Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0809.4235 · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields

Conditional probabilities with Dirac observables and the problem of time in quantum gravity

Rodolfo Gambini, Rafael A. Porto, Jorge A. Pullin, Sebastián Torterolo

Published Feb 13, 2009• 129 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We combine the ``evolving constants'' approach to the construction of observables in canonical quantum gravity with the Page-Wootters formulation of quantum mechanics with a relational time for generally covariant systems. This overcomes the objections levied by Kucha\ifmmode \check{r}\else \v{r}\fi{} against the latter formalism. The construction is formulated entirely in terms of Dirac observables, avoiding in all cases the physical observation of quantities that do not belong in the physical Hilbert space. We work out explicitly the example of the parametrized particle, including the calculation of the propagator. The resulting theory also predicts a fundamental mechanism of decoherence.

DOI
10.1103/physrevd.79.041501

Related papers

Fundamental decoherence from relational time in discrete quantum gravity: Galilean covariance

Rodolfo Gambini, Rafael A. Porto, Jorge A. Pullin

We have recently argued that if one introduces a relational time in quantum mechanics and quantum gravity, the resulting quantum theory is such that pure states evolve into mixed states. The rate at which states decohere depends on the energy of the states. There is therefore the question of how this can be reconciled with Galilean invariance. More generally, since the relational description is based on objects that are not Dirac observables, the issue of covariance is of importance in the formalism as a whole. In this note we work out an explicit example of a totally constrained, generally covariant system of nonrelativistic particles that shows that the formula for the relational conditional probability is a Galilean scalar and therefore the decoherence rate is invariant.

arXiv:gr-qc/0408050•Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Dec 1, 2004•12 citations

Relational observables, reference frames, and conditional probabilities

Leonardo Chataignier

We discuss the construction of relational observables in time-reparametrization invariant quantum mechanics, and we argue that their physical interpretation can be understood in terms of conditional probabilities, which are defined from the solutions of the quantum constraint equation in a generalization of the Page-Wootters formalism. In this regard, we show how conditional expectation values of worldline tensor fields are related to quantum averages of suitably defined relational observables. We also comment on how the dynamics of these observables can be related to a notion of quantum reference frames. After presenting the general formalism, we analyze a recollapsing cosmological model, for which we construct unitarily evolving quantum relational observables. We conclude with some remarks about the relevance of these results for the construction and interpretation of diffeomorphism-invariant operators in quantum gravity.

arXiv:2006.05526•Physical review. D/Physical review. D.•Jan 19, 2021•26 citations

The solution to the problem of time in quantum gravity also solves the time of arrival problem in quantum mechanics

Rodolfo Gambini, Jorge A. Pullin

Abstract We introduced with coauthors some years ago a solution to the problem of time in quantum gravity which consists in formulating the quantum theory in terms of real clocks. It combines Page and Wootters’ relational proposal with Rovelli’s evolving constants of the motion. Time is associated with an operator and not a classical parameter. We show here that this construction provides a natural solution to the time of arrival problem in quantum mechanics and leads to a well defined time-energy uncertainty relation for the clocks.

arXiv:2204.08371•New Journal of Physics•Apr 14, 2022•7 citations

Trinity of relational quantum dynamics

Philipp A. Höhn, Alexander R. H. Smith, Maximilian P. E. Lock

The problem of time in quantum gravity calls for a relational solution. Using quantum reduction maps, we establish a previously unknown equivalence between three approaches to relational quantum dynamics: (1) relational observables in the clock-neutral picture of Dirac quantization, (2) Page and Wootters' (PW) Schr\"odinger picture formalism, and (3) the relational Heisenberg picture obtained via symmetry reduction. Constituting three faces of the same dynamics, we call this equivalence the trinity. In the process, we develop a quantization procedure for relational Dirac observables using covariant positive operator-valued measures which encompass nonideal clocks and resolve the nonmonotonicity issue of realistic quantum clocks reported by Unruh and Wald. The quantum reduction maps reveal this procedure as the quantum analog of gauge-invariantly extending gauge-fixed quantities. We establish algebraic properties of these relational observables. We extend a recent ``clock-neutral'' approach to changing temporal reference frames, transforming relational observables and states, and demonstrate a clock dependent temporal nonlocality effect. We show that Kucha\ifmmode \check{r}\else \v{r}\fi{}'s criticism, alleging that the conditional probabilities of the PW formalism violate the constraint, is incorrect. They are a quantum analog of a gauge-fixed description of a gauge-invariant quantity and equivalent to the manifestly gauge-invariant evaluation of relational observables in the physical inner product. The trinity furthermore resolves a previously reported normalization ambiguity and clarifies the role of entanglement in the PW formalism. The trinity finally permits us to resolve Kucha\ifmmode \check{r}\else \v{r}\fi{}'s criticism that the PW formalism yields wrong propagators by showing how conditional probabilities of relational observables give the correct transition probabilities. Unlike previous proposals, our resolution does not invoke approximations, ideal clocks or ancilla systems, is manifestly gauge invariant, and easily extends to an arbitrary number of conditionings.

