Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0707.1919 · International Journal of Modern Physics A

SEARCH FOR EFFECT OF INFLUENCE FROM FUTURE IN LARGE HADRON COLLIDER

HOLGER B. NIELSEN, MASAO NINOMIYA

Published Mar 10, 2008• 36 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We propose an experiment which consists of drawing a card and using it to decide restrictions on the running of Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, such as luminosity and beam energy. There may potentially occur total shut down. The purpose of such an experiment is to search for influence from the future, that is, backward causation. Since LHC will produce particles of a mathematically new type of fundamental scalars, i.e. the Higgs particles, there is potentially a chance to find unseen effects, such as on influence going from future to past, which we suggest in the present paper.

DOI
10.1142/s0217751x08039682

Related papers

TEST OF EFFECT FROM FUTURE IN LARGE HADRON COLLIDER: A PROPOSAL

HOLGER B. NIELSEN, MASAO NINOMIYA

We have previously proposed the idea of performing a card-drawing experiment of which the outcome potentially decides whether the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) should be closed or not. The purpose is to test theoretical models such as our own model that have an action with an imaginary part that has a similar form to the real part. The imaginary part affects the initial conditions not only in the past but even from the future. It was speculated that all the accelerators producing large amounts of Higgs particles such as the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) would mean that the initial conditions must have been arranged so as not to allow these accelerators to work. If such effects existed, we could perhaps cause a very clear-cut "miracle" by having the effect of a drawn card to be the closure of the LHC. Here we shall, however, argue that the closure of an accelerator is hardly needed to demonstrate such an effect and seek to calculate how one could perform a verification experiment for the proposed type of effect from the future in the statistically least disturbing and least harmful way. We shall also discuss how to extract the maximum amount of information about such as effect or model in the unlikely case that a card preventing the running of the LHC or the Tevatron is drawn, by estimating the relative importance of high beam energy or high luminosity for the purpose of our effect.

arXiv:0802.2991•International Journal of Modern Physics A•Aug 18, 2009•41 citations

An iterated search for influence from the future on the Large Hadron Collider

Stewart, Iain

We analyse an iterated version of Nielsen and Ninomiya (N&N)'s proposed card game experiment to search for a specific type of backward causation on the running of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN. We distinguish "endogenous" and "exogenous" potential causes of failure of LHC and we discover a curious "cross-talk" between their respective probabilities and occurrence timescales when N&N-style backward causation is in effect. Finally, we note a kind of "statistical cosmic censorship" preventing the influence from the future from showing up in a statistical analysis of the iterated runs.

arXiv:0712.0715•Dec 5, 2007•1 citation

Card game restriction in LHC can only be successful!

HOLGER BECH NIELSEN, Masao Ninomiya C

We argue that a restriction determined by a drawn card or quantum random numbers, on the running of LHC (Large Hadron Collider), which was proposed in earlier articles by us, can only result in an, at first, apparent success whatever the outcome. This previous work was concerned with looking for backward causation and/or influence from the future, which, in our previous model, was assumed to have the effect of arranging bad luck for large Higgs producing machines, such as LHC and the never finished SSC (Superconducting Super Collider) stopped by Congress because of such bad luck, so as not to allow them to work.

arXiv:0910.0359•Oct 2, 2009•10 citations

LHC card games: bringing about retrocausality?

Zurab K. Silagadze

The model of Nielsen and Ninomiya claims that "the SSC (Superconducting Supercollider) were stopped by the US Congress due to the backward causation from the big amounts of Higgs particles, which it would have produced, if it had been allowed to run". They also proposed to play a card game and if the "close LHC" card is drawn (with probability $\sim 10^{-6}$), really close LHC on the eve of Higgs particle discovery to avoid more severe bad luck. Crazy? Probably. But paraphrasing Salvador Dali, if you believe that you and me are smarter in physics than Nielsen and Ninomiya, don't read this article, just go right on in your blissful idiocy. Therefore, I will try to make sense of backward causation. It turns out that not only the backward causation makes perfect sense in some models of possible reality, but that Nielsen and Ninomiya really have a chance to close LHC by a card game. The only thing they need is to be smart enough to manage to develop their theory up to the level of brilliance beginning from which it becomes a part of the fabric of reality. We hope, however, that they will use their outstanding abilities to bring about some more interesting future.

arXiv:1003.6130•Mar 31, 2010•1 citation

Quantum SMEFT tomography: top quark pair

Luca Mantani

In recent years, an interest in the study of quantum information has grown within the high-energy particle physics community. The possibility to establish the presence of entanglement at particle colliders, such as the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, is a novel and thrilling research direction, offering the opportunity to push quantum mechanics to its limits by using the heaviest fundamental particle: the top quark. With this in mind, we propose to use measurements of quantum entanglement to probe the behaviour of fundamental interactions and to search for New Physics at high energy within the Standard Model Effective Field Theory paradigm. Inspired by recent proposals to measure entanglement of top quark pairs produced at the LHC, we examine how the existence of new interactions between fundamental particles modify the Standard Model expectations. By performing analytical calculations, we unveil a non-trivial pattern of effects depending on the kinematical phase space configurations.

arXiv:2211.03428•International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP)•Nov 8, 2022•1 citation

Leveraging Quantum Annealer to identify an Event-topology at High Energy Colliders

