We present a unified derivation of Bohmian methods that serves as a common starting point for the derivative propagation method (DPM), Bohmian mechanics with complex action (BOMCA), and the zero-velocity complex action method (ZEVCA). The unified derivation begins with the ansatz psi = eiS/Planck's where the action (S) is taken to be complex, and the quantum force is obtained by writing a hierarchy of equations of motion for the phase partial derivatives. We demonstrate how different choices of the trajectory velocity field yield different formulations such as DPM, BOMCA, and ZEVCA. The new derivation is used for two purposes. First, it serves as a common basis for comparing the role of the quantum force in the DPM and BOMCA formulations. Second, we use the new derivation to show that superposing the contributions of real, crossing trajectories yields a nodal pattern essentially identical to that of the exact quantum wavefunction. The latter result suggests a promising new approach to deal with the challenging problem of nodes in Bohmian mechanics.
We present a unified derivation of Bohmian methods that serves as a common starting point for the derivative propagation method (DPM), Bohmian mechanics with complex action (BOMCA), and the zero-velocity complex action method (ZEVCA). The unified derivation begins with the ansatz psi = eiS/Planck's where the action (S) is taken to be complex, and the quantum force is obtained by writing a hierarchy of equations of motion for the phase partial derivatives. We demonstrate how different choices of the trajectory velocity field yield different formulations such as DPM, BOMCA, and ZEVCA. The new derivation is used for two purposes. First, it serves as a common basis for comparing the role of the quantum force in the DPM and BOMCA formulations. Second, we use the new derivation to show that superposing the contributions of real, crossing trajectories yields a nodal pattern essentially identical to that of the exact quantum wavefunction. The latter result suggests a promising new approach to deal with the challenging problem of nodes in Bohmian mechanics.
In recent years, intensive effort has gone into developing numerical tools for exact quantum mechanical calculations that are based on Bohmian mechanics. As part of this effort we have recently developed as alternative formulation of Bohmian mechanics in which the quantum action S is taken to be complex [Y. Goldfarb et al., J. Chem. Phys. 125, 231103 (2006)]. In the alternative formulation there is a significant reduction in the magnitude of the quantum force as compared with the conventional Bohmian formulation, at the price of propagating complex trajectories. In this paper we show that Bohmian mechanics with complex action is able to overcome the main computational limitation of conventional Bohmian methods-the propagation of wave functions once nodes set in. In the vicinity of nodes, the quantum force in conventional Bohmian formulations exhibits rapid oscillations that present a severe numerical challenge. We show that within complex Bohmian mechanics, multiple complex initial conditions can lead to the same real final position, allowing for the accurate description of nodes as a sum of the contribution from two or more crossing trajectories. The idea is illustrated on the reflection amplitude from a one-dimensional Eckart barrier. We believe that trajectory crossing, although in contradiction to the conventional Bohmian trajectory interpretation, provides an important new tool for dealing with the nodal problem in Bohmian methods.
In a recent paper [B. Poirier, Chem. Phys. 370, 4 (2010)], a formulation of quantum mechanics was presented for which the usual wavefunction and Schrödinger equation are replaced with an ensemble of real-valued trajectories satisfying a principle of least action. It was found that the resultant quantum trajectories are those of Bohmian mechanics. In this paper, analogous ideas are applied to Bohmian Mechanics with Complex Action (BOMCA). The standard BOMCA trajectories as previously defined are found not to satisfy an action principle. However, an alternate set of complex equations of motion is derived that does exhibit this desirable property, and an approximate numerical implementation is presented. Exact analytical results are also presented, for Gaussian wavepacket propagation under quadratic potentials.
Path-integral derivations are presented for two recently developed complex trajectory techniques for the propagation of wave packets: complex WKB and Bohmian mechanics with complex action (BOMCA). The complex WKB technique is derived using a standard saddle-point approximation of the path integral, but taking into account the $\ensuremath{\hbar}$ dependence of both the amplitude and the phase of the initial wave function, thus giving rise to the need for complex classical trajectories. The BOMCA technique is derived using a modification of the saddle-point technique, in which the path integral is approximated by expanding around a near-classical path, chosen so that up to some predetermined order there is no need to add any correction terms to the leading-order approximation. Both complex WKB and BOMCA techniques give the same leading-order approximation; in the complex WKB technique higher accuracy is achieved by adding correction terms, while in the BOMCA technique no additional terms are ever added: higher accuracy is achieved by changing the path along which the original approximation is computed. The path-integral derivation of the methods explains the need to incorporate contributions from more than one trajectory, as observed in previous numerical work. On the other hand, it emerges that the methods provide efficient schemes for computing the higher-order terms in the asymptotic evaluation of path integrals. The understanding we develop of the BOMCA technique suggests that there should exist near-classical trajectories that give exact quantum dynamical results when used in the computation of the path integral keeping just the leading-order term. We also apply our path-integral techniques to give a compact derivation of the semiclassical approximation to the coherent-state propagator.
In recent years there has been a resurgence of interest in Bohmian mechanics as a numerical tool because of its local dynamics, which suggest the possibility of significant computational advantages for the simulation of large quantum systems. However, closer inspection of the Bohmian formulation reveals that the nonlocality of quantum mechanics has not disappeared-it has simply been swept under the rug into the quantum force. In this paper we present a new formulation of Bohmian mechanics in which the quantum action, S, is taken to be complex. This leads to a single equation for complex S, and ultimately complex x and p but there is a reward for this complexification-a significantly higher degree of localization. The quantum force in the new approach vanishes for Gaussian wave packet dynamics, and its effect on barrier tunneling processes is orders of magnitude lower than that of the classical force. In fact, the current method is shown to be a rigorous extension of generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics to give exact quantum mechanics. We demonstrate tunneling probabilities that are in virtually perfect agreement with the exact quantum mechanics down to 10(-7) calculated from strictly localized quantum trajectories that do not communicate with their neighbors. The new formulation may have significant implications for fundamental quantum mechanics, ranging from the interpretation of non-locality to measures of quantum complexity.
