Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0809.1351

Background Independent Quantum Mechanics, Classical Geometric Forms and Geometric Quantum Mechanics-I

Aalok Pandya

Published Sep 8, 2008• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The geometry of the symplectic structures and Fubini-Study metric is discussed. Discussion in the paper addresses geometry of Quantum Mechanics in the classical phase space. Also, geometry of Quantum Mechanics in the projective Hilbert space has been discussed for the chosen Quantum states. Since the theory of classical gravity is basically geometric in nature and Quantum Mechanics is in no way devoid of geometry, the explorations pertaining to more and more geometry in Quantum Mechanics could prove to be valuable for larger objectives such as understanding of gravity.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0809.1351

Related papers

Exploring the Geometric and Dynamical Properties of Spin Systems and Their Interplay with Quantum Entanglement

Jamal Elfakir

This thesis, explores the quantum entanglement and evolution through both a geometric and dynamical perspective. The first part focuses on classical phase space and its central role in Hamiltonian mechanics, emphasizing the importance of symplectic structures in describing mechanical states. The study highlights the formal analogy between classical phase space and the Hilbert space used in quantum mechanics. The second part is devoted to the geometric description of quantum states through the projective structure of Hilbert space. Emphasis is placed on the geometric interpretation of quantum evolution, particularly via the Fubini-Study metric, associated symplectic structures, and the geometric phase acquired during unitary evolutions. The final two parts are dedicated to the study of spin systems (both two-body and many-body) under different interaction models (XXZ Heisenberg and all-range Ising). Both the dynamical aspects (evolution speed, entanglement, and the quantum brachistochrone problem) and the geometric and topological structures of the corresponding quantum states are analyzed.

quant-pharXiv:2605.00241•May 4, 2026•0 citations

Background Independent Quantum Mechanics, Metric of Quantum States, and Gravity: A Comprehensive Perspective

This paper presents a comprehensive perspective of the metric of quantum states with a focus on geometry in the background independent quantum mechanics. We also explore the possibilities of geometrical formulations of quantum mechanics beyond the quantum state space and Kahler & & manifold. The metric of quantum states in the classical configuration space with the pseudo-Riemannian signature and its possible applications are explored. On contrary to the common perception that a metric for quantum state can yield a natural metric in the configuration space when the limit h → 0, we obtain the metric of quantum states in the configuration space without imposing the limiting condition h → 0. Here Planck’s constant h is absorbed in the quantity like Bohr radii 1 ~ a0. While exploring the metric structures associated with Hydrogen like atom,

•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

Geometry of Quantum States

Daniel W. Hook

A geometric framework for quantum mechanics arose during the mid 1970s when authors such as Cantoni explored the notion of generalized transition probabilities, and Kibble promoted the idea that the space of pure quantum states provides a natural quantum mechanical analogue for classical phase space. This central idea can be seen easily since the projection of Schrödinger's equation from a Hilbert space into the space of pure spaces is a set of Hamilton's equations. Over the intervening years considerable work has been carried out by a variety of authors and a mature description of quantum mechanics in geometric terms has emerged with many applications. This current offering would seem ideally placed to review the last thirty years of progress and relate this to the most recent work in quantum entanglement. Bengtsson and Zyczkowski's beautifully illustrated volume, Geometry of Quantum States (referred to as GQS from now on) attempts to cover considerable ground in its 466 pages. Its topics range from colour theory in Chapter 1 to quantum entanglement in Chapter 15—to say that this is a whirlwind tour is, perhaps, no understatement. The use of the work 'introduction' in the subtitle of GQS , might suggest to the reader that this work be viewed as a textbook and I think that this interpretation would be incorrect. The authors have chosen to present a survey of different topics with the specific aim to introduce entanglement in geometric terms—the book is not intended as a pedagogical introduction to the geometric approach to quantum mechanics. Each of the fifteen chapters is a short, and mostly self-contained, essay on a particular aspect or application of geometry in the context of quantum mechanics with entanglement being addressed specifically in the final chapter. The chapters fall into three classifications: those concerned with the mathematical background, those which discuss quantum theory and the foundational aspects of the geometric framework, and applications of the geometric approach. The first four chapters contain the standard mathematics required to understand the rest of the material presented: specific areas in colour theory, set theory, probability theory, differential geometry and projective geometry are all covered with an eye to the material that follows. Chapter 5 starts the first real discussion of quantum theory in GQS and serves as an elegant, succinct introduction to the geometry which underlies quantum theory. This may be the most worthwhile chapter for the casual reader who wants to understand the key ideas in this field. Chapter 6 builds on the discussion in Chapter 5, introducing a group theoretic approach to understand coherent states and Chapter 7 describes a geometric tool in the form of an approach to complex projective geometry called 'the stellar representation'. Chapter 8 returns to a more purely quantum mechanical discussion as the authors turn to study the space of density matrices. This chapter completes the discussion which started in Chapter 5. Chapter 9 begins the part of the book concerned with applications of the geometric approach. From this point on the book aims, specifically, to prepare the reader for the material in Chapter 15 beginning with a discussion on the purification of mixed quantum states. In the succeeding chapters a definite choice has been made to present a geometric approach to certain quantum information problems. For example, Chapter 10 contains an extremely well formulated discussion of measurement and positive operator-valued measures with several well illustrated examples and Chapter 11 reopens the discussion of density matrices. Entropy and majorization are again revisited in Chapter 12 in much greater detail than in previous chapters. Chapters 13 and 14 concern themselves with a discussion of various metrics and their relation to the problem of distinguishing between probability distributions and their suitability as probability measures.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Dec 12, 2007•260 citations

