Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0704.2122 · Physical Review Letters

Nonadditive Quantum Error-Correcting Code

Sixia Yu, Qing Chen, Ching–Yi Lai, C. H. Oh

Published Aug 29, 2008• 55 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We report the first nonadditive quantum error-correcting code, namely, a ((9, 12, 3)) code which is a 12-dimensional subspace within a 9-qubit Hilbert space, that outperforms the optimal stabilizer code of the same length by encoding more levels while correcting arbitrary single-qubit errors. Taking advantage of the graph states, we construct explicitly a complete encoding-decoding circuit for the proposed nonadditive error-correcting code.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.101.090501

Related papers

Two Infinite Families of Nonadditive Quantum Error-Correcting Codes

Sixia Yu, Qing Chen, C. H. Oh

We construct explicitly two infinite families of genuine nonadditive 1-error correcting quantum codes and prove that their coding subspaces are 50% larger than those of the optimal stabilizer codes of the same parameters via the linear programming bound. All these nonadditive codes can be characterized by a stabilizer-like structure, and thus, their encoding circuits can be designed in a straightforward manner.

arXiv:0901.1935•IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Oct 13, 2015•5 citations

Graphical Quantum Error-Correcting Codes

Sixia Yu, Qing Chen, Choo Hiap Oh

We introduce a purely graph-theoretical object, namely the coding clique, to construct quantum errorcorrecting codes. Almost all quantum codes constructed so far are stabilizer (additive) codes and the construction of nonadditive codes, which are potentially more efficient, is not as well understood as that of stabilizer codes. Our graphical approach provides a unified and classical way to construct both stabilizer and nonadditive codes. In particular we have explicitly constructed the optimal ((10,24,3)) code and a family of 1-error detecting nonadditive codes with the highest encoding rate so far. In the case of stabilizer codes a thorough search becomes tangible and we have classified all the extremal stabilizer codes up to 8 qubits.

arXiv:0709.1780•Sep 12, 2007•32 citations

Graphical nonbinary quantum error-correcting codes

Dan Mei Hu, Weidong Tang, Meisheng Zhao +3 more

In this paper, we present a systematic way based on the nonbinary graph state of constructing good nonbinary quantum codes, both additive and nonadditive, for systems with integer dimensions. With a computer search, which results in many interesting codes including some nonadditive codes meeting the Singleton bounds, we are able to construct explicitly four families of optimal codes, namely, ${[[6,2,3]]}_{p}$, ${[[7,3,3]]}_{p}$, ${[[8,2,4]]}_{p}$, and ${[[8,4,3]]}_{p}$ for any odd dimension $\mathit{p}$ and a family of nonadditive codes ${((5,p,3))}_{p}$ for arbitrary $p>3$. In the case of composite numbers as dimensions, we also construct a family of stabilizer codes ${((6,2{p}^{2},3))}_{2p}$ for odd $\mathit{p}$, whose coding subspace is not of a dimension that is a power of the dimension of the physical subsystem.

arXiv:0801.0831•Physical Review A•Jul 3, 2008•75 citations

Quantum-error-correcting codes using qudit graph states

Shiang Yong Looi, Li Zhi Yu, Vlad Gheorghiu +1 more

Graph states are generalized from qubits to collections of $n$ qudits of arbitrary dimension $D$, and simple graphical methods are used to construct both additive and nonadditive, as well as degenerate and nondegenerate, quantum-error-correcting codes. Codes of distance 2 saturating the quantum Singleton bound for arbitrarily large $n$ and $D$ are constructed using simple graphs, except when $n$ is odd and $D$ is even. Computer searches have produced a number of codes with distances 3 and 4, some previously known and some new. The concept of a stabilizer is extended to general $D$, and shown to provide a dual representation of an additive graph code.

arXiv:0712.1979•Physical Review A•Oct 7, 2008•111 citations

Nonadditive quantum codes

Markus Grassl, Martin Rötteler

Introduction Most quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) that are designed to correct local errors are stabilizer codes that correspond to additive classical codes. Because of this correspondence, stabilizer codes are also referred to as additive codes, while nonstabilizer codes are called nonadditive codes. Shortly after the invention of stabilizer codes by Gottesman [G96a] and independently Calderbank et al. [CRS+98], the nonadditive ((5, 6, 2)) code was found [RHS+97], which constitutes the first example of a nonadditive quantum code with a higher dimension than any stabilizer code of equal length and minimum distance. About ten years later, the first one-error-correcting ((9, 12, 3)) code and the optimal ((10, 24, 3)) code were found [YCL+09, YCO07], both better than any stabilizer code of the same length. Here we describe a framework that not only allows a joint description of these codes, but also enables the construction of new nonadditive codes with better parameters than the best known stabilizer codes. These codes are based on the classical nonlinear Goethals and Preparata codes, which themselves are better than any classical linear code. In Section 10.3, the framework will be presented from two different points of view, namely union stabilizer codes and codeword stabilized codes, each highlighting different aspects of the construction. To illustrate the relationship of these nonadditive codes to stabilizer codes we first recall the main aspects of the latter. Section 10.4 is devoted to methods for obtaining new codes, including the aforementioned quantum Goethals–Preparata codes.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 5, 2013•6 citations

On the Structure of Additive Quantum Codes and the Existence of Nonadditive Codes

