arXiv:0711.2260

A Quantum Like Interpretation and Solution of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen Paradox in Quantum Mechanics

Elio Conte

Published Nov 14, 2007• 5 citations

Abstract

We discuss the Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen paradox as it was formulated by Asher Peres in 1992 [4]. On this basis we realize an algebraic quantum like elaboration showing that in this formulation the paradox may be still interpreted and solved.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.0711.2260

Related papers

On the solution of the EPR paradox and the explanation of the violation of Bell's inequality

Gyula Bene

A new interpretation offers a consistent conceptual basis for nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox is solved and the violation of Bell's inequality is explained by maintaining realism, inductive inference and Einstein separability.

arXiv:quant-ph/9708045Aug 27, 19971 citation

The paradox of separated systems in quantum theory

J. L. B. Cooper

The aim of this article is to discuss a paradox of importance in the quantum theory of measurement. The paradox was first propounded by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen in 1935(1), and was discussed subsequently by Bohr(2), Furry(3), Schrödinger(4, 5), as well as in texts (6, 7). We begin by formulating the paradox.

Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical SocietyOct 1, 19507 citations

Two Paradoxes in Quantum Mechanics

Henry Krips

The purpose of this paper is to resolve two paradoxes, which occur in quantum theory, by using the discussion of the theory of measurement presented in two earlier papers by the author [3], [4], [5]. The two paradoxes discussed will be the Schrödinger cat paradox and the Einstein, Podolski, Rosen paradox [2]. An introductory section will be included which summarizes the relevant results from the author's previous papers. Also a discussion will be made regarding the author's interpretation of the density operator.

Philosophy of ScienceJun 1, 196921 citations

The Epistemological Basis of Einstein's, Podolsky's, and Rosen's Objection to Quantum Theory

Donald L. Reisler

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox continues to be the center of great controversey and illumination within quantum theory. In this paper we examine Einstein's scientific epistemology in order to discover the basis for his objections to quantum theory. Then we discuss the consequences and implications of this for the EPR paradox and the quantum mechanical method of state representation.

American Journal of PhysicsJul 1, 19715 citations

Macroscopic quantum Schrödinger and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradoxes

M. D. Reid, Eric G. Cavalcanti

We propose macroscopic generalizations of the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox in which the completeness of quantum mechanics is contrasted with forms of macroscopic reality and macroscopic local reality defined in relation to Schrödinger's original ‘cat’ paradox.

Journal of Modern OpticsNov 10, 20055 citations

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox without entanglement

Ryszard Horodecki, Michał Horodecki, Paweł Horodecki

It is argued that the nonlocality without entanglement discovered quite recently by Bennett et al. [Phys. Rev. A 59, 1070 (1999)] should rather be interpreted as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox without entanglement. It would be a true demonstration of nonlocality without entanglement if one knew that quantum mechanics provides the best possible means for extracting information from a physical system, i.e., that it is ``informationally complete.''

arXiv:quant-ph/9811004Physical Review ANov 1, 199915 citations