Geometry of Quantum Evolution

Dariusz Chruściński, Andrzej Jamiołkowski

Usually one uses completely different mathematical descriptions to formulate classical and quantum mechanics. Classical theory may be nicely formulated in terms of symplectic geometry, and the quantum one in terms of algebraic objects related to a complex Hilbert space. However, it turns out that standard, nonrelativistic quantum mechanics possesses natural geometric structure that is even richer than that found in classical mechanics. This section reveals the beauty of the geometric approach to quantum theory and stands as a basis for the elegant geometrical ideas of Pancharatnam and, later on, of Aharonov and Anandan. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Birkhäuser Boston eBooks•Jan 1, 2004•2 citations

Geometric Quantum Mechanics in a Symplectic Framework: Metric-Affine Extensions and Deformed Quantum Dynamics

Hoshang Heydari

We present a geometric formulation of quantum mechanics based on the symplectic structure of the projective Hilbert space. Building upon the standard Kähler framework, we introduce an extension in which the symplectic structure is allowed to couple to a metric-affine background geometry, leading to a deformation of the Hamiltonian flow on the state space. We show that, under suitable conditions, the deformed structure remains symplectic and defines a well-posed Hamiltonian system. The formulation reduces to standard Schrödinger dynamics in the limit where the geometric deformation vanishes. Explicit analytical examples are constructed to illustrate the effect of the deformation. In particular, curvature-dependent deformations lead to a rescaling of Hamiltonian flows, while torsion-induced contributions produce direction-dependent corrections. In addition, geometric phases acquire corrections determined by the deformed symplectic structure. These results provide a mathematically consistent framework for exploring geometric modifications of quantum evolution induced by background curvature and affine structure.

quant-pharXiv:2603.22354•Mar 24, 2026•0 citations

PHASE SPACE GEOMETRY IN CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS

John R. Klauder

Phase space is the state space of classical mechanics, and this manifold is normally endowed only with a symplectic form. The geometry of quantum mechanics is necessarily more complicated. Arguments will be given to show that augmenting the symplectic manifold of classical phase space with a Riemannian metric is sufficient for describing quantum mechanics. In particular, using such spaces, a fully satisfactory geometric version of quantization will be developed and described.

