Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0807.5058 · Physics Letters A

Adaptive Bayesian and frequentist data processing for quantum tomography

Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano, Daniele F. Magnani, Paolo Perinotti

Published Feb 1, 2009• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2009.01.055

Related papers

Pseudo-Bayesian quantum tomography with rank-adaptation

Tien Mai, Pierre Alquier

arXiv:1605.05933•Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference•Dec 10, 2016•24 citations

Bayesian versus Frequentist Predictions in Quantum Tomography

Rüdiger Schack

This short paper is a reply to Andrei Khrennikov’s challenge to give a concrete quantum‐mechanical example where the Bayesian and frequentist approaches to probability lead to different predictions. The paper first reviews the difference between the Bayesian and frequentist approaches to hypothesis testing and then presents a simple example in quantum tomography for which Bayesian and frequentist predictions differ.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2007•2 citations

Adaptive-measurement based quantum tomography

Shao-Ming Fei

Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy•Nov 21, 2016•7 citations

Practical adaptive quantum tomography

Christopher Granade, Christopher Ferrie, Steven T. Flammia

We introduce a fast and accurate heuristic for adaptive tomography that addresses many of the limitations of prior methods.Previous approaches were either too computationally intensive or tailored to handle special cases such as single qubits or pure states.By contrast, our approach combines the efficiency of online optimization with generally applicable and well-motivated data-processing techniques.We numerically demonstrate these advantages in several scenarios including mixed states, higher-dimensional systems, and restricted measurements.Quantum information processing (QIP) promises advantages in a wide range of different contexts, including machine learning [2-4], chemistry simulation [5][6][7], and number theory [8,9].As such, the experimental effort to build useful QIP devices has exploded in recent years.In the course of this effort, quantum tomography is a valuable tool for diagnosing and debugging small quantum devices, and has subsequently seen a variety of different advances.In particular, Bayesian approaches to tomography which are especially well suited to utilizing prior information and adapting to changing experimental conditions have developed significantly in recent years [10-13], presenting a useful experimental tool [14][15][16].In this paper we demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of an adaptive tomography protocol that we call PAQT: practical adaptive quantum tomography.PAQT intelligently selects new measurements based on the outcomes of previous ones [10,[17][18][19][20][21].Adaptivity has been experimentally demonstrated [14,15,[22][23][24][25], but is not currently standard practice.Though adaptivity increases accuracy, the computational costs incurred outweigh that of simply repeating standard measurements many times.The PAQT approach employs a simple heuristic that can be efficiently computed between measurements, even with embedded hardware [26][27][28][29].The algorithm we propose is therefore compatible with modern experimental design and avoids an important limitation of previous approaches.We base our algorithm off of self-guided quantum tomography (SGQT), which treats adaptive tomography as a direct optimization problem rather than a new optimization problem between each measurement [30].Though this affords an efficient and easy to implement adaptive heuristic, SGQT is not without its limitations.It requires assuming that the target state is pure, and it does not return rich region estimates for a state.What PAQT achieves is to effectively combine SGQT with conventional and easily-implemented tomographic estimators, such as the Bayesian particle filter or least-squares fit (LSF) estimators.Under this approach, an experimentalist can collect data using SGQT (even if its assumptions are not met), and then post-process this data using particle filtering or LSF.The benefit of PAQT is two-fold.(1) From the point of view of traditional tomography, it gives an adaptive tomography protocol requiring only modest computational resources, as the bulk of the computational cost is offloaded to post-processing.(2) From the point of view of simulation-based optimization tomography (such as SGQT), it effectively augments the output with region estimation providing a statistically robust quantification of uncertainty.Thus, while we do not explicitly demonstrate that the improved scaling of Ferrie [30] remains in the more general case considered here, PAQT does provide a practical and efficient procedure for performing adaptive quantum tomography with rigorous statistical principles.

arXiv:1605.05039•New Journal of Physics•Sep 29, 2017•51 citations

Bayesian Quantum State Tomography with Python's PyMC

Daniel J. Lum, Yaakov S. Weinstein

Quantum state tomography (QST) is typically performed from a frequentist viewpoint using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) which seeks to find the best plausible state consistent with the data by maximizing a likelihood function / distribution. The likelihood function holds an implicit assumption that there is suitable data to infer frequency. In data-starved experiments, this may or may not be a feasible assumption. Moreover, MLE returns no error estimates on the final solution and users are forced to rely on alternative approaches involving either additional measurements or simulated data. Alternatively, Bayesian methods can return a solution with error estimates consistent with the data's uncertainty, but at the expense of a difficult integration over the likelihood distribution. The integration usually requires computational methods with appropriately chosen step sizes in a somewhat complicated problem formulation. This additional complexity serves as a strong deterrent from using Bayesian methods despite the advantages. Probabilistic programming is becoming a common alternative with growing computational power and the development of robust automated integration techniques such as Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). Here, we show how to use Python-3's open source PyMC probabilistic programming package to transform an otherwise complicated QST optimization problem into a simple form that can be quickly optimized with efficient under-the-hood MCMC samplers.

