Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0804.1643 · Europhysics Letters (EPL)

Employing feedback in adiabatic quantum dynamics

ARMEN E. ALLAHVERDYAN, G. Mahler

Published Nov 1, 2008• 5 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We study quantum adiabatic dynamics, where the slowly moving field is influenced by the system's state (feedback). The feedback is achieved either via mean-field quantum-classical interaction, or, alternatively, via non-disturbing measurements done on an ensemble of identical non-interacting systems. The situation without feedback is governed by the adiabatic theorem: adiabatic energy level populations stay constant, while the adiabatic eigenvectors get a specific phase contribution (Berry phase). However, under feedback the adiabatic theorem does not hold: the adiabatic populations satisfy a closed equation of motion that coincides with the replicator dynamics known by its numerous applications in evolutionary game theory. The feedback generates a new gauge-invariant adiabatic phase, which is free of the constraints on the Berry phase ( e.g. , the new phase is non-zero even for real adiabatic eigenfunctions). In a particular case the adiabatic theorem can still hold, but the new phases are non-trivial.

DOI
10.1209/0295-5075/84/40007

Related papers

Simulation of the complex dynamics of mean-field p -spin models using measurement-based quantum feedback control

Manuel H. Muñoz-Arias, Ivan Deutsch, Poul Jessen +1 more

We study the application of a new method for simulating nonlinear dynamics of many-body spin systems using quantum measurement and feedback [Mu\~noz-Arias et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 110503 (2020)] to a broad class of many-body models known as $p$-spin Hamiltonians, which describe Ising-like models on a completely connected graph with $p$-body interactions. The method simulates the desired mean-field dynamics in the thermodynamic limit by combining nonprojective measurements of a component of the collective spin with a global rotation conditioned on the measurement outcome. We apply this protocol to simulate the dynamics of the $p$-spin Hamiltonians and demonstrate how different aspects of criticality in the mean-field regime are readily accessible with our protocol. We study applications including properties of dynamical phase transitions and the emergence of spontaneous symmetry breaking in the adiabatic dynamics of the collective spin for different values of the parameter $p$. We also demonstrate how this method can be employed to study the quantum-to-classical transition in the dynamics continuously as a function of system size.

arXiv:2004.11412•Physical Review A•Aug 10, 2020•23 citations

Quantum adiabatic theorem with energy gap regularization

Nikolay Borisovich Ilin

The dynamics of a nonstationary quantum system whose Hamiltonian explicitly depends on time is called adiabatic if a system state that is an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian at the initial instant of time remains close to this eigenstate throughout the evolution. The degree of such closeness depends on the smallness of the parameter that determines the rate of change of the Hamiltonian. It is usually believed that one of the factors playing a decisive role for the stability of the adiabatic dynamics is the structure of the spectrum of the Hamiltonian. As the quantum adiabatic theorem states in its usual formulation, deviations from the adiabatic evolution can be estimated from above by the ratio of the rate of change of the Hamiltonian to the minimum distance between the energy of the state that approximates the adiabatic dynamics and the rest of the spectrum of the Hamiltonian. We analyze this dependence and prove theorems showing that the efficiency of the adiabatic approximation is more influenced by the rate of change of the Hamiltonian eigenvectors than by the dynamics of the spectrum. In a vast majority of physically meaningful cases, it turns out that controlling the dynamics of eigenvectors is sufficient for ensuring the adiabaticity, regardless of the dynamics of the spectrum as such.

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Apr 1, 2022•1 citation

Adiabatic evolution of decoherence-free subspaces and its shortcuts

S. L. Wu, X. L. Huang, H. Li +1 more

The adiabatic theorem and shortcuts to adiabaticity for time-dependent open quantum systems are explored in this paper. Starting from the definition of dynamical stable decoherence-free subspace, we show that, under a compact adiabatic condition, the quantum state remains in the time-dependent decoherence-free subspace with an extremely high purity, even though the dynamics of the open quantum system may not be adiabatic. The adiabatic condition mentioned here in the adiabatic theorem for open systems is very similar to that for closed quantum systems, except that the operators required to change slowly are the Lindblad operators. We also show that the adiabatic evolution of decoherence-free subspaces depends on the existence of instantaneous decoherence-free subspaces, which requires that the Hamiltonian of open quantum systems be engineered according to the incoherent control protocol. In addition, shortcuts to adiabaticity for adiabatic decoherence-free subspaces are also presented based on the transitionless quantum driving method. Finally, we provide an example that consists of a two-level system coupled to a broadband squeezed vacuum field to show our theory. Our approach employs Markovian master equations and the theory can apply to finite-dimensional quantum open systems.

