We present a novel quantum tomographic reconstruction method based on Bayesian inference via the Kalman filter update equations. The method not only yields the maximum likelihood/optimal Bayesian reconstruction but also a covariance matrix expressing the measurement uncertainties in a complete way. From this covariance matrix the error bars on any derived quantity can be easily calculated. This is a first step towards the broader goal of devising an omnibus reconstruction method that could be adapted to any tomographic setup with little effort and that treats measurement uncertainties in a statistically well-founded way. In this first part, we restrict ourselves to the important subclass of tomography based on measurements with discrete outcomes (as opposed to continuous ones), and we also ignore any measurement imperfections (dark counts, less than unit detector efficiency, etc), which will be treated in a follow-up paper. We illustrate our general theory on real tomography experiments of quantum optical information processing elements.
We present a novel quantum tomographic reconstruction method based on Bayesian inference via the Kalman filter update equations. The method not only yields the maximum likelihood/optimal Bayesian reconstruction but also a covariance matrix expressing the measurement uncertainties in a complete way. From this covariance matrix the error bars on any derived quantity can be easily calculated. This is a first step towards the broader goal of devising an omnibus reconstruction method that could be adapted to any tomographic setup with little effort and that treats measurement uncertainties in a statistically well-founded way. In this first part, we restrict ourselves to the important subclass of tomography based on measurements with discrete outcomes (as opposed to continuous ones), and we also ignore any measurement imperfections (dark counts, less than unit detector efficiency, etc), which will be treated in a follow-up paper. We illustrate our general theory on real tomography experiments of quantum optical information processing elements.
This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the fusion between quantum tomography and the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF), emphasizing its superiority in refining quantum tomographic reconstructions compared to conventional methodologies. By intersecting quantum mechanical principles with sophisticated filtering technologies, our analysis uncovers emergent research trajectories within the domain of quantum information science. It underscores the significant potential that this integration holds for the evolution of quantum technology applications. Furthermore, this paper delineates the expansive impact of improved quantum state information across a spectrum of scientific fields, thereby enriching the discourse on quantum state estimation and its applications. Through this investigation, we contribute to a deeper understanding of the pivotal role that advanced filtering techniques, specifically the EKF, play in advancing quantum tomography, paving the way for future innovations in quantum computing and beyond.
We expand the scope of the statistical notion of error probability, that is, how often large deviations are observed in an experiment, to make it directly applicable to quantum tomography. We verify that the error probability can decrease at most exponentially in the number of trials, we derive the explicit rate that bounds this decrease, and we show that a maximum likelihood estimator achieves this bound. We also show that the statistical notion of identifiability coincides with the tomographic notion of informational completeness. Our result implies that two quantum tomographic apparatuses that have the same risk function (e.g., variance) can have different error probability, and we give an example in one-qubit-state tomography. Thus by combining these two approaches we can evaluate, in a reconstruction-independent way, the performance of such experiments more discerningly.
In this paper we revisit the problem of optimal design of quantum tomographic experiments. In contrast to previous approaches where an optimal set of measurements is decided in advance of the experiment, we allow for measurements to be adaptively and efficiently reoptimized depending on data collected so far. We develop an adaptive statistical framework based on Bayesian inference and Shannon's information, and demonstrate a significant reduction in the total number of measurements required as compared to nonadaptive methods, including mutually unbiased bases.
We consider the statistical properties of photon detection with imperfect detectors that exhibit dark counts and less than unit efficiency, in the context of tomographic reconstruction. In this context, the detectors are used to implement certain POVMs that would allow to reconstruct the quantum state or quantum process under consideration. Here we look at the intermediate step of inferring outcome probabilities from measured outcome frequencies, and show how this inference can be performed in a statistically sound way in the presence of detector imperfections. Merging outcome probabilities for different sets of POVMs into a consistent quantum state picture has been treated elsewhere [K.M.R. Audenaert and S. Scheel, New J. Phys. 11, 023028 (2009)]. Single-photon pulsed measurements as well as continuous wave measurements are covered.
Quantum state vector reconstruction is a fundamental problem in quantum information theory, crucial for tasks like quantum state tomography and quantum error correction. Traditional methods often struggle with noisy measurements and lack a principled framework for uncertainty quantification. This paper introduces a novel algorithm, Quantum State Vector Reconstruction via Bayesian Inference, that leverages Bayesian inference to reconstruct a quantum state vector from a set of measurements, enhancing accuracy and offering a more robust approach compared to existing methods. We detail the core mechanism, emphasizing the integration of Bayesian estimation for uncertainty quantification and refinement of the reconstruction process. The algorithm incorporates a probabilistic approach to estimate the state vector distribution, improving reconstruction by incorporating uncertainty estimates directly into the reconstruction process. This results in a more reliable and accurate state vector reconstruction, particularly when dealing with noisy measurements. This work addresses the limitations of conventional methods by providing a principled Bayesian framework for state vector reconstruction, offering a significant advancement in this field.
We introduce a fast and accurate heuristic for adaptive tomography that addresses many of the limitations of prior methods.Previous approaches were either too computationally intensive or tailored to handle special cases such as single qubits or pure states.By contrast, our approach combines the efficiency of online optimization with generally applicable and well-motivated data-processing techniques.We numerically demonstrate these advantages in several scenarios including mixed states, higher-dimensional systems, and restricted measurements.Quantum information processing (QIP) promises advantages in a wide range of different contexts, including machine learning [2-4], chemistry simulation [5][6][7], and number theory [8,9].As such, the experimental effort to build useful QIP devices has exploded in recent years.In the course of this effort, quantum tomography is a valuable tool for diagnosing and debugging small quantum devices, and has subsequently seen a variety of different advances.In particular, Bayesian approaches to tomography which are especially well suited to utilizing prior information and adapting to changing experimental conditions have developed significantly in recent years [10-13], presenting a useful experimental tool [14][15][16].In this paper we demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of an adaptive tomography protocol that we call PAQT: practical adaptive quantum tomography.PAQT intelligently selects new measurements based on the outcomes of previous ones [10,[17][18][19][20][21].Adaptivity has been experimentally demonstrated [14,15,[22][23][24][25], but is not currently standard practice.Though adaptivity increases accuracy, the computational costs incurred outweigh that of simply repeating standard measurements many times.The PAQT approach employs a simple heuristic that can be efficiently computed between measurements, even with embedded hardware [26][27][28][29].The algorithm we propose is therefore compatible with modern experimental design and avoids an important limitation of previous approaches.We base our algorithm off of self-guided quantum tomography (SGQT), which treats adaptive tomography as a direct optimization problem rather than a new optimization problem between each measurement [30].Though this affords an efficient and easy to implement adaptive heuristic, SGQT is not without its limitations.It requires assuming that the target state is pure, and it does not return rich region estimates for a state.What PAQT achieves is to effectively combine SGQT with conventional and easily-implemented tomographic estimators, such as the Bayesian particle filter or least-squares fit (LSF) estimators.Under this approach, an experimentalist can collect data using SGQT (even if its assumptions are not met), and then post-process this data using particle filtering or LSF.The benefit of PAQT is two-fold.(1) From the point of view of traditional tomography, it gives an adaptive tomography protocol requiring only modest computational resources, as the bulk of the computational cost is offloaded to post-processing.(2) From the point of view of simulation-based optimization tomography (such as SGQT), it effectively augments the output with region estimation providing a statistically robust quantification of uncertainty.Thus, while we do not explicitly demonstrate that the improved scaling of Ferrie [30] remains in the more general case considered here, PAQT does provide a practical and efficient procedure for performing adaptive quantum tomography with rigorous statistical principles.