Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0805.0970

Coherent Quantum Control to Arbitrary Accuracy using the Uhrig Sequence of Ideal or Finite-Width $π$-Pulses

John Cardy, Deepak Dhar

Published May 7, 2008• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors owing to a mistake in the proof of the basic lemma.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0805.0970

Related papers

Coherent control of infinite-dimensional quantum systems

Chitra Rangan

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Jun 6, 2007•0 citations

Quadratic dynamical decoupling: Universality proof and error analysis

Wan-Jung Kuo, Daniel A. Lidar

We prove the universality of the generalized QDD${}_{{N}_{1}{N}_{2}}$ (quadratic dynamical decoupling) pulse sequence for near-optimal suppression of general single-qubit decoherence. Earlier work showed numerically that this dynamical decoupling sequence, which consists of an inner Uhrig DD (UDD) and outer UDD sequence using ${N}_{1}$ and ${N}_{2}$ pulses, respectively, can eliminate decoherence to $O({T}^{N})$ using $O({N}^{2})$ unequally spaced ``ideal'' (zero-width) pulses, where $T$ is the total evolution time and $N={N}_{1}={N}_{2}$. A proof of the universality of QDD has been given for even ${N}_{1}$. Here we give a general universality proof of QDD for arbitrary ${N}_{1}$ and ${N}_{2}$. As in earlier proofs, our result holds for arbitrary bounded environments. Furthermore, we explore the single-axis (polarization) error suppression abilities of the inner and outer UDD sequences. We analyze both the single-axis QDD performance and how the overall performance of QDD depends on the single-axis errors. We identify various performance effects related to the parities and relative magnitudes of ${N}_{1}$ and ${N}_{2}$. We prove that using QDD${}_{{N}_{1}{N}_{2}}$ decoherence can always be eliminated to $O({T}^{\mathrm{min}{{N}_{1},{N}_{2}}})$.

arXiv:1106.2151•Physical Review A•Oct 17, 2011•42 citations

Error Exponents in Quantum Hypothesis Testing

Masahito Hayashi

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because Lemma 3 is incorrect. This mistake is crucial in this paper.

arXiv:quant-ph/0607009•Jul 3, 2006•0 citations

Coherent Quantum H∞ Control via a Strict Bounded Real Quantum Controller*

Hendra G. Harrie, Ian R. Petersen

IFAC Proceedings Volumes•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

Coherent control of N-level quantum systems with shaped electromagnetic pulses

Ryan Murray, Chitra Rangan

APS•Oct 1, 2004•0 citations

Gallager Bound of Classical-Quantum Channel Coding

Masahito Hayashi

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because Lemma 3 is incorrect. This mistake is crucial in this paper.

arXiv:quant-ph/0607010•Jul 3, 2006•0 citations
Coherent Quantum Control to Arbitrary Accuracy using the Uhrig Sequence of Ideal or Finite-Width πππ-Pulses
We prove the universality of the generalized QDDN1N2{}_{{N}_{1}{N}_{2}}N1​N2​​ (quadratic dynamical decoupling) pulse sequence for near-optimal suppression of general single-qubit decoherence. Earlier work showed numerically that this dynamical decoupling sequence, which consists of an inner Uhrig DD (UDD) and outer UDD sequence using N1{N}_{1}N1​ and N2{N}_{2}N2​ pulses, respectively, can eliminate decoherence to O(TN)O({T}^{N})O(TN) using O(N2)O({N}^{2})O(N2) unequally spaced ``ideal'' (zero-width) pulses, where TTT is the total evolution time and N=N1=N2N={N}_{1}={N}_{2}N=N1​=N2​. A proof of the universality of QDD has been given for even N1{N}_{1}N1​. Here we give a general universality proof of QDD for arbitrary N1{N}_{1}N1​ and N2{N}_{2}N2​. As in earlier proofs, our result holds for arbitrary bounded environments. Furthermore, we explore the single-axis (polarization) error suppression abilities of the inner and outer UDD sequences. We analyze both the single-axis QDD performance and how the overall performance of QDD depends on the single-axis errors. We identify various performance effects related to the parities and relative magnitudes of N1{N}_{1}N1​ and N2{N}_{2}N2​. We prove that using QDDN1N2{}_{{N}_{1}{N}_{2}}N1​N2​​ decoherence can always be eliminated to O(TminN1,N2)O({T}^{\mathrm{min}{{N}_{1},{N}_{2}}})O(TminN1​,N2​).