Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0704.1712

Borromean Entanglement Revisited

Ayumu Sugita

Published Apr 13, 2007• 6 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

An interesting analogy between quantum entangled states and topological links was suggested by Aravind. In particular, he emphasized a connection between the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state and the Borromean rings. However, he made the connection in a way that depends on the choice of measurement basis. We reconsider it in a basis-independent way by using the reduced density matrix.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0704.1712

Related papers

Single-Qubit Quantum Teleportation Using Three-Qubit Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (GHZ) State as Entanglement Resource and Basis for Quantum Measurement

Sujit Chattopadhyay, Debashis Adhikari

Lecture notes in electrical engineering•Jan 1, 2025•1 citation

New States of Matter Suggested by New Topological Structures

Nils Andreas Baas

We extend the well-known Borromean and Brunnian rings to new higher order versions. Then we suggest an extension of the connection between Efimov states in cold gases and Borromean and Brunnian rings to these new higher order links. This gives rise to a whole new hierarchy of possible states with Efimov states at the bottom.

arXiv:1012.2698•Dec 13, 2010•0 citations

Links and Quantum Entanglement ∗

A. I. Solomon, Choon-Lin Ho

We discuss the analogy between topological entanglement and quantum entanglement, particularly for tripartite quantum systems.We illustrate our approach by first discussing two clearly (topologically) inequivalent systems of three-ring links: The Borromean rings, in which the removal of any one link leaves the remaining two non-linked (or, by analogy, non-entangled); and an inequivalent system (which we call the NUS link) for which the removal of any one link leaves the remaining two linked (or, entangled in our analogy).We introduce unitary representations for the appropriate Braid Group (B3) which produce the related quantum entangled systems. We finally remark that these two quantum systems, which clearly possess inequivalent entanglement properties, are locally unitarily equivalent.

•Jan 1, 2010•3 citations

LINKS AND QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT

A. I. Solomon, CHOON-LIN HO

We discuss the analogy between topological entanglement and quantum entanglement, particularly for tripartite quantum systems. We illustrate our approach by first discussing two clearly (topologically) inequivalent systems of three-ring links: The Borromean rings, in which the removal of any one link leaves the remaining two non-linked (or, by analogy, non-entangled); and an inequivalent system (which we call the NUS link) for which the removal of any one link leaves the remaining two linked (or, entangled in our analogy). We introduce unitary representations for the appropriate Braid Group ($B_3$) which produce the related quantum entangled systems. We finally remark that these two quantum systems, which clearly possess inequivalent entanglement properties, are locally unitarily equivalent.

arXiv:1104.5144•Conference in Honour of Murray Gell-Mann's 80th Birthday•Nov 1, 2010•2 citations

Knot your average qutrit: Measurement-induced entanglement splitting and the cabling dictionary for GHZ and W States

Sougata Bhattacharyya, Sovik Roy

Multipartite entanglement is conventionally classified by state families viz. family of GHZ and W class of states, with each family expected to behave differently under measurement. We show that, at least for the question of how entanglement splits after a single-particle measurement, this is not the division that matters for qutrits. Extending the Aravind's correspondence (which models entanglement as topological linking, and projective measurement as physically cutting a ring from an interlinked configuration\cite{aravind1997}) from qubits to qutrits, we derive the complete measurement-induced entanglement splitting of the GHZ type qutrit state i.e |GHZ_3> and of the full family of symmetric W class qutrit states, six two same - one different states i.e |{W_{p,p,q}^{sym}}> and one all - different state i.e. |W_{0,1,2}>, under both the computational basis (CB) and the mutually unbiased bases (MUBs), obtaining exact eigenvalues and Schmidt ranks for every outcome in every case. We see that the |W_{0,1,2}> state behaves similarly as |GHZ_3> state, a single, outcome-independent residual rank in each basis, while the |{W_{p,p,q}^{sym}> states alone show probability-weighted, outcome-dependent behaviour. The relevant structural line is therefore repeated-index versus all-different-index bag structure, not GHZ class versus $W$ class. We express this classification using a \textit{two-strand cabling} extension of Aravind's \textit{ring-and-link} picture. This is needed because the qutrit residual Schmidt rank (R) takes three values, R belonging to {1,2,3}, rather than the qubit binary (i.e. R belonging to {1,2}). We are explicit throughout that this cabling dictionary is a labeling convention built to reproduce an independently computed Schmidt rank, not a topological invariant derived from the link diagrams themselves, and we discuss what would be needed to close that gap

quant-pharXiv:2608.09076•Aug 11, 2026•0 citations

Complete sets of commuting observables of Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states

M. Q. Ruan, J. Y. Zeng

Complete sets of commuting observables (CSCOs) of the form ${\ensuremath{\Sigma}}_{N}={\ensuremath{\Pi}}_{i=1}^{N}{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{i{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{i}}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}({\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{i}=x,y,z)$ for an $N$-qubit system are extracted by a simple graphic approach. One can construct $2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{3}^{N}$ sets of operators, each set consisting of ${K}_{N}$ commuting ${\ensuremath{\Sigma}}_{N}$, ${K}_{N}={2}^{N\ensuremath{-}1}+1$ for even $N$, and ${2}^{N\ensuremath{-}1}$ for odd $N$. Any $N$ functional-independent operators among the ${K}_{N}$ operators may be adopted as a CSCO, whose simultaneous eigenstates (SEs) span an orthonormal basis of $N$-qubit space. These SEs have reduced density matrix of rank 2 and can be reduced to the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state form of Eq. (2) in suitable representations. The all-versus-nothing demolition of the elements of reality holds for each basis of the form of Eq. (2) for $N$-qubit $(N\ensuremath{\geqslant}3)$ systems. ${\ensuremath{\Sigma}}_{N}$ may be considered as the infinitesimal operator of rotational operator $R({\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{1},{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{2},\dots{}{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{N})={\ensuremath{\Pi}}_{i=1}^{N}\mathrm{exp}[\ensuremath{-}i\ensuremath{\pi}{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{i{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{i}}∕2]$ , whose eigenvalue (signature) $r={e}^{\ensuremath{-}i\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\alpha}}$, or signature exponent $\ensuremath{\alpha}$, may be equivalently used for characterizing each basis.

