Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0705.4360 · Physical Review A

Bounding fault-tolerant thresholds for purification and quantum computation

Alastair Kay

Published May 19, 2008• 6 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this paper, we place bounds on when it is impossible to purify a noisy two-qubit state if all the gates used in the purification protocol are subject to adversarial, local, independent noise. It is found that the gate operations must be subject to less than 5.3% error. An existing proof that purification is equivalent to error correction is used to show that this bound can also be applied to concatenated error correcting codes in the presence of noisy gates, and hence gives a limit to the tolerable error rate for a fault-tolerant quantum computer formed by concatenation. This is shown to apply also to the case where error detection and postselection, as proposed by Knill, is used to enhance the threshold. We demonstrate the trade-off between gate and environmentally induced faulty rotations and qubit loss errors.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.77.052319

Related papers

Accuracy threshold for postselected quantum computation

Panos Aliferis, Daniel Gottesman, John P. Preskill

We prove an accuracy threshold theorem for fault-tolerant quantum computation based on error detection and postselection. Our proof provides a rigorous foundation for the scheme suggested by Knill, in which preparation circuits for ancilla states are protected by a concatenated error-detecting code and the preparation is aborted if an error is detected. The proof applies to independent stochastic noise but (in contrast to proofs of the quantum accuracy threshold theorem based on concatenated error-correcting codes) not to strongly-correlated adversarial noise. Our rigorously established lower bound on the accuracy threshold, $1.04\times 10^{-3}$, is well below Knill's numerical estimates.

arXiv:quant-ph/0703264•Quantum Information and Computation•Mar 1, 2008•95 citations

Thresholds for Universal Concatenated Quantum Codes

Christopher Chamberland, Tomas Jochym-O’Connor, Raymond Laflamme

Quantum error correction and fault tolerance make it possible to perform quantum computations in the presence of imprecision and imperfections of realistic devices. An important question is to find the noise rate at which errors can be arbitrarily suppressed. By concatenating the 7-qubit Steane and 15-qubit Reed-Muller codes, the 105-qubit code enables a universal set of fault-tolerant gates despite not all of them being transversal. Importantly, the cnot gate remains transversal in both codes, and as such has increased error protection relative to the other single qubit logical gates. We show that while the level-1 pseudothreshold for the concatenated scheme is limited by the logical Hadamard gate, the error suppression of the logical cnot gates allows for the asymptotic threshold to increase by orders of magnitude at higher levels. We establish a lower bound of 1.28×10^{-3} for the asymptotic threshold of this code, which is competitive with known concatenated models and does not rely on ancillary magic state preparation for universal computation.

arXiv:1603.02704•Physical Review Letters•Jun 28, 2016•49 citations

Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation With Constant Error Rate

Dorit Aharonov, Michael Ben-Or

This paper proves the threshold result, which asserts that quantum computation can be made robust against errors and inaccuracies, when the error rate, $η$, is smaller than a constant threshold, $η_c$. The result holds for a very general, not necessarily probabilistic noise model, for quantum particles with any number of states, and is also generalized to one dimensional quantum computers with only nearest neighbor interactions. No measurements, or classical operations, are required during the quantum computation. The proceeding version was very succinct, and here we fill all the missing details, and elaborate on many parts of the proof. In particular, we devote a section for a discussion of universality issues and proofs that the sets of gates that we use are universal. Another section is devoted to a rigorous proof that fault tolerance can be achieved in the presence of general non probabilistic noise. The systematic structure of the fault tolerant procedures for polynomial codes is explained in length. The proof that the concatenation scheme works is written in a clearer way. The paper also contains new and significantly simpler proofs for most of the known results which we use. For example, we give a simple proof that it suffices to correct bit and phase flips, we significantly simplify Calderbank and Shor's original proof of the correctness of CSS codes. We also give a simple proof of the fact that two-qubit gates are universal. The paper thus provides a self contained and complete proof for universal fault tolerant quantum computation.

