arXiv:0705.2935 · Open Physics

On the role of entanglement in Schrödinger’s cat paradox

Stefan Rinner, E. Werner

Published Mar 1, 2008• 11 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this paper we re-investigate the core of Schrödinger’s “cat paradox”. We argue that one has to distinguish clearly between superpositions of macroscopic cat states |☺〉 + |☹〉 and superpositions of entangled states |☺, ↑〉 + |☹, ↓〉 which comprise both the state of the cat (☺=alive, ☹=dead) and the radioactive substance (↑=not decayed, ↓=decayed). It is shown, that in the case of the cat experiment recourse to decoherence or other mechanisms is not necessary in order to explain the absence of macroscopic superpositions. Additionally, we present modified versions of two quantum optical experiments as experimenta crucis. Applied rigorously, quantum mechanical formalism reduces the problem to a mere pseudo-paradox.

DOI: 10.2478/s11534-008-0021-5

Related papers

Review and suggested resolution of the problem of Schrodinger’s cat

Art Hobson

This paper reviews and suggests a resolution of the problem of definite outcomes of measurement. This problem, also known as ‘Schrodinger’s cat’, has long posed an apparent paradox because the state resulting from a measurement appears to be a quantum superposition in which the detector is in two macroscopically distinct states (alive and dead in the case of the cat) simultaneously. Many alternative interpretations of the quantum mathematical formalism, and several alternative modifications of the theory, have been proposed to resolve this problem, but no consensus has formed supporting any one of them. Applying standard quantum theory to the measurement state, together with the analysis and results of decades of nonlocality experiments with pairs of entangled systems, this paper shows the entangled measurement state is not a paradoxical macroscopic superposition of states. It is instead a phase-dependent superposition of correlations between states of the subsystems. Thus Schrodinger’s cat is a non-paradoxical ‘macroscopic correlation’ in which one of the two correlated systems happens to be a detector. This insight resolves the problem of definite outcomes but it does not entirely resolve the measurement problem because the entangled state is still reversible.

arXiv:1711.11082Contemporary PhysicsNov 28, 201716 citations

Resolving Schrodinger's cat

Art Hobson

Schrodinger's famous cat has long been misunderstood. According to quantum theory and experiments with entangled systems, an entangled state such as the Schrodinger's cat state is neither a superposition of states of either subsystem nor a superposition of compound states of the composite system, but rather a nonlocal superposition of correlations between pairs of states of the two subsystems. The entangled post-measurement state that results from an ideal measurement is not paradoxical, but is merely a coherent superposition of two statistical correlations at "zero phase angle," i.e. at 100% positive correlation. Thus the state of the radioactive nucleus and Schrodinger's cat is as follows: an undecayed nucleus is 100% positively correlated with an alive cat, and (i.e. superposed with) a decayed nucleus is 100% positively correlated with a dead cat. The superposition consists merely in the fact that both correlations are simultaneously true. Despite many published statements to the contrary, this superposition is not paradoxical. It is in fact what one expects intuitively.

arXiv:1607.01298Jul 5, 20160 citations

Entanglement, decoherence, and the measurement problem

Art Hobson

The entangled Schrodinger cat state obtained immediately upon measurement of a superposed two-state quantum system is often considered paradoxical because it appears to predict two macroscopically different outcomes, such as an alive and dead cat. However, nonlocal interferometry experiments testing momentum-entangled photon pairs over all phases demonstrate that the cat state does not fit this description and is not paradoxical. Both experiment and theory imply that it instead represents a superposition of two nonlocally coherent (i.e. phase-dependent) statistical correlations between its sub-systems. This is not paradoxical. Standard quantum theory rigorously predicts the experimentally-observed outcomes of this state. Neither sub-system is superposed; rather, the correlations between the states of the subsystems are superposed. This resolves the problem of definite outcomes. The nonlocal properties of entanglement then ensure that only one outcome occurs while the other outcome simultaneously does not occur, resolving a problem posed by Einstein in 1927. The single outcome that occurs then triggers an irreversible process leading to macroscopic registration of the outcome. This resolves the quantum measurement problem. Collapse occurs because of entanglement and does not require a special collapse postulate. Collapse is a consequence of standard quantum physics and the irreversible nature of the macroscopic registration.

