Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0706.1347

The Two-State Vector Formalism

Lev Vaidman A

Published Jun 10, 2007• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The two-state vector formalism (TSVF), the time-symmetric description of the standard quantum mechanics originated by Aharonov, Bergmann and Lebowitz is reviewed. The TSVF describes a quantum system at a particular time by two quantum states: the usual one, evolving forward in time, defined by the results of a complete measurement at the earlier time, and by the quantum state evolving backward in time, defined by the results of a complete measurement at a later time.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0706.1347

Related papers

Backward evolving quantum states

Lev Vaidman A

The basic concept of the two-state vector formalism, which is the time symmetric approach to quantum mechanics, is the backward evolving quantum state. However, due to the time asymmetry of the memory's arrow of time, the possible ways to manipulate a backward evolving quantum state differ from those for a standard, forward evolving quantum state. The similarities and the differences between forward and backward evolving quantum states regarding the no-cloning theorem, nonlocal measurements and teleportation are discussed. The results are relevant not only in the framework of the two-state vector formalism, but also in the framework of retrodictive quantum theory.

arXiv:quant-ph/0606208•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Mar 7, 2007•10 citations

Time-Symmetrized Quantum Theory

Lev Vaidman A

A brief review of the time-symmetrized quantum formalism originated by Aharonov, Bergmann and Lebowitz is presented. Symmetry of various measurements under the time reversal is analyzed. Time-symmetrized counterfactuals are introduced. It is argued that the time-symmetrized formalism demonstrates novel profound features of quantum theory and that recent criticism of the formalism is unfounded.

arXiv:quant-ph/9710036•Fortschritte der Physik•Nov 1, 1998•15 citations

No contextual advantage in nonparadoxical scenarios of the two-state vector formalism

Jaskaran Singh, Rajendra Singh Bhati, Arvind

The two-state vector formalism (TSVF) proposed by Aharonov, Bergmann, and Lebowitz [A. Aharonov, P. G. Bergmann, and J. L. Lebowitz, Phys. Rev. 134, B1410 (1964)] allows a counterfactual assignment of probabilities of outcomes of contemplated (but unperformed) measurements on quantum systems. The probabilities assigned by the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule and the associated weak values have been used to provide insights into quantum situations and to unearth underlying quantum contextuality. We apply the principle of exclusivity on ABL probabilities which are assigned to mutually orthogonal projectors to define paradoxical and nonparadoxical scenarios. Given a pre- and a postselected pair of states, we consider the nonparadoxical sector with a view to explore the demonstration of quantum contextuality. For the Klyachko-Can-Binicio\ifmmode \breve{g}\else \u{g}\fi{}lu-Shumovsky scenario, we numerically show that the ABL probabilities of the TSVF in the nonparadoxical sector do not offer any contextual advantage. Our approach can be easily generalized to other contextual scenarios as well. We thus argue that several previous proofs of the emergence of contextuality in pre- and postselected scenarios are only possible if the principle of exclusivity is violated and are therefore classified as paradoxical.

arXiv:2206.02673•Physical Review A•Jan 5, 2023•2 citations

Measurement Problem and Two-State Vector Formalism

K Morita

In this paper, I show that an interpretation of quantum mechanics using two-state vector formalism proposed by Aharonov, Bergmann, and Lebowitz, can solve one of the measurement problems formulated by Maudlin. According to this interpretation, we can simultaneously insist that the wave function of a system is complete, that the wave function is determined by the Schrödinger equation, and that the measurement of a physical quantity always has determinate outcomes, although Maudlin in his formulation of the measurement problem states that these three claims are mutually inconsistent. Further, I show that my interpretation does not contradict the uncertainty relation and the no-go theorem.