arXiv:quant-ph/9906129•Jun 30, 1999•18 citations

Noise threshold for a fault-tolerant two-dimensional lattice architecture

Krysta M. Svore, David Peter Divincenzo, Barbara M. Terhal

We consider a model of quantum computation in which the set of operations is limited to nearest-neighbor interactions on a 2D lattice. We model movement of qubits with noisy \SWAP\ operations. For this architecture we design a fault-tolerant coding scheme using the concatenated $[[7,1,3]]$ Steane code. Our scheme is potentially applicable to ion-trap and solid-state quantum technologies. We calculate a lower bound on the noise threshold for our local model using a detailed failure probability analysis. We obtain a threshold of $1.85 \times 10^{-5}$ for the local setting, where memory error rates are one-tenth of the failure rates of gates, measurement, and preparation steps. For the analogous nonlocal setting, we obtain a noise threshold of $3.61 \times 10^{-5}$. Our results thus show that the additional \SWAP\ operations required to move qubits in the local model affect the noise threshold only moderately.

Quantum Information and Computation•May 1, 2007•32 citations

Quantum accuracy threshold for concatenated distance-3 codes

Panos Aliferis, Daniel Gottesman, John P. Preskill

We prove a new version of the quantum threshold theorem that applies to concatenation of a quantum code that corrects only one error, and we use this theorem to derive a rigorous lower bound on the quantum accuracy threshold epsilon_0. Our proof also applies to concatenation of higher-distance codes, and to noise models that allow faults to be correlated in space and in time. The proof uses new criteria for assessing the accuracy of fault-tolerant circuits, which are particularly conducive to the inductive analysis of recursive simulations. Our lower bound on the threshold, epsilon_0 > 2.73 \times 10^{-5} for an adversarial independent stochastic noise model, is derived from a computer-assisted combinatorial analysis; it is the best lower bound that has been rigorously proven so far.

arXiv:quant-ph/0504218•Apr 28, 2005•84 citations

Quantum accuracy threshold for concatenated distance-3 code

Panos Aliferis, Daniel Gottesman, John P. Preskill

We prove a new version of the quantum threshold theorem that applies to concatenation of a quantum code that corrects only one error, and we use this theorem to derive a rigorous lower bound on the quantum accuracy threshold $\varepsilon_0$. Our proof also applies to concatenation of higher-distance codes, and to noise models that allow faults to be correlated in space and in time. The proof uses new criteria for assessing the accuracy of fault-tolerant circuits, which are particularly conducive to the inductive analysis of recursive simulations. Our lower bound on the threshold, $\varepsilon_0 \ge 2.73\times 10^{-5}$ for an adversarial independent stochastic noise model, is derived from a computer-assisted combinatorial analysis; it is the best lower bound that has been rigorously proven so far.