arXiv:1705.01695•Physical Review A•Oct 10, 2017•24 citations

Non-ergodicity through quantum feedback

Lewis A. Clark, Fiona Torzewska, Ben Maybee +1 more

Open quantum systems usually reach a unique stationary state with ergodic dynamics. In other words, the ensemble averages and the time averages of the expectation values of open quantum systems are usually the same for all quantum trajectories. Although open quantum systems are in general ergodic, many classical stochastic processes are not. Hence if classical physics emerges from microscopic quantum models, there have to be mechanisms which induce non-ergodicity in open quantum systems. In this paper, we identify such a mechanism by showing that quantum feedback dramatically alters the dynamics of open quantum systems, thereby possibly inducing non-ergodicity and a persistent dependence of ensemble averages on initial conditions. As a concrete example, we study an optical cavity inside an instantaneous quantum feedback loop.

•Nov 11, 2016•0 citations

Adiabatic theorem and generalized geometrical phase in the case of pseudo-Hermitian systems

S Cheniti, Walid Koussa, A Medjber +1 more

Abstract A generalization of the adiabatic theorem for quantum systems governed by pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians and details of its demonstration are given. Introducing a modified time-dependent metric giving a precise description of the quantum unitary evolution where the obtained effective Hamiltonian is observable because it is mean value is real. We show that an eigenstate of a pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian slowly transported will acquire a real generalized geometrical phase factor which contains two contributions: the first one corresponds to the conventional Berry’s phase as expected and a new geometrical term that we call the metric geometrical phase. We will apply our results in the cases of the famous time dependent brachistochrone problem and a non-Hermitian displaced harmonic oscillator.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Aug 7, 2020•11 citations

General conditions for quantum adiabatic evolution

D. Comparat

Adiabaticity occurs when, during its evolution, a physical system remains in the instantaneous eigenstate of the Hamiltonian. Unfortunately, existing results, such as the quantum adiabatic theorem based on a slow down evolution $[H(ϵt),ϵ\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0]$, are insufficient to describe an evolution driven by the Hamiltonian $H(t)$ itself. Here we derive general criteria and exact bounds, for the state and its phase, ensuring an adiabatic evolution for any Hamiltonian $H(t)$. As a corollary, we demonstrate that the commonly used condition of a slow Hamiltonian variation rate, compared to the spectral gap, is indeed sufficient to ensure adiabaticity but only when the Hamiltonian is real and nonoscillating (for instance, containing exponential or polynomial but no sinusoidal functions).

