Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0806.3776 · Foundations of Physics

The Quasiclassical Realms of This Quantum Universe

James B. Hartle

Published May 5, 2010• 65 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The most striking observable feature of our indeterministic quantum universe is the wide range of time, place, and scale on which the deterministic laws of classical physics hold to an excellent approximation. This essay describes how this domain of classical predictability of every day experience emerges from a quantum theory of the universe’s state and dynamics.

DOI
10.1007/s10701-010-9460-0

Related papers

Quasiclassical Realms

Jim Hartle

Abstract The most striking observable feature of our indeterministic quantum universe is the wide range of time, place, and scale on which the deterministic laws of classical physics hold to an excellent approximation. This chapter describes how this domain of classical predictability of everyday experience emerges from a quantum theory of the universe's state and dynamics.

•Jun 24, 2010•9 citations

A Measure of Classicality

James B. Hartle, Murray Gell‐Mann

A striking feature of our fundamentally indeterministic quantum universe is its quasiclassical realm -- the wide range of time place and scale in which the deterministic laws of classical physics hold. Our quasiclassical realmis an emergent feature of the fundamental theories of our universe's quantum state and dynamics. There are many types of quasiclassical realms our Universe could exhibit characterized by different variables, different levels of coarse-graining, different locations in spacetime, different classical physics, and different levels of classicality.We propose a measure of classicality for quasiclassical realms, We speculate on the observable consequences of different levels of classicality especially for information gathering and utilizing systems (IGUSes) such ourselves as observers of the Universe.

arXiv:2104.14465•Apr 28, 2021•0 citations

Quantum Theory and Measurement

Wojciech H. Zurek

We sketch a quantum-mechanical framework for the universe as a whole. \nWithin that framework we propose a program for describing the ultimate \norigin in quantum cosmology of the "quasiclassical domain" of familiar experience and for characterizing the process of measurement. Predictions \nin quantum mechanics are made from probabilities for sets of alternative \nhistories. Probabilities (approximately obeying the rules of probability theory) can be assigned only to sets of histories that approximately decohere. \nDecoherence is defined and the mechanism of decoherence is reviewed. Decoherence requires a sufficiently coarse-grained description of alternative \nhistories of the universe. A quasiclassical domain consists of a branching set \nof alternative decohering histories, described by a coarse graining that is, in \nan appropriate sense, maximally refined consistent with decoherence, with \nindividual branches that exhibit a high level of classical correlation in time. \nWe pose the problem of making these notions precise and quantitative. A \nquasiclassical domain is emergent in the universe as a consequence of the \ninitial condition and the action function of the elementary particles. It is \nan important question whether all the quasiclassical domains are roughly \nequivalent or whether there are various essentially inequivalent ones. A \nmeasurement is a correlation with variables in a quasiclassical domain. An "observer" (or information gathering and utilizing system) is a complex \nadaptive system that has evolved to exploit the relative predictability of a \nquasiclassical domain, or rather a set of such domains among which it cannot discriminate because of its own very coarse graining. We suggest that \nresolution of many of the problems of interpretation presented by quantum \nmechanics is to be accomplished, not by further scrutiny of the subject as it \napplies to reproducible laboratory situations, but rather by an examination \nof alternative histories of the universe, stemming from its initial condition, \nand a study of the problem of quasiclassical domains.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 8, 2018•53 citations

Quasiclassical Realms in a Quantum Universe

James B. Hartle

In this universe, governed fundamentally by quantum mechanical laws, characterized by indeterminism and distributed probabilities, classical deterministic laws are applicable over a wide range of time, place, and scale. We review the origin of these laws in the context of the quantum mechanics of closed systems, most generally, the universe as a whole. There probabilities are predicted for members of decoherent sets of alternative histories of the universe, ie ones for which the interference between pairs in the set is negligible as measured by a decoherence functional. An expansion of the decoherence functional in the separation between histories allows the form of the deterministic equations of motion to be derived for suitable coarse grainings of a class of non-relativistic systems, including ones with general non-linear interactions. More coarse graining is needed to achieve classical predictability than naive arguments based on the uncertainty principle would suggest. Coarse graining is needed for decoherence, and coarse graining beyond that for the inertia necessary to resist the noise that mechanisms of decoherence produce. Sets of histories governed largely by deterministic laws constitute the quasiclassical realm of everyday experience which is an emergent feature of the closed system's initial condition and Hamiltonian. We analyse the sensitivity of the existence of a quasiclassical realm to the particular form of the initial condition. We find that almost any initial condition will exhibit a quasiclassical realm of some sort, but only a small fraction of the total number of possible initial states could reproduce the everyday quasiclassical realm of our universe. (Talk given at the Lanczos Centenary Conference, North Carolina State University, December 15, 1993.)

