Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0807.2927 · Journal of Mathematical Physics

Completeness of †-categories and the complex numbers

Jamie Vicary

Published Aug 1, 2011• 31 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The complex numbers are an important part of quantum theory, but are difficult to motivate from a theoretical perspective. We describe a simple formal framework for theories of physics, and show that if a theory of physics presented in this manner satisfies certain completeness properties, then it necessarily includes the complex numbers as a mathematical ingredient. Central to our approach are the techniques of category theory, and we introduce a new category-theoretical tool, called the †-limit, which governs the way in which systems can be combined to form larger systems. These †-limits can be used to characterize the properties of the †-functor on the category of finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, and so can be used as an equivalent definition of the inner product. One of our main results is that in a nontrivial monoidal †-category with finite †-limits and a simple tensor unit, the semiring of scalars embeds into an involutive field of characteristic 0 and orderable fixed field.

DOI
10.1063/1.3549117

Related papers

Completeness and the complex numbers

Jamie Vicary

The complex numbers are an important part of quantum theory, but are difficult to motivate from a theoretical perspective. We describe a simple formal framework for theories of physics, and show that if a theory of physics presented in this manner satisfies certain completeness properties, then it necessarily includes the complex numbers as a mathematical ingredient. Central to our approach are the techniques of category theory, and we introduce a new category-theoretical tool, called the †-limit, to prove our results. These †-limits can be used to characterize the properties of the †-functor on the category of finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, and so can be used as an equivalent definition of the inner product. The technical statement of our main theorem is that in a nontrivial monoidal †-category with †-limits and a simple tensor unit, in which the self-adjoint scalars are Dedekind-complete, the scalars are valued in the complex numbers. 1

•Jul 18, 2008•0 citations

On the Necessity of Complex Numbers in Quantum Mechanics

Marco Oppio

In principle, the lattice of elementary propositions of a generic quantum system admits a representation in real, complex or quaternionic Hilbert spaces as established by Solèr’s theorem (1995) closing a long standing problem that can be traced back to von Neumann’s mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics. However up to now there are no examples of quantum systems described in Hilbert spaces whose scalar field is different from the set of complex numbers. We show that elementary relativistic systems cannot be described by irreducible strongly-continuous unitary representations of SL(2, C) on real or quaternionic Hilbert spaces as a consequence of some peculiarity of the generators related with the theory of polar decomposition of operators. Indeed such a ”naive” attempt leads necessarily to an equivalent formulation on a complex Hilbert space. Although this conclusion seems to give a definitive answer to the real/quaternionic-quantum-mechanics issue, it lacks consistency since it does not derive from more general physical hypotheses as the complex one does. Trying a more solid approach, in both situations we end up with three possibilities: an equivalent description in terms of a Wigner unitary representation in a real, complex or quaternionic Hilbert space. At this point the ”naive” result turns out to be a definitely important technical lemma, for it forbids the two extreme possibilities. \nIn conclusion, the real/quaternionic theory is actually complex. This improved approach is based upon the concept of von Neumann algebra of observables. Unfortunately, while \nthere exists a thorough literature about these algebras on real and complex Hilbert spaces, an analysis on the notion of von Neumann algebra over a quaternionic Hilbert space is \ncompletely absent to our knowledge. There are several issues in trying to define such a mathematical object, first of all the inability to construct linear combination of operators \nwith quaternionic coeffients. Restricting ourselves to unital real *-algebras of operators we are able to prove the von Neumann Double Commutant Theorem also on quaternionc \nHilbert spaces. Clearly, this property turns out to be crucial.

•Jan 1, 2018•1 citation

Infinite-Dimensional Complex Vectors and Hilbert Spaces

K. Kong Wan

For a quantum system with observables capable of assuming an infinite number of different values we would need an infinite-dimensional complex vector space to serve as its state space. Every Cauchy sequence of vectors in a finite-dimensional complex vector space converges to a limit vector in the space the same is not true in an arbitrary infinite-dimensional complex scalar product space. Fortunately infinite-dimensional scalar product spaces of physical importance are such that all Cauchy sequences do converge. Such spaces are called Hilbert spaces. Since every Cauchy sequence in a finite-dimensional scalar product space converges they are automatically Hilbert spaces. The situation in infinite-dimensional spaces is different. With Riemann integrals for square integrability and the scalar product replaced by Lebesque integrals we would obtain a larger set of functions which are Lebesque square-integrable.