arXiv:1912.00033•Physical review. D/Physical review. D.•Sep 1, 2021•178 citations

The time of arrival problem in the Page-Wootters formalism

Niyusha Hosseini, Maximilian P. E. Lock

The time-of-arrival problem asks for the probability distribution for when a quantum particle reaches a specified location. It has been the subject of decades of debate, exemplifying the lack of a self-adjoint time observable in quantum theory. In the Page-Wootters framework, time is a relational quantity, emerging from correlations between a system and a clock induced by a global Hamiltonian constraint. We construct a time-of-arrival distribution by inverting the Page-Wootters approach, asking what time a clock reads given that the particle arrives at some fixed position. The result coincides with a common approach to the time-of-arrival problem, suggesting a potential relational interpretation of the latter. In addition to providing a relational description of the time-of-arrival problem, this gives an application of the Page-Wootters formalism to a concrete physical problem, and reveals some complications with its canonical interpretation as a theory of conditional probabilities.

quant-pharXiv:2604.00092•Apr 2, 2026•0 citations

Free will, undecidability, and the problem of time in quantum gravity

Rodolfo Gambini, Jorge A. Pullin

In quantum gravity there is no notion of absolute time. Like all other quantities in the theory, the notion of time has to be introduced "relationally", by studying the behavior of some physical quantities in terms of others chosen as a "clock". We have recently introduced a consistent way of defining time relationally in general relativity. When quantum mechanics is formulated in terms of this new notion of time the resolution of the measurement problem can be implemented via decoherence without the usual pitfalls. The resulting theory has the same experimental results of ordinary quantum mechanics, but every time an event is produced or a measurement happens two alternatives are possible: a) the state collapses; b) the system evolves without changing the state. One therefore has two possible behaviors of the quantum mechanical system and physical observations cannot decide between them, not just as a matter of experimental limitations but as an issue of principle. This first-ever example of fundamental undecidability in physics suggests that nature may behave sometimes as described by one alternative and sometimes as described by another. This in particular may give new vistas on the issue of free will.

