A quantum mechanical theory with time asymmetry intrinsic to states (or observables) features the concept of an initial time of the state and thus a preparation time of the physical system represented by the state. This special time is investigated in the context of scattering theory, where, in standard quantum mechanics, the physical meaning of a preparation time has remained obscure. In an experiment, the preparation time corresponds to an ensemble of times of scattering marking the times in the laboratory when one scattering projectile interacts with one target quantum.
A quantum mechanical theory with time asymmetry intrinsic to states (or observables) features the concept of an initial time of the state and thus a preparation time of the physical system represented by the state. This special time is investigated in the context of scattering theory, where, in standard quantum mechanics, the physical meaning of a preparation time has remained obscure. In an experiment, the preparation time corresponds to an ensemble of times of scattering marking the times in the laboratory when one scattering projectile interacts with one target quantum.
The meaning of time asymmetry in quantum physics is discussed.On the basis of a mathematical theorem, the Stone-von Neumann theorem, the solutions of the dynamical equations, the Schrödinger equation (1) for states or the Heisenberg equation (6a) for observables are given by a unitary group.Dirac kets require the concept of a RHS (rigged Hilbert space) of Schwartz functions; for this kind of RHS a mathematical theorem also leads to time symmetric group evolution.Scattering theory suggests to distinguish mathematically between states (defined by a preparation apparatus) and observables (defined by a registration apparatus (detector)).If one requires that scattering resonances of width Γ and exponentially decaying states of lifetime τ = Γ should be the same physical entities (for which there is sufficient evidence) one is led to a pair of RHS's of Hardy functions and connected with it, to a semigroup time evolution t 0 ≤ t < ∞, with the puzzling result that there is a quantum mechanical beginning of time, just like the big bang time for the universe, when it was a quantum system.The decay of quasi-stable particles is used to illustrate this quantum mechanical time asymmetry.From the analysis of these processes, we show that the properties of rigged Hilbert spaces of Hardy functions are suitable for a formulation of time asymmetry in quantum mechanics.
Aims and problems of quantum scattering theory Scattering theory is the branch of physics concerned with interacting systems on a scale of time and/or distance that is large compared with the scale of the interaction itself, and it provides the most powerful tool for studying the microscopic nature of the world. In quantum mechanics, a typical scattering process involves a beam of particles prepared with a given energy and with a more or less defined linear momentum. One then studies either the collision with a similar wave packet, or the collision of the given wave packet against a fixed target. In particular, for a two-body elastic scattering problem with conservative forces, we work in the centre of mass frame, hence reducing the original problem to the analysis of a particle in an external field of forces. Indeed, in Section 7.2 we already used such a technique in the investigation of the hydrogen atom. The crucial difference with respect to Section 7.2 is that, in scattering problems, the continuous spectrum and its perturbations are studied, whereas the Balmer formula has to do with bound states. In the following section we outline the basic aspects of what is called time-dependent scattering. Time-dependent scattering The physical situation we would like to study is as follows: a beam of particles is prepared in a state that is approximately free and allowed to evolve towards the scatterer. After the collision we detect the scattered beam far away from the interaction region.