•Jul 9, 2019•0 citations

Introducing categories to the practicing physicist

Bob Coecke

We argue that category theory should become a part of the daily practice of the physicist, and more specific, the quantum physicist and/or informatician. The reason for this is not that category theory is a better way of doing mathematics, but that monoidal categories constitute the actual algebra of practicing physics. We will not provide rigorous definitions or anything resembling a coherent mathematical theory, but we will take the reader for a journey introducing concepts which are part of category theory in a manner that the physicist will recognize them.

arXiv:0808.1032•Aug 7, 2008•48 citations

Hilbert space refresher

Teiko Heinosaari, Mário Ziman

Quantum theory, in its conventional formulation, is built on the theory of Hilbert spaces and operators. In this chapter we go through this basic material, which is central for the rest of the book. Our treatment is mainly intended as a refresher and a summary of useful results. It is assumed that the reader is already familiar with some of these concepts and elementary results, at least in the case of finite-dimensional inner product spaces. We present proofs for propositions and theorems only if the proof itself is considered to be instructive and illustrative. This gives us the freedom to present the material in a topical order rather than in the strict order of mathematical implication. Good references for this chapter are the functional analysis textbooks by Conway [45], Pedersen [113] and Reed and Simon [121]. These books also contain the proofs that we skip here. Hilbert spaces As an introduction, before a formal definition is given, one may think of a Hilbert space as the closest possible generalization of the inner product spaces c d to infinite dimensions. Actually, there are no finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces (up to isomorphisms) other than c d spaces. The crucial requirement of completeness becomes relevant only in infinite-dimensional spaces. This defining property of Hilbert spaces guarantees that they are well-behaved mathematical objects, and many calculations can be done almost as easily as in c d .

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 15, 2011•0 citations

An effect-theoretic reconstruction of quantum theory

John van de Wetering

An often used model for quantum theory is to associate to every physical system a C ∗ -algebra. From a physical point of view it is unclear why operator algebras would form a good description of nature. In this paper, we find a set of physically meaningful assumptions such that any physical theory satisfying these assumptions must embed into the category of finite-dimensional C ∗ -algebras. These assumptions were originally introduced in the setting of effectus theory, a categorical logical framework generalizing classical and quantum logic. As these assumptions have a physical interpretation, this motivates the usage of operator algebras as a model for quantum theory.In contrast to other reconstructions of quantum theory, we do not start with the framework of generalized probabilistic theories and instead use effect theories where no convex structure and no tensor product needs to be present. The lack of this structure in effectus theory has led to a different notion of pure maps. A map in an effectus is pure when it is a composition of a compression and a filter. These maps satisfy particular universal properties and respectively correspond to `forgetting' and `measuring' the validity of an effect.We define a pure effect theory (PET) to be an effect theory where the pure maps form a dagger-category and filters and compressions are adjoint. We show that any convex finite-dimensional PET must embed into the category of Euclidean Jordan algebras. Moreover, if the PET also has monoidal structure, then we show that it must embed into either the category of real or complex C ∗ -algebras, which completes our reconstruction.

