Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0809.5038

Role of Post-Selection in Two-Photon Interferometer Tests of Bell's Inequality

J. D. Franson

Published Sep 29, 2008• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Experimental tests of Bell's inequality based on two-photon interferometry consider only those coincidence events in which both photons arrive at the detectors at the same time. In a recent paper, Cabello et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 040401 (2009)] proposed a local model that is consistent with some aspects of these experiments. It is shown here that the model proposed by Cabello et al. is local but not realistic, and the role of post-selection in experiments of this kind is discussed.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0809.5038

Related papers

Two-Photon Franson-Type Experiments and Local Realism

Sven Aerts, Paul G. Kwiat, Jan-Åke Larsson +1 more

The two-photon interferometric experiment proposed by J. D. Franson [Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2205 (1989)] is often treated as a ``Bell test of local realism.'' However, it has been suggested that this is incorrect due to the $50%$ postselection performed even in the ideal gedanken version of the experiment. Here we present a simple local hidden variable model of the experiment that successfully explains the results obtained in usual realizations of the experiment, even with perfect detectors. Furthermore, we also show that there is no such model if the switching of the local phase settings is done at a rate determined by the internal geometry of the interferometers.

arXiv:quant-ph/9912064•Physical Review Letters•Oct 11, 1999•100 citations

Asymmetric Bell Experiment with Inefficient Detectors

Marcin Paw

Let us imagine an experimentalist, who has maximally entangled photons and wants to violate Bell’s inequality in his laboratory. Among many obstacles he has to overcome, two of them are the most significant. Firstly, he has to avoid exchanging information about the measurement settings between the particles. Secondly, he has to detect particles with a high enough probability, because if the detection efficiency is too low, one can reproduce quantum correlations using a LHV (Local Hidden Variables) model. These two problems are known in the literature, respectively, as the locality loophole [1] and the detection loophole [2, 3]. Fortunately, it is possible to close the locality loophole using photons in the experiment [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. However, closing the detection loophole is still an object of study. The authors of [9] showed that for the CHSH inequality, the lower bound for detector efficiency needed to close the loophole is 82.8% for maximally entangled states. This bound was lowered to 66.7% by Eberhard [10]. Furthermore, the detector efficiency has been studied for other Bell inequalities [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. In our research, we are trying to answer the following question: If we prepare a Bell experiment and we have two detectors, having different efficiencies both smaller than 100%, which detector should each party receive? And also: Which representation of the chosen Bell inequality should we consider? These are very crucial questions, which arise in laboratories. Hence, we hope that our results will be useful for experimentalists. We focus on the I3322 inequality [17], which is a natural candidate for testing, because of its asymmetry [14, 18]. We consider the case of a post-selection strategy, which consists in rejecting all the rounds in the Bell experiment when one of the detectors does not click. We used numerical optimisation methods to find both the best classical strategy for Alice and Bob and the best detector clicking strategy. Thus, we have found minimal efficiencies of the detectors of Alice and Bob needed to violate I3322. We made the same studies also for symmetric representations of I3322 [19]. Our results show that the minimal efficiencies of Alice and Bob’s detectors of the asymmetric representation of I3322 is lower than in case of the symmetric one [20]. It is work in progress, and we are examining other post-selection methods as well as other Bell inequalities. We want to consider also the case when non-maximally entangled states are used in Bell experiments.

•Jan 1, 1992•0 citations

Stronger Two-Observer All-Versus-Nothing Violation of Local Realism

Adán Cabello

We introduce a two-observer all-versus-nothing proof of Bell's theorem which reduces the number of required quantum predictions from 9 [A. Cabello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 010403 (2001); Z.-B. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 160408 (2003)] to 4, provides a greater amount of evidence against local realism, reduces the detection efficiency requirements for a conclusive experimental test of Bell's theorem, and leads to a Bell inequality which resembles Mermin's inequality for three observers [N. D. Mermin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1838 (1990)] but requires only two observers.

arXiv:quant-ph/0507259•Physical Review Letters•Nov 18, 2005•33 citations

On "Bell's inequality without alternative settings"

J. Finkelstein

Cabello has recently (in quant-ph/0210081) observed that ``...an EPR-experiment with a fixed POVM on each particle provides a violation of Bell's inequality without requiring local observers to choose between the alternatives.'' In this note I discuss the implications of this observation for tests of locality.

arXiv:quant-ph/0210116•Oct 15, 2002•0 citations

Experimental test of the violation of local realism in quantum mechanics without Bell inequalities

Giovanni Di Giuseppe, F. De Martini, D. Boschi

We report the results of an experiment in which postselected polarization-entangled photons were used to test the recent nonlocality proof by L. Hardy [Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1665 (1993)]. The particular source of entangled photons used in the experiment has the advantage that it is very easy to prepare a pair of photons in a state with any degree of entanglement. Hardy's theorem, which only works for nonmaximally entangled states, was tested for a range of states.