Physical Review A•Nov 24, 2004•5 citations
An interesting analogy between quantum entangled states and topological links was suggested by Aravind. In particular, he emphasized a connection between the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state and the Borromean rings. However, he made the connection in a way that depends on the choice of measurement basis. We reconsider it in a basis-independent way by using the reduced density matrix.
We discuss the analogy between topological entanglement and quantum entanglement, particularly for tripartite quantum systems.We illustrate our approach by first discussing two clearly (topologically) inequivalent systems of three-ring links: The Borromean rings, in which the removal of any one link leaves the remaining two non-linked (or, by analogy, non-entangled); and an inequivalent system (which we call the NUS link) for which the removal of any one link leaves the remaining two linked (or, entangled in our analogy).We introduce unitary representations for the appropriate Braid Group (B3) which produce the related quantum entangled systems. We finally remark that these two quantum systems, which clearly possess inequivalent entanglement properties, are locally unitarily equivalent.
We discuss the analogy between topological entanglement and quantum entanglement, particularly for tripartite quantum systems. We illustrate our approach by first discussing two clearly (topologically) inequivalent systems of three-ring links: The Borromean rings, in which the removal of any one link leaves the remaining two non-linked (or, by analogy, non-entangled); and an inequivalent system (which we call the NUS link) for which the removal of any one link leaves the remaining two linked (or, entangled in our analogy). We introduce unitary representations for the appropriate Braid Group (B3B_3B3​) which produce the related quantum entangled systems. We finally remark that these two quantum systems, which clearly possess inequivalent entanglement properties, are locally unitarily equivalent.
Multipartite entanglement is conventionally classified by state families viz. family of GHZ and W class of states, with each family expected to behave differently under measurement. We show that, at least for the question of how entanglement splits after a single-particle measurement, this is not the division that matters for qutrits. Extending the Aravind's correspondence (which models entanglement as topological linking, and projective measurement as physically cutting a ring from an interlinked configuration\cite{aravind1997}) from qubits to qutrits, we derive the complete measurement-induced entanglement splitting of the GHZ type qutrit state i.e |GHZ_3> and of the full family of symmetric W class qutrit states, six two same - one different states i.e |{W_{p,p,q}^{sym}}> and one all - different state i.e. |W_{0,1,2}>, under both the computational basis (CB) and the mutually unbiased bases (MUBs), obtaining exact eigenvalues and Schmidt ranks for every outcome in every case. We see that the |W_{0,1,2}> state behaves similarly as |GHZ_3> state, a single, outcome-independent residual rank in each basis, while the |{W_{p,p,q}^{sym}> states alone show probability-weighted, outcome-dependent behaviour. The relevant structural line is therefore repeated-index versus all-different-index bag structure, not GHZ class versus WWW class. We express this classification using a \textit{two-strand cabling} extension of Aravind's \textit{ring-and-link} picture. This is needed because the qutrit residual Schmidt rank (R) takes three values, R belonging to {1,2,3}, rather than the qubit binary (i.e. R belonging to {1,2}). We are explicit throughout that this cabling dictionary is a labeling convention built to reproduce an independently computed Schmidt rank, not a topological invariant derived from the link diagrams themselves, and we discuss what would be needed to close that gap
Complete sets of commuting observables (CSCOs) of the form ${\ensuremath{\Sigma}}_{N}={\ensuremath{\Pi}}_{i=1}^{N}{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{i{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{i}}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}({\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{i}=x,y,z)$ for an NNN-qubit system are extracted by a simple graphic approach. One can construct $2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{3}^{N}$ sets of operators, each set consisting of KN{K}_{N}KN​ commuting ${\ensuremath{\Sigma}}_{N}$, ${K}_{N}={2}^{N\ensuremath{-}1}+1$ for even NNN, and ${2}^{N\ensuremath{-}1}$ for odd NNN. Any NNN functional-independent operators among the KN{K}_{N}KN​ operators may be adopted as a CSCO, whose simultaneous eigenstates (SEs) span an orthonormal basis of NNN-qubit space. These SEs have reduced density matrix of rank 2 and can be reduced to the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state form of Eq. (2) in suitable representations. The all-versus-nothing demolition of the elements of reality holds for each basis of the form of Eq. (2) for NNN-qubit $(N\ensuremath{\geqslant}3)$ systems. ${\ensuremath{\Sigma}}_{N}$ may be considered as the infinitesimal operator of rotational operator $R({\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{1},{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{2},\dots{}{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{N})={\ensuremath{\Pi}}_{i=1}^{N}\mathrm{exp}[\ensuremath{-}i\ensuremath{\pi}{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{i{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{i}}∕2]$ , whose eigenvalue (signature) $r={e}^{\ensuremath{-}i\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\alpha}}$, or signature exponent $\ensuremath{\alpha}$, may be equivalently used for characterizing each basis.