Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0706.0155

A simple hidden variable experiment

Arnold Neumaier

Published Jun 1, 2007• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

An experiment is described which proves, using single photons only, that the standard hidden variables assumptions (commonly used to derive Bell inequalities) are inconsistent with quantum mechanics. The analysis is very simple and transparent. In particular, it demonstrates that a classical wave model for quantum mechanics is not ruled out by experiments demonstrating the violation of the traditional hidden variable assumptions.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0706.0155

Related papers

Local Hidden Variable Theory of Quantum Mechanics that Violates Bell's Inequality

Henok Tadesse

In this paper the mystery of local hidden variable theory of quantum mechanics that violates Bell’s inequality is proposed. These ‘hidden variables’ are fundamentally inaccessible to physical experiments. It is not something physicists ever dreamed of.

•Jan 26, 2023•0 citations

A Proposal for Testing Local Realism Without Using Assumptions Related to Hidden Variable States

Luiz Carlos Ryff

A feasible experiment is discussed which allows us to prove a Bell's theorem for two particles without using an inequality. The experiment could be used to test local realism against quantum mechanics without the introduction of additional assumptions related to hidden variables states. Only assumptions based on direct experimental observation are needed.

•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

The EPR paradox, Bell’s inequality, and the question of locality

Guy Blaylock

Most physicists agree that the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bell paradox exemplifies much of the strange behavior of quantum mechanics, but argument persists about what assumptions underlie the paradox. To clarify what the debate is about, we employ a simple and well-known thought experiment involving two correlated photons to help us focus on the logical assumptions needed to construct the EPR and Bell arguments. The view presented in this paper is that the minimal assumptions behind Bell’s inequality are locality and counterfactual definiteness but not scientific realism, determinism, or hidden variables as are often suggested. We further examine the resulting constraints on physical theory with an illustration from the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics—an interpretation that we argue is deterministic, local, and realist but that nonetheless violates the Bell inequality.

arXiv:0902.3827•American Journal of Physics•Dec 14, 2009•59 citations

Explicit Calculations with a Hidden- Variable Spin Model

Barut

The basic problem we study here is whether the two-spin correlation experiments together with the theoretical Bell inequalities have already excluded the possibility of introducing hidden variables into quantum theory, as is often concluded. This question is answered negatively by explicitly reproducing the quantum-mechanical two-spin correlation function by a classical model, where the spin is associated with a classical dipolemoment vector. We then study the behavior of single events in classical and quantum models and conclude that the detector efficiency may be a fundamental limitation rather than just a technical problem to be overcome by better techniques. We further show that the assumptions underlying the derivation of Bell inequalities involve statements about single events which are consistent with neither the classical nor quantum models. It is important therefore to work with explicit physical situations rather than with abstract assumptions.

•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

Single-qubit tests of Bell-like inequalities

F. De Zela

This paper discusses some tests of Bell-like inequalities not requiring entangled states. The proposed tests are based on consecutive measurements on a single qubit. Available hidden-variable models for a single qubit [see, e.g., J. S. Bell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447 (1966)] reproduce the predictions of quantum mechanics and hence violate the Bell-like inequalities addressed in this paper. It is shown how this fact is connected with the state ``collapse'' and with its random nature. Thus, it becomes possible to test truly realistic and deterministic hidden-variable models. In this way, it can be shown that a hidden-variable model should entail at least one of the following features: (i) nonlocality, (ii) contextuality, or (iii) discontinuous measurement-dependent probability functions. The last two features are put to the test with the experiments proposed in this paper. A hidden-variable model that is noncontextual and deterministic would be at variance with some predictions of quantum mechanics. Furthermore, the proposed tests are more likely to be loophole-free, as compared to former ones.

Physical Review A•Oct 22, 2007•14 citations

An inconsistency in the CHSH inequality

Andrea Aiello

Violation of the CHSH inequality supposedly demonstrates an irreconcilable conflict between quantum mechanics and local, realistic hidden variable theories. We show that the mathematical assumptions underlying the proof of the CHSH inequality are, in fact, incompatible with the physics of the experiments testing such inequality. This implies that we cannot dismiss local realistic hidden variable theories on the basis of currently available experimental data yet. However, we also show that an experimental proof of CHSH inequality is, in principle, possible, but it is unclear how to implement, in practice, such an experiment.

arXiv:2409.01275•Sep 2, 2024•0 citations
An experiment is described which proves, using single photons only, that the standard hidden variables assumptions (commonly used to derive Bell inequalities) are inconsistent with quantum mechanics. The analysis is very simple and transparent. In particular, it demonstrates that a classical wave model for quantum mechanics is not ruled out by experiments demonstrating the violation of the traditional hidden variable assumptions.
Most physicists agree that the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bell paradox exemplifies much of the strange behavior of quantum mechanics, but argument persists about what assumptions underlie the paradox. To clarify what the debate is about, we employ a simple and well-known thought experiment involving two correlated photons to help us focus on the logical assumptions needed to construct the EPR and Bell arguments. The view presented in this paper is that the minimal assumptions behind Bell’s inequality are locality and counterfactual definiteness but not scientific realism, determinism, or hidden variables as are often suggested. We further examine the resulting constraints on physical theory with an illustration from the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics—an interpretation that we argue is deterministic, local, and realist but that nonetheless violates the Bell inequality.
The basic problem we study here is whether the two-spin correlation experiments together with the theoretical Bell inequalities have already excluded the possibility of introducing hidden variables into quantum theory, as is often concluded. This question is answered negatively by explicitly reproducing the quantum-mechanical two-spin correlation function by a classical model, where the spin is associated with a classical dipolemoment vector. We then study the behavior of single events in classical and quantum models and conclude that the detector efficiency may be a fundamental limitation rather than just a technical problem to be overcome by better techniques. We further show that the assumptions underlying the derivation of Bell inequalities involve statements about single events which are consistent with neither the classical nor quantum models. It is important therefore to work with explicit physical situations rather than with abstract assumptions.
This paper discusses some tests of Bell-like inequalities not requiring entangled states. The proposed tests are based on consecutive measurements on a single qubit. Available hidden-variable models for a single qubit [see, e.g., J. S. Bell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447 (1966)] reproduce the predictions of quantum mechanics and hence violate the Bell-like inequalities addressed in this paper. It is shown how this fact is connected with the state ``collapse'' and with its random nature. Thus, it becomes possible to test truly realistic and deterministic hidden-variable models. In this way, it can be shown that a hidden-variable model should entail at least one of the following features: (i) nonlocality, (ii) contextuality, or (iii) discontinuous measurement-dependent probability functions. The last two features are put to the test with the experiments proposed in this paper. A hidden-variable model that is noncontextual and deterministic would be at variance with some predictions of quantum mechanics. Furthermore, the proposed tests are more likely to be loophole-free, as compared to former ones.
Violation of the CHSH inequality supposedly demonstrates an irreconcilable conflict between quantum mechanics and local, realistic hidden variable theories. We show that the mathematical assumptions underlying the proof of the CHSH inequality are, in fact, incompatible with the physics of the experiments testing such inequality. This implies that we cannot dismiss local realistic hidden variable theories on the basis of currently available experimental data yet. However, we also show that an experimental proof of CHSH inequality is, in principle, possible, but it is unclear how to implement, in practice, such an experiment.