arXiv:0903.1859•Mar 10, 2009•4 citations
We combine the ``evolving constants'' approach to the construction of observables in canonical quantum gravity with the Page-Wootters formulation of quantum mechanics with a relational time for generally covariant systems. This overcomes the objections levied by Kucha\ifmmode \check{r}\else \v{r}\fi{} against the latter formalism. The construction is formulated entirely in terms of Dirac observables, avoiding in all cases the physical observation of quantities that do not belong in the physical Hilbert space. We work out explicitly the example of the parametrized particle, including the calculation of the propagator. The resulting theory also predicts a fundamental mechanism of decoherence.
We have recently argued that if one introduces a relational time in quantum mechanics and quantum gravity, the resulting quantum theory is such that pure states evolve into mixed states. The rate at which states decohere depends on the energy of the states. There is therefore the question of how this can be reconciled with Galilean invariance. More generally, since the relational description is based on objects that are not Dirac observables, the issue of covariance is of importance in the formalism as a whole. In this note we work out an explicit example of a totally constrained, generally covariant system of nonrelativistic particles that shows that the formula for the relational conditional probability is a Galilean scalar and therefore the decoherence rate is invariant.
We discuss the construction of relational observables in time-reparametrization invariant quantum mechanics, and we argue that their physical interpretation can be understood in terms of conditional probabilities, which are defined from the solutions of the quantum constraint equation in a generalization of the Page-Wootters formalism. In this regard, we show how conditional expectation values of worldline tensor fields are related to quantum averages of suitably defined relational observables. We also comment on how the dynamics of these observables can be related to a notion of quantum reference frames. After presenting the general formalism, we analyze a recollapsing cosmological model, for which we construct unitarily evolving quantum relational observables. We conclude with some remarks about the relevance of these results for the construction and interpretation of diffeomorphism-invariant operators in quantum gravity.
Abstract We introduced with coauthors some years ago a solution to the problem of time in quantum gravity which consists in formulating the quantum theory in terms of real clocks. It combines Page and Wootters’ relational proposal with Rovelli’s evolving constants of the motion. Time is associated with an operator and not a classical parameter. We show here that this construction provides a natural solution to the time of arrival problem in quantum mechanics and leads to a well defined time-energy uncertainty relation for the clocks.
The problem of time in quantum gravity calls for a relational solution. Using quantum reduction maps, we establish a previously unknown equivalence between three approaches to relational quantum dynamics: (1) relational observables in the clock-neutral picture of Dirac quantization, (2) Page and Wootters' (PW) Schr\"odinger picture formalism, and (3) the relational Heisenberg picture obtained via symmetry reduction. Constituting three faces of the same dynamics, we call this equivalence the trinity. In the process, we develop a quantization procedure for relational Dirac observables using covariant positive operator-valued measures which encompass nonideal clocks and resolve the nonmonotonicity issue of realistic quantum clocks reported by Unruh and Wald. The quantum reduction maps reveal this procedure as the quantum analog of gauge-invariantly extending gauge-fixed quantities. We establish algebraic properties of these relational observables. We extend a recent ``clock-neutral'' approach to changing temporal reference frames, transforming relational observables and states, and demonstrate a clock dependent temporal nonlocality effect. We show that Kucha\ifmmode \check{r}\else \v{r}\fi{}'s criticism, alleging that the conditional probabilities of the PW formalism violate the constraint, is incorrect. They are a quantum analog of a gauge-fixed description of a gauge-invariant quantity and equivalent to the manifestly gauge-invariant evaluation of relational observables in the physical inner product. The trinity furthermore resolves a previously reported normalization ambiguity and clarifies the role of entanglement in the PW formalism. The trinity finally permits us to resolve Kucha\ifmmode \check{r}\else \v{r}\fi{}'s criticism that the PW formalism yields wrong propagators by showing how conditional probabilities of relational observables give the correct transition probabilities. Unlike previous proposals, our resolution does not invoke approximations, ideal clocks or ancilla systems, is manifestly gauge invariant, and easily extends to an arbitrary number of conditionings.
The time-of-arrival problem asks for the probability distribution for when a quantum particle reaches a specified location. It has been the subject of decades of debate, exemplifying the lack of a self-adjoint time observable in quantum theory. In the Page-Wootters framework, time is a relational quantity, emerging from correlations between a system and a clock induced by a global Hamiltonian constraint. We construct a time-of-arrival distribution by inverting the Page-Wootters approach, asking what time a clock reads given that the particle arrives at some fixed position. The result coincides with a common approach to the time-of-arrival problem, suggesting a potential relational interpretation of the latter. In addition to providing a relational description of the time-of-arrival problem, this gives an application of the Page-Wootters formalism to a concrete physical problem, and reveals some complications with its canonical interpretation as a theory of conditional probabilities.
In quantum gravity there is no notion of absolute time. Like all other quantities in the theory, the notion of time has to be introduced "relationally", by studying the behavior of some physical quantities in terms of others chosen as a "clock". We have recently introduced a consistent way of defining time relationally in general relativity. When quantum mechanics is formulated in terms of this new notion of time the resolution of the measurement problem can be implemented via decoherence without the usual pitfalls. The resulting theory has the same experimental results of ordinary quantum mechanics, but every time an event is produced or a measurement happens two alternatives are possible: a) the state collapses; b) the system evolves without changing the state. One therefore has two possible behaviors of the quantum mechanical system and physical observations cannot decide between them, not just as a matter of experimental limitations but as an issue of principle. This first-ever example of fundamental undecidability in physics suggests that nature may behave sometimes as described by one alternative and sometimes as described by another. This in particular may give new vistas on the issue of free will.