Vwani Roychowdhury, Farrokh Vatan

We first present a useful characterization of additive (stabilizer) quantum error-correcting codes. Then we present several examples of We first present a useful characterization of additive (stabilizer) quantum error--correcting codes. Then we present several examples of nonadditive codes. We show that there exist infinitely many non-trivial nonadditive codes with different minimum distances, and high rates. In fact, we show that nonadditive codes that correct t errors can reach the asymptotic rate R=1-2H(2t/n), where H(x) is the binary entropy function. Finally, we introduce the notion of strongly nonadditive codes (i.e., quantum codes with the following property: the trivial code consisting of the entire Hilbert space is the only additive code that is equivalent to any code containing the given code), and provide a construction for an ((11,2,3)) strongly nonadditive code.

arXiv:quant-ph/9710031•Oct 9, 1997•4 citations
We report the first nonadditive quantum error-correcting code, namely, a ((9, 12, 3)) code which is a 12-dimensional subspace within a 9-qubit Hilbert space, that outperforms the optimal stabilizer code of the same length by encoding more levels while correcting arbitrary single-qubit errors. Taking advantage of the graph states, we construct explicitly a complete encoding-decoding circuit for the proposed nonadditive error-correcting code.
We introduce a purely graph-theoretical object, namely the coding clique, to construct quantum errorcorrecting codes. Almost all quantum codes constructed so far are stabilizer (additive) codes and the construction of nonadditive codes, which are potentially more efficient, is not as well understood as that of stabilizer codes. Our graphical approach provides a unified and classical way to construct both stabilizer and nonadditive codes. In particular we have explicitly constructed the optimal ((10,24,3)) code and a family of 1-error detecting nonadditive codes with the highest encoding rate so far. In the case of stabilizer codes a thorough search becomes tangible and we have classified all the extremal stabilizer codes up to 8 qubits.
In this paper, we present a systematic way based on the nonbinary graph state of constructing good nonbinary quantum codes, both additive and nonadditive, for systems with integer dimensions. With a computer search, which results in many interesting codes including some nonadditive codes meeting the Singleton bounds, we are able to construct explicitly four families of optimal codes, namely, [[6,2,3]]p{[[6,2,3]]}_{p}[[6,2,3]]p​, [[7,3,3]]p{[[7,3,3]]}_{p}[[7,3,3]]p​, [[8,2,4]]p{[[8,2,4]]}_{p}[[8,2,4]]p​, and [[8,4,3]]p{[[8,4,3]]}_{p}[[8,4,3]]p​ for any odd dimension p\mathit{p}p and a family of nonadditive codes ((5,p,3))p{((5,p,3))}_{p}((5,p,3))p​ for arbitrary p>3p>3p>3. In the case of composite numbers as dimensions, we also construct a family of stabilizer codes ((6,2p2,3))2p{((6,2{p}^{2},3))}_{2p}((6,2p2,3))2p​ for odd p\mathit{p}p, whose coding subspace is not of a dimension that is a power of the dimension of the physical subsystem.
Graph states are generalized from qubits to collections of nnn qudits of arbitrary dimension DDD, and simple graphical methods are used to construct both additive and nonadditive, as well as degenerate and nondegenerate, quantum-error-correcting codes. Codes of distance 2 saturating the quantum Singleton bound for arbitrarily large nnn and DDD are constructed using simple graphs, except when nnn is odd and DDD is even. Computer searches have produced a number of codes with distances 3 and 4, some previously known and some new. The concept of a stabilizer is extended to general DDD, and shown to provide a dual representation of an additive graph code.
Introduction Most quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) that are designed to correct local errors are stabilizer codes that correspond to additive classical codes. Because of this correspondence, stabilizer codes are also referred to as additive codes, while nonstabilizer codes are called nonadditive codes. Shortly after the invention of stabilizer codes by Gottesman [G96a] and independently Calderbank et al. [CRS+98], the nonadditive ((5, 6, 2)) code was found [RHS+97], which constitutes the first example of a nonadditive quantum code with a higher dimension than any stabilizer code of equal length and minimum distance. About ten years later, the first one-error-correcting ((9, 12, 3)) code and the optimal ((10, 24, 3)) code were found [YCL+09, YCO07], both better than any stabilizer code of the same length. Here we describe a framework that not only allows a joint description of these codes, but also enables the construction of new nonadditive codes with better parameters than the best known stabilizer codes. These codes are based on the classical nonlinear Goethals and Preparata codes, which themselves are better than any classical linear code. In Section 10.3, the framework will be presented from two different points of view, namely union stabilizer codes and codeword stabilized codes, each highlighting different aspects of the construction. To illustrate the relationship of these nonadditive codes to stabilizer codes we first recall the main aspects of the latter. Section 10.4 is devoted to methods for obtaining new codes, including the aforementioned quantum Goethals–Preparata codes.
We first present a useful characterization of additive (stabilizer) quantum error-correcting codes. Then we present several examples of We first present a useful characterization of additive (stabilizer) quantum error--correcting codes. Then we present several examples of nonadditive codes. We show that there exist infinitely many non-trivial nonadditive codes with different minimum distances, and high rates. In fact, we show that nonadditive codes that correct t errors can reach the asymptotic rate R=1-2H(2t/n), where H(x) is the binary entropy function. Finally, we introduce the notion of strongly nonadditive codes (i.e., quantum codes with the following property: the trivial code consisting of the entire Hilbert space is the only additive code that is equivalent to any code containing the given code), and provide a construction for an ((11,2,3)) strongly nonadditive code.