Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0709.2777

Basic outlines of a new hypothesis on physical reality

R. Alvargonzalez, L. S. Soto

Published Sep 18, 2007• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The papers mentioned in the bibliography lead to this new hypothesis which constitutes a wide panorama of the physical reality. Its coherence and its simplicity are virtues that make interesant to gaze upon it.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0709.2777

Related papers

Various Theories of Reality in Physics

Patrick A. Heelan

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1965•0 citations

Physical Reality and Information - Three Hypotheses

Gerd Niestegge

Since its emergence, quantum mechanics has been a challenge for an understanding of reality which is based on our intuition in a classical world. Nevertheless, it has often been tried to impose this understanding of reality on quantum theory - with limited success. Instead, it might be a better alternative to redefine the meaning of physical reality. This is the objective of the paper. A consideration of the quantum measurement process, conditional probabilities and some well-known typical quantum physical experiments provides the reasoning for the following three hypotheses: (1) Prior to a first measurement, a physical system is not in a quantum state. (2) Physical reality is all that and only that about which (classical) information is available in the universe. (3) Information creation is an independent process and is not covered by the Schroedinger equation. It is the first step of the quantum measurement process and does not have a classical counterpart. The first hypothesis makes sense only if the quantum measurement process can be described without presupposing an initial state for the system under consideration. This becomes possible by the objective conditional probabilities which represent the transition probabilities between the outcomes of successive quantum measurements and have been introduced by the author in some recent papers. The second hypothesis holds as well in the classical case, but a certain incompleteness of reality is typical of quantum mechanics and the origin of many quantum phenomena. Classically, the existence of a complete reality is presumed, and hypothesis 3 has no meaning then.

arXiv:1003.2379•Mar 11, 2010•1 citation

Classical and Quantum Aspects of Reality

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Oct 6, 2013•0 citations

La teoria di Co esistenza e modello di relazione con la Teoria della nebulosa primordiale

