unified framework. This framework provides a useful method to investigate a new quantum phase.
Abstract Kitaev’s quantum double model is a family of exactly solvable lattice models that realize two dimensional topological phases of matter. The model was originally based on finite groups, and was later generalized to semi-simple Hopf algebras. We rigorously define and study ribbon operators in the generalized quantum double model. These ribbon operators are important tools to understand quasi-particle excitations. It turns out that there are some subtleties in defining the operators in contrast to what one would naively think of. In particular, one has to distinguish two classes of ribbons which we call locally clockwise and locally counterclockwise ribbons. Moreover, we point out that the issue already exists in the original model based on finite non-abelian groups, but it seems to not have been noticed in the literature. We show how certain common properties would fail even in the original model if we were not to distinguish these two classes of ribbons. Perhaps not surprisingly, under the new definitions ribbon operators satisfy all properties that are expected. For instance, they create quasi-particle excitations only at the end of the ribbon, and the types of the quasi-particles correspond to irreducible representations of the Drinfeld double of the input Hopf algebra. However, the proofs of these properties are much more complicated than those in the case of finite groups. This is partly due to the complications in dealing with general Hopf algebras rather than group algebras.