arXiv:quant-ph/0607118•Physical Review A•Jul 15, 2009•93 citations
We study quantum adiabatic dynamics, where the slowly moving field is influenced by the system's state (feedback). The feedback is achieved either via mean-field quantum-classical interaction, or, alternatively, via non-disturbing measurements done on an ensemble of identical non-interacting systems. The situation without feedback is governed by the adiabatic theorem: adiabatic energy level populations stay constant, while the adiabatic eigenvectors get a specific phase contribution (Berry phase). However, under feedback the adiabatic theorem does not hold: the adiabatic populations satisfy a closed equation of motion that coincides with the replicator dynamics known by its numerous applications in evolutionary game theory. The feedback generates a new gauge-invariant adiabatic phase, which is free of the constraints on the Berry phase ( e.g. , the new phase is non-zero even for real adiabatic eigenfunctions). In a particular case the adiabatic theorem can still hold, but the new phases are non-trivial.
We study the application of a new method for simulating nonlinear dynamics of many-body spin systems using quantum measurement and feedback [Mu\~noz-Arias et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 110503 (2020)] to a broad class of many-body models known as ppp-spin Hamiltonians, which describe Ising-like models on a completely connected graph with ppp-body interactions. The method simulates the desired mean-field dynamics in the thermodynamic limit by combining nonprojective measurements of a component of the collective spin with a global rotation conditioned on the measurement outcome. We apply this protocol to simulate the dynamics of the ppp-spin Hamiltonians and demonstrate how different aspects of criticality in the mean-field regime are readily accessible with our protocol. We study applications including properties of dynamical phase transitions and the emergence of spontaneous symmetry breaking in the adiabatic dynamics of the collective spin for different values of the parameter ppp. We also demonstrate how this method can be employed to study the quantum-to-classical transition in the dynamics continuously as a function of system size.
The dynamics of a nonstationary quantum system whose Hamiltonian explicitly depends on time is called adiabatic if a system state that is an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian at the initial instant of time remains close to this eigenstate throughout the evolution. The degree of such closeness depends on the smallness of the parameter that determines the rate of change of the Hamiltonian. It is usually believed that one of the factors playing a decisive role for the stability of the adiabatic dynamics is the structure of the spectrum of the Hamiltonian. As the quantum adiabatic theorem states in its usual formulation, deviations from the adiabatic evolution can be estimated from above by the ratio of the rate of change of the Hamiltonian to the minimum distance between the energy of the state that approximates the adiabatic dynamics and the rest of the spectrum of the Hamiltonian. We analyze this dependence and prove theorems showing that the efficiency of the adiabatic approximation is more influenced by the rate of change of the Hamiltonian eigenvectors than by the dynamics of the spectrum. In a vast majority of physically meaningful cases, it turns out that controlling the dynamics of eigenvectors is sufficient for ensuring the adiabaticity, regardless of the dynamics of the spectrum as such.
The adiabatic theorem and shortcuts to adiabaticity for time-dependent open quantum systems are explored in this paper. Starting from the definition of dynamical stable decoherence-free subspace, we show that, under a compact adiabatic condition, the quantum state remains in the time-dependent decoherence-free subspace with an extremely high purity, even though the dynamics of the open quantum system may not be adiabatic. The adiabatic condition mentioned here in the adiabatic theorem for open systems is very similar to that for closed quantum systems, except that the operators required to change slowly are the Lindblad operators. We also show that the adiabatic evolution of decoherence-free subspaces depends on the existence of instantaneous decoherence-free subspaces, which requires that the Hamiltonian of open quantum systems be engineered according to the incoherent control protocol. In addition, shortcuts to adiabaticity for adiabatic decoherence-free subspaces are also presented based on the transitionless quantum driving method. Finally, we provide an example that consists of a two-level system coupled to a broadband squeezed vacuum field to show our theory. Our approach employs Markovian master equations and the theory can apply to finite-dimensional quantum open systems.
Open quantum systems usually reach a unique stationary state with ergodic dynamics. In other words, the ensemble averages and the time averages of the expectation values of open quantum systems are usually the same for all quantum trajectories. Although open quantum systems are in general ergodic, many classical stochastic processes are not. Hence if classical physics emerges from microscopic quantum models, there have to be mechanisms which induce non-ergodicity in open quantum systems. In this paper, we identify such a mechanism by showing that quantum feedback dramatically alters the dynamics of open quantum systems, thereby possibly inducing non-ergodicity and a persistent dependence of ensemble averages on initial conditions. As a concrete example, we study an optical cavity inside an instantaneous quantum feedback loop.
Abstract A generalization of the adiabatic theorem for quantum systems governed by pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians and details of its demonstration are given. Introducing a modified time-dependent metric giving a precise description of the quantum unitary evolution where the obtained effective Hamiltonian is observable because it is mean value is real. We show that an eigenstate of a pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian slowly transported will acquire a real generalized geometrical phase factor which contains two contributions: the first one corresponds to the conventional Berry’s phase as expected and a new geometrical term that we call the metric geometrical phase. We will apply our results in the cases of the famous time dependent brachistochrone problem and a non-Hermitian displaced harmonic oscillator.
Adiabaticity occurs when, during its evolution, a physical system remains in the instantaneous eigenstate of the Hamiltonian. Unfortunately, existing results, such as the quantum adiabatic theorem based on a slow down evolution $[H(ϵt),ϵ\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0]$, are insufficient to describe an evolution driven by the Hamiltonian H(t)H(t)H(t) itself. Here we derive general criteria and exact bounds, for the state and its phase, ensuring an adiabatic evolution for any Hamiltonian H(t)H(t)H(t). As a corollary, we demonstrate that the commonly used condition of a slow Hamiltonian variation rate, compared to the spectral gap, is indeed sufficient to ensure adiabaticity but only when the Hamiltonian is real and nonoscillating (for instance, containing exponential or polynomial but no sinusoidal functions).