arXiv:1904.04234Jan 1, 20190 citations

Relativity and structure deformations: epistemological aspects

Wojciech Piotr Grygiel

The Schrodinger's Cat paradox was proposed in 1935 by Edwin Schrodinger, one of the founders of quantum mechanics, as an attempt to visualize the macroscopic realization of a quantum superposition state. A cat is placed in a sealed box together with a vial of poison. A two-state particle (e.g. an electron) is sent into a detector in the box resulting either in a broken or an intact vial and a dead or live cat, respectively. The main problem consists in whether the superposition state of a microscopic particle can be transferred upon the macroscopic cat, that is, whether the cat can exist in a superposition state, being simultaneously dead and alive. Since the standard Copenhagen interpretation is unable to assign any reality to the quantum superposition state, the paradox finds no resolution within the regime of this interpretation. Von Neumann's insistence on the uniform treatment of both microscopic (quantum) and macroscopic (classical) objects according to the laws of quantum mechanics provides a more consistent framework for the resolution of the paradox. In particular, the discovery of the phenomenon of decoherence, whereby the disappearance of the quantum interferences at the macro level is accounted for, suggests the onset of an extremely efficient interference relaxation process (10-23 s) upon the interaction of the two state particle with the detector. As a result, Schrodinger's cat can exist macroscopically either as dead or alive and never as a combination of both. Decoherence not only aids the resolution of the Schrodinger's Cat paradox but also sheds light upon the mechanisms by which the macro-world emerges from the microscopic quantum realm.

Philosophical Problems in Science (Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce)Jan 1, 20050 citations

An Operational Approach to Schrödinger's Cat

L. Mandeļ

. It is pointed out that the conclusions drawn from a recent quantum interference experiment with light suggest an operational resolution of the Schrödinger cat paradox. On this occasion in honor of Prof. E.T. Jaynes, we recall that he devoted some of his research efforts to the interpretation of quantum mechanics, which led him to propose several experimental tests. Although the ‘neoclassical’ theory he developed was found not to be confirmed by experiment, it nevertheless played a role in encouraging us to think critically about quantum mechanics and to carry out new experiments. This short contribution is concerned with a well-known quantum problem of interpretation. The quantum paradox known as Schrödinger's cat, in which the cat is cast in a linear superposition of the state of being alive and the state of being dead, has been debated since the beginnings of quantum mechanics. Whereas most physicists are ready to concede the existence of superposition states for a microscopic quantum system like an atom, such states appear to be ruled out for a macroscopic system like a cat by common experience. The question then arises at which level classical concepts take over from quantum mechanical ones. In a very clear and readable discussion of this and other paradoxes Glauber has pointed out that the noise inevitably associated with the amplification process accompanying the measurement of a microscopic system leaves the cat in a mixed state rather than a pure one.

Cambridge University Press eBooksSep 2, 19930 citations

The entangled measurement state is not a paradoxical superposition of the detector

Art Hobson

The entangled state that results when a detector measures a superposed quantum system has spawned decades of concern about the problem of definite outcomes or "Schrodinger's cat." This state seems to describe a detector in an indefinite or "smeared" situation of indicating two macroscopic configurations simultaneously. This would be paradoxical. Since all entangled states are known to have nonlocal properties, and since measurements have obvious nonlocal characteristics, it's natural to turn to nonlocality experiments for insight into this question. Unlike the measurement situation where the phase is fixed at zero for perfect correlations, nonlocality experiments cover the full range of superposition phases and can thus show precisely what entangled states superpose. For two-state systems, these experiments reveal that the measurement state is not a superposition of two macroscopically different detector states but instead a superposition of two coherent correlations between distinct detector states and corresponding system states. In the measurement situation (i.e. at zero phase), and assuming the Schrodinger's cat scenario, the entangled state can be read as follows: An undecayed nucleus is perfectly correlated with an alive cat, AND a decayed nucleus is perfectly correlated with a dead cat, where "AND" indicates the superposition. This is not paradoxical.

arXiv:1912.05439Dec 9, 20190 citations