Minho Kim, Pyungwon Ko, Jae-hyeon Park +1 more

With increasing energy and luminosity available at the Large Hadron collider (LHC), we get a chance to take a pure bottom-up approach solely based on data. This will extend the scope of our understanding about Nature without relying on theoretical prejudices. The required computing resource, however, will increase exponentially with data size and complexities of events if one uses algorithms based on a classical computer. In this letter we propose a simple and well motivated method with a quantum annealer to identify an event-topology, a diagram to describe the history of particles produced at the LHC. We show that a computing complexity can be reduced significantly to the order of polynomials which enables us to decode the "Big" data in a very clear and efficient way. Our method achieves significant improvements in finding a true event-topology, more than by a factor of two compared to a conventional method.

arXiv:2111.07806•Nov 15, 2021•1 citation
We propose an experiment which consists of drawing a card and using it to decide restrictions on the running of Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, such as luminosity and beam energy. There may potentially occur total shut down. The purpose of such an experiment is to search for influence from the future, that is, backward causation. Since LHC will produce particles of a mathematically new type of fundamental scalars, i.e. the Higgs particles, there is potentially a chance to find unseen effects, such as on influence going from future to past, which we suggest in the present paper.
We have previously proposed the idea of performing a card-drawing experiment of which the outcome potentially decides whether the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) should be closed or not. The purpose is to test theoretical models such as our own model that have an action with an imaginary part that has a similar form to the real part. The imaginary part affects the initial conditions not only in the past but even from the future. It was speculated that all the accelerators producing large amounts of Higgs particles such as the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) would mean that the initial conditions must have been arranged so as not to allow these accelerators to work. If such effects existed, we could perhaps cause a very clear-cut "miracle" by having the effect of a drawn card to be the closure of the LHC. Here we shall, however, argue that the closure of an accelerator is hardly needed to demonstrate such an effect and seek to calculate how one could perform a verification experiment for the proposed type of effect from the future in the statistically least disturbing and least harmful way. We shall also discuss how to extract the maximum amount of information about such as effect or model in the unlikely case that a card preventing the running of the LHC or the Tevatron is drawn, by estimating the relative importance of high beam energy or high luminosity for the purpose of our effect.
We analyse an iterated version of Nielsen and Ninomiya (N&N)'s proposed card game experiment to search for a specific type of backward causation on the running of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN. We distinguish "endogenous" and "exogenous" potential causes of failure of LHC and we discover a curious "cross-talk" between their respective probabilities and occurrence timescales when N&N-style backward causation is in effect. Finally, we note a kind of "statistical cosmic censorship" preventing the influence from the future from showing up in a statistical analysis of the iterated runs.
We argue that a restriction determined by a drawn card or quantum random numbers, on the running of LHC (Large Hadron Collider), which was proposed in earlier articles by us, can only result in an, at first, apparent success whatever the outcome. This previous work was concerned with looking for backward causation and/or influence from the future, which, in our previous model, was assumed to have the effect of arranging bad luck for large Higgs producing machines, such as LHC and the never finished SSC (Superconducting Super Collider) stopped by Congress because of such bad luck, so as not to allow them to work.
The model of Nielsen and Ninomiya claims that "the SSC (Superconducting Supercollider) were stopped by the US Congress due to the backward causation from the big amounts of Higgs particles, which it would have produced, if it had been allowed to run". They also proposed to play a card game and if the "close LHC" card is drawn (with probability ∼10−6\sim 10^{-6}∼10−6), really close LHC on the eve of Higgs particle discovery to avoid more severe bad luck. Crazy? Probably. But paraphrasing Salvador Dali, if you believe that you and me are smarter in physics than Nielsen and Ninomiya, don't read this article, just go right on in your blissful idiocy. Therefore, I will try to make sense of backward causation. It turns out that not only the backward causation makes perfect sense in some models of possible reality, but that Nielsen and Ninomiya really have a chance to close LHC by a card game. The only thing they need is to be smart enough to manage to develop their theory up to the level of brilliance beginning from which it becomes a part of the fabric of reality. We hope, however, that they will use their outstanding abilities to bring about some more interesting future.
In recent years, an interest in the study of quantum information has grown within the high-energy particle physics community. The possibility to establish the presence of entanglement at particle colliders, such as the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, is a novel and thrilling research direction, offering the opportunity to push quantum mechanics to its limits by using the heaviest fundamental particle: the top quark. With this in mind, we propose to use measurements of quantum entanglement to probe the behaviour of fundamental interactions and to search for New Physics at high energy within the Standard Model Effective Field Theory paradigm. Inspired by recent proposals to measure entanglement of top quark pairs produced at the LHC, we examine how the existence of new interactions between fundamental particles modify the Standard Model expectations. By performing analytical calculations, we unveil a non-trivial pattern of effects depending on the kinematical phase space configurations.
With increasing energy and luminosity available at the Large Hadron collider (LHC), we get a chance to take a pure bottom-up approach solely based on data. This will extend the scope of our understanding about Nature without relying on theoretical prejudices. The required computing resource, however, will increase exponentially with data size and complexities of events if one uses algorithms based on a classical computer. In this letter we propose a simple and well motivated method with a quantum annealer to identify an event-topology, a diagram to describe the history of particles produced at the LHC. We show that a computing complexity can be reduced significantly to the order of polynomials which enables us to decode the "Big" data in a very clear and efficient way. Our method achieves significant improvements in finding a true event-topology, more than by a factor of two compared to a conventional method.