Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0709.4065

Comment on: Increasing Exclusion: The Pauli Exclusion Principle and Energy Conservation for Bound Fermions are Mutually Exclusive arXiv:physics/0609190v2 [physics.gen-ph] by Jonathan Phillips

Joshua B. Halpern

Published Sep 26, 2007• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Related papers

A Pauli-exclusion-principle-satisfying approximation for the n-Fermion problem

R. -P. Hirsekorn, L.J. Weigert

Physics Letters B•Oct 1, 1976•7 citations

Increasing Exclusion: The Pauli Exclusion Principle and Energy Conservation for Bound Fermions are Mutually Exclusive

Jonathan Phillips

A review of standard quantum mechanics, including the Pauli Exclusion Principle as it is applied to atomic species, shows that the standard theory is not consistent with energy conservation. Particular focus is given to helium in which it is shown that energy conservation is only possible if the ground state has electrons at two distinct energies. If the two electrons in the ground state, per current theory, are at the same energy as the ionization energy, it is demonstrated that according to the standard theory approximately 30 eV are lost during ionization, or alternatively, about 30 eV of energy are created during ionization/electron attachment. The same issue of energy loss during relaxation of energy levels following ionization is shown to exist for all atomic species, thus demonstrating that the Pauli Exclusion Principle and energy conservation are not consistent for any atomic species. In contrast, a new model of quantum mechanics, Classical Quantum Mechanics (CQM), invented by R. Mills, is shown, following some modification, to be consistent with energy conservation for bound electron systems. This new model is based on the validity of Maxwell s Equations and Newton s Laws at all scales. Detailed, and remarkably simple, computations for determining the ground state energy levels in one and two electron systems using CQM are presented. Excellent agreement with data is found.

Physics Essays•Dec 1, 2007•1 citation

The Pauli exclusion principle from a self-consistent field-theory of quantum electrodynamics

Mendel Sachs

Il Nuovo Cimento•Mar 1, 1963•13 citations

The forces of symmetry and the physical meaning of the Pauli exclusion principle

Evgenii A. Smolenskii

Russian Chemical Bulletin•Sep 1, 2019•0 citations

Increasing Exclusion: The Pauli Exclusion Principle and Energy Conservation for Bound Fermions Are Mutually Exclusive.

Jonathan A. Phillips

A review of those forms of standard quantum mechanics that include the Pauli Exclusion Principle as it is applied to atomic species, (that is versions of quantum that are multi-electron and multi-orbital) shows they are not consistent with energy conservation. Particular focus is given to helium in which it is shown that energy conservation is not consistent with current models. If the two electrons in the ground state, per current theory, are at the same energy as the ionization energy, it is demonstrated that according to the standard theory approximately 30 eV are lost during ionization, or alternatively, about 30 eV of energy are created during ionization/electron attachment. The same issue of energy loss during relaxation of energy levels following ionization is shown to exist for all atomic species, thus demonstrating that the Pauli Exclusion Principle (PEP) and energy conservation are not consistent for any atomic species for current forms of distinguishable electron forms of quantum theory. Only that form of quantum that has a single orbital, and for which only one ionization energy can be computed (that is the original Schrodinger form), is consistent with an energy balance. However, this form is not consistent with common spectroscopy results, and it is argued PEP has no meaning in this form of quantum theory. In contrast a new model, Classical Quantum Mechanics (CQM), invented by R. Mills,, following modification, is consistent with all spectroscopy and energy conservation for bound electron systems. This new model is based on the validity of Maxwell s Equations and Newton s Laws at all scales. Detailed, and remarkably simple, computations for determining the ground state energy levels in one and two electron systems using CQM are presented. Agreements with data are excellent.

arXiv:physics/0609190•Physics Essays•Dec 1, 2007•5 citations

Errors in Nobel Prize for Physics (5) ──Improper Exclusion Principle and Man-made Law