Giuseppe Trizzino

Theory of Relational Dimensional Coexistence: An Ontological Model of Observation, Light, and the Multiverse Giuseppe Trizzino Abstract This work outlines a theoretical framework of Relational Dimensional Coexistence, proposing that spatial dimensions and physical reality do not possess absolute, independent existence. Existence is modeled as an emergent property generated through observation. By integrating principles of relational quantum mechanics with an asymmetric causal model of perception, it is postulated that energy exists as a static, primordial stock, but that observation via electromagnetic propagation (light) acts as the fundamental tool and medium for its activation: observing implies being observable, thus giving rise to an infinite network of universes in which the primordial energy stock takes on dimensional form through specular relation. 1. Introduction: The Problem of Ontological Independence Traditional physics treats space, time, and energy as pre-existing background metrics within which observers subsequently evolve. However, quantum mechanics—particularly in relational interpretations (Rovelli) and the principle of complementarity (Bohr)—suggests that physical properties materialize only through interaction. This work introduces a radical inversion: the act of observation precedes and conditions the existence of the dimension itself. Without an active observational bridge, energy, light, and spatial dimensions collapse into nothingness. 2. The Principle of Observability and Openness to the Multiverse A fundamental pillar of this model is the ontological reflexivity of observation: Whoever observes, exists and is observable: Observation is never a one-way street or an isolated privilege. The moment a universe (or dimension) A observes a universe B, A activates its own energy field and demonstrates its existence precisely by virtue of the fact that the observer can itself be observed. The probability of infinite universes: Because every act of observation generates space for the observed and legitimizes the existence of the observer within the energy circuit of light, the system is not confined to a single pair of realities. Probabilistically, this opens up an unlimited multiverse: an infinite network of dimensions that watch each other, move reciprocally, and keep each other alive. 3. The Three Hypotheses of Relational Dynamics Within this system of universes, the interaction between two dimensions (e.g., A and B) is articulated in three distinct configurations: First Hypothesis (A observes B): Universe A observes B in an energetically passive manner via light (without exerting mechanical force or violently altering the other). A can only observe without acting, or interact; only B (the observed) can change its reality and dimension. This act allows B to exist and have the freedom to move and mutate its own dimension. At the same time, A lives and justifies its own existence precisely through its act of observing (since observing implies being inserted into the network of observability). Second Hypothesis (If B also observes A): If Universe B begins to observe A, and if A is simultaneously inserted into the visual field of a third element (C), the network expands. This is not a simple sum of isolated gazes, but an ontological chain reaction that expands the multiverse. Third Hypothesis (Reciprocal and Symbiotic Observation): By law, by chance, or by causality, observation becomes perfectly reciprocal and simultaneous. In this state, A observes B and B observes A in the same instant. Observation becomes symbiotic: the two dimensions coexist as a dimension and an anti-dimension (positive and negative), relating in such a way as to allow the coexistence and life of both, without ever being able to "touch" or mechanically destroy the other. 4. Light and Energy as Ontological Consequences The model redefines the causal chain of the universe: {Observation / Observability} — {Medium (Light)} — {Energy} — {Dimensional Existence} Light as a Non-invasive Bridge: Observation occurs via light, which acts as a medium of informative and specular connection, devoid of violence or mechanical force, but an absolute potential. Energy as a Product of Relation: We live in a universe made of energy, but energy, as a static primordial stock, acts as a vehicle for dimension and reality. Without the act of observation and the condition of observability, the medium does not "turn on," energy does not manifest, and there can be no dimension. Observation as Tool and Medium: Spatial reality exists and is maintained in life solely by the energy flow triggered by the gaze. The primordial stock is inherently static. It is the act of observation that acts as the tool and medium to unlock that energy, turning on light as an informative vector. 5. Conclusion The Relational Dimensional Coexistence model demonstrates that cosmic loneliness is a physical and logical impossibility. Reality is an immense fabric of mirrors: dimensions exist because they watch one another, reciprocally authorize each other to be, move through the freedom of the observed, and sustain themselves as a single, infinite energy system based on light and reciprocity. How can a dimension or reality be born from an observation? If we state that the energy stock is already there (static and primordial), how does the simple "act of looking" (the gaze) materially bring about a dimension or reality that did not exist before? The answer lies in moving beyond the idea that space is an "empty container" that exists regardless. In our model, a dimension is not a block of matter, but the geometric and relational space that opens up when energy is directed. The vacuum has no coordinates without a relation: Before observation, the primordial energy stock is a "zero-dimensional" entity, an unformed potential, infinite but immobile. It has no "up," "down," "inside," or "outside" because there is no distance to measure. Geometric space (dimension) arises only the moment there is a point of view pointing toward another point. The distance traveled by light traces the inaugural line of space. Light as the "Pencil" of Space: Light is not just information traveling; physically, it is energy in motion. The moment the gaze (via light) departs from A to reach B, that energy beam establishes a coordinate. It creates a living Cartesian axis between the two. Without that beam, the two are in an unformed non-place. With the beam, distance is traced, and tracing a distance means creating dimension. Actualization of Potential: Taking the principle of quantum indeterminacy: a particle is a "cloud of probability" until a measuring instrument forces it to "choose" a defined position. Extending this to a cosmic scale: the primordial energy stock is the infinite probability cloud. Observation is the act of universal measurement that "collapses" potential into a precise geometric reality. Static energy becomes spatiality precisely because the gaze forces it to focus on an axis of relation. Why is everything, nothing, and everything possible? In traditional quantum physics, as long as a system is isolated and unobserved, it exists in a superposition of states (the wave function). It is only interaction with the outside—the act of measurement—that forces the wave function to "collapse," extracting from the chaos of probabilities a unique event. Applying this to our theory: The Chaos of Potential: Without observation, the primordial energy stock fluctuates in a state of pure acausal potential. Everything is in potential and nothing is in act. Observation as "Cosmic Collapse": The act of observing acts as the ultimate measurement tool of reality, forcing primordial energy to exit probabilistic superposition. The Birth of Dimension: The moment the gaze sets the limit and traces the coordinate between universes, the "everything is possible" crystallizes into a precise geometric form. Spatial dimension arises exactly from this collapse: space is nothing more than the distance established and rendered real by the interruption of probability.

•Aug 13, 2026•0 citations

RGH_Reflective Expansion Hypothesis_ Empirical and Theoretical Implications

Senyi, Frank

The Reflective Genesis Hypothesis (RGH) proposes that physical reality and conscious observation co-arise through reciprocal informational feedback across time. Rather than treating consciousness as a late by-product of complex matter, RGH identifies it as a functional component of the universe’s self-organization. Time serves as the feedback medium through which the cosmos maintains coherence; matter and observation are complementary expressions of a single reflective process.The framework synthesizes ideas from quantum foundations, cosmology, systems theory, and models of cognition, suggesting that stability, evolution, and awareness are different scales of the same feedback mechanism. An extension, the Reflective Expansion Hypothesis(REH), interprets cosmic acceleration as the energetic trace of reflective growth. The paper outlines qualitative empirical implications and offers a structured probability assessment of the hypothesis, framed in Bayesian terms. No new experimental data are presented; the goal is to provide a coherent, testable conceptual framework.

