We reprove that the approximate degree of the OR function on n bits is Omega(sqrt(n)). We consider a linear program which is feasible if and only if there is an approximate polynomial for a given function, and apply the duality theory. The duality theory says that the primal program has no solution if and only if its dual has a solution. Therefore one can prove the nonexistence of an approximate polynomial by exhibiting a dual solution, coined the dual polynomial. We construct such a polynomial.
We reprove that the approximate degree of the OR function on n bits is Omega(sqrt(n)). We consider a linear program which is feasible if and only if there is an approximate polynomial for a given function, and apply the duality theory. The duality theory says that the primal program has no solution if and only if its dual has a solution. Therefore one can prove the nonexistence of an approximate polynomial by exhibiting a dual solution, coined the dual polynomial. We construct such a polynomial.
The approximate degree of a Boolean function f captures how well f can be approximated pointwise by low-degree polynomials. This monograph surveys what is known about approximate degree and illustrates its applications in theoretical computer science. A particular focus of the survey is a method of proving lower bounds via objects called dual polynomials. These represent a reformulation of approximate degree using linear programming duality. We discuss in detail a recent, powerful technique for constructing dual polynomials, called “dual block composition”.
The approximate degree of a Boolean function f:{−1,1}n→{−1,1} is the minimum degree of a real polynomial that approximates f to within error 1/3 in the ℓ∞ norm. In an influential result, Aaronson and Shi (J. ACM 2004) proved tight Ω~(n1/3) and Ω~(n2/3) lower bounds on the approximate degree of the Collision and Element Distinctness functions, respectively. Their proof was non-constructive, using a sophisticated symmetrization argument and tools from approximation theory. More recently, several open problems in the study of approximate degree have been resolved via the construction of dual polynomials. These are explicit dual solutions to an appropriate linear program that captures the approximate degree of any function. We reprove Aaronson and Shi's results by constructing explicit dual polynomials for the Collision and Element Distinctness functions.
The ε-approximate degree of a Boolean function f:{−1,1}n→{−1,1} is the minimum degree of a real polynomial that approximates f to within ε in the ℓ∞ norm. We prove several lower bounds on this important complexity measure by explicitly constructing solutions to the dual of an appropriate linear program. Our first result resolves the ε-approximate degree of the two-level AND-OR tree for any constant ε>0. We show that this quantity is Θ(n), closing a line of incrementally larger lower bounds. The same lower bound was recently obtained independently by Sherstov using related techniques. Our second result gives an explicit dual polynomial that witnesses a tight lower bound for the approximate degree of any symmetric Boolean function, addressing a question of Špalek. Our final contribution is to reprove several Markov-type inequalities from approximation theory by constructing explicit dual solutions to natural linear programs. These inequalities underly the proofs of many of the best-known approximate degree lower bounds, and have important uses throughout theoretical computer science.
The ability (or inability) to represent or approximate Boolean functions by polynomials is a central concept in complexity theory, underlying interactive and probabilistically checkable proof systems, circuit lower bounds, quantum complexity theory, and more. In this book, the authors survey what is known about a particularly natural notion of approximation by polynomials, capturing pointwise approximation over This book covers recent progress on proving approximate degree lower and upper bounds and describes some applications of the new bounds to oracle separations, quantum query and communication complexity, and circuit complexity. The authors explain how several of these advances have been unlocked by a particularly simple and elegant technique, called dual block composition, for constructing solutions to this dual linear program. They also provide concise coverage of even more recent lower bound techniques based on a new complexity measure called spectral sensitivity. Finally, they show how explicit constructions of approximating polynomials have been inspired by quantum query algorithms. This book provides a comprehensive review of the foundational and recent developments of an important topic in both classical and quantum computing. The reader has a considerable body of knowledge condensed in an accessible form to quickly understand the principles and further their own research.
Degree Lower Bounds for Torus Polynomials and MAJORITY vs ACC0
The class ACC0 consists of Boolean functions that can be computed by constant-depth circuits of polynomial size with AND,NOT and MODm gates, where m is a natural number. At the frontier of our understanding lies a widely believed conjecture asserting that MAJORITY does not belong to ACC0. A few years ago, Bhrushundi, Hosseini, Lovett and Rao (ITCS 2019) introduced torus polynomial approximations as an approach towards this conjecture. Torus polynomials approximate Boolean functions when the fractional part of their value on Boolean points is close to half the value of the function. They reduced the conjecture that MAJORITY∈/ACC0 to a conjecture concerning the non-existence of low degree torus polynomials that approximate MAJORITY. We reduce the non-existence problem further, to a statement about finding feasible solutions for an infinite family of linear programs. The main advantage of this statement is that it allows for incremental progress, which means finding feasible solutions for successively larger collections of these programs. As an immediate first step, we find feasible solutions for a large class of these linear programs, leaving only a finite set for further consideration. Our method is inspired by the method of dual polynomials, which is used to study the approximate degree of Boolean functions. Using our method, we also propose a way to progress further. We prove several additional key results with the same method, including lower bounds for approximating the AND function, lower bounds when the approximating polynomial is symmetric, showcasing the power of our machinery.
We prove a simple, nearly tight lower bound on the approximate degree of the two-level AND-OR tree using symmetrization arguments. Specifically, we show that ˜ deg(AND m ˆ OR n ) = ˜ Ω(√ mn ). We prove this lower bound via reduction to the OR function through a series of symmetrization steps, in contrast to most other proofs that involve formulating approximate degree as a linear program [6, 10, 21]. Our proof also demonstrates the power of a symmetrization technique involving Laurent polynomials (polynomials with negative exponents) that was previously introduced by Aaronson et al. [2].