arXiv:gr-qc/9404017•Apr 11, 1994•4 citations

Classical physics and Hamiltonian quantum mechanics as relics of the Big Bang

James B. Hartle

In a fundamental formulation of the quantum mechanics of a closed system such as the universe as a whole, three forms of information are needed to make predictions for the probabilities of alternative time histories of the closed system . These are the action functional of the elementary particles, the quantum istate of the universe, and the description of our specific history. We discuss the origin of the "quasiclassical realm" of familiar experience and Hamiltonian quantum mechanics with its preferred time in such a formulation of quantum cosmology. It is argued that these features of the universe are not general properties of quantum theory, but rather approximate features that are emergent after the Planck time as a consequence of theories of the closed system's quantum state and dynamics.

arXiv:2103.08574•Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1991•1 citation

The Quasiclassical Realms of this Quantum Universe

James B. Hartle

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Dec 9, 2020•12 citations
The most striking observable feature of our indeterministic quantum universe is the wide range of time, place, and scale on which the deterministic laws of classical physics hold to an excellent approximation. This essay describes how this domain of classical predictability of every day experience emerges from a quantum theory of the universe’s state and dynamics.
A striking feature of our fundamentally indeterministic quantum universe is its quasiclassical realm -- the wide range of time place and scale in which the deterministic laws of classical physics hold. Our quasiclassical realmis an emergent feature of the fundamental theories of our universe's quantum state and dynamics. There are many types of quasiclassical realms our Universe could exhibit characterized by different variables, different levels of coarse-graining, different locations in spacetime, different classical physics, and different levels of classicality.We propose a measure of classicality for quasiclassical realms, We speculate on the observable consequences of different levels of classicality especially for information gathering and utilizing systems (IGUSes) such ourselves as observers of the Universe.
We sketch a quantum-mechanical framework for the universe as a whole. \nWithin that framework we propose a program for describing the ultimate \norigin in quantum cosmology of the "quasiclassical domain" of familiar experience and for characterizing the process of measurement. Predictions \nin quantum mechanics are made from probabilities for sets of alternative \nhistories. Probabilities (approximately obeying the rules of probability theory) can be assigned only to sets of histories that approximately decohere. \nDecoherence is defined and the mechanism of decoherence is reviewed. Decoherence requires a sufficiently coarse-grained description of alternative \nhistories of the universe. A quasiclassical domain consists of a branching set \nof alternative decohering histories, described by a coarse graining that is, in \nan appropriate sense, maximally refined consistent with decoherence, with \nindividual branches that exhibit a high level of classical correlation in time. \nWe pose the problem of making these notions precise and quantitative. A \nquasiclassical domain is emergent in the universe as a consequence of the \ninitial condition and the action function of the elementary particles. It is \nan important question whether all the quasiclassical domains are roughly \nequivalent or whether there are various essentially inequivalent ones. A \nmeasurement is a correlation with variables in a quasiclassical domain. An "observer" (or information gathering and utilizing system) is a complex \nadaptive system that has evolved to exploit the relative predictability of a \nquasiclassical domain, or rather a set of such domains among which it cannot discriminate because of its own very coarse graining. We suggest that \nresolution of many of the problems of interpretation presented by quantum \nmechanics is to be accomplished, not by further scrutiny of the subject as it \napplies to reproducible laboratory situations, but rather by an examination \nof alternative histories of the universe, stemming from its initial condition, \nand a study of the problem of quasiclassical domains.
In this universe, governed fundamentally by quantum mechanical laws, characterized by indeterminism and distributed probabilities, classical deterministic laws are applicable over a wide range of time, place, and scale. We review the origin of these laws in the context of the quantum mechanics of closed systems, most generally, the universe as a whole. There probabilities are predicted for members of decoherent sets of alternative histories of the universe, ie ones for which the interference between pairs in the set is negligible as measured by a decoherence functional. An expansion of the decoherence functional in the separation between histories allows the form of the deterministic equations of motion to be derived for suitable coarse grainings of a class of non-relativistic systems, including ones with general non-linear interactions. More coarse graining is needed to achieve classical predictability than naive arguments based on the uncertainty principle would suggest. Coarse graining is needed for decoherence, and coarse graining beyond that for the inertia necessary to resist the noise that mechanisms of decoherence produce. Sets of histories governed largely by deterministic laws constitute the quasiclassical realm of everyday experience which is an emergent feature of the closed system's initial condition and Hamiltonian. We analyse the sensitivity of the existence of a quasiclassical realm to the particular form of the initial condition. We find that almost any initial condition will exhibit a quasiclassical realm of some sort, but only a small fraction of the total number of possible initial states could reproduce the everyday quasiclassical realm of our universe. (Talk given at the Lanczos Centenary Conference, North Carolina State University, December 15, 1993.)
In a fundamental formulation of the quantum mechanics of a closed system such as the universe as a whole, three forms of information are needed to make predictions for the probabilities of alternative time histories of the closed system . These are the action functional of the elementary particles, the quantum istate of the universe, and the description of our specific history. We discuss the origin of the "quasiclassical realm" of familiar experience and Hamiltonian quantum mechanics with its preferred time in such a formulation of quantum cosmology. It is argued that these features of the universe are not general properties of quantum theory, but rather approximate features that are emergent after the Planck time as a consequence of theories of the closed system's quantum state and dynamics.