•Nov 15, 2025•0 citations

Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? (1935)

Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, N. Rosen

Princeton University Press eBooks•Sep 23, 2025•0 citations
Since its emergence, quantum mechanics has been a challenge for an understanding of reality which is based on our intuition in a classical world. Nevertheless, it has often been tried to impose this understanding of reality on quantum theory - with limited success. Instead, it might be a better alternative to redefine the meaning of physical reality. This is the objective of the paper. A consideration of the quantum measurement process, conditional probabilities and some well-known typical quantum physical experiments provides the reasoning for the following three hypotheses: (1) Prior to a first measurement, a physical system is not in a quantum state. (2) Physical reality is all that and only that about which (classical) information is available in the universe. (3) Information creation is an independent process and is not covered by the Schroedinger equation. It is the first step of the quantum measurement process and does not have a classical counterpart. The first hypothesis makes sense only if the quantum measurement process can be described without presupposing an initial state for the system under consideration. This becomes possible by the objective conditional probabilities which represent the transition probabilities between the outcomes of successive quantum measurements and have been introduced by the author in some recent papers. The second hypothesis holds as well in the classical case, but a certain incompleteness of reality is typical of quantum mechanics and the origin of many quantum phenomena. Classically, the existence of a complete reality is presumed, and hypothesis 3 has no meaning then.
Theory of Relational Dimensional Coexistence: An Ontological Model of Observation, Light, and the Multiverse Giuseppe Trizzino Abstract This work outlines a theoretical framework of Relational Dimensional Coexistence, proposing that spatial dimensions and physical reality do not possess absolute, independent existence. Existence is modeled as an emergent property generated through observation. By integrating principles of relational quantum mechanics with an asymmetric causal model of perception, it is postulated that energy exists as a static, primordial stock, but that observation via electromagnetic propagation (light) acts as the fundamental tool and medium for its activation: observing implies being observable, thus giving rise to an infinite network of universes in which the primordial energy stock takes on dimensional form through specular relation. 1. Introduction: The Problem of Ontological Independence Traditional physics treats space, time, and energy as pre-existing background metrics within which observers subsequently evolve. However, quantum mechanics—particularly in relational interpretations (Rovelli) and the principle of complementarity (Bohr)—suggests that physical properties materialize only through interaction. This work introduces a radical inversion: the act of observation precedes and conditions the existence of the dimension itself. Without an active observational bridge, energy, light, and spatial dimensions collapse into nothingness. 2. The Principle of Observability and Openness to the Multiverse A fundamental pillar of this model is the ontological reflexivity of observation: Whoever observes, exists and is observable: Observation is never a one-way street or an isolated privilege. The moment a universe (or dimension) A observes a universe B, A activates its own energy field and demonstrates its existence precisely by virtue of the fact that the observer can itself be observed. The probability of infinite universes: Because every act of observation generates space for the observed and legitimizes the existence of the observer within the energy circuit of light, the system is not confined to a single pair of realities. Probabilistically, this opens up an unlimited multiverse: an infinite network of dimensions that watch each other, move reciprocally, and keep each other alive. 3. The Three Hypotheses of Relational Dynamics Within this system of universes, the interaction between two dimensions (e.g., A and B) is articulated in three distinct configurations: First Hypothesis (A observes B): Universe A observes B in an energetically passive manner via light (without exerting mechanical force or violently altering the other). A can only observe without acting, or interact; only B (the observed) can change its reality and dimension. This act allows B to exist and have the freedom to move and mutate its own dimension. At the same time, A lives and justifies its own existence precisely through its act of observing (since observing implies being inserted into the network of observability). Second Hypothesis (If B also observes A): If Universe B begins to observe A, and if A is simultaneously inserted into the visual field of a third element (C), the network expands. This is not a simple sum of isolated gazes, but an ontological chain reaction that expands the multiverse. Third Hypothesis (Reciprocal and Symbiotic Observation): By law, by chance, or by causality, observation becomes perfectly reciprocal and simultaneous. In this state, A observes B and B observes A in the same instant. Observation becomes symbiotic: the two dimensions coexist as a dimension and an anti-dimension (positive and negative), relating in such a way as to allow the coexistence and life of both, without ever being able to "touch" or mechanically destroy the other. 