Fu Yuhua

One of the reasons for 1945 Nobel Prize for physics is “for the discovery of the Exclusion Principle, also called the Pauli principle”. It has been found that bosons are not subject to the Pauli exclusion principle. This paper argues that in some cases the exclusion principle is also invalid for fermions. The reasons are as follows: first, according to Neutrosophy, any proposition has three situations of truth, falsehood and indeterminacy respectively; second, some scholars have pointed out that the exclusion principle may be broken in high-energy state; third, due to the existance of man created law (man-made law), the broken exclusion principle and the man-made (instantaneous) magnetic monopole can be artificially created; fourth, the exclusion principle is not compatible with law of conservation of energy, and in physics the principles that are not compatible with law of conservation of energy will be invalid in some cases.

•May 1, 2015•0 citations
A review of standard quantum mechanics, including the Pauli Exclusion Principle as it is applied to atomic species, shows that the standard theory is not consistent with energy conservation. Particular focus is given to helium in which it is shown that energy conservation is only possible if the ground state has electrons at two distinct energies. If the two electrons in the ground state, per current theory, are at the same energy as the ionization energy, it is demonstrated that according to the standard theory approximately 30 eV are lost during ionization, or alternatively, about 30 eV of energy are created during ionization/electron attachment. The same issue of energy loss during relaxation of energy levels following ionization is shown to exist for all atomic species, thus demonstrating that the Pauli Exclusion Principle and energy conservation are not consistent for any atomic species. In contrast, a new model of quantum mechanics, Classical Quantum Mechanics (CQM), invented by R. Mills, is shown, following some modification, to be consistent with energy conservation for bound electron systems. This new model is based on the validity of Maxwell s Equations and Newton s Laws at all scales. Detailed, and remarkably simple, computations for determining the ground state energy levels in one and two electron systems using CQM are presented. Excellent agreement with data is found.
A review of those forms of standard quantum mechanics that include the Pauli Exclusion Principle as it is applied to atomic species, (that is versions of quantum that are multi-electron and multi-orbital) shows they are not consistent with energy conservation. Particular focus is given to helium in which it is shown that energy conservation is not consistent with current models. If the two electrons in the ground state, per current theory, are at the same energy as the ionization energy, it is demonstrated that according to the standard theory approximately 30 eV are lost during ionization, or alternatively, about 30 eV of energy are created during ionization/electron attachment. The same issue of energy loss during relaxation of energy levels following ionization is shown to exist for all atomic species, thus demonstrating that the Pauli Exclusion Principle (PEP) and energy conservation are not consistent for any atomic species for current forms of distinguishable electron forms of quantum theory. Only that form of quantum that has a single orbital, and for which only one ionization energy can be computed (that is the original Schrodinger form), is consistent with an energy balance. However, this form is not consistent with common spectroscopy results, and it is argued PEP has no meaning in this form of quantum theory. In contrast a new model, Classical Quantum Mechanics (CQM), invented by R. Mills,, following modification, is consistent with all spectroscopy and energy conservation for bound electron systems. This new model is based on the validity of Maxwell s Equations and Newton s Laws at all scales. Detailed, and remarkably simple, computations for determining the ground state energy levels in one and two electron systems using CQM are presented. Agreements with data are excellent.
One of the reasons for 1945 Nobel Prize for physics is “for the discovery of the Exclusion Principle, also called the Pauli principle”. It has been found that bosons are not subject to the Pauli exclusion principle. This paper argues that in some cases the exclusion principle is also invalid for fermions. The reasons are as follows: first, according to Neutrosophy, any proposition has three situations of truth, falsehood and indeterminacy respectively; second, some scholars have pointed out that the exclusion principle may be broken in high-energy state; third, due to the existance of man created law (man-made law), the broken exclusion principle and the man-made (instantaneous) magnetic monopole can be artificially created; fourth, the exclusion principle is not compatible with law of conservation of energy, and in physics the principles that are not compatible with law of conservation of energy will be invalid in some cases.