The preparation procedure, an undefined notion in quantum theory, has not had the relevance that it deserves in the interpretation of quantum mechanical formalism.Here we utilize the concepts of identical and similar preparation procedures to show the conceptual differences between the statistical and the conventional interpretation of quantum formalism.Although the statistical understanding, and its final logical consequence, hidden variables theories (this connexion being explained in the text), have a great intuitive appeal due to its fewer ontological difficulties, both recent experimental results and theoretical developments seem to support an epistemic alternative closer to the conventional one.Nevertheless, we must not rule out the possibility that new theorems or new explanatory principles may modify the reigning supremacy of this interpretation. 1.-Introduction.Although the conventional interpretation of the quantum mechanical formalism (CIQM), very close to the Copenhagen interpretation, is still dominant (is used in almost all textbooks), there are physical situations that ask for an interpretation of the quantum mechanical formalism (QMF) in terms of the Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (SIQM) or even for hidden variables theories (HVT).The SIQM and HVT are different research programs, but they are closely related, as we will see further below.To introduce properly the distinctions between the three previous acronyms we will ask an old and apparently simple question.Is the wave function associated to an individual system or to a statistical ensemble?A first tentative answer could be formulated as follows.QMF introduces probabilities, and probabilities are related to statistical ensembles.Otherwise, the same concept of probability would lose its meaning.In QM, if it is said that you would get some concrete result with 0,63 probability it means that if the experiment is carried out 100 times, that concrete result would appear approximately 63 times.Hence, the obvious answer will be that the wave function should be related with statistical ensembles.However, despite its intuitiveness this idea does not capture completely what we want to express.The real problem to analyze could be best introduced with the following example.Imagine that we prepare identically two radioactive atoms with half-life of 30 minutes.By preparation we understand all those theoretical methods and physical procedures necessary to fully characterize the state of the system.It is, thus, a macroscopic reproducible act that lefts the system, without destroying it, in a concrete state after the procedure.In quantum theory, this preparation is represented by a vector state (or a density matrix).Identically in this context will mean identity of procedures, that is that the experimenter has repeated all previous operations, so that there is no difference whatsoever between them.Note, however, that identical preparations are not necessarily followed by identical results, so there is
Stationary states are unavoidable from the practical viewpoint, since all the computations of observables, such as cross sections and other experimentally measurable physical quantities, are carried out within timeindependent scattering theory. In a scattering experiment, one attempts to determine the momentum of the impact projectile as precisely as possible. However, in the standard formulation of scattering theory, one tries to reach the same ideal goal by identifying the initial state in the remote past with the plane wave. The problem of the asymptotic convergence of scattering states cannot be formulated in the same way for both proper and improper state vectors. The optical theorem is a convenient way of computing the total cross section Q, when one knows the value of the imaginary part of the scattering amplitude in the forward direction. The scattered particles are moved away from the incident beam for a certain amount which is proportional to the value of the total cross section Q.
This chapter examines the most critical properties, which make the collision phenomenon substantially different from the corresponding problem of bound states in quantum mechanics. In order to elaborate the treatments further in the course of the presented analysis, it was necessary to employ the quantum-mechanical entities, such as the equations of time evolution, as well as the state vectors and the Hilbert space of eigenstates. A given picture of quantum mechanics can be more practical than formalism for the examined physical phenomenon. Hence, the choice of the optimal picture of quantum mechanics becomes a matter of considerable practical importance. The initial state Ψ0i is experimentally prepared, i.e. characterized by means of the impulse, polarization, spin, isospin and other internal quantum numbers of the constituent parts of the scattering system.
We begin by considering the following scattering experiment. A projectile, e.g., an atom A in a given electronic state, collides with a target which we will take as a diatomic molecule BC in its ground electronic, vibrational and rotational state. For a short period of time an activated complex [ ABC ] # is generated. As time passes the activated complex can break into different products. For instance, in our example these products will be A + BC , B + AC, C + AB and A + B + C . Each one of the possible products can be in different electronic, vibrational and rotational quantum states. The total energy which is originally the sum of the electronic and translational energies of the projectile A and the electronic, vibrational, rotational and translational energies of target BC is conserved during the scattering process. Time-independent scattering theory enables one to calculate the probability of obtaining the specific products in given quantum states and the kinetic energy distribution of the products as a function of the total energy of the system without the need to solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. The time-independent formulation of scattering theory is based on the ability to propagate analytically an initial given wavepacket, Φ(0), to infinite times. That is, we need to get a closed form expression for lim t →±∞ e −iĤ t /ħ |Φ( t = 0)〉. To quote from the introduction of the excellent book on scattering theory written by Taylor: “The most important experimental technique in quantum physics is the scattering experiment. That this is so is clear from even the briefest review of modern physics”.