4. Light and Energy as Ontological Consequences The model redefines the causal chain of the universe: {Observation / Observability} — {Medium (Light)} — {Energy} — {Dimensional Existence} Light as a Non-invasive Bridge: Observation occurs via light, which acts as a medium of informative and specular connection, devoid of violence or mechanical force, but an absolute potential. Energy as a Product of Relation: We live in a universe made of energy, but energy, as a static primordial stock, acts as a vehicle for dimension and reality. Without the act of observation and the condition of observability, the medium does not "turn on," energy does not manifest, and there can be no dimension. Observation as Tool and Medium: Spatial reality exists and is maintained in life solely by the energy flow triggered by the gaze. The primordial stock is inherently static. It is the act of observation that acts as the tool and medium to unlock that energy, turning on light as an informative vector. 5. Conclusion The Relational Dimensional Coexistence model demonstrates that cosmic loneliness is a physical and logical impossibility. Reality is an immense fabric of mirrors: dimensions exist because they watch one another, reciprocally authorize each other to be, move through the freedom of the observed, and sustain themselves as a single, infinite energy system based on light and reciprocity. How can a dimension or reality be born from an observation? If we state that the energy stock is already there (static and primordial), how does the simple "act of looking" (the gaze) materially bring about a dimension or reality that did not exist before? The answer lies in moving beyond the idea that space is an "empty container" that exists regardless. In our model, a dimension is not a block of matter, but the geometric and relational space that opens up when energy is directed. The vacuum has no coordinates without a relation: Before observation, the primordial energy stock is a "zero-dimensional" entity, an unformed potential, infinite but immobile. It has no "up," "down," "inside," or "outside" because there is no distance to measure. Geometric space (dimension) arises only the moment there is a point of view pointing toward another point. The distance traveled by light traces the inaugural line of space. Light as the "Pencil" of Space: Light is not just information traveling; physically, it is energy in motion. The moment the gaze (via light) departs from A to reach B, that energy beam establishes a coordinate. It creates a living Cartesian axis between the two. Without that beam, the two are in an unformed non-place. With the beam, distance is traced, and tracing a distance means creating dimension. Actualization of Potential: Taking the principle of quantum indeterminacy: a particle is a "cloud of probability" until a measuring instrument forces it to "choose" a defined position. Extending this to a cosmic scale: the primordial energy stock is the infinite probability cloud. Observation is the act of universal measurement that "collapses" potential into a precise geometric reality. Static energy becomes spatiality precisely because the gaze forces it to focus on an axis of relation. Why is everything, nothing, and everything possible? In traditional quantum physics, as long as a system is isolated and unobserved, it exists in a superposition of states (the wave function). It is only interaction with the outside—the act of measurement—that forces the wave function to "collapse," extracting from the chaos of probabilities a unique event. Applying this to our theory: The Chaos of Potential: Without observation, the primordial energy stock fluctuates in a state of pure acausal potential. Everything is in potential and nothing is in act. Observation as "Cosmic Collapse": The act of observing acts as the ultimate measurement tool of reality, forcing primordial energy to exit probabilistic superposition. The Birth of Dimension: The moment the gaze sets the limit and traces the coordinate between universes, the "everything is possible" crystallizes into a precise geometric form. Spatial dimension arises exactly from this collapse: space is nothing more than the distance established and rendered real by the interruption of probability.
The Reflective Genesis Hypothesis (RGH) proposes that physical reality and conscious observation co-arise through reciprocal informational feedback across time. Rather than treating consciousness as a late by-product of complex matter, RGH identifies it as a functional component of the universe’s self-organization. Time serves as the feedback medium through which the cosmos maintains coherence; matter and observation are complementary expressions of a single reflective process.The framework synthesizes ideas from quantum foundations, cosmology, systems theory, and models of cognition, suggesting that stability, evolution, and awareness are different scales of the same feedback mechanism. An extension, the Reflective Expansion Hypothesis(REH), interprets cosmic acceleration as the energetic trace of reflective growth. The paper outlines qualitative empirical implications and offers a structured probability assessment of the hypothesis, framed in Bayesian terms. No new experimental data are presented; the goal is to provide a coherent, testable conceptual framework.