arXiv:2212.10655•Dec 20, 2022•0 citations

Quantum tomographic reconstruction: a Bayesian approach using the extended Kalman filter

Obaideen K, AlShabi M, Gadsden SA +1 more

•Jun 7, 2024•0 citations
We introduce a fast and accurate heuristic for adaptive tomography that addresses many of the limitations of prior methods.Previous approaches were either too computationally intensive or tailored to handle special cases such as single qubits or pure states.By contrast, our approach combines the efficiency of online optimization with generally applicable and well-motivated data-processing techniques.We numerically demonstrate these advantages in several scenarios including mixed states, higher-dimensional systems, and restricted measurements.Quantum information processing (QIP) promises advantages in a wide range of different contexts, including machine learning [2-4], chemistry simulation [5][6][7], and number theory [8,9].As such, the experimental effort to build useful QIP devices has exploded in recent years.In the course of this effort, quantum tomography is a valuable tool for diagnosing and debugging small quantum devices, and has subsequently seen a variety of different advances.In particular, Bayesian approaches to tomography which are especially well suited to utilizing prior information and adapting to changing experimental conditions have developed significantly in recent years [10-13], presenting a useful experimental tool [14][15][16].In this paper we demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of an adaptive tomography protocol that we call PAQT: practical adaptive quantum tomography.PAQT intelligently selects new measurements based on the outcomes of previous ones [10,[17][18][19][20][21].Adaptivity has been experimentally demonstrated [14,15,[22][23][24][25], but is not currently standard practice.Though adaptivity increases accuracy, the computational costs incurred outweigh that of simply repeating standard measurements many times.The PAQT approach employs a simple heuristic that can be efficiently computed between measurements, even with embedded hardware [26][27][28][29].The algorithm we propose is therefore compatible with modern experimental design and avoids an important limitation of previous approaches.We base our algorithm off of self-guided quantum tomography (SGQT), which treats adaptive tomography as a direct optimization problem rather than a new optimization problem between each measurement [30].Though this affords an efficient and easy to implement adaptive heuristic, SGQT is not without its limitations.It requires assuming that the target state is pure, and it does not return rich region estimates for a state.What PAQT achieves is to effectively combine SGQT with conventional and easily-implemented tomographic estimators, such as the Bayesian particle filter or least-squares fit (LSF) estimators.Under this approach, an experimentalist can collect data using SGQT (even if its assumptions are not met), and then post-process this data using particle filtering or LSF.The benefit of PAQT is two-fold.(1) From the point of view of traditional tomography, it gives an adaptive tomography protocol requiring only modest computational resources, as the bulk of the computational cost is offloaded to post-processing.(2) From the point of view of simulation-based optimization tomography (such as SGQT), it effectively augments the output with region estimation providing a statistically robust quantification of uncertainty.Thus, while we do not explicitly demonstrate that the improved scaling of Ferrie [30] remains in the more general case considered here, PAQT does provide a practical and efficient procedure for performing adaptive quantum tomography with rigorous statistical principles.
Quantum state tomography (QST) is typically performed from a frequentist viewpoint using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) which seeks to find the best plausible state consistent with the data by maximizing a likelihood function / distribution. The likelihood function holds an implicit assumption that there is suitable data to infer frequency. In data-starved experiments, this may or may not be a feasible assumption. Moreover, MLE returns no error estimates on the final solution and users are forced to rely on alternative approaches involving either additional measurements or simulated data. Alternatively, Bayesian methods can return a solution with error estimates consistent with the data's uncertainty, but at the expense of a difficult integration over the likelihood distribution. The integration usually requires computational methods with appropriately chosen step sizes in a somewhat complicated problem formulation. This additional complexity serves as a strong deterrent from using Bayesian methods despite the advantages. Probabilistic programming is becoming a common alternative with growing computational power and the development of robust automated integration techniques such as Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). Here, we show how to use Python-3's open source PyMC probabilistic programming package to transform an otherwise complicated QST optimization problem into a simple form that can be quickly optimized with efficient under-the-hood MCMC samplers.