Journal of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

The Two-State Vector Formalism of Qauntum Mechanics: an Updated Review

Yakir Aharonov, Lev Vaidman A

In this paper we present the two-state vector formalism of quantum mechanics. It is a time-symmetrized approach to standard quantum theory particularly helpful for the analysis of experiments performed on pre- and post-selected ensembles. Several peculiar effects which naturally arise in this approach are considered. In particular, the concept of ``weak measurements'' (standard measurements with weakening of the interaction) is discussed in depth revealing a very unusual but consistent picture. Also, a design of a gedanken experiment which implements a kind of quantum ``time machine'' is described. The issue of time-symmetry in the context of the two-state vector formalism is clarified.

arXiv:quant-ph/0105101•May 21, 2001•25 citations

THE GEOMETRY OF QUANTUM STATES

Julian Schwinger

We introduce an intuitive particle-based model of time-symmetric quantum physics that gives a concrete description of what goes on in the time between projective measurements of a quantum system. The time-symmetry in this model means that we ...Physical interpretations of the time-symmetric formulation of quantum mechanics, due to Aharonov, Bergmann, and Lebowitz are discussed in terms of weak values. The most direct, yet somewhat naive, interpretation uses the time-symmetric formulation to ...

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences•Feb 1, 1960•59 citations
The two-state vector formalism (TSVF), the time-symmetric description of the standard quantum mechanics originated by Aharonov, Bergmann and Lebowitz is reviewed. The TSVF describes a quantum system at a particular time by two quantum states: the usual one, evolving forward in time, defined by the results of a complete measurement at the earlier time, and by the quantum state evolving backward in time, defined by the results of a complete measurement at a later time.
The basic concept of the two-state vector formalism, which is the time symmetric approach to quantum mechanics, is the backward evolving quantum state. However, due to the time asymmetry of the memory's arrow of time, the possible ways to manipulate a backward evolving quantum state differ from those for a standard, forward evolving quantum state. The similarities and the differences between forward and backward evolving quantum states regarding the no-cloning theorem, nonlocal measurements and teleportation are discussed. The results are relevant not only in the framework of the two-state vector formalism, but also in the framework of retrodictive quantum theory.
The two-state vector formalism (TSVF) proposed by Aharonov, Bergmann, and Lebowitz [A. Aharonov, P. G. Bergmann, and J. L. Lebowitz, Phys. Rev. 134, B1410 (1964)] allows a counterfactual assignment of probabilities of outcomes of contemplated (but unperformed) measurements on quantum systems. The probabilities assigned by the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule and the associated weak values have been used to provide insights into quantum situations and to unearth underlying quantum contextuality. We apply the principle of exclusivity on ABL probabilities which are assigned to mutually orthogonal projectors to define paradoxical and nonparadoxical scenarios. Given a pre- and a postselected pair of states, we consider the nonparadoxical sector with a view to explore the demonstration of quantum contextuality. For the Klyachko-Can-Binicio\ifmmode \breve{g}\else \u{g}\fi{}lu-Shumovsky scenario, we numerically show that the ABL probabilities of the TSVF in the nonparadoxical sector do not offer any contextual advantage. Our approach can be easily generalized to other contextual scenarios as well. We thus argue that several previous proofs of the emergence of contextuality in pre- and postselected scenarios are only possible if the principle of exclusivity is violated and are therefore classified as paradoxical.
In this paper, I show that an interpretation of quantum mechanics using two-state vector formalism proposed by Aharonov, Bergmann, and Lebowitz, can solve one of the measurement problems formulated by Maudlin. According to this interpretation, we can simultaneously insist that the wave function of a system is complete, that the wave function is determined by the Schrödinger equation, and that the measurement of a physical quantity always has determinate outcomes, although Maudlin in his formulation of the measurement problem states that these three claims are mutually inconsistent. Further, I show that my interpretation does not contradict the uncertainty relation and the no-go theorem.
In this paper we present the two-state vector formalism of quantum mechanics. It is a time-symmetrized approach to standard quantum theory particularly helpful for the analysis of experiments performed on pre- and post-selected ensembles. Several peculiar effects which naturally arise in this approach are considered. In particular, the concept of ``weak measurements'' (standard measurements with weakening of the interaction) is discussed in depth revealing a very unusual but consistent picture. Also, a design of a gedanken experiment which implements a kind of quantum ``time machine'' is described. The issue of time-symmetry in the context of the two-state vector formalism is clarified.