arXiv:quant-ph/0112010•International Workshop on Contemporary Problems in Mathematical Physics (COPROMAPH)•Oct 1, 2002•8 citations
The geometry of the symplectic structures and Fubini-Study metric is discussed. Discussion in the paper addresses geometry of Quantum Mechanics in the classical phase space. Also, geometry of Quantum Mechanics in the projective Hilbert space has been discussed for the chosen Quantum states. Since the theory of classical gravity is basically geometric in nature and Quantum Mechanics is in no way devoid of geometry, the explorations pertaining to more and more geometry in Quantum Mechanics could prove to be valuable for larger objectives such as understanding of gravity.
This thesis, explores the quantum entanglement and evolution through both a geometric and dynamical perspective. The first part focuses on classical phase space and its central role in Hamiltonian mechanics, emphasizing the importance of symplectic structures in describing mechanical states. The study highlights the formal analogy between classical phase space and the Hilbert space used in quantum mechanics. The second part is devoted to the geometric description of quantum states through the projective structure of Hilbert space. Emphasis is placed on the geometric interpretation of quantum evolution, particularly via the Fubini-Study metric, associated symplectic structures, and the geometric phase acquired during unitary evolutions. The final two parts are dedicated to the study of spin systems (both two-body and many-body) under different interaction models (XXZ Heisenberg and all-range Ising). Both the dynamical aspects (evolution speed, entanglement, and the quantum brachistochrone problem) and the geometric and topological structures of the corresponding quantum states are analyzed.
This paper presents a comprehensive perspective of the metric of quantum states with a focus on geometry in the background independent quantum mechanics. We also explore the possibilities of geometrical formulations of quantum mechanics beyond the quantum state space and Kahler & & manifold. The metric of quantum states in the classical configuration space with the pseudo-Riemannian signature and its possible applications are explored. On contrary to the common perception that a metric for quantum state can yield a natural metric in the configuration space when the limit h → 0, we obtain the metric of quantum states in the configuration space without imposing the limiting condition h → 0. Here Planck’s constant h is absorbed in the quantity like Bohr radii 1 ~ a0. While exploring the metric structures associated with Hydrogen like atom,
A geometric framework for quantum mechanics arose during the mid 1970s when authors such as Cantoni explored the notion of generalized transition probabilities, and Kibble promoted the idea that the space of pure quantum states provides a natural quantum mechanical analogue for classical phase space. This central idea can be seen easily since the projection of Schrödinger's equation from a Hilbert space into the space of pure spaces is a set of Hamilton's equations. Over the intervening years considerable work has been carried out by a variety of authors and a mature description of quantum mechanics in geometric terms has emerged with many applications. This current offering would seem ideally placed to review the last thirty years of progress and relate this to the most recent work in quantum entanglement. Bengtsson and Zyczkowski's beautifully illustrated volume, Geometry of Quantum States (referred to as GQS from now on) attempts to cover considerable ground in its 466 pages. Its topics range from colour theory in Chapter 1 to quantum entanglement in Chapter 15—to say that this is a whirlwind tour is, perhaps, no understatement. The use of the work 'introduction' in the subtitle of GQS , might suggest to the reader that this work be viewed as a textbook and I think that this interpretation would be incorrect. The authors have chosen to present a survey of different topics with the specific aim to introduce entanglement in geometric terms—the book is not intended as a pedagogical introduction to the geometric approach to quantum mechanics. Each of the fifteen chapters is a short, and mostly self-contained, essay on a particular aspect or application of geometry in the context of quantum mechanics with entanglement being addressed specifically in the final chapter. The chapters fall into three classifications: those concerned with the mathematical background, those which discuss quantum theory and the foundational aspects of the geometric framework, and applications of the geometric approach. The first four chapters contain the standard mathematics required to understand the rest of the material presented: specific areas in colour theory, set theory, probability theory, differential geometry and projective geometry are all covered with an eye to the material that follows. Chapter 5 starts the first real discussion of quantum theory in GQS and serves as an elegant, succinct introduction to the geometry which underlies quantum theory. This may be the most worthwhile chapter for the casual reader who wants to understand the key ideas in this field. Chapter 6 builds on the discussion in Chapter 5, introducing a group theoretic approach to understand coherent states and Chapter 7 describes a geometric tool in the form of an approach to complex projective geometry called 'the stellar representation'. Chapter 8 returns to a more purely quantum mechanical discussion as the authors turn to study the space of density matrices. This chapter completes the discussion which started in Chapter 5. Chapter 9 begins the part of the book concerned with applications of the geometric approach. From this point on the book aims, specifically, to prepare the reader for the material in Chapter 15 beginning with a discussion on the purification of mixed quantum states. In the succeeding chapters a definite choice has been made to present a geometric approach to certain quantum information problems. For example, Chapter 10 contains an extremely well formulated discussion of measurement and positive operator-valued measures with several well illustrated examples and Chapter 11 reopens the discussion of density matrices. Entropy and majorization are again revisited in Chapter 12 in much greater detail than in previous chapters. Chapters 13 and 14 concern themselves with a discussion of various metrics and their relation to the problem of distinguishing between probability distributions and their suitability as probability measures.
Usually one uses completely different mathematical descriptions to formulate classical and quantum mechanics. Classical theory may be nicely formulated in terms of symplectic geometry, and the quantum one in terms of algebraic objects related to a complex Hilbert space. However, it turns out that standard, nonrelativistic quantum mechanics possesses natural geometric structure that is even richer than that found in classical mechanics. This section reveals the beauty of the geometric approach to quantum theory and stands as a basis for the elegant geometrical ideas of Pancharatnam and, later on, of Aharonov and Anandan. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
We present a geometric formulation of quantum mechanics based on the symplectic structure of the projective Hilbert space. Building upon the standard Kähler framework, we introduce an extension in which the symplectic structure is allowed to couple to a metric-affine background geometry, leading to a deformation of the Hamiltonian flow on the state space. We show that, under suitable conditions, the deformed structure remains symplectic and defines a well-posed Hamiltonian system. The formulation reduces to standard Schrödinger dynamics in the limit where the geometric deformation vanishes. Explicit analytical examples are constructed to illustrate the effect of the deformation. In particular, curvature-dependent deformations lead to a rescaling of Hamiltonian flows, while torsion-induced contributions produce direction-dependent corrections. In addition, geometric phases acquire corrections determined by the deformed symplectic structure. These results provide a mathematically consistent framework for exploring geometric modifications of quantum evolution induced by background curvature and affine structure.