Quantum Information and Computation•Mar 1, 2006•398 citations
In this paper, we place bounds on when it is impossible to purify a noisy two-qubit state if all the gates used in the purification protocol are subject to adversarial, local, independent noise. It is found that the gate operations must be subject to less than 5.3% error. An existing proof that purification is equivalent to error correction is used to show that this bound can also be applied to concatenated error correcting codes in the presence of noisy gates, and hence gives a limit to the tolerable error rate for a fault-tolerant quantum computer formed by concatenation. This is shown to apply also to the case where error detection and postselection, as proposed by Knill, is used to enhance the threshold. We demonstrate the trade-off between gate and environmentally induced faulty rotations and qubit loss errors.
We prove an accuracy threshold theorem for fault-tolerant quantum computation based on error detection and postselection. Our proof provides a rigorous foundation for the scheme suggested by Knill, in which preparation circuits for ancilla states are protected by a concatenated error-detecting code and the preparation is aborted if an error is detected. The proof applies to independent stochastic noise but (in contrast to proofs of the quantum accuracy threshold theorem based on concatenated error-correcting codes) not to strongly-correlated adversarial noise. Our rigorously established lower bound on the accuracy threshold, 1.04×10−31.04\times 10^{-3}1.04×10−3, is well below Knill's numerical estimates.
Quantum error correction and fault tolerance make it possible to perform quantum computations in the presence of imprecision and imperfections of realistic devices. An important question is to find the noise rate at which errors can be arbitrarily suppressed. By concatenating the 7-qubit Steane and 15-qubit Reed-Muller codes, the 105-qubit code enables a universal set of fault-tolerant gates despite not all of them being transversal. Importantly, the cnot gate remains transversal in both codes, and as such has increased error protection relative to the other single qubit logical gates. We show that while the level-1 pseudothreshold for the concatenated scheme is limited by the logical Hadamard gate, the error suppression of the logical cnot gates allows for the asymptotic threshold to increase by orders of magnitude at higher levels. We establish a lower bound of 1.28×10^{-3} for the asymptotic threshold of this code, which is competitive with known concatenated models and does not rely on ancillary magic state preparation for universal computation.
This paper proves the threshold result, which asserts that quantum computation can be made robust against errors and inaccuracies, when the error rate, ηηη, is smaller than a constant threshold, ηcη_cηc​. The result holds for a very general, not necessarily probabilistic noise model, for quantum particles with any number of states, and is also generalized to one dimensional quantum computers with only nearest neighbor interactions. No measurements, or classical operations, are required during the quantum computation. The proceeding version was very succinct, and here we fill all the missing details, and elaborate on many parts of the proof. In particular, we devote a section for a discussion of universality issues and proofs that the sets of gates that we use are universal. Another section is devoted to a rigorous proof that fault tolerance can be achieved in the presence of general non probabilistic noise. The systematic structure of the fault tolerant procedures for polynomial codes is explained in length. The proof that the concatenation scheme works is written in a clearer way. The paper also contains new and significantly simpler proofs for most of the known results which we use. For example, we give a simple proof that it suffices to correct bit and phase flips, we significantly simplify Calderbank and Shor's original proof of the correctness of CSS codes. We also give a simple proof of the fact that two-qubit gates are universal. The paper thus provides a self contained and complete proof for universal fault tolerant quantum computation.
We consider a model of quantum computation in which the set of operations is limited to nearest-neighbor interactions on a 2D lattice. We model movement of qubits with noisy \SWAP\ operations. For this architecture we design a fault-tolerant coding scheme using the concatenated [[7,1,3]][[7,1,3]][[7,1,3]] Steane code. Our scheme is potentially applicable to ion-trap and solid-state quantum technologies. We calculate a lower bound on the noise threshold for our local model using a detailed failure probability analysis. We obtain a threshold of 1.85×10−51.85 \times 10^{-5}1.85×10−5 for the local setting, where memory error rates are one-tenth of the failure rates of gates, measurement, and preparation steps. For the analogous nonlocal setting, we obtain a noise threshold of 3.61×10−53.61 \times 10^{-5}3.61×10−5. Our results thus show that the additional \SWAP\ operations required to move qubits in the local model affect the noise threshold only moderately.
We prove a new version of the quantum threshold theorem that applies to concatenation of a quantum code that corrects only one error, and we use this theorem to derive a rigorous lower bound on the quantum accuracy threshold epsilon_0. Our proof also applies to concatenation of higher-distance codes, and to noise models that allow faults to be correlated in space and in time. The proof uses new criteria for assessing the accuracy of fault-tolerant circuits, which are particularly conducive to the inductive analysis of recursive simulations. Our lower bound on the threshold, epsilon_0 > 2.73 \times 10^{-5} for an adversarial independent stochastic noise model, is derived from a computer-assisted combinatorial analysis; it is the best lower bound that has been rigorously proven so far.
We prove a new version of the quantum threshold theorem that applies to concatenation of a quantum code that corrects only one error, and we use this theorem to derive a rigorous lower bound on the quantum accuracy threshold ε0\varepsilon_0ε0​. Our proof also applies to concatenation of higher-distance codes, and to noise models that allow faults to be correlated in space and in time. The proof uses new criteria for assessing the accuracy of fault-tolerant circuits, which are particularly conducive to the inductive analysis of recursive simulations. Our lower bound on the threshold, ε0≥2.73×10−5\varepsilon_0 \ge 2.73\times 10^{-5}ε0​≥2.73×10−5 for an adversarial independent stochastic noise model, is derived from a computer-assisted combinatorial analysis; it is the best lower bound that has been rigorously proven so far.