Physical Review A•Jul 1, 1997•67 citations

An energy–time Bell inequality in two-photon interferometry

Paul G. Kwiat, Aephraim M. Steinberg, R. Y. Chiao

We have performed an EPR-type experiment first proposed by Franson,1 resulting in two-particle interference that is both nonclassical and nonlocal. We used photon pairs produced in an entangled state of energy via spontaneous down-conversion. Each photon enters an unbalanced interferometer, and we detect singles and coincidence rates at the output ports. If the long- and short-arm path-length difference is much greater than the photons’ coherence lengths, no fringes are seen in singles as the arm lengths are varied. Yet when the difference between the path-length differences of the two interferometers is less than these coherence lengths, fringes are observed in coincidence, resulting from an interference of the (indistinguishable) “long–long” and “short–short" coincidence possibilities. If the electronic resolution is sufficient to eliminate the background of "short–long" and "long–short” coincidences, the visibility may be as high as 100%.2 For V > 71%, with certain reasonable auxiliary assumptions, Bell’s inequalities can be violated. The interpretation is that no local, realistic model can yield the observed results. The use of this type of entangled state is significant because it is much closer to the original EPR paradox than the spin-singlet case commonly considered.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1992•0 citations
Experimental tests of Bell's inequality based on two-photon interferometry consider only those coincidence events in which both photons arrive at the detectors at the same time. In a recent paper, Cabello et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 040401 (2009)] proposed a local model that is consistent with some aspects of these experiments. It is shown here that the model proposed by Cabello et al. is local but not realistic, and the role of post-selection in experiments of this kind is discussed.
The two-photon interferometric experiment proposed by J. D. Franson [Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2205 (1989)] is often treated as a ``Bell test of local realism.'' However, it has been suggested that this is incorrect due to the 5050%50 postselection performed even in the ideal gedanken version of the experiment. Here we present a simple local hidden variable model of the experiment that successfully explains the results obtained in usual realizations of the experiment, even with perfect detectors. Furthermore, we also show that there is no such model if the switching of the local phase settings is done at a rate determined by the internal geometry of the interferometers.
Let us imagine an experimentalist, who has maximally entangled photons and wants to violate Bell’s inequality in his laboratory. Among many obstacles he has to overcome, two of them are the most significant. Firstly, he has to avoid exchanging information about the measurement settings between the particles. Secondly, he has to detect particles with a high enough probability, because if the detection efficiency is too low, one can reproduce quantum correlations using a LHV (Local Hidden Variables) model. These two problems are known in the literature, respectively, as the locality loophole [1] and the detection loophole [2, 3]. Fortunately, it is possible to close the locality loophole using photons in the experiment [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. However, closing the detection loophole is still an object of study. The authors of [9] showed that for the CHSH inequality, the lower bound for detector efficiency needed to close the loophole is 82.8% for maximally entangled states. This bound was lowered to 66.7% by Eberhard [10]. Furthermore, the detector efficiency has been studied for other Bell inequalities [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. In our research, we are trying to answer the following question: If we prepare a Bell experiment and we have two detectors, having different efficiencies both smaller than 100%, which detector should each party receive? And also: Which representation of the chosen Bell inequality should we consider? These are very crucial questions, which arise in laboratories. Hence, we hope that our results will be useful for experimentalists. We focus on the I3322 inequality [17], which is a natural candidate for testing, because of its asymmetry [14, 18]. We consider the case of a post-selection strategy, which consists in rejecting all the rounds in the Bell experiment when one of the detectors does not click. We used numerical optimisation methods to find both the best classical strategy for Alice and Bob and the best detector clicking strategy. Thus, we have found minimal efficiencies of the detectors of Alice and Bob needed to violate I3322. We made the same studies also for symmetric representations of I3322 [19]. Our results show that the minimal efficiencies of Alice and Bob’s detectors of the asymmetric representation of I3322 is lower than in case of the symmetric one [20]. It is work in progress, and we are examining other post-selection methods as well as other Bell inequalities. We want to consider also the case when non-maximally entangled states are used in Bell experiments.
We introduce a two-observer all-versus-nothing proof of Bell's theorem which reduces the number of required quantum predictions from 9 [A. Cabello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 010403 (2001); Z.-B. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 160408 (2003)] to 4, provides a greater amount of evidence against local realism, reduces the detection efficiency requirements for a conclusive experimental test of Bell's theorem, and leads to a Bell inequality which resembles Mermin's inequality for three observers [N. D. Mermin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1838 (1990)] but requires only two observers.
We have performed an EPR-type experiment first proposed by Franson,1 resulting in two-particle interference that is both nonclassical and nonlocal. We used photon pairs produced in an entangled state of energy via spontaneous down-conversion. Each photon enters an unbalanced interferometer, and we detect singles and coincidence rates at the output ports. If the long- and short-arm path-length difference is much greater than the photons’ coherence lengths, no fringes are seen in singles as the arm lengths are varied. Yet when the difference between the path-length differences of the two interferometers is less than these coherence lengths, fringes are observed in coincidence, resulting from an interference of the (indistinguishable) “long–long” and “short–short" coincidence possibilities. If the electronic resolution is sufficient to eliminate the background of "short–long" and "long–short” coincidences, the visibility may be as high as 100%.2 For V > 71%, with certain reasonable auxiliary assumptions, Bell’s inequalities can be violated. The interpretation is that no local, realistic model can yield the observed results. The use of this type of entangled state is significant because it is much closer to the original EPR paradox than the spin-singlet case commonly considered.