In a recent publication, Goldfarb et al. have proposed a new trajectory scheme to solve quantum problems: Bohmian mechanics with complex action BOMCA . According to these authors, their contribution represents “a novel formulation of Bohmian mechanics.” In our opinion, rather than a new formulation of Bohmian mechanics, the proposal of Goldfarb et al. consists of a novel quantum computational scheme, which is based on solving the complex trajectory equations resulting from an already known complex version of Bohmian dynamics. On the other hand, Goldfarb et al. also claimed that their numerical scheme describes “fully local complex quantum trajectories,” with the reward of a significantly higher degree of localization than in the conventional Bohmian mechanics by lowering the magnitude of the quantum potential. At least from a theoretical and interpretative point of view, we consider that it is very important to clarify what “fully local quantum trajectories” means. Bohmian mechanics is a nonlocal theory because standard quantum mechanics is a nonlocal theory. This nonlocality manifests via the presence of a quantum potential, and therefore the corresponding quantum trajectories will display features that reflect such nonlocality. Something similar should also occur for any trajectory-based approach that intends to be equivalent to standard quantum mechanics. In this Comment we would like to provide a general discussion on these two aspects arising from the work of Goldfarb et al., which can be of much interest to the Chemical Physics community. In particular, we would like to stress the special interest relying on how the term locality should be employed. The approach of Goldfarb et al. starts with the timedependent quantum Hamilton-Jacobi equation. This equation was considered by Leacock and Padgett in 1983 within the context of the quantum transformation theory as a way to obtain bound-state energy levels of quantum systems with no need to calculate the corresponding eigenfunctions. According to Leacock and Padgett, the quantum Hamilton-Jacobi equation can be either stated as a postulate as done by these authors or derived from the Schrodinger equation through a simple connection formula. In the second case, the quantum action corresponds to the complex phase of the wave function when the latter is expressed as a pure complex exponential function. This relationship allows one to pass straightforwardly from the quantum Hamilton-Jacobi formalism to the standard one in terms of the time-dependent Schrodinger and vice versa . Although both the Ansatz and the formulation used by Leacock and Padgett are similar to those considered in the standard quantum WKB semiclassical approximation, as pointed out by these authors, their approach conceptually differs from the WKB one. Within Bohmian mechanics, energy eigenstates present an inconvenience: they give rise to zero velocity fields. Hence, when particles are described by this type of states, they will remain steady motionless . To overcome this problem, Floyd and Faraggi and Matone developed timeindependent quantum Hamilton-Jacobi-like formulations starting from real bipolar Ansatze, though they did not claim full equivalence with standard quantum mechanics regarding their predictions. Later, John proposed a timedependent complex quantum trajectory formalism based on the same connection formula mentioned by Leacock and Padgett to study the dynamics associated with some simple analytical cases, such as the harmonic oscillator or the step barrier. This “modified de Broglie–Bohm approach to quantum mechanics,” as termed by John, is formally equivalent to the BOMCA formulation of Goldfarb et al. Nevertheless, we would like to specify that, due to the fundamental theoretical nature of John’s contribution, a separate calculation of the wave function is required in order to obtain the corresponding trajectories John makes use of the “guiding wave” idea from Bohmian mechanics . Meanwhile, in the version of Goldfarb et al. the modified de Broglie–Bohm approach is formulated in terms of a closed set of equations in the spirit of quantum hydrodynamical formalisms , which avoids the calculation of the wave functions, thus providing a new, practical use to such an approach. Furthermore, within the approach of Goldfarb et al., the expression for the quantum force happens to be typically much smaller than in standard Bohmian mechanics. On the other hand, we would also like to note that a related formulation has also been used by Chou and Wyatt, though they developed a different, novel numerical scheme to tackle the problem of bound-energy levels and scattering in one dimension. When trying to understand the quantum-classical correspondence from the perspective of a WKB-like formulation of Bohmian mechanics WKB-BM , Sanz and co-workers reached the complex quantum HamiltonJacobi equation the same year as John, but independently. The WKB-BM formulation constitutes an excellent, compreTHE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS 127, 197101 2007
Bohmian mechanics as formulated originally in 1952, has been useful in the implementation of numerical methods applied to quantum mechanics. The scientific community though has had ever since a critical thought about it. Therefore, there are still points to be clarified and rectified. The two main problems are basically: Bohmian mechanics gives a privilege role to the position representation. Secondly, the current interpretation of Bohmian trajectories has been recently proven wrong. In this context, in Chapter 2, new complex Bohmian quantities are defined; so that they allow the capacity to formulate Bohmian mechanics in any arbitrary continuous representation, for instance, the momentum representation. This Chapter is fully based on two articles, regarding the proposed complex Bohmian formulation and its extension into momentum space. Chapter 3 deals with a redefinition and reinterpretation of the Bohmian trajectories from the handling of the continuity equation, this is done without any need of additional postulates or interpretations. Also, it is proved that Bohmian mechanics is actually more than a projective aspect of the Wigner function. As a third point, Chapter 4 presents a sytematic treatment of the hydrodynamic scheme of Bohmian mechanics. Then, a brief summary of the transport equations in Bohmian mechanics is done. Next, a unified hydrodynamic treatment is found for the Bohmian mechanics. This treatment is useful to sketch, a Bohmian treatment to efficiently find the steady value of the transmission integral. In Chapter 5 conclusions of this thesis are drawn.