Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0705.1099 · Physical Review A

Minimal qudit code for a qubit in the phase-damping channel

Stefano Pirandola, Stefano Mancini, Samuel L. Braunstein, David Vitali

Published Mar 6, 2008• 52 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Using the stabilizer formalism we construct the minimal code into a $D$-dimensional Hilbert space (qudit) to protect a qubit against phase damping. The effectiveness of this code is then studied by means of input-output fidelity.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.77.032309

Related papers

Qudit vs. qubit: Simulated performance of error-correction codes in higher dimensions

James Keppens, Quinten Eggerickx, Vukan Levajac +2 more

Qudits can be described by a state vector in a $q$-dimensional Hilbert space, enabling a more extensive encoding and manipulation of information compared to qubits. This implies that conducting fault-tolerant quantum computations using qudits rather than qubits might entail less overhead. In this work, we investigate the viability of qudits in error correction codes by creating and simulating the quantum circuitry for the smallest qudit error correction code with a multidimensional circuit-level noise model and specifically adapted decoders. After introducing a flag qudit to protect the code from hook errors, comparable error thresholds of the order of $10^{-4}$ are obtained for qudits of dimensions $2$, $3$ and $5$.

arXiv:2502.05992•Physical Review A•Sep 3, 2025•4 citations

Quantum error correction and detection: Quantitative analysis of a coherent-state amplitude-damping code

Ricardo Wickert, Peter van Loock

We reexamine a non-Gaussian quantum error-correction code designed to protect optical coherent-state qubits against errors due to an amplitude-damping channel. We improve on a previous result [R. Wickert, N. K. Bernardes, and P. van Loock, Phys. Rev. A 81, 062344 (2010)] by providing a tighter upper bound on the performance attained when considering realistic assumptions, which constrain the operation of the gates employed in the scheme. The quantitative characterization is performed through measures of fidelity and concurrence, the latter obtained by employing the code as an entanglement distillation protocol. We find that, when running the code in fully deterministic error-correction mode, direct transmission can only be beaten for certain combinations of channel and input state parameters. In contrast, in error-detection mode, the usage of higher repetition encodings remains beneficial throughout, however, at the expense of diminishing success probabilities.

arXiv:1303.0273•Physical Review A•May 9, 2014•7 citations

Quantum Error-Correcting Codes for Qudit Amplitude Damping

Markus Grassl, Linghang Kong, Zhaohui Wei +2 more

Traditional quantum error-correcting codes are designed for the depolarizing channel modeled by generalized Pauli errors occurring with equal probability. Amplitude damping channels model, in general, the decay process of a multilevel atom or energy dissipation of a bosonic system with Markovian bath at zero temperature. We discuss quantum error-correcting codes adapted to amplitude damping channels for higher dimensional systems (qudits). For multi-level atoms, we consider a natural kind of decay process, and for bosonic systems, we consider the qudit amplitude damping channel obtained by truncating the Fock basis of the bosonic modes (e.g., the number of photons) to a certain maximum occupation number. We construct families of single-error-correcting quantum codes that can be used for both cases. Our codes have larger code dimensions than the previously known single-error-correcting codes of the same lengths. In addition, we present families of multi-error correcting codes for these two channels, as well as generalizations of our construction technique to error-correcting codes for the qutrit V and Λ channels.

arXiv:1509.06829•IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Jan 8, 2018•56 citations

Quantum error-correcting codes for amplitude damping

Markus Grassl, Zhaohui Wei, Zhang‐qi Yin +1 more

Traditional quantum error-correcting codes are designed for the depolarizing channel modeled by generalized Pauli errors occurring with equal probability. Amplitude damping channels, in general, model the decay process of a multilevel atom or energy dissipation of a bosonic system at zero temperature. We discuss quantum error-correcting codes adapted to amplitude damping channels for higher dimensional systems (qudits). For multi-level atoms, we consider a natural kind of decay process, and for bosonic systems, we consider the qudit amplitude damping channel obtained by truncating the Fock basis of the bosonic modes to a certain maximum occupation number. We construct families of single-error-correcting quantum codes that can be used for both cases. Our codes have larger code dimensions than the previously known single-error-correcting codes of the same lengths.