arXiv:1801.05798•Compositionality•Dec 18, 2019•24 citations
The complex numbers are an important part of quantum theory, but are difficult to motivate from a theoretical perspective. We describe a simple formal framework for theories of physics, and show that if a theory of physics presented in this manner satisfies certain completeness properties, then it necessarily includes the complex numbers as a mathematical ingredient. Central to our approach are the techniques of category theory, and we introduce a new category-theoretical tool, called the †-limit, which governs the way in which systems can be combined to form larger systems. These †-limits can be used to characterize the properties of the †-functor on the category of finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, and so can be used as an equivalent definition of the inner product. One of our main results is that in a nontrivial monoidal †-category with finite †-limits and a simple tensor unit, the semiring of scalars embeds into an involutive field of characteristic 0 and orderable fixed field.
The complex numbers are an important part of quantum theory, but are difficult to motivate from a theoretical perspective. We describe a simple formal framework for theories of physics, and show that if a theory of physics presented in this manner satisfies certain completeness properties, then it necessarily includes the complex numbers as a mathematical ingredient. Central to our approach are the techniques of category theory, and we introduce a new category-theoretical tool, called the †-limit, to prove our results. These †-limits can be used to characterize the properties of the †-functor on the category of finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, and so can be used as an equivalent definition of the inner product. The technical statement of our main theorem is that in a nontrivial monoidal †-category with †-limits and a simple tensor unit, in which the self-adjoint scalars are Dedekind-complete, the scalars are valued in the complex numbers. 1
In principle, the lattice of elementary propositions of a generic quantum system admits a representation in real, complex or quaternionic Hilbert spaces as established by Solèr’s theorem (1995) closing a long standing problem that can be traced back to von Neumann’s mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics. However up to now there are no examples of quantum systems described in Hilbert spaces whose scalar field is different from the set of complex numbers. We show that elementary relativistic systems cannot be described by irreducible strongly-continuous unitary representations of SL(2, C) on real or quaternionic Hilbert spaces as a consequence of some peculiarity of the generators related with the theory of polar decomposition of operators. Indeed such a ”naive” attempt leads necessarily to an equivalent formulation on a complex Hilbert space. Although this conclusion seems to give a definitive answer to the real/quaternionic-quantum-mechanics issue, it lacks consistency since it does not derive from more general physical hypotheses as the complex one does. Trying a more solid approach, in both situations we end up with three possibilities: an equivalent description in terms of a Wigner unitary representation in a real, complex or quaternionic Hilbert space. At this point the ”naive” result turns out to be a definitely important technical lemma, for it forbids the two extreme possibilities. \nIn conclusion, the real/quaternionic theory is actually complex. This improved approach is based upon the concept of von Neumann algebra of observables. Unfortunately, while \nthere exists a thorough literature about these algebras on real and complex Hilbert spaces, an analysis on the notion of von Neumann algebra over a quaternionic Hilbert space is \ncompletely absent to our knowledge. There are several issues in trying to define such a mathematical object, first of all the inability to construct linear combination of operators \nwith quaternionic coeffients. Restricting ourselves to unital real *-algebras of operators we are able to prove the von Neumann Double Commutant Theorem also on quaternionc \nHilbert spaces. Clearly, this property turns out to be crucial.
For a quantum system with observables capable of assuming an infinite number of different values we would need an infinite-dimensional complex vector space to serve as its state space. Every Cauchy sequence of vectors in a finite-dimensional complex vector space converges to a limit vector in the space the same is not true in an arbitrary infinite-dimensional complex scalar product space. Fortunately infinite-dimensional scalar product spaces of physical importance are such that all Cauchy sequences do converge. Such spaces are called Hilbert spaces. Since every Cauchy sequence in a finite-dimensional scalar product space converges they are automatically Hilbert spaces. The situation in infinite-dimensional spaces is different. With Riemann integrals for square integrability and the scalar product replaced by Lebesque integrals we would obtain a larger set of functions which are Lebesque square-integrable.
We argue that category theory should become a part of the daily practice of the physicist, and more specific, the quantum physicist and/or informatician. The reason for this is not that category theory is a better way of doing mathematics, but that monoidal categories constitute the actual algebra of practicing physics. We will not provide rigorous definitions or anything resembling a coherent mathematical theory, but we will take the reader for a journey introducing concepts which are part of category theory in a manner that the physicist will recognize them.
Quantum theory, in its conventional formulation, is built on the theory of Hilbert spaces and operators. In this chapter we go through this basic material, which is central for the rest of the book. Our treatment is mainly intended as a refresher and a summary of useful results. It is assumed that the reader is already familiar with some of these concepts and elementary results, at least in the case of finite-dimensional inner product spaces. We present proofs for propositions and theorems only if the proof itself is considered to be instructive and illustrative. This gives us the freedom to present the material in a topical order rather than in the strict order of mathematical implication. Good references for this chapter are the functional analysis textbooks by Conway [45], Pedersen [113] and Reed and Simon [121]. These books also contain the proofs that we skip here. Hilbert spaces As an introduction, before a formal definition is given, one may think of a Hilbert space as the closest possible generalization of the inner product spaces c d to infinite dimensions. Actually, there are no finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces (up to isomorphisms) other than c d spaces. The crucial requirement of completeness becomes relevant only in infinite-dimensional spaces. This defining property of Hilbert spaces guarantees that they are well-behaved mathematical objects, and many calculations can be done almost as easily as in c d .
An often used model for quantum theory is to associate to every physical system a C ∗ -algebra. From a physical point of view it is unclear why operator algebras would form a good description of nature. In this paper, we find a set of physically meaningful assumptions such that any physical theory satisfying these assumptions must embed into the category of finite-dimensional C ∗ -algebras. These assumptions were originally introduced in the setting of effectus theory, a categorical logical framework generalizing classical and quantum logic. As these assumptions have a physical interpretation, this motivates the usage of operator algebras as a model for quantum theory.In contrast to other reconstructions of quantum theory, we do not start with the framework of generalized probabilistic theories and instead use effect theories where no convex structure and no tensor product needs to be present. The lack of this structure in effectus theory has led to a different notion of pure maps. A map in an effectus is pure when it is a composition of a compression and a filter. These maps satisfy particular universal properties and respectively correspond to `forgetting' and `measuring' the validity of an effect.We define a pure effect theory (PET) to be an effect theory where the pure maps form a dagger-category and filters and compressions are adjoint. We show that any convex finite-dimensional PET must embed into the category of Euclidean Jordan algebras. Moreover, if the PET also has monoidal structure, then we show that it must embed into either the category of real or complex C ∗ -algebras, which completes our reconstruction.