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Jun 1, 2014•7 citations

The two-qubit amplitude damping channel: Characterization using quantum stabilizer codes

S. Omkar, R. Srikanth, Subhashish Banerjee +1 more

arXiv:1511.03368•Annals of Physics•Jul 7, 2016•3 citations

Quantum stabilizer codes embedding qubits into qudits

Carlo Cafaro, Federico Maiolini, Stefano Mancini

We study, by means of the stabilizer formalism, a quantum error correcting code which is alternative to the standard block codes since it embeds a qubit into a qudit. The code exploits the noncommutative geometry of discrete phase space to protect the qubit against both amplitude and phase errors. The performance of this code is evaluated on Weyl channels by means of the entanglement fidelity as a function of the error probability. A comparison with standard block codes, like five- and seven-qubit stabilizer codes, shows its superiority.

arXiv:1204.6572•Physical Review A•Aug 8, 2012•40 citations
Using the stabilizer formalism we construct the minimal code into a DDD-dimensional Hilbert space (qudit) to protect a qubit against phase damping. The effectiveness of this code is then studied by means of input-output fidelity.
Qudits can be described by a state vector in a qqq-dimensional Hilbert space, enabling a more extensive encoding and manipulation of information compared to qubits. This implies that conducting fault-tolerant quantum computations using qudits rather than qubits might entail less overhead. In this work, we investigate the viability of qudits in error correction codes by creating and simulating the quantum circuitry for the smallest qudit error correction code with a multidimensional circuit-level noise model and specifically adapted decoders. After introducing a flag qudit to protect the code from hook errors, comparable error thresholds of the order of 10−410^{-4}10−4 are obtained for qudits of dimensions 222, 333 and 555.
We reexamine a non-Gaussian quantum error-correction code designed to protect optical coherent-state qubits against errors due to an amplitude-damping channel. We improve on a previous result [R. Wickert, N. K. Bernardes, and P. van Loock, Phys. Rev. A 81, 062344 (2010)] by providing a tighter upper bound on the performance attained when considering realistic assumptions, which constrain the operation of the gates employed in the scheme. The quantitative characterization is performed through measures of fidelity and concurrence, the latter obtained by employing the code as an entanglement distillation protocol. We find that, when running the code in fully deterministic error-correction mode, direct transmission can only be beaten for certain combinations of channel and input state parameters. In contrast, in error-detection mode, the usage of higher repetition encodings remains beneficial throughout, however, at the expense of diminishing success probabilities.
Traditional quantum error-correcting codes are designed for the depolarizing channel modeled by generalized Pauli errors occurring with equal probability. Amplitude damping channels model, in general, the decay process of a multilevel atom or energy dissipation of a bosonic system with Markovian bath at zero temperature. We discuss quantum error-correcting codes adapted to amplitude damping channels for higher dimensional systems (qudits). For multi-level atoms, we consider a natural kind of decay process, and for bosonic systems, we consider the qudit amplitude damping channel obtained by truncating the Fock basis of the bosonic modes (e.g., the number of photons) to a certain maximum occupation number. We construct families of single-error-correcting quantum codes that can be used for both cases. Our codes have larger code dimensions than the previously known single-error-correcting codes of the same lengths. In addition, we present families of multi-error correcting codes for these two channels, as well as generalizations of our construction technique to error-correcting codes for the qutrit V and Λ channels.
Traditional quantum error-correcting codes are designed for the depolarizing channel modeled by generalized Pauli errors occurring with equal probability. Amplitude damping channels, in general, model the decay process of a multilevel atom or energy dissipation of a bosonic system at zero temperature. We discuss quantum error-correcting codes adapted to amplitude damping channels for higher dimensional systems (qudits). For multi-level atoms, we consider a natural kind of decay process, and for bosonic systems, we consider the qudit amplitude damping channel obtained by truncating the Fock basis of the bosonic modes to a certain maximum occupation number. We construct families of single-error-correcting quantum codes that can be used for both cases. Our codes have larger code dimensions than the previously known single-error-correcting codes of the same lengths.
We study, by means of the stabilizer formalism, a quantum error correcting code which is alternative to the standard block codes since it embeds a qubit into a qudit. The code exploits the noncommutative geometry of discrete phase space to protect the qubit against both amplitude and phase errors. The performance of this code is evaluated on Weyl channels by means of the entanglement fidelity as a function of the error probability. A comparison with standard block codes, like five- and seven-qubit stabilizer codes, shows its superiority.